Why haven't you identify with the final ideological redpill Sup Forums?

Why haven't you identify with the final ideological redpill Sup Forums?

Right-wing socialism, otherwise known as Prussian socialism or prussianism is an ideology largely based around the book Preußentum und Sozialismus by German Author, Oswald Spengler, in which he details his ideology and argues that socialism's rise in Germany had not begun with the Marxist rebellions of 1918 to 1919, but rather in 1914 when Germany waged war, uniting the German nation in a national struggle that he claimed was based on socialistic Prussian characteristics, including creativity, discipline, concern for the greater good, productivity, and self-sacrifice.

Face it you libertarian fools, taxation for the greater good used to enforce a strong nation-state and universal care for your own people is how a country should function. A state which serves its own people first and foremost without any Marxist doctrine of class division. This is the only way for a nation to remain strong and protect against the rampant degeneracy brought by free market capitalism as well as the economic decay of Marxist theory.

Other urls found in this thread:

warosu.org/lit/thread/S4570057
mises.org/library/omnipotent-government-rise-total-state-and-total-war-0
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

sounds like nazism, you can't make good tax payers out of ahmed and niggers therefore poland is more nazi than western europe
and you will never be

Under the the system described. There would be no Ahmeds or Tyrones.

WOLLT IHR DEN TOTALEN KRIEG?!

Interesting, im going to read this book. Thanks for the info.

I don't even know why the hell we are discussing this, /leftypol/. It is obvious that the ruling classes, the political and media classes, don't give a shit aobut us - left or right. At the moment they use you, tomorrow they may use the right again, but in the end everybody loses and the bank wins!

Which leads me to your topic: these ideas were floating around for a long time in Germoney. They were integrated into Nation Socialist Germany. And later, after the war, in Social Market Economy - which I believe to this day, that it was the greatest economic model in history: free market, with social security, universal health care, workers rights and participation. And there was a sense of unity and working as a whole, the Deutschland AG.

The fucking politicians destroyed it! They said it was because of global competition like China, but I don't buy it. They got our sovereignity long ago. And now they are coming for our welfare state with mass immigration which will crash it.

Left or right: you're fucked! Evil wins. A global plutocracy is ruling over us and whatever nice, political masterplan you may have cooked: it does not matter.

We don't need another 19th century idea to tell us how to deal with the modern world.
Too many of them are failing.
Why have we stopped making up new ideologies?

>gibs me ur moneyz n i create dah paradice n shiet mayung!

kys statist

Thats literally National Socialism

What about the niggers?

This idea was tried. And it worked. The economics of 30s and 40s Germany were astounding, even Hitler's greatest opponents will admit that his economic recovery from the disaster brought to Germany by WWI was near miraculous.

The age of an ideology doesn't determine its applicatorial value either. Non-argument. Come up with your own economic system if you think that's the way forward and don't tell others they should blindly disregard great literary works by brilliant thinkers simply because of their age.

Why can't we just make a political system where everything is done meritocratically and truthfully? Hardcore individualistic unitary power type shit?

>I'll spell some words incorrectly and then tell him to kill himself, that'll show him
10/10 argument my clearly very intelligent friend

Sup Forums where were you when an ENTIRE board of pseudo-intellectual liberals got completely and utterly ass-blasted by a lone Spenglerian?
Link related is mandatory reading for anyone interested on the topic.
warosu.org/lit/thread/S4570057

Not literally. National socialism encompasses the expansionist ideas of the NDSAP as well as a lot of the unrelated social policies of the party. This is almost purely economic.

What do you guys think of Strasserism.

socialism is degenerate in all forms

step up your game and chew on some evola or e michael jones

How would they deal with modern day problems?

Do they provide ideas how to stop the the widening wealth gap for example?
What about migration? It's basically inevitable for rich European countries.
How to deal with the hedonism of today? Nobody wants to put nation over pleasure anymore.

"Prussian Socialism" sounds like rebranded National Socialism. While not a bad thing, it must be differentiated by not mentioning the Jews.

>This idea was tried. And it worked. The economics of 30s and 40s Germany were astounding, even Hitler's greatest opponents will admit that his economic recovery from the disaster brought to Germany by WWI was near miraculous.
Except that whole thing if you go past narrative and look at historical facts Germany was just a huge economic bubble and wrought with corruption tyranny and massive waste.

mises.org/library/omnipotent-government-rise-total-state-and-total-war-0

>Do they provide ideas how to stop the the widening wealth gap for example?
It's a socialist ideology so yes this is at the heart of it. A healthy state can give back to the workers.
>What about migration? It's basically inevitable for rich European countries.
Migration is not inevitable if it is outlawed by a healthy state. Immigration can be easily dealt with, it's just the elite of today doesn't want you to know that.
>How to deal with the hedonism of today? Nobody wants to put nation over pleasure anymore.
The hedonism of today derives from the consumerist doctrines of capitalism. A society built on love for your people would teach from a young age about the greater good and how the harder they work the better life will be for everyone.

Indeed, it's less about the Jews and more about making a point on how socialism need not be Marxist.

>Face it you libertarian fools, taxation for the greater good used to enforce a strong nation-state and universal care for your own people is how a country should function. A state which serves its own people first and foremost without any Marxist doctrine of class division. This is the only way for a nation to remain strong and protect against the rampant degeneracy brought by free market capitalism as well as the economic decay of Marxist theory.

This is basically what I want.

>meritocratically and truthfully
How are you going to make people behave like that? It's normal to form in group out group preference within every social activity.

did you just read a wikipedia article and then decide to make this thread?

>Mises institute
Talk about bias. They spin everything to suit their ideology.

If America was 100% white, I wouldn't mind socialism here either.

Didn't a lot of American companies invest in Nazi Germany? Prove me wrong with that thread screenshot please.