HyperNormalisation is a 2016 BBC documentary by British filmmaker Adam Curtis. The film was released on 16 October 2016 on the BBC iPlayer.[2] In the film, Curtis argues that since the 1970s, governments, financiers, and technological utopians have given up on the complex "real world" and built a simple "fake world" that is run by corporations and kept stable by politicians.
reminder to also watch his 'Bitter Lake' documentary on the middle east, islamic terrorism, etc
Christopher Smith
Adam curtis has an excellent understanding of sociological political economy. But I need to know if he supports feminism or not. Its my barometer for likability
John King
I've watched it, would recommend it. It will change your perspective on the present state of the world.
Wyatt Diaz
Checked, and bumped.
I watched it, excellent prog.
Christian Garcia
Haven't seen this, will watch.
Thanks, fellow bong
Gabriel Parker
Nice digits. I've tried to watch it for a couple of days and I'm barely past the hour and a quarter mark on VLC. Very slow narration style.
Bentley Long
Adam Curtis is blue pills soaked in red dye. He's the most pseudointellectual filmmaker ever. It's no surprise he's pushed by the BBC. He exists to make middle class median IQ people feel like they're smart, yet after they've consumed his films, they can never impart any actual wisdom back from what they've just seen.
Alexander Gonzalez
Adam Curtis and Yuri Bezmenov together are the sinlge best concentrated antiviral to cultural marxism.
The normies need them badly.
Adrian Barnes
Nice quads. Read None Dare Call It Conspiracy.
Benjamin Long
tl;dw
Joshua Ramirez
Everyone you see in that film is an actor, faking the narrative. It's called programming for a reason. Old-style Televisions hypnotized people with their flicker rate, like this:
I highly doubt it. There are parts of "All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace" where he basically spends a good long section naming what it is easiest to call an "international banking clique" to remain impervious to muh antisemitism.
And if you want him to talk about social engineering then watch "The Century of the Self."
The conclusions I came to from his films brought me here, are the strongest argument for nationalism and rejection of consumerism, and plainly name many of the engineers of the downfall of the west. Wat?
Gavin Morales
check 'em
Joshua Cooper
>full to the brim with redpills nah, his research is spot on but his conclusions are blue pilled as fuck, why even try to involve trump in any of this? everything hillary did was manipulativ and two faced, it's really beyond me how anyone doesn't see this
Kevin Brown
quads of truth.
curtis' data is always on the money, but he usualy shits the bed when finishing up.
>The conclusions I came to from his films brought me here, are the strongest argument for nationalism and rejection of consumerism, and plainly name many of the engineers of the downfall of the west. Wat?
What I got from Bitter Lake is that he can point out perfectly the contradictions and insanities of Western progressive liberalism, and then he just stops short before basically saying "Welp! This is what we're stuck with! LOL!"
Charles Jenkins
Adam "Hitler Was Right" Curtis has been slipping hidden red pills into his films for years.
Evan Nguyen
kek finds truth in grace and beginnings
Logan Hall
Haven't actually seen it but I do enjoy Adam Curtis documentaries and their visual style. I'll have to watch it later OP.
Jackson Campbell
Its the same with all his films. He tells the story and explains the state of things. You're right that he come up with a lot of problems and not a lot of solutions, I'd argue his conclusions aren't just bluepilled, they're non-existant.
But at the end of a film like that I don't want to be told what to think by the film maker. And neither should you.
Sebastian Lopez
his films are all the same, ffs
Ryder Murphy
I didn't draw that conclusion from the documentary at all, given his scathing description of Hilary's tenure as SoS of the Obama Administration. Curtis was too cowardly to name her, true, but the message of Hypernormalization is clear even without it. Trump's inclusion in the documentary isn't about politics so much as the new way of seeing things. That Trump signifies something more significant then the impotent, irrelevant bureaucratic functionary that Hilary did.
Mainstream media, through being willingly collaborative with politicians about 'message control', consumerism, market research, crisis actors and reprinting 'inside sources' has created an 'uncanny valley' with the common man and the world going on around them. The bluepill. But the constant cognitive dissonance involving shit like Libya/Gadaffi or the banking crisis is opening the window for alternative media to provide competing worldviews. Competing realities. Culminating in Trump, who in truth represents nothing else but a rejection of the false reality the establishment assets with a substitution of his own. That's the quality that makes him unstumpable..