Where do you see world events going in the next 2 to 4 years?

Where do you see world events going in the next 2 to 4 years?

Other urls found in this thread:

nextbigfuture.com/
spacedaily.com/robot.html
nanodaily.com/
theburningplatform.com/tag/fourth-turning/
telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2016/09/17/how-modern-teenagers-are-rebelling-against-their-parents-by-bein/
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3790614/They-don-t-like-drugs-gay-marriage-HATE-tattoos-Generation-Z-conservative-WW2.html
marcomm.news/gen-z-is-the-most-conservative-generation-since-those-born-before-1945/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>Where do you see world events going in the next 2 to 4 years?
1. More terrorist attacks in Europe and North America.
2. More deterioration of the civic culture in the US as the left and political establishment do everything to undermine the sitting president. Sacrificing a functional governing system in the long run in order to undermine any remotely reactionary leadership in the short run.
3. Economics is a coin flip. It might improve moderately under sane and rational leaders, but it might also go into full armagedon mode if elites try to intentionally crash it.
4. West and Russia relationships is also a coin toss. They're might be a better relationship between Trump and Putin, but if Putin decides to push Trump too much or the elites work hard at sabotaging it we could see far greater tensions and possibly more military actions.
5. The hidden debt bubble in China will probably pop causing huge economic waves in the world, most hard hitting in Asia and Australia due to many of them selling resources to Chinese economy. Also likely to see larger waves of Chinese immigrants trying to escape economic and possible political chaos in China with as much of their money as they can get out.

>waves of Chinese immigrants
fuck all the refugees, ruin their own countries and then refuse to sink with them

>Economics is a coin flip. It might improve moderately under sane and rational leaders, but it might also go into full armagedon mode if elites try to intentionally crash it.

Agree with others, but this is the one that burns my mind. I just feel there has to be a crash, 08 wasn't as bad as it should have been and instead for many the can was kicked.

>The hidden debt bubble in China will probably pop causing huge economic waves in the world, most hard hitting in Asia and Australia due to many of them selling resources to Chinese economy.

Very interesting for me, see flag.
I've seen the news of their debts floating around but where are they primarily, what sectors?

Housing and construction I think are the big ones.

A spike in interracial relationships. Most German women will be dating refugees. All women prefer black men.

6. EU will sow the seeds of its own destruction. As more nations become reluctant to continue taking part, the political elite will try to force the project forward with things like the EU army and new economic measures to force the nations to stay in. It will become even more apparent to the people that they are being forced in against their own will. Migrants will continue coming in and will be used by the elites as weapons against the native population to both guilt them into compliance while also using resulting crime and violence as further justification for maintaining EU.
7. The internet will maintain the appearance of free speech on the surface, but right wing groups will continue to be kicked off of popular platforms and domain names for their sites will be revoked by ICANN that no longer has its hands tied by US free speech practices.
8. Oil prices will at some point start to rise significantly, but not at the same rate as in prior boom periods. OPEC will continue to decline in influence.
9. Gulf oil nations like Saudi Arabia and Arab Emirate will continue to have money problems that will likely start reaching a breaking point. Vast amounts of foreign workers in their countries will either be sent home or forced to work under increasingly harsh conditions. Locals will become increasingly agitated. High possibilities for war between Arab gulf nations and Iran as gulf nations use conflict as a pretext for declining living standards. If that happens oil prices will likely spike and cause economic turmoil throughout world.

> war with china.

> mass backlash against banks.

>trump will turn the tables on rsrael and put them in their place.

>Elites being exposed.

My comment regarding modest economic improvement under rational leadership is really more focused on the US. While huge systemic problems still exist in the US economic system, the potential for untying the hands of the oil and gas industry in North America could be very beneficial, especially if oil markets become turbulent.

Regarding Chinese debt bubble. Most of China's debt is hidden in state/provincial banks that were used for loans in a large number of poorly made and highly wasteful construction projects. The Chinese have tried moving these debts into newly established state banks, but these are little more than zombie banks for holding bad loans. There is no way for them to cover this money loss and eventually some one will have to pay the cost. Since so much of the Chinese economy is dependent on construction and their need for construction is going down this problem is unlikely to be covered up by growth elsewhere.

Restoration of the Roman Empire dubbed the Neo Rome, expanding from the might of the US and the mass of Russia.

My guess is that some bad stuff will happen and some good stuff will happen.

Screencap this, I'm always right with this stuff

Excellent, looks like everything will fall in place nicely.

>>trump will turn the tables on rsrael and put them in their place.

He is pro-Israel though...

>6
Don't really see it all this way. Migrants are perhaps voting stock (happened in Sweden) who almost overwhelmingly vote for big government socialism.
The EU is seen as an instigator of this, not a protector from it.

>7
Might go this far, but it might not.
Making these groups underground is likely to inspire terrorist factions forming.

>9
Gulf states would get slammed in a toe to toe with Iran. They can't fight for shit (they can't even take Houthis on properly). America would have to help them.

>
My comment regarding modest economic improvement under rational leadership is really more focused on the US. While huge systemic problems still exist in the US economic system, the potential for untying the hands of the oil and gas industry in North America could be very beneficial, especially if oil markets become turbulent.

Yeah I can see that, a war in the middle east blocking off the straight of Hormuz would be great for domestic producers, but a war like that would also be humongous and have difficult to calculate worldwide effects.

Some people want a war with Iran, but if they think hard about it they realize how disastrous it'd be.

>The Chinese have tried moving these debts into newly established state banks, but these are little more than zombie banks for holding bad loans. There is no way for them to cover this money loss and eventually some one will have to pay the cost. Since so much of the Chinese economy is dependent on construction and their need for construction is going down this problem is unlikely to be covered up by growth elsewhere.

They may yet pull something off to cover their asses but I'm not so sure. It's hard to imagine they're doing nothing and just waiting for this gigantic anvil to drop on their heads that they feel must happen.

i recognize that pasta

I just can't wait for the inevitable resource wars desu

This desu

>war with china
Maybe, but it could take a lot of different forms. China certainly has a growing pool of unmarried young men, and nations with large populations of unattached young men have often used war as a way of putting them to use and avoiding internal rebellion.

However its not that simple. Right now, China knows it can't win an outright war with the west. It needs more time and economic/industrial/technological development combined with declining west to make this realistic. With their likely economic down turn this may not be seen by their leadership as a feasible option. However, they may also decide to roll the dice and see if they can use it to avoid internal problems and possibly come out ahead.

I do think China will continue to grow increasingly belligerent to their neighbors and they may get a war that way. Not a good time to be neighbors with Chinese.

>mass backlash against banks.
It always seems like we should be seeing this but then don't. I think a lot of it has to do with elites being tied to banks and keeping any backlash from taking real political action. If this were to happen I think it would likely be combined with growing resentment against globalists. Depends on how well elites can keep control.

>trump will turn the tables on rsrael and put them in their place.
Possible but not guaranteed. He may want to keep good relationships with jewish elites or may simply need Israel to be on board for some major political undertaking. I do think he will likely take a harder line against getting dragged into random middle east conflicts, but he will probably continue selling and buying defense technologies with them. I do think the Israelis will continue to to expand nations they sell weapons and computer defense technologies to.

>Elites being exposed.
This will probably happen in Europe as the elites keep trying to hold nations inside the EU. This may also happen in the US as elites keep attacking Trump.

Trump preparing world for the chaos and the fall of the united states. Great times are ahead of us, well at least for us who don't live in the usa.

Although I don't support it, Trump may be assassinated. People have already tried and he's not even in office yet.

36D Go Fish brotha!
Trust Trump brotha!

World War III.

Think about it:

>WWII happened after the economic crash of the late 1920s / early 1930s (we're still reeling from 2008)
>People were angry at the elites that caused it (same as now)
>They elected populist right-wing leaders (like we're doing now)
>Racial tensions broke out (like is happening now)

It's going to happen, and we all know it.

>Don't really see it all this way. Migrants are perhaps voting stock (happened in Sweden) who almost overwhelmingly vote for big government socialism.
>The EU is seen as an instigator of this, not a protector from it.
Consider rereading what I wrote. I too believe the EU is a big instigator in the migrant crisis and I agree that they will use them as a voting base if given the option. My point is that native populations are likely to start noticing the elites forcing them to stay in the EU under one name or another against their will and this will cause a further divide. The migrants are just one factor in this.
>Gulf states would get slammed in a toe to toe with Iran. They can't fight for shit (they can't even take Houthis on properly). America would have to help them.
The goal of such a war for them wouldn't be to "win". It would be to direct attention away from their failing system and then to justify their decreased living standards afterwards by blaming it on the war and their enemies.
>They may yet pull something off to cover their asses but I'm not so sure. It's hard to imagine they're doing nothing and just waiting for this gigantic anvil to drop on their heads that they feel must happen.
They could have a plan for getting through this and that plan could even involve war. However, China is like the Titanic and you can't turn the Titanic on a dime. They may see what is coming and legitimately be powerless to do anything substantial. We should watch their elites for signs of panic.

>NATO attacking north africa to reach Saudi
>Russia attacking through Mongolia, China and the Stans to reach Iran

This is ridiculous.

> It would be to direct attention away from their failing system and then to justify their decreased living standards afterwards by blaming it on the war and their enemies.

I suppose, but Iran wouldn't go in a war like that thinking it's not going to get full scale invaded, they'll launch every missile they've got into the gulf states. The house of Saudi is likely to fall simply because most of it's top people were blown to flaming bits.

>China
Yeah maybe, I'm not familiar enough with their system.
As for a war, it mightn't even be necessary as other SEAsian nations could capitulate.

What's the story behind that pic?

americans in the past almost hunted buffalo to extinction

Mass removal of the "Great horned Kebab".

>lighting a cigar with a gas lighter

>not believing in the Grand Ruso-American Alliance

>tfw you will never stand atop mountain of buffalo skulls

>WWII happened after the economic crash of the late 1920s / early 1930s (we're still reeling from 2008)
While it's true that we are still feeling the economic pains of 2008, the severity of the crash wasn't nearly as bad as in the 1930's. While some metrics may be comparable, we simply don't see massive breadlines and break down of whole segments of society. I think in part because we have different systems set up that keep the full pain of the economic system coming to the surface. However, our societies do have greater diversity and less self sufficiency. I think the potential for a "real" economic collapse in the coming years is very possible.
>People were angry at the elites that caused it (same as now)
Again, we're not nearly at the same levels as we were in the past. We should be, but we aren't. Until people are forced to feel hunger and cold the deep burning of the elites isn't likely to come to the surface.
>They elected populist right-wing leaders (like we're doing now)
What we call right wing now is not at all right wing by historical examples. We have a situation where the political discourse and world view of people has been pushed so far left that anything even approaching the mainstream middle of two generations ago is considered extreme right wing.
>Racial tensions broke out (like is happening now)
Racial tension is growing, but lets not forget that their were periods of time in the 60's and 70's when race riots and bombings were happening on a regular basis in the US. Very few people in Europe are calling for the complete removal of any other people.

While I agree that we have the ingredients for a similar situation, I don't think the heat for cooking them all together for a similar dish has reach a high enough temperature yet.

we could with muslim skulls

>NATO attacking north africa to reach Saudi
No, that's supposed to show battle in Syria/Iran. Because that's where Western/Russian tensions are currently coming into military contact. I think Russia supports Iran don't they?

I guess Saudi is in blue because Western govs support them a lot.

>Russia attacking through Mongolia, China and the Stans to reach Iran
Mate it's just a fucking arrow! How fucking dense are you! They'd go through Kazakhstan wouldn't they?

He fucked a nigger too.

BLEACHED

>still killing your race just by another name
Get out of here coal miner/kike

Democrats will go full "kill whitey" and obstructionist. All the old guard Democrats will fall out. Democrats still being early in their rebuilding won't have the political infrastructure and will fail at basically everything. Some black guy will run for president and will lose because incumbency is too strong.

>not getting jokes

You need to get a life.

They seem to be doubling down on stupid shit as a party. At this rate they'll put some turbo privilege checker as their runner.

>While it's true that we are still feeling the economic pains of 2008, the severity of the crash wasn't nearly as bad... I think in part because we have different systems set up that keep the full pain of the economic system coming to the surface.
True, and those same safeguards should theoretically prevent another Hitler, but we're already seeing the start of far-right politics taking power, so who knows. The public resentment is certainly there.

People might be in work now, but so many people hate their jobs and are fucking depressed as fuck, because they're enslaved by a system where the very rich get bailed out by the fucking government, where the rules are essentially stacked against them. They feel no hope.

>Again, we're not nearly at the same levels as we were in the past. We should be, but we aren't.
People are obviously scared of Naziism, but look at the shitstorm of the migrant crisis and of terrorism. This is a new threat that we've never really had before. And it will keep getting worse, and causing more resentment, until finally our anger explodes and we nuke the middle east (or something like that. Maybe.)

>What we call right wing now is not at all right wing by historical examples.
Yes because of Naziism, but it's starting isn't it? Another Nazi party could never take hold immediately because of the safeguards and fear of the old one. In fact I don't think anything resembling fascism will take place. That doesn't mean right-wing populist politics won't take hold though - they already are.

>Racial tension is growing, but lets not forget that their were periods of time in the 60's and 70's when race riots and bombings were happening on a regular basis in the US. Very few people in Europe are calling for the complete removal of any other people.
They're strongly considering it, and violence has happened on a bigger scale in 2016 than arguably any other year recently. Think of the Islamist attacks. Think of the BLM violence / riots.

race-mixing isn't a joke
Whites will be gone at 2100 if shit doesn't get better

I'm aware of this and would be happy to see that not happen.
Though if you are a constant humorless stick in the mud about these types of issues and can't put things across in a funny way, you may as well close your mouth forever as people won't listen to you - in fact they're likely to do the opposite to spite you.

Read pic related and take it to heart.

>While I agree that we have the ingredients for a similar situation, I don't think the heat for cooking them all together for a similar dish has reach a high enough temperature yet.
Of course it hasn't, not yet, but it seems to be in the direction of getting hotter.

Yes I definitely don't think we're that close to WWIII right now. But I definitely DO think there will be some sort of culmination of all this anger. Some sort of solution (perhaps a final one? :D) to the Muslim Question. To the Negro Question.

If I had to predict America I would say they will have more racial violence, followed by a new peace of some sort. Those niggers are never going to be shipped back are they. As much as I want them to be.

If I had to predict Europe I definitely think we will see very strict immigration laws coming in across European countries, and strict integration laws, and a clampdown on crime in Muslim communities (holding them to the same standards as us).

Ultimately, we have more power than them in Europe. They have just been throwing their weight about more than we have in the last 10 years. But now white people are regaining their balls and they're not afraid to throw their weight about.

So I don't think we will expel Muslims but I definitely think we will be far, far stricter. I think that is the only conclusion to current sentiments.

Look how old they all are. They're all 70+. The last 8 years gave the GOP a chance to recruit some younger people, just look at the house.

But I don't think the Dems will be that lucky. I don't know of many young white people who want to be a Democratic congressman. Most of their younger politicians aren't white and that will hurt them. First because they're often less electable, but second because they aren't going to pretend to prop up the civic nationalist meme that the older Democrats do. The new diverse democrats will go full "fuck yo flag muh reparations" which won't help them get elected either.

Pretty soon they will be completely dependent on race baiting as if they weren't already.

>Democrats will go full "kill whitey" and obstructionist. All the old guard Democrats will fall out.
>They seem to be doubling down on stupid shit as a party. At this rate they'll put some turbo privilege checker as their runner.
There is a real possibility that a muslim of color will be leading the DNC by the time of the next elections. Most of their existing leadership, the old white people, are well, old. The current vice president seems like the only one that may still have some kind of political career in the future and he is already seen as kinda an idiot by most people.

The Democrats could collapse in the coming years, but the bigger question is what will fill the void. The US political system is such that instead of tons of competing parties, there tends to be two massive coalitions of parties. It may take a decade or two of chaos but this is usually the pattern it falls into.

I would be concerned that actual communists and socialists would come to the forefront of any new left leaning party. The Democrats are already at that doorstep already but at least have a political history that included superficially resisting such things.

If the Democrats collapsed you might see a peculiar situation where Republican establishment might abandon the Republicans to join up with a newly forming left party. You could also see all the extreme fringes of the left coming to the surface in a new party.

Interesting times.

Just had a shit day man
Stuff usually gets me laughing
But not tonight

Not much to add, but Obama wants to "recruit new talent" so we'll see.

Don't forget they can pull people out of nowhere and media campaign them at full force.

>There is a real possibility that a muslim of color will be leading the DNC by the time of the next elections.

I'd laugh all day.

>I would be concerned that actual communists and socialists would come to the forefront of any new left leaning party.

An economic collapse favors their rise if it occurs.

Sal'right f.a.m

If the Democrats collapse I'll throw a goddamn block party all for me.

>If the Democrats collapsed you might see a peculiar situation where Republican establishment might abandon the Republicans to join up with a newly forming left party
The problem is that many of those who could turncoat are already pretty old. Maybe Romney and Ryan, but idk who else would be there to jump to a new Democrat party.

I sort of doubt it because I see ID politics becoming bigger if the white population continues to fall. I don't see how a new left party could dig out of that hole created for them by the democrats. They are going to have to play ID politics and I imagine Ryan and Romney just quitting at that point.

>we're already seeing the start of far-right politics taking power
There is no political party or leader in a major western nation that could be considered "far-right". The media just likes to throw around that term like candy.
>They feel no hope.
There is a growing sense of dread among many people, but at the same time we find most of the masses just pretending things aren't that bad and focusing on vapid things like sports and entertainment.
> until finally our anger explodes
While an explosion of anger would certainly be painful in the short term, I think that it potentially could be beneficial in the long term. The current trajectory of western nations is not good at all and we need a serious change. Not just politically but in our world outlook. The elites are fighting this tooth and nail, but I think their attempts will either anesthetize the society so much that it falls apart or they create an even more horrendous backlash.
>Yes because of Naziism, but it's starting isn't it?
The Nazis were really a collection of right and left elements united around an intense sense of nationalism. I would say they were peculiar to their time and place. The greatest potential for something like that making a come back is as a backlash against the elites since the same elites try to turn the Nazis into some kind of primordial demonic force. If people are desperate they may look to anything that seems to have power. Most of the modern allure of Nazism is the result of the elites demonization of them.
>That doesn't mean right-wing populist politics won't take hold though - they already are.
More people are opening up the right wing populism, but that hardly means its taking hold. The seeds may be getting planted but I don't think we're anywhere near harvest time yet and the growing season may be cut short yet.

I'll be honest I can't quite pin you down. I don't know if you fear right-wing ideas or are celebrating them.

This is what matters:
>The new energy paradigm (Shale Oil Revolution), and the Shale Oil 2.0, Big Data Strikes Back, are going to continue transforming the political landscape of the world. Saudi Arabia is beyond fucked... and with its radical charged, high population (nearly 30 million)... Iraq is fucked, Iran is not as fucked, but its fucked... Russia.. Nigeria, Venezuela, the list goes on.

>Destabilization in the Middle East will progress until maps from the late 20th century will be useless. As a result of the turmoil, Europe will finally become Right-Wing after the 6th millionth terrorist attack. However Europe will be isolationist, not expansionist. It will be Grandpa-tier Nazism, all the nationalism and socialism, but without the tanks.

>China's growth and expansion will force other nations in Asia to band together for better negotiating power in trade and defense. Taiwan will be a canary in the coal mine for East Asia. The USA will build on its ties to South Korea and Japan, and attempt to contain world domination. China will not take over the world, but it will do well.

>Automation will hit China, India, Vietnam, Indonesia, and a million other places like a fucking train. Why? Technology of the 21st century means one thing: the nation with the best technology makes goods and services most efficiently. In the past, it was the nation with the lowest cost of human labor. Well sports fans, technology is going to give us manufacturing so cheap it will make owning out-right slaves about as cost effective as delivering pizza in a Ferrari.

>Automation

I feel it's inevitable, but......it's just not fucking coming fast enough. What's taking it so long?

Our shopping habits have to change first.

THE FOURTH TURNING
It won't be good.

I believe you mean 72 dimensional badminton. Don't feel bad user it's a common misconception.

>The new energy paradigm (Shale Oil Revolution), and the Shale Oil 2.0, Big Data Strikes Back
Fracking and horizontal drilling have definitely opened up vast new reserves of both oil and gas. Mainly by making it economical to actually get them. However, they are still more expensive to develop than the existing reserves in the Middle East, Russia and other places. For North America, if we can get over leftist idiots blocking every pipeline then the cost of the shale, tar sands and other reserves will make them the most economical for us. If the left doesn't stop the US from continuing the building of facilities for compressing and shipping natural gas then it might even become economical for us to sell it to Europe. But at the same time, if the US can't control its leftists and if Russia or other places get their act together, then the cost benefits may go to them. It's still a whole lot cheaper to pull oil out of the ground in some of these places than it currently is in North Dakota or the Balkans.

>China will not take over the world, but it will do well.
I disagree. While they "could" come out of this doing okay, they have some serious shit coming down the pipeline that could mess them up bad. Economics, demographics, industrial imbalances, heck even their environmental situation is bad enough where its not just envirotards who are complaining. They may need to go through a painful period of contraction to sort a lot of this out.

>Automation will hit
>I feel it's inevitable, but......it's just not fucking coming fast enough. What's taking it so long?
Automation and various additive manufacturing technologies are all being developed and worked on. We seem to be getting closer and closer all the time. King of like Zeno's Arrow Paradox. I do know that the last company I worked for was investing in co-bots which were basically robots that could work along side humans on an assembly line doing certain repetitive tasks.

>Material Science

For breaking news in science, read this website:
nextbigfuture.com/

You can filter the stories by what field you are interested in. Just lurk through it for a half hour and read the titles of the articles to get an idea what the subject matter is about.

>Our shopping habits have to change first.
Could you explain your thoughts on this?
I think that some of the technologies coming down the pipeline could drastically change our buying habits, but I'm not sure how current buying habits could be slowing this down.
What generation are we supposed to be going into now?
I thought it was 144 dimensional water polo?

Site looks interesting. I'll look into it some more later on.
You could also look into:
spacedaily.com/robot.html
nanodaily.com/

America is falling. Whether it is murdered by Russia, ISIS, or rebels from within is yet to be seen. But what you are seeing right now is undoubtedly the death throes of a nation.

Tensions in the Middle East WILL escalate until WW3. There is nowhere for the tensions to go but up.

Sure, but I want to avoid coming off as some tedx cunt
There isn't enough incentive for automation yet because what is basically slave labor is still so cheap. The East is slowly getting more expensive though which will be a force that pushes automation.

One of the biggest advantages of automation will be its ability to avoid overstock and waste. For there to really be an incentive for automation we will probably looking at shopping patterns that are less on demand and more like pre-ordering. Holding stock is extremely expensive.

Civil War because the libturds are too fucking shortsighted to see that Trump is the only thing protecting them from the Alt-Right's violent wrath and try to overthrow him.

This retardation is why Europe is fucked. You chav morons honestly believe a nuclear superpower is going to challenge another two with a bunch of shit skin allies and Europe busily killing itself with more shit skins?

You're daft man. There is no war coming. You're going to live in a Muslim country. Americans can't help you, we're busy becoming a beaner country.

China and Russia will cooperate coolly until the EU and US finish their demographic suicide. At that point they'll probably split the territory as satellite states or war over them by proxy.

Plausible except the black guy losing. Any black candidate wins the general unless he is fully retarded. The only way the DNC stays out of power is of the Jews don't let the negros take power away from them.

Your entire post is essentially about skipping the 1930's and going straight into 1939-1940. People forget the Nazi's didn't just come to power gassing a bunch of Jews, and the breadlines didn't just start in 1929. I'd also argue that without modern welfare systems, we are well past the great depression. You just don't see it, as the government is paying for it all.

It's different this time, but no less destructive. 2017 won't see the start of WWIII, but it certainly echos the early 1930's. Our time frame will perhaps speed it up a bit, and we will see total war by 2020.

>Any black candidate wins the general unless he is fully retarded.
If he's able to play Obama, but likely he won't. Obama really wasn't very racebaity during his elections and people liked that. I don't see many other blacks being able to do that.

Doesn't matter. Swing states decide elections and most of them are bottom bitch cuck havens or feature a decisive urban negro vote. Unless the black dem was literally Bojangle tier, he would win while telling whites to fuck off.

>What generation are we supposed to be going into now?

theburningplatform.com/tag/fourth-turning/

The end. My friend the end.

Within 5 years
>1-3 more countries leave/ try to leave EU
Within 10 years
>EU is disbanded
Within 15 Years
>Far right becomes mainstream, reemergance of facism
Within 20 years
>Race war/ purging of nonwhites in Europe

Not even a stormfag, it's just obvious that the left is no longer controlling the culture due to their failings.

Within 10 years we're going to be seeing the millennials starting to take positions of power.
Left is going to be taking control and things are going to be heading south when that happens

Don't be so sure.

telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2016/09/17/how-modern-teenagers-are-rebelling-against-their-parents-by-bein/

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3790614/They-don-t-like-drugs-gay-marriage-HATE-tattoos-Generation-Z-conservative-WW2.html

marcomm.news/gen-z-is-the-most-conservative-generation-since-those-born-before-1945/

____

Plenty of media wants to say "Gee everybody is hip and liberal! Guess we all better be liberals :^)" but many in gen Z hate this shit and love to make a mockery of it.

Never underestimate humor, my dude.

Most people are liberals/ progressives when they're young and become more conservative over time. What's different is that Babyboomers and Gen X could still grow up in relatively homogeneous neighborhoods and benefit from societies institutions. Since most millenials and later generations don't have that they are more likely to not carry on the delusions of previous generations when they start to become actual people (ie, live responsible lives as adults).

This

Although, I don't think National Socialism/anti-Semitic Fascism is ever going to make a comeback.

Negative perceptions of Nazism are still prevalent even in Europe's far right (outside of racist skinheads, they avoid being associated with National Socialism).

On top of that, countries and peoples who were victimized by the previous Reich (Russia, Jews of Israel, France, etc.) would never tolerate the overt existence of a Fourth one. A lot of anti-EU propaganda outside of Germany already denounces the European Union as a defacto Fourth Reich.

Really much of it is "we're sick of rapefugees/brown people everywhere".

I highly doubt the majority are interested in other traditionally nazi/fascist views. They want the same life they have now/10 years ago just minus all the third worlders everywhere.

Basically any group that seized power in Germany and openly hoisted the Swastika over Berlin could expect to have their diplomats thrown out of almost every UN member state, all treaties, military or trade immediately reneged on and cancelled, overseas assets seized. And if they try and began mobilizing for war, Russian and Polish tanks overrunning their Eastern border and French and British tanks marching to their West, American aircraft pounding them day and night from the sky, and the Israelis threatening to glass every major city in Germany if they as much as think about dragging another Jew into a concentration camp.

Under no circumstance, can I imagine that the world would allow a re-Nazified Germany six years to rearm and prepare for war like they had in the last war.

>and the Israelis threatening to glass every major city in Germany if they as much as think about dragging another Jew into a concentration camp.

This is probably why the Israelis are afraid of Muslim nations getting nukes, because then they will be able to get some leverage over their apartheid state.

Why don't you stop being so excited about that happening because it wont. Stop fantasizing about bombing the place.

The people of Europe don't want the place to turn black. That is not the exact same thing as being a Nazi and only complete morons think that's the case. There is more that goes into it.

They'd still keep gay clubs and pot cafes and all that shit.
Look at Le Pen or Wilders or all the rest.