IQ's of Nazi leaders tried for war crimes

1 Hjalmar Schacht 143
2 Arthur Seyss-Inquart 141
3 Hermann Goering 138
4 Karl Doenitz 138
5 Franz von Papen 134
6 Eric Raeder 134
7 Dr. Hans Frank 130
8 Hans Fritsche 130
9 Baldur von Schirach 130
10 Joachim von Ribbentrop 129
11 Wilhelm Keitel 129
12 Albert Speer 128
13 Alfred Jodl 127
14 Alfred Rosenberg 127
15 Constantin von Neurath 125
16 Walther Funk 124
17 Wilhelm Frick 124
18 Rudolf Hess 120

You may find these data in The Nuremberg Mind: The Psychology of the Nazi
Leaders by Florence R. Miale and Michael Selzer, as well as in The Reich
Marshal: A Biography of Hermann Goering by Leonard Mosley.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=WnAvNdVyJB0
youtube.com/watch?v=p5ZcEkCQpTw
youtube.com/watch?v=G_8wLKy3-Sc
youtube.com/watch?v=sEGeHxF0tF4
iq-tests-for-the-high-range.com/public_health_warning.html
mises.org/library/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-totalitarian
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mefo_bills
youtube.com/watch?v=s6StVNfcttc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Who gives a shit? Crazy people can be smart. I'm convinced we have tons of intelligent people in this very board. What are you saying Frenchbro? Genuinely interested.

Hjamlar Schacht was anti nazi you fucking frog eater so GTFO

>IQ

>fought for germonies still

>Nigger can't score more than a 50

Lmao.

Everyone else is crazy and or retarded.

So why not create the reichtag?

>nationalsocialists
>crazy

off my board cuckfag

Surprised it's not higher. My uncles iq is 145 and all he has is a pleb job in finance.

>Hjamlar Schacht

Yeah, thats why they were Nazis in the first place.

>(((IQ)))

You're also a fucking moron if you think this place is only Natsoc. Get a grip child. You're looking for a safe space just as much as the next SJW, cut it the fuck out.

Imagine being the person with a IQ higher score than them.

Having more intelligence than past world leaders and their advisors.

Must be a trip

>You must have a low IQ if you question the validity of IQ

Brainlets everyone.

The truth is that lolbertarians and ancucks cant refute NatSoc without using the NatSox=communism xDDD meme

a bunch of retards.

Honestly, how long have you been here? You don't have to be natsoc but if you buy into the ridiculous portrayals of le nazzzziisss we see in the media you're not welcome here,

>Alfred Rosenberg
>(((Rosenberg)))

> Crazy people
what does he mean by this?

I am 100% sure this is real and they all took the Jewish IQ test and this author is impartial.

>tfw to smart to not sell allies bullshit
>Tfw nsdap comrades sell themsevles to save me and the other heads of the aryan race

People lie more about their IQ than their dick size

Its a perfectly German name.

You realize how European Jews got their names?

They bought them. And the kikes with the most money got the most beautiful names like Goldberg,Hirsch or Rubin and the poor kikes got shit names like Wolfssohn (wolfs son) or Dreyfuß (three foot).

However there are real Goyim with those names, its just that they are really rare for non jews.

You're retarded or something?

I agree my German friend. It's just hilarious that the safespace meme applys to Sup Forums fucking heavily.

Not at all Sven, I thought you were going a completely different direction with that, so my apologies. I've been here too long my friend, before we had area flags and everyone was just a jidf or texan

You will see the same sample of IQs in the leadership of any country. A ceiling around 140 and floor around 120. Leaders as a rule are smarter than average, but not so smart that they alienate their peers.

Not to be a fucking sperg but I scored between Papen and Doenitz and I feel like a complete dumbass.

I believe in IQ as an ability to predict intelligence and behavior, but I don't feel much smarter than most people

youtube.com/watch?v=WnAvNdVyJB0

>Highest ranking individuals in a political party have above-average IQs
There's a shocker! These aren't particularly high scores btw.

I like to have arguments with non NatSocs since I was lolbertarians for a couple of years as well, its just that this place is trolled and shilled so hard that it gets tiresome at somepoint.

And the influx of redditors from the r/thedonald was so high that it requires some board discipline to integrate them.

But I agree, its important to not become a safespace because it keeps you sharp

youtube.com/watch?v=p5ZcEkCQpTw

>You will see the same sample of IQs in the leadership of any country

Is that a fact ? WATCH THIS
youtube.com/watch?v=G_8wLKy3-Sc

Schacht doesn't count though... he was never a nazi, he served as a banker for the rothschilds in the weimar republic...

> 19 Tyröhn Schwarz, 83

This guy gets it. This whole thread is pointless.

>tfw we didn't win

I'm right in there as well, or at least I was when I was tested which was years ago. I suspect, based on my experience, that you are greatly overestimating the intelligence of "most people", while being overly critical of yourself.

People in general are tragically dumb. As you interact more with people in such as way that you can evaluate their decision making systemically you'll understand better the magnitude of information they simply fail to perceive as relevant or worthy of consideration. Below 100 is essentially a child.

truest thing in the post, if you belive everything in the internet we live in a world with 20cm average dicks and 150 average IQs.

Doenitz did nothing wrong

>Governments actually elect smart people as ministers etc

wow such a revelation!

im smart my mom said so

>tfw the whole crew gathered together
youtube.com/watch?v=sEGeHxF0tF4

>Below 100 is essentially a child.
Yeah, you're probably spot on.

I used to look at the bell curve and wish that I was further to the right, but the older I get, the sadder it becomes that there are so many to my left

>doge meme

kill yourself

What is a cm

Afraid to be measured? Afraid you'll be found wanting?

Not uncommon: iq-tests-for-the-high-range.com/public_health_warning.html

>Below 100 is essentially a child.

My IQ is 93. This is accurate.

...

It is socialism.

No.

Wrong board fuckface

Yes.

mises.org/library/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-totalitarian

>What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.

Do you think the US economy is free in times of war? Do you really think that? Have you looked up what your government did under Roosevelt? How is this not the same?

also

>citing mises.org as a neutral source

is this en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mefo_bills
socialist to you as well?

Where the average IQ of a country is 75 the leadership will still be standard deviations higher than the population.

They did that before the war also.

spotted the slow kid

Nazi germany was capitalist, you dumb fuck.

Yeah of course the government interfered with the big companies, so does yours. You cant avoid that when companies reach a certain size and or provide goods that become basically of infrastructural value. Like google for example.

Look how your government colluded with the railorad companies in the 19th century. Were you socialist then?

There were some railroads that received government money, but the most successful ones were privately financed.

>tfw to intelligent too win.

kek yes and they were provided with government contracts and people who didnt want to give up their land got pressured by the government.

I dont get your point though.

If you think that putting the survival of the whole people before individual gain makes you socialist in a marxist sense than you are technically wrong but right to call NatSoc socialism then if you associate it iwth that thought.

It's not my native tongue..
But i think you meant "too" intelligent "to" win.

Am I being counter-memed?

Ok i get it now :)

I wonder how Carl copes with becoming THE meme for cuckoldry, aids and nu malehood

bruh, both our countries literally have ex socialists going "we are socialists but we want to put our country first, and that is what national socialism gives us" look at the NSU documentary on netflix... a literal neonazi puts it out there

tfw higher IQ and far less accomplishments than all of them

I don't deny the US has had and still does have socialist policies and just because Germany didn't have Marxism doesn't mean it wasn't socialist, there are other schools of socialism.

I get what you are saying, but even if they call themselves national socialists they are more like national communists/bolshewists or just strasserists.

To understand the socialist part of NatSoc you need to read Oswald Spenglers "Prussiandom and socialism"

This socialism is a völkisch thing ingrained in Germans and existed for hundreds of years. It has nothing to do with marxism.

>Goering : 138
>Hess : 120
wtf, how can this nogger be more intelligent than the Hess genius

Watch:
youtube.com/watch?v=s6StVNfcttc

>tfw you will always be a brainlet with an IQ of 110

kys

Yes, National Socialism.

But most people think of left socialism based on Marx and Lenin when they hear the term socialism. You have to admit that.

I get that your point is that both ideologies are more or less collectivist which opposes your libertarian views.

I was libertarian for 3-4 years as well till I realized that nature put me into a collective already, of a white straight male. This is how people view you, especially in a multi racial society. And you are only as free as your collective is, no matter how libertarian your laws are.

There is no freedom for a white in a non white country.

Göring was morphine addicted, he was a WW1 hero though, was kind of a fighter ace

Sieg Heil

>IQ
You realise that has nothing to with intelligence still good now ignorant people can't claim that natsocs were stupid

I can't. That's extremely inconsiderate to my family and it's a sin.

I wonder what Hitler's IQ was. Must've been off the charts.

It was 888

I know, but he was pretty useless in WW2, making wring decisions and all. I don't see how he would have a 138 IQ in 1945

Having an IQ on the level of Karl Doenitz is an honour desu

He was also a narcicisst and addicted to his autistic collections of art and hunting trophies so I guess that took a lot of time.

Hitler was just too loyal to him.

all high tier leaders are going to have high iqs. it's not just a Nazi thing to have your smartest and best in that kind of position.

morality is relative and anyone with an iq above 120 can stand outside of the boundaries of meme moral principles if they want to. you have to be smart to free yourself from guilt of doing (((the wrong thing)))

>Hitler was just too loyal to him.
Yes. He should have put Galland at the head of the Luftwaffe

By my approximations, 148.8.

Are these online test worth anything?
I've tried several, all say around 130, wich seems a bit high for me.

They weren't crazy. Not the least bit.

I guess the Una Bomber woul've fit right in.
If they were so smart, why didn't they win?
Seriously...

Appearances mean more to the flock than content.

They would rather live in happy lies than gross truths.

A-am I a nazi, Sup Forums?

I hear you bro. I was crushed when the test told me 112

No, they're mostly BS.

I've taken a bunch of them and have gotten scores from 110 to 160+ depending on the test.

The question is basically was the Luftwaffe able to win the Battle of Britain and did just fail because of stupid decisions or was the Luftwaffe incapable of doing so per se due to their lack of strategical bombers and short fighting time for the fighters?

>110 is a brainlet
That's more than 75% of the world, desu.

Mm, someone who fought off intellectually the capital of billions, international bolshevism, founded a new order, builded a new state, became the leader of a state of 80 million people with complete centralization, there is not a man in history that is like Hitler.

built*

The Luftwaffe was incapable of winning the battle of Britain due to lack of long range fighters and bad commandements (Galland and many other aces said it).
However, they could have better defend Germany after 1942 if they have had a better commander.

What does being in a white country mean though? Not all white people are predisposed to the same politics. Say you have a 100% white country, but they're all bottom of the barrel white trash? What have you accomplished?

I would generally prefer to be in an above average white country, but I would rather based my foundation on something more philosophical than someone's race. The beautiful thing about libertarianism is if you don't want to associate with certain types of people for whatever reason no one is going to force you to.

I agree.

Well there is the problem.

You are going to be forced.

In a completely libertarian society new groups will form, new cults and sects will emerge and they will just subdue you because they can.

Libertarianism is just impossible to achieve just like communism because both deny human nature. We lust for power and control and to establish our order over others. That is just how it is.

>tfw IQ of 156
Should I turn the U.S. NatSoc Sup Forums?