This guy deprogrammed a Bernie supporter in 10 minutes
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
bloomberg.com
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
breitbart.com
mises.org
youtu.be
twitter.com
Tranny?
Not sure. Definitely confused.
How come they all have these facial ticks or seem like their face is "acting" when they talk to make it seem like what their saying makes sense and is intelligent? It's so god damn smug like talking with your hands or pointing with your palm facing upwards.
SEX PEST STEEVE!?
>fluidlee
She's obviously genderfluid you shitlords, god
Wow, people like this actually exist outside the internet... Holy shit.
Scripted?
An intelligent conversation? ON MY INTERNET?
what the fuck is going on here?
>white people have woken up to see the problems people of colour are facing
wew
Insta-classic?
>are you white?
>yes, I am.. unfortunately
Okay this is wonderful concrete evidence of the brainwashing. This person needs to be sent to a starvation camp and beaten half to death with an oak table leg once or twice a day until "it" gets its fucking thinking straight.
>tfw no berniebro milf gf
That's a very interesting conversation even if her defense of socialism is clearly lacking (could have at least talked about wealth redistribution and basic needs). I like the way he swayed her not by speaking but by listening, getting into her shoes, understanding how she sees the world and adapting his arguments to that. Nice vid OP.
Fuck off, Jonathan Brandis!
I still can't believe people think anarchy is actually viable. He was pretty right on the rest of the stuff though.
It could be argued that corporatism is the end result of capitalism though. Government should break up monopolies and try to lift the standard of living for its citizens.
Really made me think
That was the scariest part. These people actually hate their own race, arguably the most successful race in history, definitely the most successful in modern history.
These people have an imposed inferiority/under dog complex or something. It's like those people who always brag about being sick or having a mental condition.
It's like a weakness pathology
Thanks for sharing OP. This is the type of discussion we need. Note his approach, calm, well spoken, thoughtful, and listens to opposition. It's scary how rare this type of discourse has become in America. In order to dismantle this new dangerous liberal movement we must have a civil discussion. This is what America is all about, two different ideas being discussed in a calm and logical fashion. Cut out the mass crowds and all the fucking screaming and just talk to each other.
The weak instinctively adapt to the strong out of fear.
Adam has an admirable commitment to libertarianism, but he's a fuckin' mess of a person, and has alienated a lot of his viewership over the years. Pretty much stop watching him a year ago.
Yeah, that's how he basically won them over. Inviting demeanor, not being aggressive, listening to "it's" arguments, and smoothly changing opinion. This guy has it down.
>he's an ancap
ffs
These peoples minds have been warped and filled with shit their entire lives. If you think you're going to change their minds in one conversation you are out of your mind.
It will work on a few, like this girl but the majority of them will never be swayed. The only way to win on the ideological is to start our own culture war and long march through the institutions.
Is that why you decided to post in this thread?
Kokesh just needs to figure out that free migration so long as we do have a government is forced migration, otherwise I think he's a bit optimistic as to the future of transitioning to ancapism peacefully, but he's a good dude.
Looks like a man pretending to be a woman pretending to be a man. Does that make it superfluid?
You're deluded if you think you haven't swallowed complete shit for all your life too but I agree that most (mainly women and their white knights) tend to repeat the mantras they learned on their feminist shitholes to avoid having to form arguments. The good ones are worth the hassle though.
It ridiculous that libertarians oppose borders, but believe in property rights. Should we not be able to defend our culture?
i hate these people so much.
This is how you have actual discussion. This guy was very open, polite, and showed he cared. He didn't try to aggressively attack and insult her.
Nice strawman faggot.
Borders and abortion are incredibly divisive issues within the lolberg community.
lurk moar you fat burger faggot
But I knew I was being fed shit. These people eat it right up. See the difference?
I'm not worried about the good ones or the bad ones, I want radical leftism to lose power and credibility. I don't want this insanity to be seen as normal. That will never happen with individual conversations and muh democracy.
Why do you direct link to Jewtube? Why is there this great insistence on "fuck these Jews who shill their brand, oh btw here's a direct link to 'x'"? Stop it with these e-celebs, believe it or not, Sup Forums memes are all that is necessary. We don't need to see some retarded bulldyke whine for 10 minutes on some radio show.
purist libertarians oppose borders. sane libertarians realize that they're a necessary evil
Hoppe is rational, he cannot be classified with the rest of the lolbertarian faggots.
However, capitalism is globalism. When a business inevitably outsources to spics or chinks, you'll all have to speak Cantonese to be competitive in the market.
NatSoc is the final redpill, does away with Jewish international bankers (it's the free market goy, don't be a bigot!) and Jewish Bolshevik Marxists.
Isn't this the lolbertarians fag that thinks smoking weed solves all the world's problems?
>It could be argued that corporatism is the end result of capitalism though.
Wrong. Corporatism can only surface if there's a government selling power to those corporations
>Capitalism is globalism
No it isn't, and just saying so doesn't make it true. Wanting to buy Chingchongs rice has nothing to do with ceding sovereignty to him.
Believing that an individual has the right to the proceeds of his own labour has nothing to do with wanting kikes to flood your country with spics. Stop speaking out of your arse.
>NatSoc is the final redpill, Jewish Bolshevik Marxists.
>Socialism
>Doing away with Marxists
>le natzog is the final redpill
kek
Kek
KEK
The one thing he does not take into account is the infrastructure and the investment the government needs to put into it and the upbringing and education of its people. There are coast which legitimize taxation beside other aspects of a state like security, social net, health care.
But he is right though a government should not tax income and earn the money they need to provide and run the infrastructure with the infrastructure itself, hence privatization is the wrong path to go when it comes to crucial infrastructure. The benefitor of privatization is always the share holder or stock holder while all processes get "optimized" towards a more profitable system. Though this is not necessarily bad but the state needs to be the Profiteur to ease with this income the tax burden of its people. We actually need a government run like a business and let the people be the shareholder with their best interest in mind, because corporatism always will corrupt into something bad and unhealthy for people, environment and state.
TLDR: We need a smarter government and smarter people.
But it literally is true. The free market cares about the free market, not emotions. It is not bound by anything, if chink goods are cheaper, then so be it. Doesn't give a shit about any of that ethnic identity shit.
Buying the chink's goods means that you become dependent to his goods, you become indolent and rely on him to produce the shit for you at criminally low prices, that's why everything is made in China.
>Stop speaking out of your arse.
Oh yeah, free market capitalists never outsource their labour or open up borders in the name of the free market, my mistake.
He can be painfully autisic
youtu.be
MUH WEED
Oh look, another mentally ill ancap
Adam "I'm so beta I need my gf to sign a
relationship contract" Kokesh
youtube.com
But I'm a purist libertarian. Property rights necessitates borders.
The free market is a sentient being my friend. It does not care. Period.
I did not assert that *all capitalists share Hoppe's immigration views* or whatever it is your abject lack of comprehension skills has led you to think.
p.s: That pictuure is almost as retarded a strawman as you are fighting; unlike immigration, there is a consensus among libertarians on welfare, in that the government should not provide any.
Lmao. She looks crazy(dem eyes), and hungry as fuck for attention. Kikesh is probably crazy too, and a Jew.
Lmao at these people
This assumes governments are not a natural occurance tho
genderfluid is tumblr bullshit
this is a cis woman
trannies have actual issues
>The free market is a sentient being my friend. It does not care. Period.
I agree, so it doesn't matter if I pay or if some kike pays. It doesn't care if the profit is from a wholesome family bakery or some Jewish porno store. That is my point.
>I did not assert that *all capitalists share Hoppe's immigration views* or whatever it is your abject lack of comprehension skills has led you to think.
When did I speak on your behalf and claim that all lolbergs are equivalent to Hoppe? In my first reply, my first sentence was: Hoppe is rational, he cannot be classified with the rest of the lolbertarian faggots.
I think it is your comprehension skills that need improving, friend.
> That pictuure is almost as retarded a strawman as you are fighting; unlike immigration, there is a consensus among libertarians on welfare, in that the government should not provide any.
That's great, they can think whatever they wish, but the result of their choice will be a bigger government because that's what the spics vote for. It isn't a strawman when it's true. Austin Peterson: “I want gay couples to be able to protect their marijuana fields with fully automatic rifles". Your social platform is shit because it promotes rampant degenerate individualism, and your economics are a kike's wet dream: swindle the goy endlessly with no regulations at all. Only when you account for the subverting agents, as Hoppe does, do you have something rooted in reality.
Crowder's the only autist here.
>slav wants me to believe a woman over a war vet
Anyone interested can just google "Adam Kokesh contract" and not have to listen to this retard yammer
>Property rights necessitates borders.
This depends on how one is able to legitimately acquire property
When I discuss things with people, I first present my position, then state logical arguments as to why my position is correct, and present evidence and arguments to why the opposite side is incorrect. Clearly the way this man discusses things is far superior.
I meant to say "not a sentient being" so your first paragraph is unnecessary.
>When did I speak on your behalf and claim that all lolbergs are equivalent to Hoppe? In my first reply, my first sentence was: Hoppe is rational, he cannot be classified with the rest of the lolbertarian faggots
Here: "Oh yeah, free market capitalists never outsource their labour or open up borders in the name of the free market, my mistake."
>Third paragraph
I agree, open borders are for naive idealists, and Mxicans are a bunch of welfare leeches and commies, my point was that the picture is idiotic for claiming that a lolberg government simultaneously let a bunch of foreigners in AND give them welfare. But whatever, it's one of those painfully unfunny ironically unironic ms pain images, they are never worth enlarging or reading
>doesnt know that ancap is jsut capitalist fundamentalism
I know, my paragraph is still relevant, though. If it was sentient, it would care, but because it isn't it does not.
>Here: "Oh yeah, free market capitalists never outsource their labour or open up borders in the name of the free market, my mistake."
Where does this compare anything to Hoppe? Hoppe is not a free market capitalist, do you think those who virtue-signal about liberty and NAP would take too kindly to his "physical removal"? He is how the free market capitalists ought to be, but in reality, most of them are lolberg.
>AND give them welfare.
Not that government, the ones the spics will inevitably vote in.
>But whatever, it's one of those painfully unfunny ironically unironic ms pain images, they are never worth enlarging or reading
Well then you'll hate this one:
Or this one.
>dude Milo is a free market capitalist lolberg, we need his in our movement don't punch to the right you anti-Semite!
What ought to be is not what is.
>I advocate for stateless society.
"Hey guys, can you fix this road in your community, so I, from the other community, could use this road without problems?"
>ancap
I like he guy but ancap is just a fase, even Milton Friedman says we need a government.
You at least need justice system, an army and enforcement to have a stable society/economy.
...
Speaking of taxes, does anybody have the George Lincoln Rockwell quote about the virtues of community/nation, compared to the Jew Rand preaching individualism?
Dont shill your shit here
Don't be so sure you've settled on the final red pill my good leaf. Sooner or later we all shed our nationalist ambitions and long for the ancien regime.
Milo is neither a capitalist, nor a lolberg, nor a jew. He is however a faggot who will burn for eternity
>what ought to be is not what is
Don't I know it. Sup Forums ought to be a place to discuss politics, not somewhere to spam your homosexual pornogrphy
why are you incapable of doing anything but strawman?
>even Milton Friedman says we need a government
This is called an appeal to authority and is pic related
>The free market is a sentient being
crowder is autistic but lolbergs are turbospergs
Not an argument.
Socially speaking, I've already gotten to stage four.
>Sooner or later we all shed our nationalist ambitions
Are you trying to swindle me, rabbi?
>Milo is neither a capitalist, nor a lolberg, nor a jew.
Blatantly misinformed. en.wikipedia.org
>Yiannopoulos was born in Greece and raised in a small town in Kent in southern England. His mother is British. His father is Greek. He is a practising Catholic but matrilineally Jewish,
Faggots are degenerate, though. I do agree.
>why are you incapable of doing anything but strawman?
The image is referencing how Milo is adorned, or at least used to be. Think back to he was /ourguy/.
Pot calling the kettle black, in a free market, BLACKED porn would prosper because that's what the people want, it's the free market who are you to shut us down oy vey!
NatSoc sees this parasitic cancer and destroys it, anything not advancing the future of the ethnic citizens/nation is eliminated, and rightfully so. Have fun in your free market paradise of Jewish bankers.
>George Rockwell
You mean the government plant who co-opted the traditionalist wing of American politics and turned it into a laughing stock by associating it with a bunch of kike, bolshevist, war-losers?
Oh, I get it now. You're just the kind of guy who can't think critically. You read Sup Forums which is filled with idiots and edgelords and just believe all of it without questioning or research.
Cool...
>le nadzog is the ultimate redpill
oh dear
Sorry, I didn't mean Jewish bankers, I meant to say Friedman. Oops, I meant Rand. Shit, try Mises. Sorry, it's actually Rothbard.
>by associating it with a bunch of kike, bolshevist, war-losers?
Source?
>You read Sup Forums which is filled with idiots and edgelords and just believe all of it without questioning or research
See: >oh dear
I mean, it's your Jewish paradise to lose. Have fun!
>i am a libertarian because i believe in reason and evidence even though theyre is not a SINGLE example of a functional libertarian society
No its called common ground. We have to agree on a legal system just as we do on a language.
Did someone said ancap?
The stuff directed at our burger friend just reaffirmed this>matrilineal jew
If your mother being one (his mother wasn't jewish either, but rather some form of Ashkenazum, who are Turkic, thus unless she actually practiced the religion is not a jew)
You calling that faggot /ourguy/ is even further proof (not that we needed it) that you are just a canvas onto which other peoples opinions are printed.
Every type of social organization that has ever existed has, at some point, not existed.
ancap is gonna be the communism of the 21st century callin it
en.wikipedia.org
Nazis:
[x] kikes-Bernhard Rogge, Erhard Milch etc
[x]bolshevist- national SOCIALIST german WORKERS party
[x] war loser-Do I really need to spell that one out.
>muh natZOG
>his mother wasn't jewish either, but rather some form of Ashkenazum, who are Turkic, thus unless she actually practiced the religion is not a jew
Source?
>bloomberg.com
>youtube.com
>You calling that faggot /ourguy/
>The image is referencing how Milo is adorned, or at least used to be. Think back to he was /ourguy/.
"Our" is the board, not mine. /ourguy/ shilling is e-celeb promotion, more faggotry to derail this board into oblivion.
>you are just a canvas onto which other peoples opinions are printed.
See: What is it with this increasing trend of Peterson archetypes of "dude fuck ideology lmao haha am I a centrist yet?"
There is no such thing as original belief systems, they have all been thought of. You align yourself with that which you agree with the most.
But this one Australian poster is the true bastion of creative/original thought, surely his guidance will lead us all to the path of light, he knows not to associate with those peons who have belief systems others also hold.
You're confusing two different concepts- the legal system itself and the enforcement of the legal system.
Of course there needs to be agreement in the law... that does not require that we hand over law enforcement to a giant territorial monopolist. As an example, common law in the ancien regime was enforced at the local level. Disputes were settled by competing law enforcement agencies.
I wasn't attempting to make one Hans, just pointing out that you were using fallacies in lieu of one.
No we don't.
When did you ever consent to the German legal system? Did you consent to having your right to question the holohoax revoked?
>Bernhard Rogge
He's a Jewish National Socialist, not from the American Nazi party. I asked you for proof on GLR.
kike NatSoc officers existed, that is no mystery. Do you think they would have lasted after victory?
Losing the war, because the Western world is great under Jewish control of media and white guilt complex, right?
>SOCIALIST
Titular. Simply because kike bankers were put out of business does not equate to socialism. Privatization that benefited the state/future of ethnic Germans was encouraged. Even (((Wikipedia))) outlines this ambiguity behind their economic platform:
>en.wikipedia.org
>Hitler's views on economics, beyond his early belief that the economy was of secondary importance, are a matter of debate. On the one hand, he proclaimed in one of his speeches that "we are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system",[16] but he was clear to point out that his interpretation of socialism "has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism," saying that "Marxism is anti-property; true Socialism is not."[17] At a later time, Hitler said: "Socialism! That is an unfortunate word altogether... What does socialism really mean? If people have something to eat and their pleasures, then they have their socialism."[15]
>The term that Hitler later wished he had used for his political party name was “social revolutionary.”[18] In private, Hitler also said that "I absolutely insist on protecting private property... we must encourage private initiative".[19] On yet another occasion he qualified that statement by saying that the government should have the power to regulate the use of private property for the good of the nation.[20] Shortly after coming to power, Hitler told a confidant: "There is no license any more, no private sphere where the individual belongs to himself. That is socialism, not such trivial matters as the possibility of privately owning the means of production. Such things mean nothing if I subject people to a kind of discipline they can't escape...What need have we to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human beings".[21] He clearly believed that the lack of a precise economic programme was one of the Nazi Party's strengths, saying: "The basic feature of our economic theory is that we have no theory at all."[22] While not espousing a specific economic philosophy, Hitler employed anti-semitic themes to attack economic systems in other countries, associating ethnic Jews with both communism ("Jewish Bolsheviks") and capitalism, both of which he opposed.[23][24] Hitler also believed that individuals within a nation battled with each other for survival, and that such ruthless competition was good for the health of the nation, because it promoted "superior individuals" to higher positions in society.[25] At Berchtesgaden in July 1944, Hitler gave his final speech in front of an audience. Drafted by Albert Speer, he emphasised the "self-responsibility of industry". After the war was won "private initiative of German business will experience its greatest moment". Hitler also expressed his belief in "the further development of humanity through the promotion of private initiative, in which alone I see the precondition for all real progress."[26]
>successful
>sabotaged other races
Wew...
What fucking fallacies? I just said that name so I don't have to write a fucking book because my points are somewhat the same as Milton Friedman.
That you at least need a state to enforce the law so that capitalism can function.
You can stop with your pseudo-intellectual comments now.
This image has never been more relevant to a thread
You are such an uninitiated dummy that you aren't even capable of understanding my posts. So lets kick it back into first gear here
You are calling milo a jew, even though he is a self proclaimed "catholic", Correct?
You are using the "martilinial" justification for this. Correct?
Okay. Now the matrilineal meme comes from Jewish teaching whereby a persons Jewishness is inherited from their mother.
Now here comes the tricky part. The jews you are familiar with (milo for example) are the descendants of Turks who converted to Judaism, thus do not possess the matrilineal jewishness to pass on their children, thus their children aren't *real* jews and their children etc.
Now, onto the part where you (predictably) make a strawman to attack.
Firstly, there is such a thing as original belief systems. All belief system were, at one time or another, original.
Secondly, I did not claim to be "the true bastion of creative/original thought" I simply claimed (and you proved that claim correct) that you lack critical thinking and swallow Sup Forums memes as truth as readily as you encounter them. Which is why you're all
>nadZOG is le troo redpill guys! hehe, right? Am I fitting in?
Fucking pathetic
Fuck off Pajeet
Goddamn,! Again, you are a fucking idiot who cannot follow a fucking conversation properly.
Me: Rockwell was a plant whose job was to associate the American right with the war losing, kike-filled, leftist nazis, thus ensuring it remains irrelevant
You:Source
Me: outlines how the nazi were a collection of commies wiuth kikes amongst their ranks that lost the fucking war.
You:I asked for proof on how the American Nazis were those things.
NO YOU DIDN'T! You said "source" why would I give you a source on something that I didn't cxlaim? You cannot even follow a conversation, why am I bothering with you?
Also:
>hurrdurr well kikepedia says da nartzees weren't really socialists.
PIC. FUCKING. RELATED
>Are you white?
Are you joking? Look at that nose
>Answers: Yes, unfortunately
You said
>"even Milton Friedman says we need a government."
That is an appeal to authority which is a logical fallacy.. It's literally saying "x MUST be true because x said so..."
You can stop being an argumentative, non-arguer now.
>You are calling milo a jew, even though he is a self proclaimed "catholic", Correct?
>Judaism is the precursor to being a Jew, and not the other way around
His faith does not dictate his genetics.
>You are using the "martilinial" justification for this. Correct?
Not me, him. Read the article, he is a self-admitted Jew, you can even ask him yourself. breitbart.com
>Matrilineal
Jewish customs can say whatever they please, but that means nothing in reality. If you have Jewish ancestors, you have Jewish ancestry. Pretty straightforward. You might not be considered a Jew in the eyes of their culture, but you will still have genetic results yield Jewish ancestry.
>*real* jews
No true scotsman.
>All belief system were, at one time or another, original.
Yes. Until they weren't.
>there is such a thing as original belief systems
Like? If it lies on a political spectrum, it isn't original. It's an ideology, and that's a no-no.
>that you lack critical thinking and swallow Sup Forums memes as truth as readily as you encounter them.
See: This is getting sad. If you can't make an argument for Jewish capitalism, just let me know.
>Again, you are a fucking idiot who cannot follow a fucking conversation properly.
Start arguing anytime.
>outlines how the nazi were a collection of commies wiuth kikes amongst their ranks that lost the fucking war.
Proof? Can you show that the two Jews you named cost the war? I am pretty sure their Jewishness did not affect the military performance, unless you can source it.
I'm still waiting on a source that Rockwell was a shill. That is what you claim here: >You mean the government plant who co-opted the traditionalist wing of American politics and turned it into a laughing stock by associating it with a bunch of kike, bolshevist, war-losers?
Those "bolshevists" (read: Bolsheviks) were National Socialists..
.... their entire philosophy was antithetical to Jewish Bolshevism. Have you even read Mein Kampf? He makes it pretty clear. Onus is on you to show how the "nahtzees" were Bolsheviks, as you claim.
>PIC. FUCKING. RELATED
Well, calling them kikepedia is redundant, I already called them Jews to begin with. Point being, even the Jews are aware that there is ambiguity in the economic platform of the Third Reich. Preserving the future of their people was the most important thing, just read Mein Kampf, it's all in there.
>The jews you are familiar with (milo for example) are the descendants of Turks who converted to Judaism, thus do not possess the matrilineal jewishness to pass on their children, thus their children aren't *real* jews and their children etc.
The reason they can't pass on "Jewishness" isn't that they're converted. It's that they're not women, you imbecile. A converted female Jew can pass on "Jewishness" as far as Judaism is concerned.
Milo "claims" his grandmother was Jewish, thus having the appropriate requirements to be, ethnically Jewish. What I'm wondering is where you found out that they merely converted.
I'm shitposting on a chinese image board in a -to me- foreign language, not talking in a debate class.
You are the person that is not making any arguments, I have, now two times talked about the need of enforcement and you ignore it and go for muh fallacies instead of trying to discuss the subject in question.
I should have looked at the flag first.
>Milo "claims" his grandmother was Jewish, thus having the appropriate requirements to be, ethnically Jewish.
What does "ethnically Jewish" even mean? Are Ethiopian Jews "ethnically Jewish", or the Slavic ones, or the Middle Eastern ones? Also, how do you know Milo's grandmother wasn't just a converted "non-ethnic" Jew?
>conversation even if her defense of socialism is clearly lacking
Because there is no solid non sophist defense of Socialism.
If you want to talk about the cream of the crop on both sides not a single socialist has yet to solve the misean calculation problem and it's been nearly 100 years.
But this discussion goes way over the head of most people because they simply don't want to read and comprehend it even though it really isn't that hard.
mises.org
There is nothing wrong with talking with your hands
He believes in state, he says so in the video. Just smaller, and more in terms of helping citizens rather than controlling them. Not poisoning the water and stuff is for everyone's benefit. Taxing people depending on how much they poison the water, is not.
>Government should break up monopolies and try to lift the standard of living for its citizens.
That's quite literally how corporatism rose into existence.
All this shit happened 130-100 years ago and leftist made the same arguments. Simply put the numbers never backed their false assertions even at the time. It was the companies that government was supporting to these goals that were tremendously expensive
Yeah I get it it's a "long" talk for the age of 140 character FB memes and 1-2 min sloganeering videos but think of it like this.
It's as long as two episodes of any TV show on the ole boobtube.