Jewish Ritual Child Murder

It was real. There are a few undeniable cases like Simon of Trent and Little Saint Hugh where liberals have to intentionally lie and leave out facts in any discussion. Moreover, there are just so many cases, over such a wide geographic range, through hundreds of years that it is undeniably true. This isn't a pattern of antisemitism. There are patterns to the physical evidence.

You have babies drained of blood in multiple countries over a long period of time. You have adolescent boys stabbed dozens of times, many of whom were circumcised when they were killed. These aren't patterns of random deaths being blamed on jews. Moreover, most people were illiterate, even books let alone news were very rare, so the idea that people isolated from each other by time, language, and space would all report that jews were killing children in very specific ways (including finding bodies) is undeniable evidence that this was an occult ritual of certain jewish sects. That or time traveling serial killers. Antisemitism certainly doesn't fit the meta pattern.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/juTbHiKk7Uw
theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/03/who-is-for-free-speech-the-ariel-toaff-case/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Toaff
whale.to/c/toaff.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Take the case of Little Saint Hugh. Liberals and jews lie by omission about the facts of the case. Poor Hugh was seen with the Jew Koppin going to his home. When he went missing, they searched Koppin's home and found Hugh in the well. He had ritual torture marks that recreated what Jesus went through. There was a crown of thorn with the body. This is enough circumstantial and physical evidence to convict someone today. What do liberals and jews do? They delete the facts. They only speculate, without any evidence, about torture and false confessions. They are scum who cover up the torture and murder of children!

Thoughts?

Are there suspected modern cases?

Every so often you hear of a baby drained of blood and the internet goes wild over it. But, no, no solid cases recently. The lines that practice these occult rituals may have died out or they may just be much better at hiding the evidence. Little Saint Hugh was found in a well on jewish property. Simon of Trent was dumped close to town. Other cases were similar where the bodies were readily found and the occult injuries were easily identified. In this day and age, even normies aren't that dumb.

It does make the Moloch conspiracy theories make more sense. Also, Planned Parenthood and the sheer number of jewish doctors that perform abortions is unsettling.

See

>Little Saint Hugh
>found to have not been mutilated when the grave was opened in the 19th 8

How is that even possible? We are talking about flesh wounds. This is the type of lying and dishonest behavior jews and liberals do constantly. What would skeletal remains centuries later tell you about flesh wounds?

Anytime a moron on Sup Forums claims something has "undeniable evidence" you know it's full of shit.

A whole lot, actually. What do you think flesh is attached to? Hell we can determine the race of a body by the bones alone...

Put your head in the sand. You are a pathetic stooge.

That's not how you get people to listen to your stupid theory, stooge.

Nothing, you moron. There didn't need to be any damage to his skeleton. In fact, there wouldn't be in jewish ritual murders as the victims were bled. The stab wounds were to collect blood, not to cause immediate death. So, no, you wouldn't expect skeletal damage from a jewish ritual murder.

I am not going to convince someone like you, so why bother? Fuck off.

The blood libel is a fucking horrible thing but people laugh if you tell them then they look it up and are confused

You mean someone with critical thinking skills above that of a goldfish?

You have given zero arguments.

1) Stab wounds are noticeable on bone
2) The vast majority of blood libel cases were found to be false accusations or cover ups of murders by others
3) Your only "evidence" are thin little strands of circumstantial evidence like the location of a found body that you use to make grandiose claims

What about Nathaniel Bar-Jonah? he fed a kid to a church at a potluck.
youtu.be/juTbHiKk7Uw

It is because of terms like Blood Libel and other lying that jews and liberals do. Libel implies the accusations are false. There is no doubt that some jews have been falsely accused of ritual murder, but it was a real phenomenon. The preponderance of evidence is astonishing . As are how bad counter arguments are. We have two idiots in this thread thinking skeletal remains could contradict jewish ritual murder . Facts don't matter to these people.

I hate the jews so fucking much dear God...

they are basically pure satanists.

1. No, very violet stab wounds might, might leave a mark on bones. There is zero reason to think jewish ritual murders would. Zero.
2. False. A couple cases were. There are dozens of cases. This is how liberals and jews operate. They debunk a case or two and ignore the rest.
3. No one who objectively looks at this pattern would say that. You are just proving that you have an emotional attachment to believing this is all made up. You are pathetic. Even if you are jewish you are pathetic. Jews who objectively look at the evidence conclude many cases were real.

1) You keep claiming "Jewish ritual murders" exist and yet never provide evidence of it. You can't make the claim the ritual wouldn't have it if you can't even source what the fucking ritual is you mouth breather.

2) There are 0. And your claim is like going "oh look at these 10 white serial killers. This must be proof all whites are serial killers!" It's SJW tier of logic.
3) NO TRUE SCOTSMAN WOULD DO THAT TO HIS PORRIDGE.

Fucking moron. Are you autistic or just stupid?

...

Not an argument, Colgate.

Is there a need for argumentation in this case tho, schlomo kun

This is what is known as a dishonest jew. Dishonest even to himself. Not all jews are dishonest. Jews who objectively look at the evidence and put away their emotion conclude that these all weren't blood libel cases. That jews did murder Christian children for their blood. See .

So no you're gonna resort to calling me a Jew because your stupid theory can't even pass the scrutiny of Sup Forums of all places? Your "source" is a guy who wrote books while pretending to be multiple people throughout his life.

Also notice how this dishonest jew wants something impossible: he wants evidence that can't exist. Koppin could be convicted today of torture and murder and that isn't enough for him. These types of people are best ignored. They just constantly lie and make absurd demands.

>he wants evidence! That evil kike rascal!

Damn, you're literally just an SJW of the right. It's so cute.

A true holocaust (((burnt offering)))

The Jerusalem Tophet
Valley of the Son of Hinnom
Gehenna
The Lake of Fire Hell

Check'd, but it's fake

In an article printed in the January/February, 1984, issue of Biblical Archeological Review, Lawrence Stager (Associate Professor of Syro-Palestinian archaeology at the University of Chicago’s Oriental Institute) and Samuel Wolff (Ph.D. Candidate in archaeology at the University of Chicago) presented this argument on the basis of their excavation of the child and animal cemetery uncovered at the north African site of Carthage.

Concerning the matter of why children were sacrificed, Stager and Wolff comment:

Inscriptions from the Tophet (of Carthage] demonstrate that the commonest reason for child sacrifice was the fulfillment of a vow. The Phoenician/Punic word for vow (ndr) frequently appears on inscribed stelae. Taking vows was an old and hallowed Near Easter custom.

Concerning the manner of the sacrifices, Stager and Wolff quote the third century B.C. Greek author Kleitarchos, who was paraphrased by a later writer, Diodoros, as saying:

"Out of reverence for Kronos, the Phoenicians, and especially the Carthaginians, whenever they seek to obtain some favor, vow one of their children, burning it as a sacrifice to the deity, if they are especially eager to gain success. There stands in their midst a bronze statue of Kronos, its hands extended over a bronze brazier, the flames of which engulf the child. When the flames fall upon the body, the limbs contract and the open mouth seems almost to be laughing, until the contracted (body) slips quietly into the brazier. Thus it is that the ‘grin’ is known as ‘sardonic laughter’, since they die laughing.”

Archaeologists Lawrence Stager and Samuel Wolff concluded that the Carthaginian Tophet is "the largest cemetery of sacrificed humans ever discovered."

It happened

So called christians never did anything like this...

They have. There isn't a massive coverup though. People know that Pagans and Satanists have killed children before. You don't have insane and irrational screeching and people demanding impossible things in those cases.

Burning would definitely cause skeletal damage. Blood letting would not. This isn't complicated. The lying pieces of shit that people call academics constantly cover up jewish ritual murder with this bullshit. We know Little Saint Hugh was ritually murdered. We do not think that type of ritual would cause skeletal damage. The fact that his skeleton is normal is expected.

The case of Ariel Toaff is very interesting.

Toaff is a Jewish scholar (the son of a Chief Rabbi of Rome) who concluded there was some basis in historical fact for the "blood libel."

He was pressed hard by the Jewish community to recant. He refused. They kept pressing him, and he finally recanted.

Summary here: theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/03/who-is-for-free-speech-the-ariel-toaff-case/

And here (with predictable wikipedia spin, but the article does summarize some of the facts set forth by Toaff): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Toaff

Re Toaff's "Blood Passover": whale.to/c/toaff.html
(There's probably a pdf of this, in English, floating around on the web somewhere)

-- Have there been any academic breakthroughs on this subject since Toaff published? I used to follow this stuff, but haven't paid any attention for the last several years.

You are a perfect example of someone who is having emotional and not rational reactions. It can be expected because you have been culturally programmed to have these reactions. You saw an inane point about skeletal damage and immediately latched on to it despite the fact that it doesn't contradict the story of Little Saint Hugh . Then you off handedly dismissed jewish scholarship on the issue, which is still apologetic, based on a textbook logical fallacy. You probably googled Ariel Toaff debunked and chose the first point made, not even noticing that it was a textbook ad hominem fallacy. I do not blame you. I just hope that you can separate your emotions from the issue eventually.

Recent? I doubt it. Look what happened to a jew. Evidence does not matter. Argument does not matter. Facts do not matter. If you bring this up the academic establishment will turn against you.

Yes, we must not let these children be forgotten.

Yeah but why aren't there threads condemning these acts by christians? Why is it always the Jews? People making these threads need to fuck off, it is the current year and this sort of shit needs to stop, we have a job to finnish.

Now lets fucking get on with it...

There are tons of threads on Moloch, Freemasons, and other occult conspiracies on /pol. None has the type of evidence that Jewish Ritual Murder does.

>People making these threads need to fuck off, it is the current year and this sort of shit needs to stop, we have a job to finnish.
So you are trolling? This is a serious issue.

You people should be infiltrating all places in society, get a job, get a GF, be active on facebook, slip in subtle red pills. Do something instead of bitching about what some sick fucks have done decades ago, past is illusion didn't you realise this yet?

What you do now will shape your life and seal your fate as it is now, do you always want to be like this? Or would rather be a pillar of light that people/normies look up to with respect?

Israel isn't full of evil sick fucks, the vast majority of them want the same things we do, sure there are bad Jews, but there are also bad christians and muslims too. One religious ideology has overstepped the line and needs to be destroyed or reformed, either method will require brute force.

One can care about multiple things.

What needs to happen is clear, something that makes shock and awe look like a picnic in comparison. This will make the message clear that they either play ball and get in line with the rest of us or get killed, plain and simple.

Meaning if they want to drive fucking trucks into crowds of innocent people including children, or if they want to gun down people just living out their lives. Then they will be killed wherever they try to hide and we have the fucking tech to do that, so who is protecting them? The people who were protecting them will be gone soon and the sheer might the US military will come for these stupid kid raping sand niggers and that is the mother fucking truth.

Not to mention Russia playing in the battle field with a warming of relations between east and west, ISIS is gonna have a very bad fucking day.

Hello rabbi

kys

>history is merely an illusion, goy
>Jews are totally based
>As I was saying, those Palestinians are so evil. We must support Israel
>We must support Israel against the muslim menace

so as I was saying there are BAD Jews, seriously just go with the flow, all will be revealed, have patience goy...

Is anyone else bothered by the abortion connection now? It is just unsettling.