Cultural marxism

What you don't realize is that while you talk about your boggie man of cultural marxism you've been duped by the bourgeois capitalism is the true cause of destruction of the family and immigration. Debate me.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=CYl845GORmM
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Nothing to debate. You are wrong.

not an argument.

Capitalism causes the destruction of the family by forcing people to keep economic relationships above all else leading to people never making decisions solely on love. Money goes before love in capitalism.

It totally is an argument.

Again - nothing to debate. You are wrong. Stop reading progressive tripe - it rots your brain. I've studied economics from Smith, Marx, Keynes, Hayak, Friedman, Krugman, Sowell, Pikkety, etc, etc. I am well versed in how it all works and you citing a childish progressive/Critical Theory bullshit argument and you are wrong.

cool so we can stop immigration right, ivan?

No you are wrong

Stop immigration by ending the source of suffering in foreign country's. Capitalism and USA imperialism.

Is this bait

No.

LOL

...

>Capitalism is the true cause of destruction of the family and immigration

He says, as millions of Marxists openly advocate the destruction of the family and the shitskinning of white nations.

Pure communism is retarded but I have to agree. (((Capitalism))) has destroyed the family and society.

Can you eat love?

The "cultural Marxism" conspiracy theory becomes all the more ridiculous when you actually read the writings of the Frankfurt School.

>"cultural marxism seeks to destroy the family!!!"
Adorno actually praised the family unit as a potential shield from fascism.

>"cultural marxism seeks to wipe out religion!!!"
Walter Benjamin was practically a Jewish theological who wanted Marxism to return to Torah and kabbalah mysticism to snap it out of economism.

>"cultural marxism promotes sexual degeneracy!!!"
Erich Fromm wrote a good amount on the degradation of human relationships due to capitalism.

>"cultural marxism promotes degeneracy in media and pop culture!!!"
Ever read The Culture Industry essay? Even Marcuse didn't like political art and praised the works of right-wing authors whom he believed were aesthetically beautiful.

>"cultural marxism seeks to wipe out white people!!!"
The Franks wrote barely anything on the issue of racism aside from the essay on antisemitism in Dialectic of Enlightenment (recall Adorno had very little to do with The Authoritarian Personality and most of that book's 900 pages were written by Berkeley scholars who had nothing to do with the Frankfurt School). Marcuse was friends with Angela Davis though.

>"cultural marxism is a satanic jewish plot!!!"
Jews don't even believe in the devil. "Satan" in the Book of Job simply translates to "the adversary".

There's a reason so-called "Marxists" never pushed "cultural Marxism" in their own societies.

I don't advocate destruction of the family or mass immigration. Immigration harms the workers.

reminder that the concept of cultural marxism is nonsense and a prime example of people lazily lumping unrelated shit into one category of "stuff i don't like"

Their suffering is not and never will be my problem.

Shitskins will never have a single drop of empathy for me, why should I?

I think the media has destroyed the family. Everything is sexist and racist now

This. The Franks were anti-degeneracy and criticized mass media as a product of capitalist consumerism.

Because they are people. And them immigrating harms the worker.

keep drinkin it up OP

...

Capitalism only allows the most profitable media to stay around. Its very profitable to call everything racists and sexist.

we're playing this game? ok, no true capitalism has ever been tried, only various forms of statism and communist socialist shitters

>1: He thinks relationships are all about love
Virgin fedora detected

Communism doesn't solve this problem. Who is guaranteeing your family the resources needed to survive, the state? TOP FUCKING KEK.

Build a wall. Kick them out.

We have no obligation to let them in, that's what borders are for.

>REAL capitalism has never been tried!

What type of media would be around under a communist regime?

Yes the state. So few people actually need to work with the amount of automation we have now that a huge amount of people could not work.

lol those aren't marxists. they're crony capitalists in commie clothing

globalism benefits the aristocracy. unlimited immigration gives people someone to hate instead of the aristocracy. natch intersectional horseshit

thats a completely different game from the one i was playing, dunno why you responded to me.

You had me until I saw this.

Capitalism does advocate for immigration and feminism because they both produce the labour surplus which capitalism requires to exist.

Not buying this "we're wrecking their countries nonsense though."

Worker controlled media that truly gives the perspective of the working man and the people.

People's media.

Feminism has always been a part of proletarian struggle. Without the emancipation of women, socialism is nothing.

What stalin says is good for you

Infowars.com ?

Look at all the democracy's we have overthrown in south america. Like Chile. Look at what we did to Cuba before they had there revoultion.

Yeah pretty much

If that's the working mans perspective then sure I guess.

fuck off leftypol

Women will be equal once the revoultion happens. There is no need for feminism.

There absolutely is. Look at Anarchist Catalonia if you don't believe me: the Spanish Anarchists never resolved the contradiction between the sexes and continued to dominate and exclude women even after they had control of the factories. Stalin's USSR was no different.

Unless women's issues are thoroughly addressed, revolution will go nowhere.

>ending the source of suffering in foreign country's
If you think genuinely think the reason Africa is made of AIDS is because of " Capitalism and USA imperialism" and not the fact it's LITERALLY full of niggers you need to shut the fuck up and lurkmoar.

What do you mean by the working man's perspective? When I say the media I mean news stations news papers etc. who decides who can have a news station or publish newspapers? The government? But this is full communism right? Ok so no government.. Hmm so everyone can have their own news station and news paper right? I don't know man every time I think of full communism or whatever you want to call it all I notice are the flaws. But maybe that's because I'm American.

whatever is the most popular non-corporate media. Its cronyism in media that corrupts it

One of these is economic and the other is cultural. Why are you putting them up against each other like some kind of retarded faggot?

News and media would be run as cooperatives where the workers democratically decide how to run the business.

whats stopping them

>the economy has no impact on culture.

Real Marxists pay attention to both base and superstructure. Of course we want to re-shape the culture, but not through infiltrating capitalist institutions as right-wing conspiracy nuts like to claim. We believe in a complete upheaval of culture.

The fact that the culture of a capitalist system idolizes and encourages business so few workers become class conscious enough to make a coop. Your taught how to run a business in some schools but never taught howto run a coop.

True. Mass immigration and liberal degeneracy has greatly inhibited upon any real movement towards socialism, and has only served to the profit of capitalists. Much as the Soviets found it necessary to support some nationalist movements against imperialism, in spite of their reactionary nature, we must also support reactionaries to some degree of we ever wish to attain communism.

The Jews are and will be the problem no matter which -ism you attribute its symptoms to. Saged.

physical and ideological infrastructure of big business

I am actually in the process of trying to launch an independent, community-based news source in a medium sized city. It is very difficult to make it economically viable (cover costs of operating) let alone be able to monetize it so it can grow.

I'm not arguing about da joos again.

The only members of the Frankfurt School who explicitly used Jewish concepts in their writing were Walter Benjamin and Erich Fromm. Fromm was secular and only used theological concepts as examples. Benjamin was mystical and was often ridiculed by other members for disguising kabbalistic concepts in his writings as "Marxism."

youtube.com/watch?v=CYl845GORmM

I'm well aware that the Marxist plan is "complete upheaval of culture". There are definitely conspiracy nuts on the right but the media and academia paint any exposure as conspiracy. Bravo to your side of the aisle tying my side in knots for so long but there is a shift happening and it's very interesting to watch the back-and-forth.