>The former British spy behind the shocking dossier about Donald Trump is “terrified for his safety” after being identified Wednesday, a report says. >Christopher Steele, 52, has gone into hiding after being publicly named in a story by the Wall Street Journal.
>Sources said the ex-MI6 agent has fled his home in Surrey, which borders London, and is now on the run.
Juan Perez
Who will get to Steele first?
Putin?
Or Sup Forums with a pizzagate-like bullshit conspiracy theory?
Josiah Lewis
The hero we need but don't deserve
Connor Wilson
>pizzagate-like bullshit conspiracy theory Nice conflating there agent user.
Nolan Jackson
bump
Dylan Flores
Total bullshit. What a coincidence that all of a sudden a "former british agent" is revealed from the shadows and has a dossier on TRUMP, GTFOH. CIA you are the worst liers in the history of this fucking world, IN THE WORDS OF JFK,
"GOD EMPEROR TRUMP SHALL SHATTER YOU IN A 1000 PIECES AND SCATTER YOU TO THE WINDS!"
David Davis
>lie about a bunch of shit >oh no people are mad at me
Isaiah Adams
So.... the tripfag from the other night checks out?
Oliver Scott
>Christopher Steele >Christopher Stoole >Christopher Poole
it is known
Jaxson Myers
>"former british agent" emerges from the shadows with a dossier on TRUMP Funny part is, he's been outed; who outs their source? Probably "on the run" to his country house or some Caribean Island for a week or two.
David Jones
CIA will give him the ol polonium teapot and rus will be blamed haha
Jordan Reed
It was The Wall Street Journal that broke this particular story (with the MI6 guy's name), I believe. Not CNN, who broke the story about the two-page summary, nor BuzzFeed, who published the 35-page dossier, nor the political campaigns he was supposedly contracted by. But WSJ—or someone?—had apparently been in contact with him, and asked for interviews before all this.
Caleb Garcia
yeah this stinks to high heaven. on the run? from what? trump isnt putin he isnt going to get assassinated and he hasnt pulled a snowden so he isnt going to get guantanomoed...
at worst he will eat some legal shit and he can use his money and connections to get a cozy golf-laden rehabilitation sentence... he always has the excuse "i honestly believed what i heard from my (((sources))) was true"
otherwise he can go live in the 3rd world as a hermit.. yeah.
its bullshit, pure and simple, he's been asked to take the heat and make it look good
Cameron Watson
>The Wall Street Journal that broke this particular story Yes, that's what article in OP says. WSJ article was an expose on who he is and possible connection to report, Steele himself was not quoted or interviewed. Was not definative about where report came from; mostly speculative, but still outed the guy.
Andrew Reed
and also... the WSJ? how the fuck did they get they get their dicks out of washingtons ass and the other way around, fast enough to find out about anything of value or purpose, far alone uncover a top-level spy with all those top-tier spy skills, as being the source of an explosive dossier against the presedent elect of the USA.
jesus christ can i have some more grease on my fake news please`? its not going down
>on the run? from what? >trump >putin Hell, even just media attention/paparazzi is enough of a reason to get the fuck out of Dodge.
Poor bloke probably just wants to eat his tea and crumpets in his bowler hat and bathrobe, in peace and quiet.
Nathaniel Murphy
amerilards believe almost everything they are told, its true.
Adrian Collins
Obviously Russia would want to know who gave him the info.
Christopher Bell
>obviously
why would russia give a shit as it is obvious false info and thus they arent involved.
they are sitting back and watching the US institutions fuck each other over, laughing and /popcorning and at the very least, hoping that Trump will at least bring some law and order to the west.
Adrian Ramirez
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Robert Smith
Believe it or not, a story can be report on by more than one source. Weird but true.
Regardless of who broke the story first, notice the air of conjecture in both reports.
Dylan Sullivan
>Britain votes for Brexit, pissing off (((globalists))) >USA votes for trump, (((globalists))) kvetch some more >Trump gets closer to Nigel Farage, who (((globalists))) hate >Trump says the UK will be first for a trade deal
>suddenly a """British""" man threatens Trump
Very interesting, I'll tell you that.
Owen Russell
>weird but true
yeah. if by weird you mean anybody with half a brain can realise that in order for a spy to have been outed and for two random assholes working for financial mouthpieces to have done so simultaneously, they must have been simply fed the information by a third party.
given that major "trustworthy" and otherwise "unbiased" papers were chosen, distant from the mudslinging that is going on right now and generally not publishing this kind of expose, it can then be assumed that the motive of the third party is to garner as much trust in the story as possible, AND that they are pretty well connected because otherwise the WSJ and Forbes arent going to run the story.
If it had been a local english rag that broke the story, it would be at least plausible, but at this point it looks a lot like, dun dun dun.... FAKE NEWS generated and carefully decimated so as to maximise a specific narrative.
Ethan Morgan
Not surprised he got threatened after releasing such a shit dossier, the cia may try to off him for botching their smear campaign
Brody Nguyen
The convincted would-be Trump assassin was also British.
>This product is fantastic i bought one and it was so good i bought two more for my dad. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this product. 5 stars!
Kayden Nelson
...
Parker Brooks
>yeah. if by weird you mean . . . No. I mean it doesn't matter who broke the story first. What matters is neither story can say with any certainty whether Steele was in fact the source of the report. As far as who leaked the source, that's another point of conjecture.
Gavin Rivera
inb4 he doesn't exist
Andrew Foster
Really not sure what your point is here. This story broke in the WSJ around 11:45 am here.
Hah. How many former MI6 with previous experience in Russia that now own private firms can there be? Forbes probably just used Google.
Jace Campbell
You really seem like someone who needs to be right about something on the internet, so, okay?
Zachary Morgan
Was thinking more along the lines of Valerie Plame. Someone got set up for something, and now it's all going to pieces. Maybe it was supposed to. Jesus, I don't know what to believe at this point.
Adam Price
If he's unlucky he could wind up like Litvinenko
Adam Wright
yeah he probably just wrote that shit down on his blog:
>dear Google diary, today I wrote the dossier on Trump. Hahahaha what a load of shit, I made it all up I can't wait to see what happens.