Friendly reminder that Conservashits vote against their own economic interests

...

Other urls found in this thread:

stream.org/progressives-stop-saying-voting-against-their-own-interests/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>because Hillary has no idea of the struggles we face
Its not that she has no idea
Its that she just doesn't fucking care
She couldn't even be bothered to pretend

The only candidate that honestly cared about the people was Sanders. You may not agree with his politics, but you know this is the truth.

Well I bet the guy in the top picture will be getting a manufacturing job at the very least.

Obama added only part-time jobs. The Dems are so DISCONNECTED that they think that's actually a GOOD thing. Apparently they don't know working 2 part-time jobs is much more exerting than working 1 good full time job.

Berncuck detected

Cared about "The People"?

maybe his people, but he wouldn't have done shit for the average joe?

Free school? C'mon, what a waste. Americans would be spending tax dollars for people to get liberal art degrees. Absolute waste.

>It's in my economic interest to subsidize illegals and nigs.

My questions is: why spend money employing workers to no skill manufacturing jobs when robots can do it for far cheaper? Those jobs are going to have to be minimum wage even with Trump cutting regs and giving tax breaks, otherwise it's just not worth it.

I kind of agree. But my solution would be to make trade school free as well, so...

>>My questions is: why spend money employing workers to no skill manufacturing jobs when robots can do it for far cheaper?
Because preventing the social instablity caused by massive amounts of unemployment is more important then economic efficiency.

>>Those jobs are going to have to be minimum wage even with Trump cutting regs and giving tax breaks, otherwise it's just not worth it.
Set the tarriffs high enough and it will be more then worth it for companies to both make things here and pay people a decent wage for making things here.

Who are you to tell me my own economic interests?

Reminder to hide and sage all slide threads.

He has 3 houses, why doesn't he give one to the needy? He is just as fucking greedy as wall street people are, it's just that he has literally 0 value in the private sector, because he's dumb as fuck. He has never worked a job in his entire life that wasn't paid for by the taxpayers, everything he has comes from taxpayers or low income donors that he stole $230million for and gave to hillary, fuck him.

It is worth it. Even with robots doing work today, its best to have our own people picking up the slack rather than foreign nations. At least the money made will be circulating in our own economy.

Plus, robots can't do everything. 100 years from now, that may be a different story, but as of now, we need human beings to create our shit, or at the very least, provide supervision and repairs of machinery.

Also, down the path of Hillary, our country would suffer an inevitable economic collapse. There would be no robots to make goods as we'd be something closer to a Latin 3rd world Hell Hole.

Just my 2 cents on the matter.

>because trump is rich he cant help you

whats it like having the mentality of child? your whole life tumbling from one emotional outburst to the next?

Trade school and CERTAIN STEM degrees should be free. Everything else should require payment out of pocket.

I know this is bait but all he cared about was the extreme wealthy and extreme poor. His policies would hurt the middle class so hard and chase the extreme wealthy out of the country.

>Because preventing the social instablity caused by massive amounts of unemployment is more important then economic efficiency.

This is dependent on companies caring about the worker. It's been shown time and time again that companies would rather maximize profits and stuff it in their pocket than hire new help.

>Set the tarriffs high enough and it will be more then worth it for companies to both make things here and pay people a decent wage for making things here.

Might help save a few jobs, but we still come back to the point of robots replacing lower skill jobs and the point above.

your right i should have voted for hillary instead that would have been better for me refugees welcome :)

Would economics be counted in this? just wondering

My company laid off 20 full time, full benefit workers to hire a slew of undertrained, apathetic part timers so we could be at the 49 full time threshold for Obamacare.

>Look how many jobs we created for underachieving millennials!

Fuck that.

>Bernie
>Candidate
He was never an option to begin with you dumb cunt. There was absolutely zero chance he would have gotten the nomination and even less that he would have won the general election. His sole purpose in the primaries was to rile up the youth vote for donations and support and direct their frustration at the Republicans because Hillary has the youth appeal of a wet sandwich

ignore or sage all spam.

I can't answer that properly, as I don't know. But I'll go ahead and pull an opinion out of my ass with no backing, this is Sup Forums after all.

To me, economists just make predictions and guesses about what will happen. engineers, mechanics, plumbers, etc. provide an actual service that can be manifested in the real world.

I say let the economists pay for their own shit.

But Trump employs a shit load of low wage people - of course he's aware of their problems and realistic ways to fix it without destroying the companies that employ them

Sounds like you could have really used help from that basket of deplorable white males you repeatedly threw under the bus in order to cater to minorities that will hate your guts no matter what you do for them.

Was turning everyone against you part of your plan?

>economic interests
>stealing money from other people for themselves

k

>>This is dependent on companies caring about the worker. It's been shown time and time again that companies would rather maximize profits and stuff it in their pocket than hire new help.
This would be why you have labor laws and regulations.

>>Might help save a few jobs, but we still come back to the point of robots replacing lower skill jobs and the point above.
Yeah we need to outlaw automation too, good point.

So you're advocating AGAINST technological progress because MUH JAWBS?

You people are luddites, go fuck yourselves. Here's how you deal with this: you replace everyone with robots, vote in socialists and give yourselves generous welfare. Not intentionally keep yourselves stunted, that's Ming Dynasty-level stupidity.

This
The entire democratic party line is now
>FUCKING RETARD CIS WHITE MALE SCUM WHY WON'T YOU VOTE FOR US REEEEEEEEE

I was out with some gay friends last night who are convinced Trump will get impeached.

Why...nobody can tell...but apparently thatll happen.

>it's another episode of the left thinking they know what others economic interests are.
How elitist of you.

Ironic, considering as a child he was taken to job sites and has personally been on job sites working closely with those who helped build his empire; Trump is well aware of the struggles and hardships of every day Americans.

Being a billionaire doesn't automatically disconnect you from understanding where people come from.

My grandfather wasnt especially poor growing up and later in life owned several car dealerships and a real estate business. It never went to his head and was always very generous with his money and offered work to those who needed it.

Same goes for Trump. You can find many untold stories of him just randomly and freely giving money to either people who worked for him, helping people in a financial crysis, or repaying a personal debt of gratitude.

You underestimate Trump's connection with those who have less than he does.

yea he will get impeached and obama never did anything wrong, his AGs weren't corrupt beyond belief, he didn't spy on US citizens with the NSA, or 420 other illegal things he did. only trump can do bad things, after all hes a republican!!!!!

I was talking with a grad school professor in my department just before the election
I mentioned how it's strange that they oversampled democrats so hard in the polls and he cut me off
>Well when they do that sort of thing there's always a good reason, these guys are experts
I need to go find him and smug at him

The right doesn't have your interests in mind, Bubba. They've tricked you into thinking it but they dont. Every time you let them in they just give themselves and their friends tax breaks and subsidies, take away laws that prevent them from doing unethical shit, and profit from fighting wars. Stop falling for it you stupid fags.

Glass beads, user.

>>So you're advocating AGAINST technological progress because MUH JAWBS?
Damn right I am.

>>You people are luddites, go fuck yourselves.
Fuck you too, nigger faggot leaf.

>>Here's how you deal with this: you replace everyone with robots, vote in socialists and give yourselves generous welfare.
Europe tried something like this, it didn't work. As those who have lots of money and don't want to pay taxes will always find ways to undermine welfare programs.

>>Not intentionally keep yourselves stunted, that's Ming Dynasty-level stupidity.
That would be why automation needs to be outlawed globally with any nation that pursues automation being subjected to severe penalties.

I got this one too

>I hate him out of common human decency

Oh okay literally not an argument you just dislike him as a person. fags cannot separate their feelings for the man from the actual policies

Like a women, or children. Its not like id hang out with trump He is kind of annoying to me but I think hell be a decent prez.

see The democrats are the party of ethnic minorities and fat ugly unfuckable women. They don't care about the interests of blue collar whites.

...

>being this stupid and entitled
So you're gonna deny better living conditions for humanity because fuck it I want my job right now?

You will cause America to fall if you do that. China won't be held up by such petty and stupid things as Luddites.

>audi r8

China will do what we tell them to if the alternative is the destruction of their society by economic or military means.

Besides, the chinese blue collar types are also severely harmed by increasing automation.

>Americans should let their children and grandchildren suffer in poorer living conditions so a bunch of nameless/faceless Pakistanis can live slightly better

thats very humanistic of you but unfortunately im too selfish.

>war with China
You absolutely cannot win that one without nukes fampai.

Useful idiot detected, friendly reminder you are the first to be executed by those people.

Nah. Our military is stronger then theirs and we would crush them easily, the only real advantage they have is numbers and that isn't enough against the sort of firepower the US has access to.

>Sanders Death Squads
The fact you actually think he's actually a communist is proof you people are truly stupid and deluded.

>You absolutely cannot win that one without nukes fampai.

Oh good, because we have plenty of those

What about YOU, leaf? Do you even have a military?

I always assumed leafs don't even have a military because they just think America will step in if anyone fucks with them

more numbers only means more dead chinks

Same here the only US candidate i would ever vote for would have been Bernie Sanders.

Not even i agreed to everything he said but he seemed to have genuine feeling for the american peoples well being and prosperity.

friendly reminder that there are other kinds of interests besides the economic. you might be culturally incapable of getting this, though.

That's what the Nazis said aboutt he USSR.

China is so huge and has so much manpower and productive capacity, while they can't compete on a technological level at the moment, the sheer number of forces they have on hand is not possible to overcome, the US doesn't have enough people. FFS, the PLA has 2.8 million troops in peacetime, in wartime?

There's no way you're beating that, not without India joining in.

leftist logic

>if he's richer than you, he hates you.

So I suppose we ought to elect the homeless?

perhpas this is where the autist communist left comes from

>People think politicians give a fuck about them

Yeah, Sanders knew the struggles of hard working people. How's that nice summer home of his that he bought with campaign cash treating him? What about his shiny new sports car?

Fun fact, his wife reported their assets to be at a mere $700k before the campaign.

This man never had a job until he was 40 years old. Now, he's going on a bunch of talk shows and doing promotion for his book.

It amazes me that people think he gives two fucks about any of you.

>What about Hillary?
Hillary is about as normal as it gets for a Democrat. They're as corrupt as it comes but most Democrats don't have Wikileaks and the FBI putting their corruption into the public eye so they get away with it.

>What about Trump?
I don't think Trump knows he's lying, I think he just doesn't give a shit and says things he reads online. He called America a disaster and a third world country. He sees himself as a superhero who can "make America great again". What I don't get is, why did no one ask him why America wasn't great? What makes America great?

Oh well, this election was a cluster fuck. Had the Democrats picked literally anyone else, a squirrel for example, this election would've had different results. That's what they get for kicking out Bernie Sanders even though he had no fucking plans to deliver any of his promises.

>Bernie "no such thing as poor white people" Sanders

So you actually want to nuke China just because they refuse to not automate their production?

You're so insanely immoral at that point I hope the world gangs up on you and destroys your country, you'll have lost all credibility and will have turned into the 4th Reich.

...

>>That's what the Nazis said aboutt he USSR.
The Nazis were wrong about the USSR though.

>>China is so huge and has so much manpower and productive capacity, while they can't compete on a technological level at the moment, the sheer number of forces they have on hand is not possible to overcome, the US doesn't have enough people. FFS, the PLA has 2.8 million troops in peacetime, in wartime?

None of that shit matters, just more soldiers and tanks for the US military to kill and destroy.

>>There's no way you're beating that,
Wrong.
>>not without India joining in.
lol

How is wanting to work over wanting a handout against their own economic interest?

Haven't been on /pol in like 2 months... figured CTR would be dead and gone by now

>India
Fucking lul

Indians are the most god damn incompetent people on the planet and their military is an utter joke.

>none of that shit matters
It actually does, you just refuse to admit it because it would require admitting America isn't invincible and can't defeat anyone on earth, which I know you won't admit because there's only two kinds fo Americans here: Nazis who hate America for being run by the Jews, and /k/ommandos who think America is the most unbeatable, unstoppable force conceivable and literally cannot lose.

They vote for what they think is right. Free money isn't right. Both guys in the picture understand hard work.

It's about having enough cannon fodder.

My only interest is the destruction of the democratic party.
Judging by their temper-tantrum STILL going on, I'd say I voted toward my interest.

God damnit I didn't look at the flag.

>>It actually does, you just refuse to admit it because it would require admitting America isn't invincible and can't defeat anyone on earth

In terms of conventional military capability we are invincible and anyone who says otherwise is wrong, and no numbers do not matter when you outclass your opponent in the way we outclass the chinese.

Trump might not be able to relate to the working class, but at least he actually tries to, unlike Hillary who went before coal miners and told them they'd have to find a new job if she won.

>You're so insanely immoral at that point I hope the world gangs up on you and destroys your country, you'll have lost all credibility and will have turned into the 4th Reich.

You don't have the balls

OR the manpower
OR the money
OR the military tech
OR the nukes
OR the hardware

A global war against us would only mean a world that is completely destroyed and unlivable

and frankly YOU, of all people, my meek little leaf, are the least likely to have the balls.

Sorry, we're kings and we're the best at everything.

The only reason you don't bow to us is because we find it in our infinite mercy not to make you.

And you will deny it.

You will.

So will everyone else on this board not from the USA.

But you know it to be true.

>The only reason you don't bow to us is because we find it in our infinite mercy not to make you.


this

for some reason this is lost on everyone. We could make the entire world pay us homage in virgins and gold. But we dont.

So what does that say.

>Left tries to smear Trump for being rich and therefore out-of-touch
>Left tries to simultaneously defend limousine liberals and champagne socialists
wew lad

Liberals think white working class people want handouts like the niggers. They don't want that. They want jobs. Trump promised jobs. Hillary promised more handouts and tranny rights.

>vote against their own economic interests
And how do you know what their interests are if you don't ask them? The voters TOLD you what their interests are, and you you did not listen. Trump voters don't mind if some people have more. They are not jealous marxists who want to take away what others have so that they can choose how it gets redistributed. They would rather go out and work and build and earn for themselves, and if others earn more, they are not jealous of that, and they don't mind if that person keeps it, unlike communists who want to seize their private property and spread it to those they deem less fortunate, whether those people want it and ask for it or not. But you are not going to to that. You are not going to redistribute anything. You are going to take it, and keep it in your hands, while the poor people suffer and die in the street, like the farmers did in Soviet Russia. And that is what the people voted against, and you just kept lying and lying about it, and stil are. They didn't vote against their interests, they voted against yours.

Nice try nigger but we don't want mexicans or muslims

Both are uber-rich shitheads who will pillage this country like Yeltsin did with Russia

You mean black and Hispanic people.
I disagreed with his policies, but respected him, up until he said white people don't know what it's like to be poor and live in ghettos. Fuck this kike, all he did was progressively shit on white people and men. That's why him and Hillary lost, surprisingly when all you do is shit on the majority, they don't vote for you.

He would have taxed the average joe even harder just to pay for college campus and women studies

you must be at least 12 to post here.

If you actually think you can take on the entire world I fucking dare you to do it. I dare you, and if this were real life I would bet you every cent I have that you would lose, because I'd be right.

your righteous indignation doesn't make it any less true

your nation remains some sovereignty only because we allow it, the world should shudder for when the american people realize their power.

one day we wont be so kind.

>Liberals think white working class people want handouts
If only they would ask what people actually wanted instead of trying to force feed them an opinion that they are not interested in.

>stream.org/progressives-stop-saying-voting-against-their-own-interests/

Even if that were true, I don't need food when I can just drink your sjw tears, pathetic cuck.

Who's going to stop us, leaf? You?

Does canada even have a military? I always assumed you relied on us to protect you.

No, leaf, you would lose.

You would lose because you have stupidly relied on us for protection for years and years now

>one day we wont be so kind.

I yearn for such a day

>remains some sovereignty

>I don't think Trump knows he's lying
I disagree. I think he knows exactly what he's doing. He's playing a character that's larger than life. He says shit that is blatantly untrue, but does it with a knowing smirk that implies he's letting you in on it. His supporters feel like they're in on the joke and people who hate him are driven to apoplexy because they think his supporters are stupid and don't realize he's lying. Meanwhile, Trump spams a metric fuckton of bullshit at the media to the point that they're completely overloaded and while they're trying to parse why his latest batshit pronouncement is untrue, he's made half a dozen more. And when they occasionally pin him down, he just shrugs, says, "yeah, okay," and blows it off. The press has no idea how to deal with him, his opposition is becoming increasingly desperate to do something, ANYTHING, to slow him down, distract him or at least partly wound him. And nothing has worked. Of course, he was up again the worst candidate the Democrats have fielded since they put Michael Dukakis up against Bush Sr.

>giving more and more money to inner city nignogs is in my economic interests

huh

The US has three times the tonnage on air and sea than Russia and China put together.

The only chance they'd have against the US is to go nuclear.

>hes right
>I know ill point out a typo

thatll really piss off the kids.

why did you pick that reaction image? I seem to have annoyed you anyhow!

That's irrelevant. You can't defeat the PLA without nukes, it's too large.

Do we? Or do you?

You're right, that's why I voted for Trump

You do realize America is only just over 4% of the world population right?

Without resorting to nuclear attack, you cannot stop the other 96% of the human race from destroying you.

Why are we even listening to this leaf?

leafs have absolutely no knowledge of warfare

From this point on all posts from countries who haven't won a major war will henceforth be ignored.

If robots can do the job cheaper, why are factories moving to China and Mexico and not to Germany and Japan?

That just means more dead bodies, my syrup and semen slurping leaf

I see you no longer have an argument and are resorting to ad hominims.

I'll take that as confirmation I've won.

If I can't have somebody who will give me stuff, at least I can have someone who doesn't openly hate me. And maybe I don't want to be given stuff, anyway.

Friendly reminder that Conservashits vote against my political ideas so that makes them stupid
-message send from my iPhone my mommy got me to match the Prius daddy got me for getting into university to study arts