I am writing an essay for my english class and I have absolute freedom. I want to redpill my professor, but how far can I go in order t prevent a suspension, whilst still managing to do so?
>I have about a thousand words criticising Islam.
>Should I speak of the jews?
>Should I speak of IQ differences?
>Should I praise national socialism?
>Should I bash leftist politics?
I have done excellent so far, classwise, and in terms of grades; my professor thinks highly of me.
>Help me, Sup Forums.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
cbsnews.com
aljazeera.com
youtube.com
noisyroom.net
thereligionofpeace.com
twitter.com
Don't go full natsoc, my dude. Otherwise you're basically fucked.
Stick to criticising Islam and throw in leftist bashing to top it off.
Truth is truth, if you can back it up with sauce there should not be a suspension at all.
Thou speaketh the truth, always
Give me some good redpills, with sauces.
More salsa = better.
Don't you think that's a bit naive?
You can probably make a really good argument in praise of facism - I did it once, got an A. I pointed out all the examples of fascist symbols and ideology in American history, right down to the Lincoln monument.
I submitted a 12 page paper on fascism last week. It is still to be assessed.
Redpill her vagina with your penis. Become the professor penetrator you were born to be.
Do we want to change the world or do we want to keep it this way?
Personally I decided to speak the truth or not speak at all. I'm still an entrepreneur doing good business.
The redpill should be applied slowly and in moderation. Fail to do this and everyone will forever see you as an autistic splurgelord.
She is rather attractive, actually.
Write it from the perspective of a concerned liberal to make her let her guard down.
Something like how to integrate immigrants from conservative background into our liberal gay, kike, trans society.
I started the essay with a short analysis of "Submission" - Michel Houellebeqh - and I went from that into European politicians cucking the continent through migration, and then I plan on critisising islam on it's own.
Criticising islam is not red pilling anyne. Name the Jew, the IQ differences and the ethnic replacement thats going on.
>Should I praise national socialism?
>Should I bash leftist politics?
Dude.....
Speak the truth when it's actually helpful. Though it can of course be a lot of fun to confront certain people with the facts and see them have a mental breakdown.
But I don't think the average school teacher is a really great target audience. Some people actually have been suspended for speaking the truth, backed up by facts
That's why I speak the truth or not speak at all.
In this case that could imply not writing the essay. I'm not going to support the lies.
>redpilling a female
You're wasting your time. Women don't understand the world or even care. They're traitors through-out every civilization.
Good luck redpilling a likely Marxist, identity politics obsessed academic shill. We'll be waiting here for you when you return with the news that you've shattered her worldview that she's cultivated for the entirety of her life.
Write and essay on r/K selection theory and its application to culture and politics.
You'll probably get yourself kicked out of school desu
Good book
Boy howdy, I know fuckall about that.
Give me a quick summary of what that is, yes?
Very much so.
I'd rather not - however, I don't think so.
> prevent a suspension
Do you have or have not absolute freedom?
Go with this - cultural approach.
Culture as the base of civilization and how multiculturalism destroys cohesion in society and drags it apart. How ideas can not get attraction because there is incompatible cultural view to drag them down.
Bash religious approach which attacks intellectual and scientific advance of society.
cbsnews.com
Destroying culture as the engine of civilization destroys this civilization. Suppressing ideas by political correctness or some agenda wanting to be not critiqued makes us vulnerable and makes scientific advance in society impossible.
Also think about pointing out the diversity of the planet and that we need to be connected to the nature - imported cultural views about how things should be done can harm our habitat badly if left unchecked.
Sandnigger (or global kike capitalist) views how (taiga) forests should be treated simply do not work.
This is good, I will see about weaving it into my paper.ยจ
You're 'aigh, Eesti.
If you really want to redpill someone, you have to start slow. Something like anti-immigration --> not all cultures are equal --> race and IQ, with months inbetween those things. You can make a compelling and completely bluepilled argument against immigration, which will nudge people towards you, whilst still not getting you ostracized
Think it through.
Free your mind and try to be your opponent while compiling it.
a good dicking is always the best redpill
You finnish people know how to present arguments.
>Part of my paper:
"The native European population is rapidly decreasing for the benefit of migrants, and a question that is quite important is whether or not this is an ethnic replacement implemented on purpose by European governments, or if it is a natural societal reaction to the migration crisis. Either way, it is a worrying development, as it is certain to undermine European culture and values. The wanton destruction and carelessness in regards to European arts and architecture is apparent to anyone who is willing to see."
Is it too much?
>>Should I speak of the jews?
No
>>Should I speak of IQ differences?
No
>>Should I praise national socialism?
No
>>Should I bash leftist politics?
Yes, but only criticise the extreme parts so it seems like you are a moderate. People are more likely to listen to moderates.
You might point out here that sustainable societies can not breed over their carrying capacity and spilling unsustainable approach at our habitat over the border solves nothing.
Also read how Syria overpopulated.
aljazeera.com
There is more on this topic, search.
It's difficult to say. It also kind of depends on your professor. What's her backgroud? Is she a completely bluepilled green party voter? Is she intellectually honest?
If somebody is both knowledgeable and intellectually honest, you can sometimes just drop the race and iq bomb on them. If they're not, and they're completely bluepilled, you usually have to nudge them towards you in small steps (otherwise their brains will go to "this is rayciss ignore everything"-mode)
I could share some of my old essays with you, if you want (concerning immigration, race and IQ and that sort of stuff)
This is shitty propaganda article btw.
From 1950 to 2011 population in Syria increased sevenfold. Point it out.
read "caged virgin" or listen to some talks by the writer and stick to points on how islam is shitty for women (and children) in any area it is allowed to thrive, it is the easiest redpill to swallow. They fly girls out of the uk over summer break to sew them shut and burn off the clit/remove the labia. Sex after marriage often requires seeing a doctor to reopen them because the opening left is so small. women cant drive, cant be in public without a male, can be beaten, family honor killings of sisters and daughters with muslims in the west happens, child brides, list goes on forever. If you speak out on a public platform your life is in real danger, no other relegion is this violent currently.
I used that book to redpill my mother who used to think it was a "fun" new thing getting popular like Buddhists or something.
She is fairly intellectually honest, even considering she identifies as a feminist.
>I do not oppose equal rights, so that is no problem.
I do not know where she is in regards to Islam, but I wrote a short paper earlier, bashing on it, and got an A.
>Unsure about how to go about it.
also stay FAR AWAY from IQ stuff, its too out there for almost all people outside pol. Focus on things like illiteracy and cultural normalization of abuse.
you are going to have a hard life
youtube.com
i believe mr. whittle explains r/k theory in this one, i might be wrong.
Well, here's something I wrote. Pick and choose how far off the deep end you want to go, some of this stuff is probably way too redpilled for bluepilled people (add sources for employment rates, demographic change and IQ stuff if you want to make it more legitimate). If you don't want to go off the deep end, then you can simply make a bluepilled argument against immigration or something
>sourcing wikipedia
that's pretty autistic of you
True, but I wasn't aiming to argue policy points, I was simply trying make a logical framework to explain why things are happening as they are. But you're right, I probably should have put in proper sources for everything
Also I'm Finnish, autism is my second nature
taquiyya is a good jumping off point for the uninitiated as it reconciles the conflicting notions of islam being evil dogshite and "but i know so many nice muslims!"
noisyroom.net
this website is great for both sauce and info on all things islam
thereligionofpeace.com
and a dude named David Wood on youtube is worth checking out and highly recommended
godspeed user