How can you disagree with this...

How can you disagree with this? I'm not talking about people on ~$150k I'm talking millionaires and billionaires who have more money than they know what to do with. They could make other peoples lives so much better and they wouldn't even notice it missing.

Other urls found in this thread:

today.com/video/boy-who-wanted-to-share-his-toys-with-syrian-refugee-invited-to-white-house-812259395779
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Give a kid something they like or have wanted and you will see how that sharing goes. That's what happens when you take advice from a 5 year old.

If you raise your kids right, they will be happy to share.

today.com/video/boy-who-wanted-to-share-his-toys-with-syrian-refugee-invited-to-white-house-812259395779

After seeing a famous photo of a young Syrian boy covered with blood after an airstrike in Aleppo, 6-year-old Alex who wrote to President Obama to offer the child his own home. Now the president has invited Alex to visit him at the White House.

>should
>Implying they don't
>What are taxes?
Sage this slide thread

wow i agree everyone with more money than me should give me some

How the fuck is Bruce Wayne going to afford his shit when he's paying 90% tax? Fucking idiot go fuck yourself.

Definition of sharing is voluntary. Taxation is theft and slavery with armed government force with threats of imprisonment.

Go be a man child somewhere else

Are you LARP'ing right now or literally autistic?

Are you making felony terroristic threats?

>rich people should share

poor people should make

Or tell that kids lazy parents to work harder. someone should hold this kids head under water

it should be considered child abuse to use children as pawns for virtue signaling

Stealing isn't virtuous, no matter how you slice it.

Prove me wrong, I dare you.

How could they make other lives better? You fucking retard.

If a billionaire gave away a billion dollars...

that would be 14 cents to every person in the world...

That would last a couple hours to people living on 1 dollar per day.

Ever heard of being edgy?

> If you raise your kids right, they will be happy to share.
So this is why cuckold fetish is so prevalent nowdays :^)

If you believe in private property, this is top kek, Rich people MAY share... IF they want to. otherwise tyrrany

>They could make other peoples lives so much better
Can't remember when other people did something to make my life much better, so I should give a fuck because...?

theft is different from sharing

Send me half your next paycheck OP, I need to buy some video games and weed.

Thanks for sharing!

tell that to tax dodging companies like apple, facebook or google

Fuckin rich people DO share all the time.

I'm pretty sure any millionaire who is not a philanthropist in today's day and age is shamed to death.

I have never understood why it is "greed" to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else's money.

You understand how taxes work right? You understand how those taxes provide the basic infrastructure to modern society yes?

Autists, autists everywhere

>6 year old kid wrote letter to obama

suuuuuuuure, this totally happened
in the real world

How about teaching your child that the world is filled to the brim with people that will abuse your kindness? Sharing is a socialist concept and it does not make the world a better place.

Yeah fuck private property, why would a person be allowed to have something that I don't have.
Fucking commies

People that rich don't pay taxes, they take taxes.

Yeah, maybe they should. And they do.
But being forced to share is not sharing.

Owning a whole country isn't 'private property'.

>How can you disagree with this
Why should Trump give me money just because he has more than me? He can do anything he wants with his money. Private property and stuff.

It worked for millenia, why do you want to change it?

>Government receives tax
>Steals the money, buys vacation homes and basically just spends it on hookers and blow
>"Y-you retards"

I haven't payed tax in 12 years.

>6-year-old Alex who wrote to President Obama to offer the child his own home.
>wrote to President Obama to offer the child his own home.
>offer the child his own home.
> his own home.

This is liberalism in a fucking nutshell. "His own home" you mean the one that the 6 year old worked for, saved for, and bought? that home? Or do you mean the one that his parents are working for and still trying to pay off, and isn't his to offer?

OP, ignore , don't send him 50% anything, instead send me 100% of your paycheck. I gave up weed band ut now I need to buy other shit to distract me.

It's called sharing.

So you're askinfor rich people to ONLY give to the people in their rich country? Maybe YOU should give your money to people who are ACTUALLY poor.

You fucking retard.

what a fat pig

ANCAP when?

I wish I could dodge the tax here.

>How can you disagree with this?

Because I'm not an fucking child that thinks "billionaires" have all of their money in a big vault somewhere. Let me give you a great big hint faggot: Billionaires invest their money and run businesses you fucking idiot. But yeah hey let's tax the shit out of them and let the GOVERNMENT have that money, because the GOVERNMENT are just so responsible with the money they already fucking have right?

Money in the hands of an industrialist is -always- better used than money in the hands of the state.

I'm talking about millionaires and billionaires who wouldn't notice the money missing.

Obviously sending you my paycheck would have a deleterious effect on my lifestyle because I don't have a billion dollars in the bank.

Now THAT'S a slam pig!

I was talking about liberals adopting a communist attitude, accusing others of greed while being greedy fucks themselves. I don't know where you got that "owning a country" idea from.

Sorry but you'll have to do better than parroting Reaganesque lines about the inherent evilness and corruptness of government, laddy.

But why discrimiate against the highly successful and smart? You have waaay more than you need, give it to me!

I work for myself and keep the biggest jobs off record. My company is not registered to pay tax because we don't meet the minimum cashflow. I pay the guys working for me officially less than taxable and the rest I give in cash.

Fuck the kaffer government

That's capitalism to you.

>I deserve other people's money
Get fucked commie.

Nobody owes you anything and you're entitled to nothing. You want some a piece of a rich person's money? Start a business and convince him to invest in it. You don't get anything for doing nothing.

lel that kids fucked

>raising your kids to think that they're entitled to anything without having worked to it
Why would you ever do that

"You have a lot of stuff" "I'm entitled to some of that stuff" "There's only so much stuff to go around, so the more stuff you have means less stuff for me"
I hate these people

>Sorry but you'll have to do better than parroting Reaganesque lines about the inherent evilness and corruptness of government, laddy.

No, I really don't, because the fact you even label what I just said as "Reaganesque" shows that you don't know a fucking thing about economics or industry anyway.

The fact you even think taxing the rich works is pretty laughable anyway. You clearly do not understand entry-level jewry like holding companies and real estate development.

I'm sorry Australia but your socialism is weak before the power of Corporatism. Wealthy people funnel their money into foundations like the Clinton Foundation in order to manipulate government regulations and tax laws in their favor. You are not redistributing wealth Karl Jr., you are just relocating it.

Poor people should [spoiler]git gud[/spoiler]

Im not rich. I don't want the rich to give the poor money. They will only abuse it. They need to make the moneys themselves in order for it to have value. Otherwise its just wasted.

They also act like no one has ever worked to earn their wealth.
I've had some argue that the kids of rich hard working parents don't actually deserve the money when the parents die. They act like they have any kind of authority on who deserves what

Commie chink, please.

That's not how it works in America, actually.

There should be something done with the billionaires. I don't care about people having a lot of money, that's fine. But these people have so much power they can wield over countries it's ridiculous. Look at George Soros for fuck's sake.

>Wealthy people funnel their money into foundations like the Clinton Foundation in order to manipulate government regulations and tax laws in their favor.
By the way, why giving money to "charities" cuts your taxes? Wasn't giving money to those in worse living conditions supposed to an act of... CHARITY than a way to avoid taxes?

>LOOK, LOOK! I'M A NICE PERSON BECAUSE I GIVE MONEY TO CHARITIES... And thanks for the tax cuts, suckers

Fuck off cunt
You'll get not one of my francs.
NOT A SINGLE FUCKING ONE!

t. mountain jew

Fuck poor people. They remain poor for a good goddamn reason. Its because they don't want to to work, make excuses why they can't work or are 'mentally ill'. They ain't getting of my goddamn money.

Only if I get to share with whom I prefer.

They already do share, its called taxing. In fact they pay more tax, in terms of both volume and proportion. Poor people are poor because they deserve to be. First generation immigrants usually outperform the lower segments of society because they actually have drive and ambition to succeed. The system has already done its job and put the most useless people at the bottom of the heap where they belong.

When you say that rich people over a certain threshold of income need to give away their money, you are creating a society where you are punishing people for succeeding.

That's how the current system is. It treats people well when they are failing, ignores people who are doing alright, and punishes people who are succeeding.
And even if you say that rich people won't miss it, the very idea that the government treats people differently will influence things.

That's why the only way to have a productive, successful society while still having a social safety net is flat tax + universal basic income

Poor people shold stop having children.

>By the way, why giving money to "charities" cuts your taxes?

I guess because it's a goodwill gesture that benefits the community and therefore the state, at least on paper.

>Wasn't giving money to those in worse living conditions supposed to an act of... CHARITY than a way to avoid taxes?

Oh it's worse than that, many of those charities aren't really charities at all. The Clinton Foundation is actually a giant lobbyist scheme. They don't actually use the money they are given through donations to feed hungry kids or get medicine for sick people. They spend the money paying lobbyists to push legislation allocating federal funding to feeding hungry kids and getting medicing for sick people.

It's a massive fucking cash scheme masquerading as a humanitarian NGO and the Clinton Foundation isn't the only one.

first you share your toys with a shitskin, then you share your wife with a shitskin

>They remain poor for a good goddamn reason.
Yep, because everyone can become a manager and avoid taxes and it's impossible that the smarter and luckier people will accumulate more money than everybody else.

no argument provided-error- no argument provided bleep-bloop-blop

That's obvious, but isn't there a law to prevent giving stuff to politicians?

>106752637
lol i'm not an ancap, i'm ok with taxation- if taxes are low!
i'm don't want to pay for asylum seekers, leeches and politicians salaries

Most poor people, are just as you described them - welfare leeches, amplified this problem, as it became a viable lifestyle.

Those that actually have a "rightfull" claim to social welfare, are now competing with cons, and the whole budget gets slashed to their demerit.

>Most People are shitty and lazy, who would have ever guessed?

why should they share? what reasons do you have?(note: neutral tone)

how much should they share % wise? with their local community, their country? should they share with the poorest people they can find?

should they be FORCED to share? is it virtuous to share if you are forced to do it?

do you accept this kid's (parents) message is an emotional appeal?

Formally, and legally, the foundation is a separate entity from whoever it's named after. Hillary Clinton can't directly embezzle funds for her own personal purposes but there are ways to make money move without bringing the Federal Election Commission down on you.

Charities are a great big loop hole for bypassing tax laws and a great deal of many other things as well. People are afraid to call this out because anyone who does would immediately be painted as an evil fuck who wants to deny starving Congolese kids their daily rice ration.

big sums of money are better at the hands of those who made them, it actually does more service to society.
They make good investment choices, it's not intuitive but the same wealth has more value with them

they already pay way too much taxes

If all the billionaires combines their money (roughly 7 trillion) and spread it out to the American people (roughly 320 million) everyone would get about $21.8k. Not exactly making every rich, is it? I mean no ones turning down nigh on 22 thousand dollars but these people seem to think that rich people are hoarding all the money and if it was spread out everyone could live like they do.

WRONG

>They could make other peoples lives so much better and they wouldn't even notice it missing.
They already do by reinvesting their capital into other businesses which in turn have the ability to provide more employment opportunities lmao how do you think our economy functions to begin with

But if anybody was brave enough to fix the charity shit, lobbyists would take a huge, painful hit, right?

Yup, but they use starving children and kids with leukemia as a shield. To change it would require you to engage people in such a way that they will spend more than a full hour thinking about the issue. Most people don't even think that long about who should be President so it's not an easy task.

Where do you stop?

That's the problem. Westerners are the top, most "best off", richest people in the world. A thousandaire is still living a huge rich, extravagant, exotic life of the richest people on the planet compared to the bottom 80%. Hell, any American, even the poorest America, lives better than 95% of Europeans.

There will always be dirt poor people. Look at the trillions of aid that has been given to African countries to help them not be dirt poor. What has it done for them? They just bought lots more food to have lots more kids than they can provide for, leaving them in the same place but with more people than before they started receiving the monetary aid.

Think about. Where do you stop? Confiscating everything everyone has and leaving them with only $10, which is still a greater amount than most people alive in the world will earn in a year?

Indeed.
How much we have to change?
Would stoping the tax cuts would be enough or we need to go further?

>sharing is the same as forcing you to share
marxists ladies and gentleman
what's next, comparing Guevara with Jesus?

>billionaire gives all his money to everyone in the united states
Enjoy your tree fiddy you little faggot

>universal basic income
You mean, universal constant inflation. If the government pays people a basic living salary, this increases the money supply in the hands of "customers". More money chasing the same amount of products and services drives up the cost of everything. Very quickly, the basic universal income you are paying citizens is no longer enough as the market value stabilizes where it was BEFORE universal basic income was started. This means people can't live on that money from the government any more, and need more money. If you up their basic universal income, you restart the inflation spiral.

The only ways to avoid that are to: a) not do it, or b) go communist where everyone is given state owned housing to live in, and state owned and provided food to eat.

I know which option I'd prefer.

Universal income is just a way for the money printers to guarantee themselves a lifetime of employment.

>Billionairs are greedy cause they want to keep their money.. I am not greedy for demanding they take their money and give it to me and other people that didnt work for it.

.... so what again is the fair share of money for which you never worked for?

>Rich people should share.
Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't realise I am working for you, and not for me.

Hillary has and does commit acts many American's would consider "embezzlement", by paying herself a large salary and having the foundation reimburse her for many of here day living costs, as well as paying for her travel, etc etc etc.

The Clinton Foundation didn't even bother donating money or helping people outside the Clinton family and their close friends and staff until the Obama campaign pointed out they hadn't done anything but pay themselves up through the year 2008.

"Should"=/="must"

Soon, Shlomo, very soon.

beep boop
trying to find an argument

Increasing oversight on these "charity" foundations would be a good start. At the very least changing the laws to make it so that only domestic charity is recognized as a tax write-off.

Change too much too fast and people start to get nervous they might go to jail or lose money. If that happens it's an uphill battle because they'll turn all of their resources against any changes that might be made in the future.

Its called freedom, he makes his decisions about his money and the poor people make their decisions with theirs (eg spending it all on drugs, fast food and stupid unnecesary shit.).

Millionaire here.
I have no problem giving money to my fellow White man

Poor people choose to be poor.
There is nothing stopping you from picking up a book and starting your own business.

I would rather have income mobility than universal income. It is a slippery slope when you try to define who is "rich" especially when being rich does not equal having wealth. More people within the upper tiers of income have moved from the lower ranks up to the upper ranks within one generation. There is a far smaller percentage of those in the upper ranks that have inherited their wealth.

Poor people should stop reproducing until they are not wealthy enough to raise their children properly.

Problem solved.

WHAT A SUPRISE

fucking greedy jew

>Rich people should give their money to the government instead of investing it into productive uses.
>Rich people should feed parasites for free instead of having them work for it.
Are you retarded?

Your comment reminded me of Ben Shapiro triggering an entire high school when he said that a person who is poor all their life is not good at handling money.