As soon as you make a politician, email me in game here:

As soon as you make a politician, email me in game here: oppressive.games/power/pol.php?pol=504
Tell me what your discord name is so I can verify you.

Other urls found in this thread:

discord.gg/KkA4H9V
oppressive.games/power/pol.php?pol=504
discord.gg/AdFrMRt
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I'll take Utah

t. Palpatine

gonna veto all your bills recucklicans

im 17 but roleplay as a child

fuck off commiecuck

Watch us

dumping political art because reasons

We take any right wing conservatives, nationalists, and even fascists. The democucks are winning right now because they have more members so we need to change that.

We're so desperate we'll take jews

...

have you tried organization

oi vey

Hello everybody. As you know it's been a interesting couple days for me, but in this statement I intend to write the truth and nothing but it on my feelings toward the GOP and the game. I've found two options in order to move on the first being to leave. More on the second later. I'm considering leaving the game because it's not really fun anymore. But not the game the Discord. Rumsod made a decent game but the Discord specifically the GOP discord is (for me in specific anyway) full of ppl pranking and memeing me and an endless amount of criticisms from the Cruz regime. Yet when I leave the majority goes bye bye. The funny thing is the I left the GOP over a PRANK. Ted removed all my roles and said Treasuer is no longer a role so I got upset and left. Only to find out it was all a joke. I being the only true elected leader that was in the party naturally didn't like the fact that it was a joke. But how does not being able to take a joke effect my leadership ability. The party was plenty successful with me in office. I once gave out money for three elections without Cruz support. Only using the fundraising committee that I created. I also made the funding request channel and the AA coordinator job. Instead of giving me back the job they APPOINTED Enoch and said "we will give you your job back if you spy on John Major" so I did I gave them the info they asked for so they could get him to make peace. Now when it was almost time for them to do there end of the deal I got suspicious by some of the wording Heydrich used so I asked an ally for the truth instead of me and Enoch being co treasurers as agreed on Enoch wanted to make me his undersecretary. I did my end of the deal they DID NOT do there's. Thats the type of stuff that doesn't make the game all that fun in my option. But there was one thing I noticed while being with Major.

Quick post the Hoksfeld Manifesto

Although the words he was using were a bit aggressive his message was correct. End the dishonesty and corruption in the GOP. I agree with some aspects of both groups but his message is correct. And in light of that I'm making one last attempt at making the game fun for us all. I will create a party called the freedom coalition. This party will be open book transparent and there will be frequent elections and places where people can share what they don't like about a leader in a safe environment without ban risk. I tested this in my RNC chat and it worked quite well. I obviously won't make a party if no one is gonna join so PM me if you plan to do so I can run some numbers I'll hopefully know in the next few hrs. I hope everyone in the game who wants to have fun. Have a voice and a say and be in an open area with no bans PM me with interest in joining. This maybe the last thing you hear from me so in lieu of that I say

...

"Contact me in game to join my super cabal. Signing bonuses up to $20,000. -J Kamehameha"

if you get cucked by democucks what does that make you?

lol no one's gonna read that autistic spam

Excuse you that is the Hoksfeld Manifesto, the most influential and well written piece of political discourse to come out of this century

>mass recruiting from Sup Forums has never failed!
RIP Cult of Ebola-chan, Fourth Reich, Fourth Reich II: Electric Bougaloo, and Eternal Reich

The history of all hitherto existing society(2) is the history of class struggles.

Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master(3) and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes

In the earlier epochs of history, we find almost everywhere a complicated arrangement of society into various orders, a manifold gradation of social rank. In ancient Rome we have patricians, knights, plebeians, slaves; in the Middle Ages, feudal lords, vassals, guild-masters, journeymen, apprentices, serfs; in almost all of these classes, again, subordinate gradations.

The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones.

Republican Party Discord Link:
discord.gg/KkA4H9V

Email me in game here to get verified:
oppressive.games/power/pol.php?pol=504

Our epoch, the epoch of the bourgeoisie, possesses, however, this distinct feature: it has simplified class antagonisms. Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other — Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.

From the serfs of the Middle Ages sprang the chartered burghers of the earliest towns. From these burgesses the first elements of the bourgeoisie were developed.

The discovery of America, the rounding of the Cape, opened up fresh ground for the rising bourgeoisie. The East-Indian and Chinese markets, the colonisation of America, trade with the colonies, the increase in the means of exchange and in commodities generally, gave to commerce, to navigation, to industry, an impulse never before known, and thereby, to the revolutionary element in the tottering feudal society, a rapid development.

The feudal system of industry, in which industrial production was monopolised by closed guilds, now no longer sufficed for the growing wants of the new markets. The manufacturing system took its place. The guild-masters were pushed on one side by the manufacturing middle class; division of labour between the different corporate guilds vanished in the face of division of labour in each single workshop.

Meantime the markets kept ever growing, the demand ever rising. Even manufacturer no longer sufficed. Thereupon, steam and machinery revolutionised industrial production. The place of manufacture was taken by the giant, Modern Industry; the place of the industrial middle class by industrial millionaires, the leaders of the whole industrial armies, the modern bourgeois.

Modern industry has established the world market, for which the discovery of America paved the way. This market has given an immense development to commerce, to navigation, to communication by land. This development has, in its turn, reacted on the extension of industry; and in proportion as industry, commerce, navigation, railways extended, in the same proportion the bourgeoisie developed, increased its capital, and pushed into the background every class handed down from the Middle Ages.

We see, therefore, how the modern bourgeoisie is itself the product of a long course of development, of a series of revolutions in the modes of production and of exchange.

Each step in the development of the bourgeoisie was accompanied by a corresponding political advance of that class. An oppressed class under the sway of the feudal nobility, an armed and self-governing association in the medieval commune(4): here independent urban republic (as in Italy and Germany); there taxable “third estate” of the monarchy (as in France); afterwards, in the period of manufacturing proper, serving either the semi-feudal or the absolute monarchy as a counterpoise against the nobility, and, in fact, cornerstone of the great monarchies in general, the bourgeoisie has at last, since the establishment of Modern Industry and of the world market, conquered for itself, in the modern representative State, exclusive political sway. The executive of the modern state is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie.

above link expired, new link:
discord.gg/AdFrMRt

The bourgeoisie, historically, has played a most revolutionary part.

The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his “natural superiors”, and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous “cash payment”. It has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervour, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation. It has resolved personal worth into exchange value, and in place of the numberless indefeasible chartered freedoms, has set up that single, unconscionable freedom — Free Trade. In one word, for exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation.

The bourgeoisie has stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honoured and looked up to with reverent awe. It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage labourers.

The bourgeoisie has torn away from the family its sentimental veil, and has reduced the family relation to a mere money relation.

We need more manpower

WHITE BACKGROUND
and the word
>POWER

hahahahahahah

The bourgeoisie has stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honoured and looked up to with reverent awe. It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage labourers.

The bourgeoisie has torn away from the family its sentimental veil, and has reduced the family relation to a mere money relation.

The bourgeoisie has disclosed how it came to pass that the brutal display of vigour in the Middle Ages, which reactionaries so much admire, found its fitting complement in the most slothful indolence. It has been the first to show what man’s activity can bring about. It has accomplished wonders far surpassing Egyptian pyramids, Roman aqueducts, and Gothic cathedrals; it has conducted expeditions that put in the shade all former Exoduses of nations and crusades.

The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionising the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society. Conservation of the old modes of production in unaltered form, was, on the contrary, the first condition of existence for all earlier industrial classes. Constant revolutionising of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainty and agitation distinguish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones. All fixed, fast-frozen relations, with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions, are swept away, all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify. All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses his real conditions of life, and his relations with his kind.

literally commie scum

The need of a constantly expanding market for its products chases the bourgeoisie over the entire surface of the globe. It must nestle everywhere, settle everywhere, establish connexions everywhere.

The bourgeoisie has through its exploitation of the world market given a cosmopolitan character to production and consumption in every country. To the great chagrin of Reactionists, it has drawn from under the feet of industry the national ground on which it stood. All old-established national industries have been destroyed or are daily being destroyed. They are dislodged by new industries, whose introduction becomes a life and death question for all civilised nations, by industries that no longer work up indigenous raw material, but raw material drawn from the remotest zones; industries whose products are consumed, not only at home, but in every quarter of the globe. In place of the old wants, satisfied by the production of the country, we find new wants, requiring for their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes. In place of the old local and national seclusion and self-sufficiency, we have intercourse in every direction, universal inter-dependence of nations. And as in material, so also in intellectual production. The intellectual creations of individual nations become common property. National one-sidedness and narrow-mindedness become more and more impossible, and from the numerous national and local literatures, there arises a world literature.

The bourgeoisie, by the rapid improvement of all instruments of production, by the immensely facilitated means of communication, draws all, even the most barbarian, nations into civilisation. The cheap prices of commodities are the heavy artillery with which it batters down all Chinese walls, with which it forces the barbarians’ intensely obstinate hatred of foreigners to capitulate. It compels all nations, on pain of extinction, to adopt the bourgeois mode of production; it compels them to introduce what it calls civilisation into their midst, i.e., to become bourgeois themselves. In one word, it creates a world after its own image.

The bourgeoisie has subjected the country to the rule of the towns. It has created enormous cities, has greatly increased the urban population as compared with the rural, and has thus rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life. Just as it has made the country dependent on the towns, so it has made barbarian and semi-barbarian countries dependent on the civilised ones, nations of peasants on nations of bourgeois, the East on the Wes

...

The bourgeoisie keeps more and more doing away with the scattered state of the population, of the means of production, and of property. It has agglomerated population, centralised the means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands. The necessary consequence of this was political centralisation. Independent, or but loosely connected provinces, with separate interests, laws, governments, and systems of taxation, became lumped together into one nation, with one government, one code of laws, one national class-interest, one frontier, and one customs-tariff.

The bourgeoisie, during its rule of scarce one hundred years, has created more massive and more colossal productive forces than have all preceding generations together. Subjection of Nature’s forces to man, machinery, application of chemistry to industry and agriculture, steam-navigation, railways, electric telegraphs, clearing of whole continents for cultivation, canalisation of rivers, whole populations conjured out of the ground — what earlier century had even a presentiment that such productive forces slumbered in the lap of social labour?

We see then: the means of production and of exchange, on whose foundation the bourgeoisie built itself up, were generated in feudal society. At a certain stage in the development of these means of production and of exchange, the conditions under which feudal society produced and exchanged, the feudal organisation of agriculture and manufacturing industry, in one word, the feudal relations of property became no longer compatible with the already developed productive forces; they became so many fetters. They had to be burst asunder; they were burst asunder.

Bump
ALWAYS IGNORE jbz

Once again:
Republican Party Discord Link:
discord.gg/KkA4H9V

Email me in game here to get verified:
oppressive.games/power/pol.php?pol=504

Johny is a river to his people. Johny is the man who you want to send youre money to if youre sick of youre superiors, for johny can arrange that any state ellection get's rigged in favour of those who seeks the service's of his network skills, johny knows much people who know people, and Johny is not afraid of the party heads.

Look have been a king maker and I have a up coming from king in my hands all I needed from you is all our power and allies helping my king. I have guss that you will not listen to me but this could help us both have a say in the White House one day. We are the king maker not the king.

Yeah Johny is a river all right, a river of shit and piss.

which state should i chose?

It depends on what positions you choose. Once you get on the discord we can discuss which state would be best.

what if i have multiple accounts?

Multiple accounts aren't allowed. If the game dev looks and sees you have more than one, you will be banned.

Ignore him, he's exaggerating. Use them to help me do attack ads!

even with different emails? different usernames? different IPs?

I mean it is checked by ip address so if you use different then you probably won't get caught but its not advised by our party.

what positions should i chose to best help the party?

honestly i feel most people are going to put extreme right wing for both

Closer to center is the best just in general but extreme right is fine for some states

someone make new thread when this one dies.

with the new primaries, only ideologues will actually be able to win. centrist nerfed, go big red!