You're right, nip false flag bro. But there's a problem. It can be explained with two uncomfortable truths:
1. Some people are more violent, less intelligent, and more harmful to society than others. A perfect society would be less violent, more intelligent, and more peaceful than all the others: so a perfect society must not include any of those people, and would only have the best people in it. Perfection is impossible, but a society should attempt to approach it as much as possible.
2. The violent, unintelligent, or disruptive behavior can be correlated to certain groups. Sometimes ethnic, or religious, or cultural, or sexual.
The great, uncomfortable conclusion that we glean from these two inconvenient truths is that: Society would be better off without certain people, and these people belong to certain groups. These groups can be identified using unbiased data.
However, because we live in a republic and hold the ideal that "all men were created equal", it's hard for a lot of people to accept that all men, or all groups, aren't actually equal. If they were, evolution couldn't take place.
And most of all, people can't stand the idea that maybe THEIR group is part of the problem. This includes white people, or subsaharan Africans, or whatever group is the majority in the subject country. They spout the "and then they came for me" meme, as if they're so special.
They don't realize that the TRUE redpill, is coming to understand that sacrificing yourself and your group, or assisting the sacrifice of other groups, for the greater cause of human progress, is the ultimate good that one can do.
But because people are inherently selfish, this ideology can never take root. After all, most of the time, it's a suicidal way of thinking. It requires people to objectively measure themselves and admit their inadequacies, and that's just beyond most people's abilities.
Maybe when the machines take over, a true meritocracy can exist, and man will be perfect.