The minimum wage in Seattle is 15$ per hour

The minimum wage in Seattle is 15$ per hour.
And what is the unemployment rate? only 3.3%.

Georgia has a minimum wage of 5.15$. wnd what is the unemployment rate? 6.3%.

Bernie Sanders was right all along

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=5bXdZlusde4
cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2015/10/AER_revision.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

uhh...

Maybe Seattle should make the minimum wage $30/hour. Maybe they'll get to 0% unemployment.

Correlation does not entail causation, kike. There are multiple factors that contribute to these outcomes.

Look at the demographics of Washington vs Georgia.

So are you suggesting in order to lift up the poor class?

The current minimum wage is many states is artificially low. you see, someone has to do shitty jobs. even if you wont do it, someone else will have to do it. if you don't increase the minimum wage, we will forever have a large percentage of the population having a shitty wage.

You can't (and shouldn't) have 0% unemployment.

t. econfag

Demographics have little to do with this

The 11 poorest states all have republican policies, and there is no significant correlation between the amount of minorities and the GDP per capita. West Virginia is doing extremely poorly and it's 90% white

Fed min wage is 7.50. And its not Seattle that is at 15 its seatac. And about 90% if the people that work there work at the airport and do not live near there because prices have jumped.

Why not? What if, hypothetically, everybody was capable and willing to work?

Increase in efficiency and automation will mean less jobs, not more. The idea that you will have more jobs available as the population grows is the opposite of what will happen

No one to spend the money.

>jew
>jew
Judas pls.

if there are more jobs than workers wages will automatically rise as workers pick the company with best paycheck.

i wish that georgia had 5.15$ minimum wage

Most of those poorest states with the exception of West Virginia and Kentucky have high minority populations, Montana and Idaho's costs of living are so ridiculously low that their quality of life doesn't suffer from a low GDP, California's is inflated because there's a shit ton of wealth generated by many companies and a small minority control a huge amount of the wealth but overall many people in the state have a worse quality of life than people in states with a lower GDP but lower cost of living.

R A R E
A
R
E

Do try to not take the bait.

That is wrong.

This map shows the percentage of white people per state. there is no correlation between the GDP and the amount of white people

Sorry to break your alt-right fever dream

Hitler was right all along.

...

Mississippi and Louisiana have the highest black populations in the country and are also the worst in pretty much every metric.
Sorry to break your egalitarian fever dream.

But...Its so yummy and telling people they are wrong gives me a chub.

Stop replying to these copy pasted threads

Sage

Louisiana is actually doing better than the 11 poorest states.

Again, i see absolutely no correlation between minority groups and the GDP per capita.

However, i do see a strong correlation between low GDP per capita and republican governors. stop blaming minorities, blame right wing economic policies

Here is a map of the black population in the US.

Compare it with the map of GDP per capita here There is literally no correlation.

Unemployment in Washington state is 5.5% kike

Seattle is a city within washington

You can't compare unemployment in a city to unemployment in a state

Yeah Race pretty much does matter way more than Democrat/Republican. Also GDP isn't everything, Detroit may have a higher GDP per capita than many parts of Montana, but government spending is factored into GDP, also not to mention that the people in Montana will have lower rates of teenage pregnancies, STDs, the crime rate is substantially lower, property, housing, food, and pretty much everything are cheaper, and the quality of life is essentially universally better.

Seattle is all white. Georgia has a ton of blacks. You're comparing a city to an entire state, also.

Sage.

I already showed you two maps that clearly suggest there is no corellation between race and GDP per capita.

Compare this three maps:
Do you see ANY correlation in this maps? because i do not.

> Import blacks to Seattle until they're 80% of the population
So changing nothing else initially, do you think Seattle would stay the same as a city or become dramatically better/worse? Considering what every majority black city in America is like it seems pretty obvious to me.

Again, why instead of blaming minorities, blame right-wing policies, which have a much stronger correlation?

Those also have a strong correlation with black people, in case you hadn't noticed. As if we have any right-wing policies anymore, neocons are not "right-wing."

> Race has no correlation to GDP per Capita
Literally just look up GDP per capita by race to find a correlation you fucking retard, not to mention crime and other things which impose massive economic opportunity costs, it's fucking obvious that certain races are not as capable as others at generating economic productivity.

We have funny story for this in motherland:

3rd grader complains to his mom
-mom, kids we making fun of me today at school
-what happened son?
-we were measuring our peepers and I have much longer than theirs. They were laughing at me. Is it because I'm black?
-no, Tyrone, my boy, it's because you're 34

African americans are generally coming from a lower socio-economic status than white people, and that has alot to do with historical reasons, not just for race reasons.

However, economic policy has a much stronger correlation to the well being of the economy, not the amount of minorities within a state, as demonstrated here You cannot ignore the strong correlation between low gdp per capita and republican policiesm even in states like west virginia which are 90% white

...

West Virginia is doing poorly and it's 90% white.

That is an undeniable proof that policy has more to do with economics than race

Bernie sanders signed a non agression agreement with Clinton and intentionally lost.

America will never elect a kike.

We will never raise the minimum wage nationally so you fucks can have your shortages and price hikes, and trigger terrorist attacks on good transports to cause your kike happening.

African Americans are poor because they're genetically more stupid and have lower IQs and can't sustain a high-trust technological society, based on the per capita GDP of blacks and extrapolating to your graph differentiating states based on GDP if every state was black people then the entire country would be in the lowest bracket. They also vote overwhelmingly Democrat and every state would have gone for Democrats but the country would be a fucking hellhole. The whiter states in the Northeast vote Democrat and still get by fine because their demographic situation is fine.

youtube.com/watch?v=5bXdZlusde4

...

>Hurr durr race is the only reason black people are doing poorly


Imagine if white people were slaves for centuries and then had to suffer jim crow and discriminatory laws as late as the 60s. do you think whites would do well today in the US, economically? of course not

kek

What are these so called 'right wing' economic policies that this yid is talking about? Pretty sure they went out the window a while back

Again, i'm aware of this chart.

If you look at the maps i gave you throughout this thread however, economic policy has a MUCH MUCH stronger correlation to GDP per capita than race.

But of course you are intellectually dishonest so you ignore facts that contradict your preconceived notions

>whole thread bashing republican policies
>imagine if democrats hadn't done X Y and Z regarding slavery

Playing both sides like the little kike you are

> What is an outlier
I'll even give you West Virginia or Kentucky, but have you ever even been to America? they aren't crime riddled hellholes like inner Washington D.C., Baltimore, or Detroit, their standard of life on the hole is higher than heavily black areas.

Deregulation and trickle down economics are what ruins the economy with right wing policies every single time

So if all of America was just black people and Democrats had a permanent supermajority what do you think the country would be like?

>trickle down economics
Has any conservative economist ever endorsed trickle down economics?

>implying
get rid of the minimum wage al together. The minimum wage just sets a government standard for lower class work. If there was no minimum wage lower class workers would figure out how much they a really worth.

That's the core of the entire republican economic platform

Get of your proxy leaf. Or was the leaf always your proxy. Fuck off kike we aren't following your retarded socialist ideas.

Bad because there needs to be two competitive parties in order to punish politicians for corruptions.

If the US was just black people and has two competitive parties, and both of them were lefty parties, the country would do very well.

No it's not. The words "trickle down" are bullshit kinda like the term Obamacare is bullshit. You are thinking supply side economics and there is nothing wrong with that.

> policy has a MUCH MUCH stronger correlation to GDP per capita then race
> be intellectually dishonest and ignore facts
Fuckface, are you ignoring that there's greater than a > $20K fucking difference in GDP per capita between whites and blacks? If that's not a fucking correlation to you then I don't know what the fuck ever will be to you, piss off

Lower taxes actually increases federal revenue, to a certain point. It's called scientific taxation according to Laffer's Curve, and it's why Reagan, Kennedy, Coolidge, and now Trump have all lowered taxes. Trickle down is a meme that a liberal critic made up and has no basis in reality.

>moves goalposts

Bad because there needs to be two competitive parties in order to punish politicians for corruption.

If the US was just black people and had two competitive parties, and both of them were lefty parties, the country would do very well.

Oh shit, lets have a $1,000,000,000/hr minimum wage. Then everyone will be rich, and everyone will be employed.
#Socialism ftw!

>forgetting the density of the black population

yes whites would be on their feet. The same way Japan went from backwards peasants to modernized country within 40 years.
You have had 50 years now of equal treatment there is no excuse.

Most black people are on their feet too.

It's just that they had to compete with white people when white people had the advantage of not suffering from decades of slavery and jim crow laws

You only have yourselves to blame for threads like this. All you fuckers just have to spam "A FUCKING LEAF" whenever ba Canadian posts something retarded. You just lack self control and give them what they want. It should be bannable to say A FUCKING LEAF now due to you shitheads.

>Most black people are on their feet too.
Why would you just lie here and think you can get away with it? I don't understand why kikes have to be so frustrating

...

If people own more they spend more so others earn more and create more jobs. Small businesses create more jobs than coporations anyway,

A post scarcity society is only impossible so long as we confine ourselves to the cradle we call earth, while ignoring the vast and innumerable riches right in our cosmic backyard.

I'm not lying. most black people are on their feet. they are doing worse in average, but they also started in an unfavorable condition of centuries of slavery.

You see guys, you look at the stats which show that in average black people have lower IQ, which is correct. however, that is not a sufficient explanation to their current socio-economic status. there is more than one factor here - you cannot ignore the history of segregation and enslavement they went through. they clearly started from unfavorable conditions.

And btw, i would like to note that even though african americans in average have a lower IQ, within every ethnicity there is a very wide spectrum of different attributes. there are african americans who are more intelligent than both of us. everyone should get equal opportunity based on their own merits as an individual, not based on how their "race" is doing on average

The kikery is strong in this thread.

You should start mass importation of niggers, Schlomo.

Israel is desperately low on diversity.

You completely miss the point. you ignore my arguments and choose to deflect instead.

It's not about "forcing diversity", it's about giving everyone equal opportunity based on their own merits as individuals. i would happily accept black people into my country if they will be contributing citizens - and the purpose would not to "diversify things" but to give them a fair and equal opportunity to prove themselves.

And btw, i hope you realize israel is already extremely diverse ethnically. there are alot of africans, middle easterns, russians and europeans

*and the purpose would not be to "diversify things" but to give them a fair and equal opportunity to prove themselves.

Oh look, the same kike is making the same thread after getting reamed the day before.

It is almost like I have read this in a book somewhere before. I wonder....

>kike meddling with American politics

What's new, shlomo?

That's a fucking retarded argument, btw.

Yeap

We are talking about economy here.

Louisiana has better GDP than the 11 poorest states and it has an extremely high black population.

West Virginia is 90% white and it's doing worse than Louisiana

uh honey no, outliers don't make up the whole. Do they even have schools in merchant land?

>if they will be contributing citizens
Why don't you go spend some time in Detroit while you reflect on your comment. Here, particularly with respect to your want for more things left Democrat.

...

>Deflecting
Are you against open borders between, let's say, new york and PA?

Open Borders are good only in specific scenarios. If you do not understand the difference between the borders of israel and the borders of New York you are stupid

I had black israeli friends. they are human beings and they deserve to get every right other fellow human beings are getting.

>seattle unemployment 3.3%

>A bum on EVERY corner

Something doesn't add up here...

No.

People will choose to ask for a higher wage or seek employment elsewhere.

>Just ask for a higher wage XD i'm sure they will take your threat seriously and won't just hire someone else :3 :3

>just ask for a higher price, i'm sure the consumer won't take your threat seriously and won't just shop somewhere else

>26 posts by this id
>1/4 of thread
lol samefag i'm out

Yes you can, we had it here in Australia from the war till the 1970s when policy changed.

An entire class of people can be idiots and still be human.

Again. If you have no problems with people who are contributing, then take that philosophy with you to Detroit. See who is contributing.

I'm participating in the discussion, i'm not samefagging.

Companies will take whoever is willing to work for the least amount of money

Are you in favor of a policy of accepting only immigrants with an IQ of 120 or above, instead of making it race based?

Because this kind of policy better suits the reasoning you are providing, not racial discrimination

I'm not talking about immigrants. This is with respect to your original arguments and suggestions that you consider rational composition of the areas that are being contrasted.

If you blame minorities for poor economy (despite the fact policy and resources has an enormously bigger impact on the economy than racial composition), i thought you were talking about immigration policy.

Again. Visit Detroit to observe what decades of left policy and certain racial demographics yields.

Oh, you are giving it as an example of lefty policy?

You are being purely anecdotal here. i already demonstrated multiple times in this thread that in average, lefty policies are far better for the economy than right wing policies. it's in fact not even close.

Here, have a meta-analysis of the economy under both democrats and republicans. democrats get better GDP, better unemployment, better stock market numbers and less recessions.


cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2015/10/AER_revision.pdf

But i guess you will ignore the data and stick to the individual cases that fit your narrative, that's what republicans do, right?

Yeah, that's what allowed the emergence of a sort of middle class after the Black Plague, which was one of the major reasons the nobility lost power over the centuries that followed.

Not hearing how that's bad.

Minimum wage makes it illegal for you hire someone who does not have skills and train him on the job. It might benefit some low skill workers in certain circumstances but hurts those with no skills whatsoever as it's illegal to employ them or you have to take a loss on that person and no business will do that. Low unemployment is the answer to increase wages as businesses will need to compete for workers. Until that point minimum wage is just a slippery slope to more unemployment.

The bums aren't registered as Seattle citizens.