2017

>2017
>being a nationalist
What is WRONG with you ?

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Depends
are you civic nationalist:
A shit eating nigger apologist who believes it moral to be a faggot like Milo.

or are you ethno nationalist:
A highly moral person who sticks up for their family and traditional perspectives.

Libtards literally lack the IQ to be anything better.

>A FUCKING ROACH!

Beware Turkroach, the day is soon at hand.

>lefty
>ascetism

Look at the glorious asceticism of the left, does it not make you weep in shear awe?

Ethnonationalism is not a stable or sustainable philosophy. It is not compatible with free markets and technological change, and will only hold humanity back from achieving greatness.

TOTALLY ROACHED OUT

>liberal
>asceticism

I just don't give a fuck anymore and nationalism seems to bother everyone the most so I help push nationalism.

Plus you can't lie, meme quality has gone up as the rise in nationalism has happened. Somehow, the right is better at memes.

Not true. It could work in European nations.

The nationalists fight against other nationalists, so you can be a comfy liberal.

How do you not understand this?

Yes--there is probably some equilibrium where a minority of states survive under enthonationalist regimes and leech of the innovation and wealth provided by other more cosmopolitan countries.

>nationalist
>aspergers

Crusaders weren't nationalists. That's a stupid American meme. "MUH CRUSADERS WERE RACISTS LIKE ME, THE CRUSADES WAS A RACIAL WAR". No, inbred American fuck, it was a religious war. Catholics don't give a fuck about your racial crypto-Jewish fetishes.

>technological change

So why has the vast majority of human technological progress taken place in white ethnostates?

Because being a beta nu male cuck is gay as fuck. Suck dicks faggit.

Why are you so convinced that a country without violent dindus can't be wealthy?

>03
A sinner before Kek

>So why has the vast majority of human technological progress taken place in white ethnostates?
Back in ye olde times every state was an ethnostate. Obviously the places that first developed modern liberal democracy were as well. This doesn't mean that it played an important causal role in Europe's success, nor does it imply that it's a smart idea now.

Countries without violent dindus are definitely wealthier, but that doesn't mean we should set up institutions to lock them out. The treatment might be worse than the disease.

>Ethnonationalism is not a stable or sustainable philosophy. It is not compatible with free markets and technological change, and will only hold humanity back from achieving greatness.

You only think this way because it is against your interests if America were to become more focused on staying European.

But I'm both a (social) liberal and a nationalist. Liberal in the sense that I value personal freedom, a somewhat small government, though I still want to retain for instance free healthcare and education. Which is why I am not a classical liberal.

But I don't want a bunch niggers and other immigrants to take advantage of it. While I accept faggots and trans, I DO think there is something wrong with it and the best course of action would be to find a cure.

I also find it hypocritical that faggotry and trans is celebrated while incest is not. Especially since we don't have rules against people who has a chance to severely damage their offspring if they mate, except if we're talking about incest. Either let live and stop give a shit what consenting adults do in the bedroom. Or go full eugenics. But at least be consistent.

>Ethnonationalism is not a stable or sustainable philosophy.
>therefore pic related is stable
It appears I just walked into bizarro Sup Forums

>LGBT+
>not LGBTQ+
WHAT THE FUCK
HOW CAN YOU BE SO INSENSITIVE

>Liberal
>Asceticism
Are you retarded? Oh wait Turk of course you are.

I don't know if a more open, cosmopolitan USA is better for me or not (I'm a white male). It might not be. But it is better for humans overall, and probably for my children and their children and other future generations because of higher technological innovation.

The US is very polarized along racial lines, but we will peacefully transition our government leadership yet again and the basic structures of society will continue. Sounds pretty good to me, no?

How could anyone who support Bernie Sanders have to do with asceticism?

Liberals are associated with free shit FFS.

>The US is very polarized along racial lines, but we will peacefully transition our government leadership yet again and the basic structures of society will continue.
t. rome, yugoslavia, austro-hungary, etc.

>free healthcare and education.
>I want the government to have a monopoly on my physical and mental health
You're a fucking retard is what you are.

>more open, cosmopolitan USA
The more diverse it gets the less open it will be.

archive.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/

...

>muh nations

im an imperialist tbf

Don't give a fuck what anyone says, the Nationalist looks like he has a lot more fun than the liberal in that image.

Where do I sign up?

The effect of diversity on civic engagement is interesting, but it's not a decisive metric. What about poverty reduction? GDP and incomes? Employment? Technological development?

It seems pretty clear that on these other dimensions, having a cosmopolitan and open society where humans are equally respected regardless of race is preferable. I would also note that your measures of ethnic strife are in part a function of whites and their openness (i.e. if everyone like you changed your mind to be more like me, those measures would improve).

This is an obvious straw man

These stats have got to be from before rapefugees

>but it's not a decisive metric
It's an extremely important metric. Society is made worse as civic engagement decreases. You have yet to provide any empirical evidence for why being cosmopolitan is even desirable or productive.
>(i.e. if everyone like you changed your mind to be more like me, those measures would improve).
Inane statements like this will stop people from taking you seriously.

The retard is you, we already have private healthcare providers.

>What about poverty reduction? GDP and incomes? Employment? Technological development?

2004 i think

>The effect of diversity on civic engagement is interesting, but it's not a decisive metric. What about poverty reduction? GDP and incomes? Employment? Technological development?

But the guy on the right looks badass and the guy on the left looks like a huge faggot. Why would I want to be a sissy cup pajama pants fuccboi over a crusading knight?

>77
Praise Kek

Yeah fuck public trust like shown in Putnam's studies. I'll ignore race and ethnicity because reasons and willing have a higher crime riddled, costly, low trust society, that don't want to people help their fellow man. Can't have single payer system with diversity low iq mystery meats.

You have made some bold claims, now back them up.

Well I'm sold, Natty sounds way more fun.

...

>The treatment might be worse than the disease.
No it wouldn't. There's no reason to suppose that that is the case. Ethnostates are good. There is NOTHING wrong with them.

There is nothing wrong or good about Nationalism, Nationalism is the only Truth, and Truth is not good or bad.

>are you civic nationalist:
Nationalism means race.

>liberal
>asceticism
holy kek

>It is not compatible with free markets and technological change, and will only hold humanity back from achieving greatness.
There is no correlation between any of that, multi-racialism is what holds humanity from the stars.

...

>Ethnonationalism is not a stable
Nationalism is the most stable.
>sustainable philosophy
It is not a philosophy.
>It is not compatible with free markets
No clue what race has to do with free market.
>technological change
Only pure races adapted and invented new technology, non pure races can not adapt to new technology nor invent it.
>hold humanity back from achieving greatness.
The only things holding white progress are non whites, "humanity" does not exist as an equality.

Liberals aren't those things you listed. Neither are nationalists.

>but it is better for humans overall

Compared to what, user?

Is it just me or would you rather be in badass chain mail and shit with a fuckin sword. Then "LGBT+, RESPECT FOR WOMEN, Political correctness"
If everyone was liberal there would be no men to fuck peoples wives.

...

>nationalism is only about ethnics

Guess you've never heard of civic nationalism.

It's ok the day of the raid can, can't come soon enough.

You're telling me liberals are the most LGBT hating, politically incorrect, sexist animals?
Man wait till I tell CNN!

>free markets and technological change
the relentless incantation of the deluded neolib. humanity isn't on a path to 'greatness' or some kumbaya utopia with the current geopolitical and economic climate the way it is. more growth will only lead to extinction.

All of those liberal "qualities" are forced down throats with propaganda, law, and tyranny. Nationalism embraces human nature and freedom to express that which is naturally human.

>civic nationalism
It's called statism, which is really can be any state in the world you can be civic towards.

why are the subjects from different years?

▶
>tolerance

lulz!

>Nationalism means race.

Are you litelary this fucking retarded?

>Nationalism
>nation
Nation =/= Race

Nation can have few races. Nation is held together by culture/history etc. For example Tatars are different race than Slavs, and there are peacefully living tatars(which are muslims btw) in Poland territory for hundreds of years. They fought arms to arms with us against common foes. They are Poles now even if their ethnicity is Tatars.

When the fires rise, you will not survive.

Nation =/= Race
Nation = Race

>ethnic nationalism
>wanting balkanization

Ethnic nationalism with territorial integrity, White start a lawful process of economic sacrifice to relocate nonwhites with white capital and taxes.

Lmao fucking jap pig, You would know!
We rose some fires real high in ww2 on hiroshitfuck and nagigayballs

Wow, an retard who did not bother to read the post to the end. I won't bother with wasting my time for u.

>Presents a dichotomy that people on both sides are literally willing to die for
>'wow you must not have thought this through'

Nationalism is just for your nation. So in our case, Native Americans and Europeans can both be American nationalists because we belong to the same nation.

>civic nationalism
>it's okay if niggers and muslims are imported from Africa, we're all a diverse giant melting pot and we're all American :)

>ethnic nationalism
>I can't handle the fact that there are people in this country who dont look exactly like me. Fuck the minorities who've been here for generations, I'm white and that's all that matters.

It has less to do with race and more to do with culture.

>Islam the country
I wouldn't be a nationalist if I lived in chickenstan either

You nuked nipon twice and yet it is your country that has all the niggers.
Enjoy your multiculturalism.

> American nationalists because we belong to the same nation.
Nation = Race
State = Political Entity such a mayor, school board election etc..

...

>implying that all the states of the union would play nice with each other if given the opportunity to make their own regions

Civic Nationalism is the only option because loyalty to the idea of a state, not a race, is the only stable option.

>japan was nuked twice and firebombed
>japan 100% Japanese
>usa 50% white

>Multiculturalism
>big cocks
Choose one jap pig.

>Civic Nationalism is the only option because loyalty to the idea of a state, not a race, is the only stable option.
Loyalty to the race is what the founders did.

A stable state cannot exist for long without racial homogeneity.
Culture is determined by the overall genotype of the population in question.

niggers have big cocks.
You want to be nigger?

There is no such thing as Civic "nationalism" what you're saying is statism, it's completely arbituary, you can create a state out of anything and have a single state encompassing everything, there is no state nation.

The only nation if you care about nationalism is race, nation literally means race.

>Loyalty to the race is what the founders did.

I'm pretty sure the constitution never mentioned race when it was first written.

And if they really cared about race, then why the fuck didn't they end slavery and ship all the niggers back to Africa then? At least then we wouldn't have as many of them as we do now.

>I'm pretty sure the constitution never mentioned race when it was first written.
There was no need to state the obvious, only whites were men.

>And if they really cared about race, then why the fuck didn't they end slavery and ship all the niggers back to Africa then?
The niggers were slaves, they couldn't do anything without what masters tell them, thus they can't do anything to whites, which is why whites are 100% European.

>1 post by this id

Well played

America is a cultural nationalist state.

>peaceful coexistence
>>Translation: Choosing to be blissfully ignorant to any conflict
>tolerance
>>Translation: Choosing to be blissfully ignorant to any conflict
>respect for women
>>Translation: Choosing to be blissfully ignorant of biological differences
>LGBT+
>>Translation: Choosing to be blissfully ignorant of any facts about LGBT
>asceticism
>>Translation: Posted from my iPhone
>political correctness
>>Translation: Feelings over facts.

Im hispanic/white so i guess im already half nigger. But im still american at least. You also are a bunch of racist bigots. American tourism is dead cause you cant get your head out your ass we need to gas you squintblinkers.

>cultural nationalist
no such thing as a "cultural" nation, culture varies by province and individuals.

>Im hispanic/white so i guess im already half nigger. But im still american at least.
Non white, American means whites.

being turkish in 2017, what the fucks wrong with you.

You might like the exact opposite of what I live, and you may do absolutely nothing of what I do, thus having a state based on "culture" is idiotic.

>Posting inferior crusader

My culture is about racial purity and racial integrity of the state, same as the founders, you have a different culture.

> rape as war bounty
Sorry senpai but letting shitskin women live only ensures the survival of their race, since muzzos practice polygamy and can recoup their population by having one mudslime take five wives.

What the fuck is even that picture?
Do you know what the fuck nationalism even is, or how broad of a spectrum it is?
None of those things are truly required to be a nationalist. I am just a nationalist because it can inspire the people to weather hardships and achieve great things.