Watching Simpsons

>watching Simpsons
>mention this book
>Lisa shouts "that's the bible for right wing losers"
What did they mean by this?

Other urls found in this thread:

crooksandliars.com/2016/12/sears-ceo-proves-ayn-rand-economics-fail
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

The Bible is the Bible for right wing winners

You could answer yourself and read it.

That Objectivism KILLED Sears.

crooksandliars.com/2016/12/sears-ceo-proves-ayn-rand-economics-fail

why do you care what an obnoxious little 8 year old cartoon girl thinks, you mouth breathing moron?

fuck off and go prep the bull moose that fucks your beaver-wife's daughter, pierre.

I don't read books by women, women belong in the house raising kids not writing books. Except for Lucy Maud Montgomery because she's Canadian

The Simpsons might just be too subtle for me. All the jokes go over my head.

Don't ever, EVER fucking call me Pierre again. I'm not a no good dirty rotten socialist communist french nigger faggot

Ayn Rand sucks balls, her "economics"are a fucking joke and all her books are giant circle jerks about retarded libertarian ideals that would never work in real life. Sage in all fields

>whines about being called pierre
>no problems with bestiality, though

yeah, this is definitely NOT a proxy post. you're candian through and through alright.

t. Chang Kuai Qian

I DONT GIVE A SHIT WHAT YOU CALL ME BECAUSE I KNOW ITS JUST YOU NIGGERS DOWN SOUTH ARE A BUNCH OF NEGROS OR MEXICOONS BUT I AINT NO DAMN FRENCH NIGGER DONT EVER FUCKING CALL ME FRENCH AGAIN I FAILED FRENCH CLASS EVERY YEAR OF SCHOOL I NEVER PASSED FRENCH AND IM PROUD!

Ayn Rand is a Jew.

Ayn Rand born Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand

Objectivism is hardly fucking right-wing, it's both economically and socially liberal.

Economic liberalism is right-wing though. Seems like this board is lost in the jungle of political terminology.

calm the fuck down, pierre le faggot. just because you secretly wanna get FROGGED doesn't mean the french are coming to invade.

shouldn't Lisa be closer to 30 by now? How long has The Simpsons been going? Will Fox ever let it die?

In Pierre's défense, the person that wrote it would be who's opinion he's concerned about, not the projection.

But he's still a french nigger, so he's still a faggot.

yes, too long and not as long as it keeps pumping out ratings.

I would depart every single french from Canada if I were prime minister I would declare war on Quebec I would spend our entire budget to destroy Quebec I don't care if I become the worst prime minister in history as long as Quebec doesn't exist

It's adopted by the right now, unfortunately, but traditionally the right was more protectionist.

Most people hate Ayn Rand even though they've never read anything by her.

Those who have appreciate her do so for her unapologetic view of individuality & selfishness, not her ability to write good fiction.

FFS, John Galt's speech is over 100 pages of retreading the same points she's spent the last 800 pages repeating over & over.

IM NOT FRENCH

Wasn't Galt's speech 70 pages?

I imagine it depends on the publisher.

There is a lot of libertarian self-fellating in it. But the core story is still cool and it preaches a message of independence, self-sufficiency, and merit. I love how liberal faggots detest the idea of individual achievement.

You love it? stfu and stop saying that, you sound stupid.

I actually liked her book a lot, even if she wasn't very subtle in her writing style.

oh fine. you don't want to secretly get FROGGED and you're not a commie.

poor little guy, i didn't mean to trigger you THIS hard.

Bout that, yeah. Just checked & it goes from page 936 to page 993.

I was exaggerating, but its still too long for speech.

I love what? The Fountainhead isn't a bad book. It has its flaws, so does much in literature.

Shut the hell up

Why are there suddenly 3-5 threads about this mediocre author in Sup Forums?

Sliding shills, probably

opposite for me. i really liked the fiction but she got way too preachy for a crazy system that denigrates compassion - one of the basic human emotions.
Also, some parts were just dragging on and on.
Overall, 4/5 for originality and unapologetic daring writing.

Libruls are special...!

Voulez-vous parler votre langue maternelle?

The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged are overly long mouthpieces for a hypocritical Jew who sucked the teat of the government when she became an even older, hypocritical Jew.

Anthem is better.

Atlas Shrugged? As a fiction novel, it was absolute garbage. She should have stuck to philosophy books, because it's crystal clear she was a philosopher and not a novelist. Aside from a few exceptions, as a rule they can't write for shit. It's like a of point of pride for them to write in as convoluted and dry a style as possible.

isn't ayn rand all about the utter degeneracy of ultimate selfishness? how absolutely retarded must a writer be to compare degenerate selfishness to the right wing which is focused on eliminating degenerate selfishness?

Triggered
Babby needs a safe space

>sucked the teat of the government
To be fair, if you're being taxed and regulated upon, you might as well use the shit you're forced to pay for.

Otherwise, it's the
>if u don't like government so much why do you drive on public roads?
argument

Define degenerate selfishness.

She was specifically about "rational self-interest", with a whole slew of unique definitions for every single common word she used. Objectivism is big on that shit.

Except it didn't. Sears CEO was a retard who got rid of their famous and hugely successful catalog and introduced competition quotas. That's not even close to a good implementation of Ayn Rand's philosophical ideas. That's just the CEO being a retard and not understanding what made Sears successful in the first place.

Pierre.

selfishness and degeneracy are synonymous with each other
everything the word degeneracy paints as negative to a society or person can also be described under the act of putting yourself above anyone else. it means you have no greater purpose than that of yourself and your own benefit.
of course humans are inherently selfish to some degree no matter what their actions are, but the further removed from yourself an act is, the less selfish it is comparably

it is in your rational self interest to be degenerate, that is simply how humans are, which is why a human must strive to go against his very nature and become something more than his inherent self for a purpose that is greater than himself

>Norway

Fucking retarded socialists. You are exactly the point Ayn Rand argues against. Human nature is not flawed. It is something to be celebrated. You should be proud to be a human being, not groveling in the dirt apologizing for existing.

Mandated charity is not charity at all, but a sick perversion of the concept.

Okay I won't call you Pierre, Пьep

This is your non-argument in syllogism form
1. Degeneracy is bad
2. Selfishness is degeneracy
3. Therefore, selfishness is bad.

By defining selfishness as degeneracy, you're making a circular argument. What is degeneracy then? Why is it bad? What does it have to do with selfishness?

there is nothing worse than communism and socialism, it is by far the worst of ideologies. you cannot force a man to work and expect him to do so with joy and with intent, nor can anything be accomplished if you are to treat anyone as equal. not to mention communism does not even follow the basest in political or human logic by allowing the few at the top to do whatever they want without consequence, for they do not have a superior to hold them accountable
however, a human needs purpose to live a happy life. without purpose you are nothing but a speck of dust rolling around in the ulcer of time, wallowing in the selfishness and doing whatever appeases your ego. with a purpose you will strain yourself beyond what a reasonable degenerate could ever be expected to do, and you will do so willingly with joy, for you cherish this chance at fulfilling the task that you believe so much in

i will touch on the concept of god. it is a purpose, a purpose beyond yourself, or so you would assume at the surface, but think thoroughly through it and you will realize that the only purpose in god is the purpose of keeping yourself from hell. thus it is a superbly superficial purpose still only for self benefit, not for the betterment of anyone or anything else. you do not care so much for your god as you care to avoid mortal harm in yourself, the god does not even need your help because he is so unfathomably superior your efforts could never aid him. yet worse are religions where the purpose is to gain access to heaven, as that is far more degenerate than trying to avoid suffering.
1/2

but assume the purpose is grounded at a level in which humanity can understand, a purpose where every bit of effort will carry the goal forth ever so slightly to eventually break the tide of degeneracy and create something beautiful. by putting an ideology or thought beyond your very self means you negate that inherent degeneracy ever so slightly in an attempt to improve not only your own life but humanity as a whole, instead of directing your energy to exclusively aid yourself, you very indirectly aid yourself by following a higher purpose you approve of. your ego cares for these ideals and thus puts them ahead of anything else, but that is as much as can be done about the inherent selfishness of humanity
this falls under collectivism, yet it has nothing to do with socialism nor communism. you do not have any rights and you're not given anything, all you own and gain will be earned by yourself and it will be earned for a reason, not for yourself. it must be willingly or the entire point is moot

you may think the idea of being able to do whatever you want to be a great way of life, but when you can do whatever you want whenever you want with no repercussions of any kind an apathy grows in you as you do more and more things for just a little more pleasure for yourself. but it isn't for any reason, and you know this, and you will do your best to put this aside and not think about it
there were no arguments in that post, it was a simple post that expressed opinions, not arguments
in case it is not clear, selfishness is bad because it does not make you fulfilled as a human in the end, it actively degenerates the human populous and makes life on earth just that much worse as time goes on. apathy is far worse than suffering, for feeling something is always better than feeling nothing. apathy is born from purposelessness, purposelessness is born from selfishness without restraint. restraint breeds purpose.

That's exactly the reason The Fountainhead is superior in every way.

Better story. 1/3 the size. Just the right amount of preaching.

Plus the goofy-ass James Bond sequence at the end of AS is just hilariously terrible.

It's a book about a guy who betters himself, doesn't care about pleasing people, wants to be his own man, doesn't follow the rules and gives zero shits about what his superiors think because he has strong convictions and knows he's right.

So it should be no mystery why liberals are terrified by Ayn Rand's philosophy.

lemme bust in that ass yankee cracker whiteboy cuck lil hoe

someone is buttmad

Why did they make Lisa a Buddhist?

suck my ipoon and ill give u a big poon in your mouth

Who the fuck is still watching The Simpsons is the real question

>tfw no fpbp

>right wing
>losers
Not in this timeline.

more like lolbertlotltarians

Ayn Rand is fucking shit, if I could with no consequences, I would have killed her before she could have any influence on politics.