Did this man really use chemical weapons on his own people?
Did this man really use chemical weapons on his own people?
Ian Hill
Other urls found in this thread:
mobile.nytimes.com
twitter.com
Easton Walker
yes
Connor Reed
no, that's fake news
Ryder Jones
Source?
Nathaniel Gonzalez
The US paid Al-Qaeda rebels to destabilize Syria in order to stop a Russian pipeline that would supply eastern europe and compete in the free market against the free market banking monopoly.
Eli Diaz
no
Angel Bailey
>Saudi Arabia wants their pipeline to run through Syria.
>Saudi trades oil in the dollar.
Henry Watson
>Did this man really use chemical weapons
yes
>on his own people?
on terrorists, so who cares?
Julian Edwards
...
Jackson Thomas
...
Benjamin Gutierrez
Not on his own people but on foreign mercenaries.
Either way it was once or twice and small amounts, could be fabricated tho, evidence seems weak.
Adrian Lopez
Sarin gas attacks are being used by Isis to clear cities and pipeline tracks. mobile.nytimes.com
The Clinton foundation army is deploying sarin gas along the proposed oil pipelines. All of the gas came from lybian stockpiles that Hillary collected and shipped to Syria. It's one of the biggest cover-ups in modern history
Adrian Bell
>Sunnis
>""""people""""
Caleb Johnson
Israel did but that's non PC to say that they secretly want more land they can get their nose on.
Samuel Ramirez
...
Grayson Anderson
I lived in Syria, had relatives in Lebanon. Been there when it was getting bombed by israely forces.
Learn some history and make educated derivatives.
Lincoln Rogers
>Jihadists
>His own people
Daniel Stewart
>muslims
>people
James Perry
Unlikely. All you have to do is stop and think about who the usage of chemical weapons would have benefited.
>West watching intently for an excuse to intervene in Syria.
>Constant warnings that usage of chemical weapons would constitute an excuse to intervene.
>Assad supposedly does it anyway.
Assad would gain nothing and the rebels everything. It's more likely the rebels used the stuff and blamed Assad so they could get more sympathy, support, and hopefully get the West to give them more help.
Thomas Nguyen
/r/ happy merchant rubbing two noses together
Michael Robinson
IIRC, the gas attack happened either a few days before UN inspectors (?) concidentally would arrive to Syria or a few days after. It screams false flag, because: (a) mentioned inspectors; (b) it was a red line previously set by Obama, giving a reason to those who don't like Assad to pull off a false flag; (c) there's no reason for him to use chemical weapons on that street or few houses or whatever, because air strikes would be just as effective, especially given "a" and "b".
Red flag 101. But most people are idiots and would swallow it with the right presentation by MSM.
Jose Edwards
Lol okay never said you are wrong
Easton Hall
Nope. It was a false flag.
Samuel Cook
Digits confirm
Brody Cook
I get grumpy around 4am
Eli Miller
no
Zachary Nguyen
somebody used them, that much is fact. They both pointing fingers, but the victims were definitely not fighting for Assad and the neighborhoods attacked were definitely not Assad held territory.