How do we improve the white birth rate?

Many Cultural Marxists/Liberals seem to like using the low national birth rates argument to justify immigration policies(despite immigrants often becoming a burden to the welfare system) . So it stands to reason that if white countries have a booming or atleast stable population growth, there wouldnt be any economic reasons to support immigration. So how do we improve the abysmally low white birth rates, in order to have any chance of decreasing immigration?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=iXG9cM5QxgU
time.com/4585232/white-deaths-exceed-births-united-states/
youtube.com/watch?v=FQu3ovIlPh4
pennlive.com/news/2016/11/large_amish_turnout_helps_tilt.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Repeal the of the 20th century.

Stop posting on Sup Forums today and in a few years you might be able to impregnate some hot sun kissed aussie cunts

make women trustworthy

i refuse to believe that were so low
i feel like outcast among my 20-25 year old friends because literally all of them have a kid, even some 5/10 guy found 9/10 qt wife

The sad thing is that swedish women already had a good birth rate before we mass imported niggers. Literally no reason to import shitskins to clean our toilets

Forced sterilization of non-whites.

but they have one kid, not multiple

Women are disgusting. We need to make boipussies fertile.

still, i would like to see some more recent statistics

Make changes to familial organization, nuclear family may be over today, since the women are allowed to work, since aldutery is not a crime, sexual liberty etc etc.
Without those laws and punitions Mariage and nuclear family died in 20 years. Now only niggers are doing children.
It is the same in Japan.

I think we should, remove all welfare, put a 1600€ or more welfare for all women in childbearing age, so they wont need to work, and they will be able to raise children without having to stay with a man to feed her and the child.
In the meantime since there's no couple and full sexual liberty it means improved eugenics(woman fucks with attractive and good guys) ultra high natality, no cucks, no couple and depression..
Of course only applicable if you say only for white women and no allocations for semi whites.

I prefer the welfare solution to the retarded catholic solution which is DEUS VULT lets either treats women like muslims do so they wont cuck us either accept the cucking and pay for children all, your life and for a woman you may love for only 2years.....

...

So your solution rather than not being a weird fuck and having a kid is to increase welfare for women so they can birth little baguettes with no financial worry?

The white ones will have 1-2 baguette, browns multiple

let pop drop the people left are christ cucks and naturally repopulate

youtube.com/watch?v=iXG9cM5QxgU

Put in place a racialist matrilineal society

We don't NEED more people, look at Japan, they're rich AND old as all their wealth and debt is owed to themselves.

Fuck this birth rate meme, its a plague we need to unleash on the third world. Those labs in Wales with the super un-cureable AIDS need fired up and launched asap.

Well for me im gonna find a girl in the East but for the masses.. Well nobody is living in couple in cities like Paris, women are doing studies and this kidn of shit so they dont produce childrens.
Yes obviously for them living in couple at 22 and having children is being a weird fuck, so thats a solution.

After that I would say its pointless we cant beat Grey's natality, we better save the good elements live in sanctuaries.

>(((2011)))

How are you supposed to financially support your family while having 2 or more kids in modern society?

I have done my bit. My family is at least at replacement level. And most of my friends have kids too. True they mostly started at 30, but there's very few who remain childless.

Off the top of my head, the childless among my age peers are usually gay, mentally ill in some rather serious way, or somehow unlucky in love. There are some weirdos who will probably not find wives mind. Perhaps this is the only category in which an improvement could be sought, or where we could blame various social factors for fucking up the individuals concerned. As for number of kids, it's almost always two. People seem to think a kid needs a sibling.

Is the problem in the age bracket above mine, among the 40 year olds, perhaps? There are a few other couples my age who haven't got round to children yet, but they probably will in the next three years or so, having only relatively recently got married.

Is my experience unusual?

Make Women Great Again.

And/or remove their voting rights, they are clearly not able to handle this sort of responsibility.

A child costs €150,000 to raise for 18 years. Add more years for college (even with free tuition), housing, etc. If you're from the lower middle-class you may have like €250k, so 2 kids and you eat dog food for the rest of your life.

theres a difference between increasing your population to African tier levels, and stabilizing population growth that will ensure a nation has a healthy economic/taxation/social system for decades to come. With the way things are going in Europe, many believe that without immigration, by 2050, the average European will be aged in their 60. In the US, more whites are dying than being born today.
time.com/4585232/white-deaths-exceed-births-united-states/

We are going to see a huge drop in the population of whites around the world. and wit that, there will be less civilised societies. History is shaped by demographics, and Europe is dying.

During the 1970s the white American birthrate declined rapidly due to a major recession, but when the economy recovered in the 1980s the birthrate recovered. It reached its peak around 1990 but after the recession of the early 90s it began declining- even the economic boom of the 1990s didn't reverse the decline.

The reason for this is immigration- 300,000 immigrants were brought in each year under Ronald Reagan but Bill Clinton increased that number to 800,000 and allowed mass illegal immigration and "temporary" immigrants which increased the yearly intake to something like 1.5 million.

Whites, being forced to compete with immigrants for jobs and housing, found themselves taking longer to have kids and having fewer kids as a result as mothers couldn't afford to just take time off to have babies as easily as before the mass immigrant wave.

White birthrates in Australia (Australia doesn't keep tabs on the births of each race, but the USA does) are probably depressed since the mid-2000s and the mass immigration wave of chinks into your country buying up all the housing. Same with Canuckistan and New Zealand.

Trump wants to deport roughly 20 million people, which would reduce the US population to 304 million and he wants to slash legal immigration back to what it was before 1965- a massive decrease. The result of these policies are that shitskins won't be allowed into the country to have babies and illegals currently having babies will be deported, reducing non-white births by at least 500,000.

Whites will find cheap housing vacated by non-whites and easily get good jobs, enabling white couples to have babies sooner because women will be able to quit their job to have a kid and then quickly find a new job in an economy in which they don't have to hold onto their job for dear life lest some chink take it for half the pay.

The result of course is that white birthrates will increase significantly.

It's only white liberals that have low birth rates

White conservatives are doing just fine.

White liberals are degenerate narcissists who will be wiped out by evolution thankfully.

> tfw the only white country with a reasonable fertility rate

Your population is small so it doesn't matter.

The basic thing to take away from this is if costs of housing are too much and people can't find jobs to support children then white people will wait until they have those things. Meme answers like "ABOLISH FEMINISM LMAO" fail to understand that low white birthrates are primarily an economic problem, similar to how people (not niggers obviously) tended to have fewer children if food is scarce historically and more children if food was plentiful.

A strong economic situation will enable people to have more children more quickly.

Whites in the US will enter a baby boom during the 2030s and 2040s. This is because of groups like the Charedi Jews, Amish, Fundamentalist Protestants and others who have 6+ children on average and double in number every 20 years.

The average Jew only has 1 child on average, the Jewish population if it was uniform in terms of births would shrink from 5.6 million to only around 3 million by 2060. However because the Charedim are doubling every 20 years and will number 720,000 in 2020 they will number about 2,880,000 million in 2060 and Jews overall will have roughly the same population in 2060 as they do now. Jewish Americans will reach their highest numbers ever this century because of the Charedim.

Similarly white Christians tend to be far more fertile than the average Jew and white fundamentalists are far more numerous proportional to the rest of the Christian white population than Jewish fundamentalists are. The white population will overall grow even faster and will have doubled to more than 400 million by the end of this century.

Ok Lemme tell you the smart way to improve the white birthrate.

Kick the fucking useless welfare niggers out

Do what adolf hitler did reposses all homes owned by the banks distribute them out to hetorosexual couples that'll make kids Affer a loan that can be paid of in 10 years or 25% off with the birth of a child 4 childs = entire house is paid off. As far as rent rent should be no more than 1/8 of the total income of the renter. during the third reich the max rent was 24 reichs a month.

But hitler was a evil nazi racist.

youtube.com/watch?v=FQu3ovIlPh4

In 2015 Finland's TFR was only 1.65. That puts you at Canada-tier. Russia has a fertility rate estimated at about 1.75 as of 2017.

Iceland and Ireland have the highest fertility rates of mostly white nations. Iceland is projected to increase to as much as 1/6 of their population assuming low immigration and fertility rates hold, and 400,000 if immigration is increased.

As an individual you can have 20 children and the problem will still be here. The solution is political.

you havent taken account of the cultural war thats been waged against conservatives for decades. The older generation may be conservative, but the younger generation are increasingly becoming secular and liberal. Even self identified conservative women are adopting damaging liberal and cultural Marxist traits. The average conservative is alot less conservative than previous generations, and this trend will continue for the foreseeable future. Conservative women are now an endangered species in Australia. As long liberalism/Cultural marxism is seen as an attractive way of living for younger women and conservative lifestyles is demonized, expect to see more women ditch conservative lifestyles.

Absolutely none of that is relevant to anything

The only thing relevant is economics

How is this even a problem for you Spaniards?

Not enough time on siesta to bust a nut in Sofia's fat ass?

Try fucking you faggots. And instead of cumming on her face like she likes, finish in the pussy.
It ain't rocket science you gay nerds.

Idiot. Giving women free money will not make them get married more, quite the opposite, even less.
Now take a look at this picture that shows the countries with the highest fertility rates. What do they have in common? They are piss poor, women have no rights, no education, no public security even, the only means they have to get ahead in life is to get married and have children and this provides a fertility rate of 5-6 children/woman.
Now obviously we don't want and don't need to reproduce the circumstances these countries have. But we need to take away some of women's rights. In this sense we need to copy islam (note, not indtroduce islam, just copy it this particular aspect of how it deals with women).

We need to introduce a soft patriarchy where women have far fewer rights. no voting, no no fault divorce, no custody of children, no alimony, no child support and most importantly, no welfare for single moms.

I mean this picture, fuck me.

Reread your comment. You implied that conservative communities will continue to have higher than average white birth rates in the US, and will continue to inflate the average birth rates for whites. And that economics argument doesnt make sense considering whites had the highest birth rates , when Europe was a lot poorer than today. Universally, the more impoverished a community is, the higher birth rate. See Africas birth rate.

It isn't because of economics. It's about the indoctrination of the middle and upper class in the west. It comes from people not knowing how to please or keep a slut which ain't rocket science. We have been taught wrong. Unlearn what you have learned and become an animal again, white man.

What he said you mongol

Remove nowhites, then it doesn't matter.

The problem is political? Relying on the government to fix your shit is for betas and women. Grow a pair and fuck.

t. father

This tbqh. Like Japan

>you just have to fuck maan
You figured it out man, our problems are solved

Yeah it ain't rocket science is it, faggot? It's so easy a nigger can do it.

This user gets it.

The state has acted as a replacement for the very binding institution of a family over the last 100+ years. Families were strong and baby factories because they kind of had to be.

Even indirect shit like Social Security has been disastrous for the family unit because now parents can treat their children like dogshit and not bother raising them to be economically productive because "lol the goberment will take care of me."

By donating to my gofundme. I'll pump another one out for the glory.

No Pierre you need to focus on interventions that help women that work with no cap off at lower middle class. Support middle class working women with kids, not lower class leaches.

Since men and women are both unstable and suck at marriages at this point (and unlikely to change) what you need is for people that work and have kids to get a lot of help so they continue having it.
People that don't work and have kids should just fuck off.
Example, maternity leave. If you have no job, whatever, you don't have to prove you were looking for a job while pregnant since its no use and for the three months after. If you have a job the state gives a cutback to the employer when woman goes on maternity leave and you get a priority in childcare placement so it doesn't hinder you in your job purpose. Give a tax cut for large companies to have a childcare / crèche stuff on the job. That sort of stuff.

And the solution to the political is to have lots of kids and raise them to think and vote exactly the way you want them to.

It's likely that the Amish swung PA for Trump.
White men could change that tomorrow. The answer is simple: do not give white liberal women the time of day, and they will change to suit you.

The only reason they act like this is because white men allow it.

>It's likely that the Amish swung PA for Trump.
Curious. Are they political? I expected they might refrain from participation altogether.

You're not the only one. The problem with France is that 35-40% of the newborn are shitskins

Don't oppose Christianity.

Provide incentives for stay-at-home moms, white chidldren, and proportionally more for every child. Get higher incentives for marriages.

Change culture to promote family values more.

>Curious. Are they political
They don't like to talk about it, so we don't really know. But:
pennlive.com/news/2016/11/large_amish_turnout_helps_tilt.html

>You're not the only one. The problem with France is that 35-40% of the newborn are shitskins

I thought it was closer to 50%. Either way you are of course hopelessly fucked as even what passes for your far right, Le Pen, has absolutely no issue with this whatsoever and so long as these shitskins are citizens they are indistinguishable from real French people and have a right to stay here for all of eternity.

Not that we're any better of course. The West is fucked.

>I thought it was closer to 50%.

The 35-50% numbers aren't for all of France, just places like Paris.

Given the way our native communities are so prone to division and downright treason, any figure over 5% is cause for serious alarm.

>35-40%
Wat? I thought even greater paris it was just closer to ~30% for shitskins

Fascinating, thanks for that! Wish we had more groups like that over here - detached from the insane mainstream and doing things the good old-fashioned way. I hope they expand through good demographics to become an even more considerable electoral factor!

In metropolitan centres the figure ratchets up every year, thanks to natives having few kids late and invaders having lots early.

More benefits could only work for 99% white countries. Otherwise it'll just make muslims and africans breed at a much higher rate.

Promoting big white ass for white people and while promoting the opposite for everyone else

No, just have to give the benefits only to whites and natives.

>b-but muh racism
Who cares, they should be happy they're allowed to live in Europe/America in the first place.

The birthrates not the actual numbers

Promote Catholicism. It is strictly against pre-marital sex and also forbids contraception.
It goes without saying that abortion would be banned in a Catholic society.

Ask yourself: What is actually bad about a shrinking population?
Population growth only matters in regards to competion with other countries... i.e. economic or through war. (more people equals more cannonfodder, more and cheaper labor and more taxpayers and voters)
A shrinking population however means the same wealth divided by less people equals a higher standard of living thus more happiness..

Giving women incentives to get married and have more children a.k.a. free money will not make them get married more, quite the opposite, even less.

Now take a look at this picture that shows the countries with the highest fertility rates. What do they have in common? They are piss poor, women have no rights, no education, no public security even, the only means they have to get ahead in life is to get married and have children and this provides a fertility rate of 5-6 children/woman.Now obviously we don't want and don't need to reproduce the circumstances these countries have. But we need to take away some of women's rights. In this sense we need to copy islam (note, not indtroduce islam, just copy it this particular aspect of how it deals with women).We need to introduce a soft patriarchy where women have far fewer rights. no voting, no no fault divorce, no custody of children, no alimony, no child support and most importantly, no welfare for single moms.

We can make tube test artificial babies nowadays no ?
Well let's just make tube test white babies

Let's have massive white people factories that would pump out a thousand blonde blue eye 2m50 aryan superwarriors every day

This is the solution

Hmm, let me think of it...
Maybe the bankruptcy of social security, health care and pension systems? Is a total economic collapse bad enough? How about a hostile takeover from a foreign population with a higher fertility rate and a completely alian culture that contradicsts everything Europe stands for?
Just how retarded you can get?

>shrinking population

It's a problem because the rest of the world's population isn't shrinking. Muslims birth rates aren't shrinking, Africans', Mexicans', Indians' birth rates aren't shrinking, whether it's in Western countries or in their own countries.

If you care the least about self-preservation, global competition, or genetics, birth rates will always be an important factor. Like OP, states low birth rates are also used by (((globalists))) and their useful idiots to justify more immigration and demographic replacement.

Shrinking populations wouldn't be as much of a problem if we had control over our immigration policies, and if everyone in the world also had shrinking populations. As that's not the case though, it's important to increase it for Western natives.

Nothing a few nukes can't change.

>Maybe the bankruptcy of social security, health care and pension systems? Is a total economic collapse bad enough?
Those sound all pretty good honestly, exactly what's needed right now to change things.

A system that demands neverending growth is cancerous.

false retard

more white babies = less shitskin influx = stable society = problems solved

your retarded line of thinking is what got us here in the first place

The governments are against white birth rates so it would take a full blown violent revolution in order to restore the classic way of life.

these

Why not just accept only female refugees from these places and educate them allowing a much wider selection of women to reproduce on the home field and preventing foreign countries from Spawning like rabbits due to lack of women

>improved eugenics(woman fucks with attractive and good guys)

So so if only the good looking guys with big dicks breed you call that eugenics? If it had always been this way we would have been the ones getting conquered by advanced cultures that kept their women under strict control, where the most intelligent and adventurous men who took risks got the best women. Women should not get to choose who they want because their choice is garbage for eugenics. We're going to end up with a race of dumb mongrels

>more white babies = less shitskin influx
The floodgates were opened back when the birthrate was still 7 or so. If the people controlling the government decide they want shitskins in your country you'll get shitskins in your country - the excuse is secondary.

Yeah because South America turned out so great when the europeans fucked all the native girls right?

Correct

It's important to note that Jews destroyed the family unit, and try to make it harder for whites to reproduce for this specific purpose, and have for decades.

...

...

...

...

...

good thinking, but refugees are overwhelmingly male, not female

I wonder who could be behind this post.

you know that you can't even think of shit like this in public .
how could you implement this ?

With all of these in mind, I wonder how much longer Europeans will idly sit by and let this happen to them. What will it take to restore what they used to have?

Closing the borders and deporting shitskins until they stabilize their birth rates and the world stops heading towards it's self destruction

Get a job that isn't dog shit, find a woman that can do the duty of a good wife e.g. Cook, clean, look after your kids. Work hard get promoted more, live comfortably. That, or start your own business work 60+ hour weeks and if you are smart, lucky, and hard working, you could become pretty rich.
These thing aren't necessarily easy, but anything worthwhile rarely is.