Feudalism with rights and fair distribution of wealth > Anything else

Feudalism with rights and fair distribution of wealth > Anything else

>Feudalism with rights and fair distribution of wealth

I would impregnate that swell dame in the missionary position for the sole purpose of procreation

Agreed.

Feudalism with fair distribution of glory.

Deus vult.

Why not just feudalism with rights?
No killing/raping/starving/abusing your slaves, stuff like that.
Why drag commieshit into it?

>Feudalism


Yeah no.

You sick bastard

So, communism? Hmmmmm

babby's first poli sci class

Who says communism is fair?

>implying that's possible

What is it with Sup Forums autists romanticising medeival Europe? It was an absolute shit show back then.

>It was an absolute shit show back then.
You're sure about that? Or did it just lack electricity?

>thinks feudalism was an actual thing
catch up on historian consensus fag

>B-but, please sire, can me family haff 3 potatos this week?
>rights

Not how it worked. The workers worked the land which was owned by the Lord. They sold him the crops, and he sold them on from there.

>they sold it to the lord
who had a battalion of armored knights... my point still stands.

No, they most likely didn't. That's just not how society worked. There were levy troops who were made up of the workers is about all.
The workers made money for the Lords, so it was in their best interests to keep them productive and not inclined to move away or revolt.

Thats fascism

>all posts made by this IP address are satire and/or ironic

This is the only correct answer.

Man that sounds fucking dankstein.

wtf

is nowhere safe?