2017

>2017
>Not being a civic nationalist

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0hq2rOEwnIU
unz.com/akarlin/not-sending-their-best/
interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/(RequestingCountry)/290/(current_age_maxi)/100/(search)/1
en.metapedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

What's wrong with being a maoist exactly?

Civic nationalism doesn't work anymore than anclap.

Ethno-nationalism is the only answer.

>2017
>Thinking that all cultures are equally capable of assimilation to even achieve civic nationalism.

Hmmmm.... you tell me.

youtube.com/watch?v=0hq2rOEwnIU

This guy gets it.

/thread

why is the top row bad?

Wtf is chink holding?

Change the bible in the top row to Meditations and that'd be pretty sweet.

Art of War.

14/88
GAS THE KIKES
RACE WAR NOW

Because when whites get together they impose there hate on people of colors and do imperealesm
this leads to slavery so its bad

Nation = Race.

I know further, sir, that we have never dreamed of incorporating into our Union any but the Caucasian race—the free white race. To incorporate Mexico, would be the very first instance of the kind of incorporating an Indian race; for more than half of the Mexicans are Indians, and the other is composed chiefly of mixed tribes. I protest against such a union as that! Ours, sir, is the Government of a white race. The greatest misfortunes of Spanish America are to be traced to the fatal error of placing these colored races on an equality with the white race. That error destroyed the social arrangement which formed the basis of society. The Portuguese and ourselves have escaped—the Portuguese at least to some extent—and we are the only people on this continent which have made revolutions without being followed by anarchy. And yet it is professed and talked about to erect these Mexicans into a Territorial Government, and place them on an equality with the people of the United States. I protest utterly against such a project.

Sir, it is a remarkable fact, that in the whole history of man, as far as my knowledge extends, there is no instance whatever of any civilized colored races being found equal to the establishment of free popular government, although by far the largest portion of the human family is composed of these races. And even in the savage state we scarcely find them anywhere with such government, except it be our noble savages—for noble I will call them. They, for the most part, had free institutions, but they are easily sustained among a savage people. Are we to overlook this fact? Are we to associate with ourselves as equals, companions, and fellow-citizens, the Indians and mixed race of Mexico? Sir, I should consider such a thing as fatal to our institutions.

Civic nationalism doesn't work. It's been tried, all you get is Brazil.
It's slightly more functional that not real socialism (tm) but not by much.

Which is good.

Wait, you want a 25 percent white america?

Because it's great to have a diverse country where there are people of different races who think and act like white people

And increase their quality of life, life expectancy and abolish their own slave trades.
:^)

>impose there hate on people of colors
Wouldn't be an issue if the nation was homogeneous

This

>1 Post by this ID

S A G E

Blacks are genetically incapable of acting white on more than a cherrypicked scale

civic nationalism is just a re-branding of multiculturalism
the same way that democratic socialism is a re-branding of eurocommunism
exactly the same thing with exactly the same end result just changing the reason they say they want that result

What's wrong about the commie reading MAD Magazine?

>Because when whites get together they impose there hate on people of color
Kinda weird how when people of color get together, they also impose their hate on people of color

>start being a civic c̶u̶c̶k̶ nationalist

>Ethno-nationalism is the only answer.

that doesn't work.

Agreed, It's really just cuckservatives trying on a new name

Works for Japan.

Isn't white nationalism civic nationalism? or does this not matter because most white americans are mixed whites anyways?

You're right, the UK was pretty unsuccessful until the 60's. Sweden is doing great now :^)

White Nationalism is ethno-nationalism. "Civic" implies diversity.

Why is the bottom one more desirable than the top one? Seems you want everyone to be American, but you get that in the top one also. The bottom is just impossible to make happen and is actually the dream of most liberals. I don't understand why that is better.

a synthetic imposition of unity which is almost never done correctly.

I fixed it for you, user.

You assholes can't even go a thread without splitting hairs on who's white, you expect me to believe you dumbasses can go and turn the US into an ethno-nationalist country?

This

Ethno-nationalism is the ultimate redpill.

But aren't there differnet types of white people liek german, swedish, scottish, english, irish, norwegian, etc? Are these people all compatible?

>implying Christianity has objectively helped blacks

The first one is the best. There is no hate or racism because there is nobody in the country to hate or be racist against.

If a racist tree falls in the woods and there are no minorities there to hear/see it, did racism occur?

We're not japan.

>Leaving blacks

>implying bottom right can even exist

You presume Islam will not inherently due to the content of its theology create abuse, violence and terror, in quantities significantly higher than for Christianity and for the foreseeable future.

Challenge for you: If you make this presumption, how would your reasoning differ?

>right
>left
There is only White Nation and traitors to it, there is no ideology only crime against the nation.

it's called banter

>eating Mr Ling's plastic rice
>getting stabbed by Ben Carson
>getting snackbarred by Clockmed

You have too much slave DNA in your bloodline. Protection of property is obviously not on your mind.

are retarded?

ethno-nationalism is pretty much the only solution that has ever been stable over the long run

colonizing your own country against its peoples will, with millions of violent and imperialistic 3rd worlders is suicidally insane in the historical context

I'll accept this.
Asian's don't go around fucking shit up for other people.

Reminder, the only country which isnt losing IQ points from immigration (and isnt a low IQ oil sheikdom) is Singapore. Literally founded by a racist, and run by that racist until recently

unz.com/akarlin/not-sending-their-best/

Civic Nationalism only works in a racist, authoritarian system. Says a lot imo

>implying Japan has a future

> Sweden is doing great now :^)
But they are

There is nothing right about Maoism. He was legit one of the dumbest people in history. Some gooks still love him for some reason.

fixed.

>being jew'd by jew god

Sure it is

So what whi would this ethnostate be for?

The English/Anglos like the founders?

German for the stormfags?

Would the natives get anything?

Don't the English and Germans already have their own country?

How long before they all start getting antsy?

ftfyf

10/10

Meh, I think blacks can be civilized, but I can understand why you would want to take the simpler route. It wouldn't be easy.

not because of immigration

interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/(RequestingCountry)/290/(current_age_maxi)/100/(search)/1

And Japan will more easily absorb automation, giving them a technological headstarr

Why not everyone holding the same Bible then the same flag

for whites. White America got along fine, if we need ethnic separation we can decide that later amongst ourselves

There will almost certainly be German parts and English parts, etc

...

Sage

>far right
People want a nation with its own idenity, culture and morales

>civi nationalist
Lets push our country with cheap arse workers to be a capitalistic shothole

Being THIS gay.

There is no such thing as civic nationalism.
Its just the current system of multiculturalism exploition rebranded.

huh i guess im a civil nationalist too. neat

>Don't the English and Germans already have their own country?
yes and blacks have their own country too
well continent actually

You're delusional.

crime has declined everywhere, doesnt mean you arent importing crime. DUHHHHHHHHH

>More applications in 2014
>Drop in all crime since 2013
Explain

>clockmed

Take stalinism, take out the parts that make some sense and double down on whats left

I see nothing wrong with thst image. The problem is that a lot of foreigners are told that they can keep their lifestyle because the evil white man etc etc

Fixed that for you.

Ah, APUSH... I remember those days. Good times, gooood times.

>implying this means minorities arent more crime prone

Crime has dropped everywhere buddy, doesnt mean crime disparities have gone away. Fucking stupid

...

>IHDI
topkek

which is why he was able to take over a country despite having way less resources and men than his opposition and set China on becoming an industrialist nation.

whites will look for other reasons why their lives are shit in a 100% white population. This is how communism came to be

Civic nationalism is one of those ideas that does sound quite nice on paper, but in practice doesn't work because of the nature of the people involved.

In russia? During a huge costly war?

Show me examples of civic nationalism working.

>implying sweden and germany even consider crime reports against muslims as legitimate and not tell the victims to fuck off

its like yo want to get fucked in the ass

I think you meant blacks

So you won't let in any population even if they're slightly more crime prone than the native population? Should Australia refuse US immigrants since you guys have thrice our murder rate? The effect of immigrants in crime would honestly have to be tiny if applications accelerate yet crime remains stable.

>stats are only real when they affirm my beliefs

Whats a better measure of living standards?

It doesn't exist, the USA was the government and "nation" of the white men, what else would it be?

Now do one for
>what's possible

>thinking your civic nationalism works

you're too bluepill for this board

>you need to constantly fuck and have a constant population growth to be successful

That whole argument is made to suit globalists capitalists who want a constant stream of cheap shitskin labor, and don't care what happens to the country after they die. Marxists also latched onto it because they are globalist by nature, and figured-out that low-time-preference shitskins tend to vote more Marxist than the native white population.

Africa is going to have like 5 billion more people born by the end of the century, but it's only going to make them shittier.

Japan can just build robots to make-up for the pleb jobs.

It's "current year" bias. Any time crime rates drop it's a vindication of whatever they're doing at that moment.

However any disparity in crime rates you can find proves nothing

en.metapedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime

For a long period of time*

>So you won't let in any population even if they're slightly more crime prone than the native population? Should Australia refuse US immigrants since you guys have thrice our murder rate? The effect of immigrants in crime would honestly have to be tiny if applications accelerate yet crime remains stable.
It's your country do whatever the fuck you want with it.
I wouldn't give a fuck if you did something like that

Russians cant blame blacks or mexicans on the failures of their nation so they blame the rich instead.

To have the dominant race of your country only take up 25% of the population?

>got along just fine

Until we went to war with their original country but then again, there's the perfect example of Civic Nationalism working.

You had people of German descent killing Germans in WW1 and 2 because they didn't think of themselves as Germans, they thought of themselves as Americans.

Shit even beans in the 1920s had no problem killing other beans during the Banana Wars.

>Should Australia refuse US immigrants

Yes. We're the niggers of the Anglosphere, but at least we aren't as cucked in some areas like speech and gun control.

The only reason to be a civic nationalist is that it would be easier to get to than an ethnic nationalist state. But the latter is still far superior to the former.

Just showing that Sweden is importing dysfunction. Also America's diversity accounts for our crime rate.

White Americans have a crime rate comparable to European nations

>civic
>nationalism

I CAN'T KEK ANY HARDER

HAHAAHAHAHAAA

>implying peaceable Ethno-nationalism ala late half of the 20th cent. Japan is bad

Ethno-nationalism doesn't have to mean mercantilism and war, user.

>Communism was invented by Blacks

Birth of an epic new meme?

For all the bitching and chimping they do, they sure are hesitant to leave to US arent they?