Why are so many Sup Forums regulars so compassionless?

Why are so many Sup Forums regulars so compassionless?

I'm not saying you're cold in comparison to say, total bleeding hearts. But in general, when I see any topic being discussed relating to health, welfare, and morality, Sup Forumslacks come off as extremely heartless.

Were you exposed to too much affection and compassion growing up? Did it leave a sour taste in your mouth?

Did you get too little? Does all this just seem normal to you?

Compassion and sacrifice doesn't have to mean weakness and submission. You can find a compromise.

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/BnaVe
sq.4mg.com/NationSuccess.htm
academia.edu/3620724/Chinese_Lack_of_Empathy_in_Development
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

It wasn't a prank, he was just better than Clinton.

Pic unrelated.

You have to be more specific.

But, this is most likely some 8/10 bait so take a (You)! Ain't I a nice guy? :D

nigger

Yeah, your picture is insulting though. It was a great victory and you think it is a prank. Lets hope you are not trying to convince other people that his win was just a prank bro.

Anonymity + a satirical response to the outside world being such a hugbox

>Compassion and sacrifice doesn't have to mean weakness and submission. You can find a compromise.

The barbarians are at the gates, the time for compassion was yesterday, today is the time for strength, for tommorow is the time for war.

Nothing truly great has ever been accomplished without the correct application of violence

1. Who Actually thinks sacrifice means submission, how retarded do u have to be to think this

2. Sage

...

If you want to gear up for war you should have supported Hillary and go to war with Russia.

This board is to vent, not to act rational. Do you get it now? (Not everything on the internet is a representation of the person writing it.)

I don't want to gear up for anything nor do I want that.

Strength is being prepared for the inevitable, the war for the west is inevitable

Nobody on this board is rational? I wonder who would want to think something like that, probably our enemies.

This is a shit thread. Very insulting.

With logic and reasoning you come to a solution that will help more people in the long run, but hurts/offends people in the moment. So it SOUNDS cold and heartless, but in reality it is infinitely more compassionate (if we are equating compassion with human quality of life).

We can let the drones take care of the endless waves of brown people, but I think our military will improve with the new administration. The last place you want political correctness is in your military, so it's great that the leftists are out of here.

The only good poster in this thread not trying to subtly insult right wing people. Yes, if you push someone out of the way of traffic, it may offend them in the moment, but they will kiss your feet later.

I guess some people on here actually are rational.

im sure users here have compassion. this is just the place where we dont act compassionate?

Physical conflict is only one arena in which this war will be waged.

You can already taste it in the air, our societal decline

If you have so much compassion, how many rapefugees are sleeping in your house? How much money do you give to drug addicted homeless pieces of shit that need your love? How much time do you spend with little nigger kids with no father and a crack whore mother?
You've got plenty of compassion it unless you spend every day doing something about it, stfu

>trying to psychoanalyze replies and (You)'s
>were you all hurt as children
>are you feeling down user

In the words of that gay ass zack de la rocha

>anger is a gift

>muh feels
gtfo nigger
out out out

We got info wars going on now so it's all good brother. The right tends to attract the people competent enough to earn money, and that competence will surely result in more victories to come. If leftists want to attract people with welfare, then they will find that their own party members cannot debate or defend their ideology, they lose.

This

/thread

BECAUSE HUMAN LIFE HAS NO INHERENT VALUE.

None. Your perspective is too small and it is too narrow.

Once you understand the vast and meaningless void we all inhabit, you will come to this same realization.

Compassion gets you nowhere in the real world. Nature is war and always have been, the humans who got ahead did so by being absolutely compansionless and cruel towards their enemies and tribes from other races.

"Compassion" and "morality" are just lies we teach to the populace in order to keep them docile and non-violent, so that they do not harm the assets that are themselves and other wage-slaves. At the top levels of governance compassion does not exist, there are no rules in war and he most detached and cruel fuckers always win. This is why you will see passenger planes being missiled and kidergardens being shot up in false flag attacks from our own governments. The winners have no compassion, no empathy, they are psychopaths. They torture and rape and murder little kids for fun.

Compassion is a myth. Compassionate people will always lose to those who have none. Compassion should only be showed to your family and ethnic group, everyone else is an enemy and deserves none.

Don't be confused. If I could shoot or run over every piece of shit in my city and not go to jail with subhumans I would. They are a drain on our society and our patience

A FUCKING LEAF

No, if I started robbing people and just taking by force, eventually I would get killed. You have to be the small minority in governments to do that shit these days. It is not evolutionary advantageous anymore, I guess the meek really did inherit the earth.

I think many do it to be edgy. I genuinely am pro-capitalism, pro-conservatism, pro-traditional values, but I can still admit that people don't deserve to die in the street for being born into extremely different circumstances. It may also be due to the fact that many Sup Forumsacks are from stable middle-class households, and therefore don't understand what being poor is. Many people think being "broke" is the same as being "poor". Telling people to "just go to college" or "just get a better job" is equivalent to teh following scenario:

Imagine there are 2 people, one born into middle-class, and one born into true poverty. They are both instructed to scale a 15-ft wall that is standing in front of them. The middle-class participant is given a 10ft ladder, and the impoverished is given nothing. Obviously, the one with the ladder doesn't have to work nearly as hard to scale the wall, while the poor have to train their bodies for years to scale the wall. By the time they scale the wall and get to the other side, they see that there is now a 20ft wall, and the middle-class participant is nowhere to be found. He's already too far ahead.

archive.is/BnaVe

I believe that right wingers overall are very compassionate People, but we dont have compassion for Liberals, Kikes, Niggers and Muslims who wanna put us into an oven

You should join the military then. We'll see how you feel after getting shot at by sandniggers for a pointless cause no one should be involved in.

Success has a tendency to correlate with IQ, not with what class you are born into. I have data which shows this.

This data also shows that the success of a nation is dependent on average IQ.

sq.4mg.com/NationSuccess.htm

>tfw been around long enough to remember the 2006 summer raid of habbo
>that was right around the beginning of the end of days for "real" Sup Forums
>tfw that was over TEN FUCKING YEARS AGO

Don't care about your post OP, just came to shit on the thread with my feeling old.

>but in reality it is infinitely more compassionate (if we are equating compassion with human quality of life).
Can you explain how reducing the quality of life for the poor, actually increases their quality of life? I'm not being combative, just want to know what you mean

If that's the case, your middle-class life has no more value than the poor. Why should we cater to you, but not them?

Because we aren't going to save western society by being polite and giving hugs to the people who are actively destroying white nations

Unfortunately image chains have always been sociopath machines.

You can only look at so much gore, cp, hardcore hatred, rekt threads, etc before you completely lose your soul.

There's also a tradition on this site to be as cruel as possible to other users. The very act of trolling is antagonistic. It's also been associated with psychopathic behavior. When two users get into an argument, often the measure of "victory" is seeing who can be more cruel.

Not everyone falls into this trap, but most people here do

>Can you explain how reducing the quality of life for the poor, actually increases their quality of life? I'm not being combative, just want to know what you mean

Okay, does the poor having more money equate to lower quality of life? It does not. So when the rich get richer, and the gap between the rich and the poor grows, but the poor still get richer non the less, then the whole quality of life argument is void. Because before, when this gap was closer, the poor were making less money, and had a lower quality of life.

>sq.4mg.com/NationSuccess.htm

This graph does not imply causality, only correlation. It doesn't take a genius to realize that the poorest in a 1st world country will be smarter, on average, than a yam farmer in Kenya.

I hold no compassion for those that would want my race to no longer exist, those that would chastise me for simply being born with a penis, those that claim me to be 'rich and privileged' growing up just because I can now buy a nice car (them having no idea what my childhood was like).

Basically I hate people who hate me.

Nihilism is for the weakest of faggots. kys

I don't think you understood what I'm saying. I was talking to someone else in this instance, so I'll wait for their reply.

I'm actually very compassionate and hold a lot of empathy, not rude to anyone and I hold moderate views on most subjects.
I just come here everyday for my two minute hate to get anger out of my system.

I'm sure i'm not the only one.

The correlation is true though, and it is pretty telling. On to your next point.

IQ is not an indication of what you have learned, in fact you can do an IQ test on a toddler with reflex test only, and it will have consistency with later IQ tests which will test, say, 10 faculties of the brain. The IQ just tests how quick your brain is, how many numbers you can remember forewards and backwards, etc. And the data does show a correlation that people with quicker brains make more money on average than people with slower brains.

I think people come here from a release from that kind of compassion, most here are probably good people but everyone needs to blow off steam sometimes. And besides, we do it for the lulz. There's a joke in every tragedy and we find it every time.

History has proven that inequality causes huge problems.
So a rational thing is to reduce inequality, in order to help society as whole. Your argumentation, while you aren't wrong, is flawed because poor people don't see it that way.
In any case low empathy correlates with low IQ. See Africa.

Well you were implying that he was stating that the poor should have a lower quality of life when he did not state that, and I am correcting that error. The poor actually get richer in a right wing government.

Edgy, are you 12?

People on Sup Forums are all mentally ill, Sup Forums is just the apd wing of it.

IQ test is pattern recognition and verbal test, at least the standard one.

But if success is correlated with IQ, and you have a welfare state, then you are taking money from people who generate more income, and giving it to people who generate less income. Furthermore, you give them more money for each child they have. The incentive is to get people who do not generate as much wealth to have more babies, while the people who do generate more wealth might have less because the taxes do have a tendency to rise in a welfare state.

Did you seriously come to this board expecting compassion?

This here's the jungle lady.

Well you need to start listening to IQ specialists because I know the gold standard of IQ tests has 10 different subcategories in it, not just 2.

Add the Trump Dossier being filed by the CIA into Pranks in 2017 and its gold.

LIBERALS WAS A MISTAKE

Can you give an example of people on Sup Forums being compassionless? How are you judging the lack of compassion? Is it through what is said directly about or to a specific person like another poster, or about actual political systems that lead to lack of compassion.

Odds are that posts directed at other users aren't actually how people would feel in the real world because people post differently to how they act. Kind of like how facebook isn't a good representation of everyones life because they only post the good shit about themselves.

Succesful people depend on less succesful people. They aren't succesful in vacuum. You're doing it to buy social stability.
Again, this is historically proven. Do you understand now why people like Von Mises discard reality as a valid proof? Because their theories only work in theory, or in a simplified societal model they start with.

I'm just saying that's the standard one (and the one I did).

empathy is for fags

You're still confusing correlation with causation. They are not the same, no matter what you say. If you can PROVE that IQ is the cause, and not merely a symptom, then that's one thing, but you can't because no studies have ever shown that.

>IQ is not an indication of what you have learned...
I never said it was. I know it's not. However, it IS dependant on available nutrition and genetics. Nations with more nutritious diets (full of fats and proteins) have higher IQs. Protein availability is likely the greatest indicator of a groups IQ on a macro level. That being said, even the poor in the USA eat better than the yam farmers.

this guy is probably 5'5

I can tell you that a person who runs a factory is better off without a class of people not working, and instead are taking his tax dollars for their own personal living, would be better off without them at all. That would take the tax away. And he is better off with competent workers rather than incompetent workers, well, in a welfare state who is going to breed more?

He literally said "even if it means lowering quality of life"

Africans show low levels of empathy.

>in order to help society as whole.


darwinism helps society by removing inferior genetics. we should stop any form of welfare and let nature run its course rather than taking from people who succeed and giving it to people who don't just so maybe they will stop living in their own shit and killing each other (they won't). it has a negative impact on humanity to let these people continue to breed and even giving them financial incentives to do it because they can get more gibs for more kids

No, correlation is not always causation. But to say that correlation can never be an indication of the cause? Wrong.

People not working is just a small part of poor people. I never said you should give welfare to people who don't want to work. They are parasites and society has no need for them.

so do asians

academia.edu/3620724/Chinese_Lack_of_Empathy_in_Development

Compassion according to evolutionary psychology is only useful in small tribal groups like family, friends, coworkers and etc.

Beyond that, absolute strangers under the guise of anonymity, feel nothing , do nothin and say nothing for they are only a concept in your mind.

Therefore, if I see a school shooting on the news , I then can get a good hard chuckle trolling the relatives of the dead.

Absolute strangers aren't people and shall be treated as fictional entities.

In the US being "compassionate" means giving your taxes to Jamal and Shaniqua so that they can rape your daughter, kill your son, and shit out their replacement and sustain them with EBT.

Yea, fuck your compassion.

niggers are the way they are because they're stupid, not because they lack empathy

You don't realize that the only way to get on the government welfare programs is to have more kids. You have to have kids to qualify for medicare, food stamps, section 8, etc. The incentive to have kids come from the requirements to join these programs, not from the benefits they receive. In other words, if welfare was more easily available to average citizens, there would be much less incentive to breed for money.

We need to detach ourselves from empathy so that we can be emotionally resilient enough for the coming years.

So if you take welfare away from someone using it, you understand that it is going to lower their quality of life right?

And getting rid of the welfare state is necessary to fix our economy.

Then they have lower quality of life in the here and now and in return they get better quality of life in the long run when they get better incomes.

The poor used to make much less money before the US was developed 200 years ago.

>XXL
Damn if only a Star Spangled Banner got that id.

>barbarians are invading
>so you should have went and attacked your allies to let the brown hordes trample you from behind
low effort shilling should be bannable

Nope. Again, demonstrated in history.
You have a cool theory, I rely on empirical evidence.
Whites show high levels of empathy and white societies are most succesful.
Africans societies demonstrate things you find great, and look at Africa.

said every literal autist

maybe you should read more than one post baby brains

autism

this. OP is a meanie :c

Would you rather live in China than in Sweden? And by the way, IQ statistics for Asian societies aren't really true, especially in Chinese case.
Again, low IQ correlates with low empathy.

empathy is a mistake, all it does is hold the west back

You're moving goal posts. You were directly stating that correlation was causation. Now you say "not all correlation", but your point is still valid? Wrong.

someone shoop the bottom image into the trump golden showers

Studies show that better looking and more successful people have less compassion.

Sup Forums is a board of peace full of 10/10 men with successful careers.

It is very mean, luckily we are meaner.

I feel compassion for those important to me, and for those who deserve it. That's mainly my family and friends, and all whites to some extent. People without morals, sjw:s, subhumans and hardcore leftists do not deserve anything but death.

low empathy doesn't correlate with low iq tho. :^)
silly mountainnigger

>Absolute strangers aren't people and shall be treated as fictional entities.
This is actual autism, bud. Not even trolling.

We aren't compassionless, we just have carefully calibrated compassions.

Fuck off.

Oh look. It's yet another demoralisation thread.

Yes, in this case I think the cause of lower income is because of a lesser quality brain. You have to be intelligent to be successful at an intellectually demanding task.

Now to say that this is wrong because correlation is not causation is wrong. People say that correlation is not causation because sometimes that is true. But, if low IQ people make less money because they do less intellectually demanding tasks, and you graph it out to show the situation as it is, then you cannot dismiss it by calling it a fallacy. That's called the fallacy fallacy.

>Oh look. It's yet another demoralisation thread.
It is? I don't feel very demoralized. Usually such threads are filled with interracial porn. Nothing else really makes me rage anymore.

>Compassion and sacrifice doesn't have to mean weakness and submission.
Sup Forums is weak and submissive regardless.

Truth hurts. Logic can't be defeated by feelings.

We have more moral concerns then just feeling good
We have a strong sense of right and wrong that disregards present feelings and allows us to come to the conclusions that will lead our peoples to the greatest success