I have to do a thesis for history in college and I am doing WWII from the German perspective. I am doing it from the Armistice all the way to the end of the war and I want to redpill some people. Do you guys have anything that can help me make some people see the Germans as more than what Shekelstein told them?
WWII from the German Perspective
Hunter Sullivan
Tyler Martin
Mention the clay that was taken from Germany after WWI, wich were still populated by a German majority.
Also Nazi ideology was about power, so taking neighbours terretories was a logical step.
You could also mention how the Allies declared war on Germany only to contain its power, not for some crusade for justice. Poland was still occupied after the war and if they cared about the jews, they could have worked together with Germany and give them terretories in Israel.
Logan Sullivan
Unlawful territorial restrains were bullshit but wasnt there something about not accepting a trade organization or something that was a heavy weight for Britain to enter the war?
John Edwards
do your own research on these (take them with a pinch of salt)
Tyler Gutierrez
This is probably the greatest reason. How easily history forgets the 20 000 000 Christians slaughtered under the Soviet Union, all the Russians starving and having to result to cannibalism
This is a common ground that people will agree with. Make reference to Jewish control of the media and the banks aswell, but the emotional weight of the horrors of communism will more than likely be the most accesible red pill for normies. good luck friend
Oliver Richardson
Massive lose of terriories and ecconomic problems, because of the Treaty of Versallies. The lost world war one was mostly a result of internal froces and Weimar was percieved as democracy scam be communists and socialists who threw their more extrem communist friends unter the bus. The German minorities got treated really bad, especially in Polland. The attack on poland was mostly a result of this.
Jaxon Ramirez
***J0O**
fuck
Levi Baker
...
Jeremiah Clark
and remember to discredit the propaganda against Hitler. History is written by the Victor, and Hitler's defeat is no exception
Evan Mitchell
Hunter Roberts
...
Jacob Miller
>Mention the clay that was taken from Germany after WWI, wich were still populated by a German majority.
yes, but yet it belonged to Poland. Even the current lands
>Also Nazi ideology was about power, so taking neighbours terretories was a logical step.
yeas and no. it was leading ideolody so far. territories =money. also Hitler was raised in XIX century where there was no Poland. Border on Russia was natural po him
>You could also mention how the Allies declared war on Germany only to contain its power,
pretty much
>f they cared about the jews
no one cared about the jews in europe - before, during and after the war
Asher Kelly
>You could also mention how the Allies declared war on Germany
Germany declared war on the USA and Russia you moron.
Nathan Baker
Poland was a rightful German Clay and the people recognized themselves as such. Why do you think they lost their "war" so quickly and without much civilian resistance to occupation
Leo Lee
Germany was bound by alliance to declare war on US because of Japan and Japan only declared war because of US oil embargos and interference in the Pacific.. His war on Russia was to attempt to stop the spread of communism. The US declared war on communist nations for 4 decades after the war and nobody can seem to make the connection that communism is a plague.
Benjamin Parker
t. eternal Kraut
I wish you knew some history
Joshua Butler
Jewish civil war in Germany. Hunt for the info. Blame the Jews for a reason.
Jordan Bell
Freedman's speech will explain you a lot as to why WW2 happened and why the Jews, UK government and bolsjeviks were the 3 main factors that destroyed the western world in the 20th century:
youtube.com
>must hear for every Sup Forumsack
Kayden Flores
>Jews give historic Prussian lands to Poland after WW1
>Poles get's butthurt when the Wehrmacht takes it back
what did you think was going to happen Pjotr?
Ayden Flores
talk about germany before ww2 and how they got jewed
Brody Price
Be very careful red pilling people on these issues you need to do it in a way that is subtle and makes them think they thought of the ideas them self. If you are too direct on issues like this they will hunker down and become even more blue pilled , they are far too brainwashed for direct red pilling on such huge issues.
Isaac Rodriguez
>historic Prussian lands
We could talk if eastern germany may belong to Poland but not current lands
Josiah White
>without much civilian resistance to occupation
en.wikipedia.org
Debil american
Colton Stewart
Adventures of Warner Holt, book 1
Joseph Martin
The best way to redpill people when talking about Hitler is to look at his actions in pure logic. A lot of people feel that firing Jews from key positions in businesses was unfair and a bad choice. If you think about it a lot of high level jobs were occupied by Jews and the money was flowing out of the country, when he fired them all, German people took those positions who kept the money flowing, morally it was incorrect but logically it was more than sound.
Luke Gonzalez
>historic Prussian lands
you mean the lands that Germans stole 100 years earier and were never theirs before that?
Kevin Davis
here is your homework.
Anthony Edwards
My grandfather, who wasn't a nazi on why he and his comrades fought:
>Once we went to war against the Bolsheviks we knew we had no choice but fight for my country or to see it fall to their rotten ideologie.
>We all knew that it's impossible to conquer the East, but we thought we could keep the Russians out of Germany until they offer peace or start another civil war.
Jordan Ward
Pic related is propably the most (((neutral))) version of the war. Ofc he leans towards allies but its pretty minimal. Its almost a 1000 page behemoth though so you have to just focus on chapters about Germany