Sweden reported a surplus of 85.3 billion SEK (~€8.5 billion)

>Sweden reported a surplus of 85.3 billion SEK (~€8.5 billion).
>Germany posts a 6.2 billion budget surplus in 2016.

Why is it that countries accepting refugees are doing so amazingly well economically ?

Other urls found in this thread:

ibtimes.com/germany-records-largest-budget-surplus-reunification-2319059
ww.rrojasdatabank.info/HDRP_2010_40.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=9Deg7VrpHbM
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Positive surplus isn't always a good thing it could mean poor government spending or heavy taxation.

Maybe they should invest that surplus in deportation forces.

They're closely related to Jews. Behind every Swede/German there is a Jew

Migrants are a net benefit to an economy

The right-wing meme that they all sit on welfare needs to die

The german surplus is way less than it was in the past years.

>meme

Migrants work and pay taxes. Illiterate syrian refugees dont.

Show me I indisputable evidence that Swedecucks didn't hack the election. Go ahead, I'll wait.

Neither Sweden nor Germany's economy is nearly as strong as they used to be; that's what happens under socialism, you can only afford it for so long while simultaneously taking in refugees who predominately don't contribute nearly as much as the average native swede

I think its lies. These people lie.

They are printing money to fund building housing for invaders.

Source?

Fruits of previous generations.

The West better prays to God so China or Islamic world does not truly text its strength, the world might become aware the king is naked.

It actually is the strongest it has ever been. But the reason why is because they keep raising the taxes

It actually is stronger than ever, but for reason totally unrelated to migrants - ie. it's innovative and has a very strong brand

>"Ayy bro profits and stuff!"

>Debt increasing by billions every years

fake news

This is true but it's a short term irrational solution and also a wildcard since there is little background check on the capabilities of each migrants and the needs of a country. IMO a better solution is to promote local birth rates and education and proper checks on migrants professional backgrounds.

Last year the German surplus was 19.4 billion.
The Swedish economy is a bubble, we have a lot of debt and unlike the U.S we can't simply ignore it.

Source for 2015 German surplus: ibtimes.com/germany-records-largest-budget-surplus-reunification-2319059

A surplus may mean the population is overtaxed. Or not enough spending (healthcare, infrastructure, education) is going on.

...

Surplus of money maybe.

Only thing that counts is our surplus of heart though.

Who cares that the roads literally disintegrate when i drive over them because they are not maintained anymore.

Who cares that i see more and more pensioneers fishing around in trash cans for bottles to deposit because they don't receive enough pension to live after 40 years of working.

Who cares that every single fucking thing i have to pay for gets more expensive every fucking month because my money is worth less and less.

The refugees are safe and sound. That's all that counts.

Cause slaves. This are not refugees this are cheap workers

>Believing left-wing propaganda

Because you let shitskins starve and force them to pick up the shit jobs


That's the reason for mass immigration to first world countries. Nobody wants to do the shit jobs so let shitskins do it for 300 euros each month.

literally fake news

the UN have NEVER said that

>these people will work
After 15 years more than half of non western immigrants are still unemployed

What makes you think they are telling the truth?

Liberal propaganda, it's NOT beneficial. Grade school math.

Budget surplus is literally the opposite of debt

Most money invested in american co-owned companies.
We profit when americans have low wages.
>dont tell anyone

>Germany posts a 6.2 billion budget surplus in 2016.

So our surplus is even smaller than that of Sweden while we have a way larger economy. Without migrants, we would have even more.

>Migrants are a net benefit to an economy
That depends on what migrants you import. Looking over the decades, the muslims/turks we started to import in the 60s, then their kids etc... are a net loss for our country. They contributed like for the first 10-15 years and then they were a drain on society. Today muslim unemployment rate is 50%, before the migrant crisis.

In general, muslims are fucking useless to import... or rather "don't import people with darker skin". You can cherry pick here and there to get a good indian, turk or so but less and 0.1% of them would be a useful immigrant. And the only reason that the "needed" immigrants are a surpluss at all is because the native birth rates are low. If we could have enough people to take care of the demand of a growing economy in the countries then no immigration would be needed at all.

ww.rrojasdatabank.info/HDRP_2010_40.pdf

It's on page 42

That's usually applies for first generation immigrants. Down the road, things change.

You don't want a big surplus, you economy retard.

A surplus is a sign of a good economy, but you take notice and either cut taxes or increase spendings the next year

This is why germany surplus was twice as big in 2015 than in 2016

The German surplus has dropped from 18bn last year (roughly) to 6.2bn this year. Seems to me like Germany is bleeding money at a rate which will see them in massive oopsies by the end of this year.

...

You are insane

>0.906 HDI
>Third world country

thanks for debuking that fake news, keep up the good work

LOL

>You don't want a big surplus, you economy retard.
>implying 6.2 billion is a big surplus for an economy that strong
>Having lots of money available is bad.

Yeah, I bet having lots of reserves available for some "holy shit hard times" is never a good idea.

kys

It is the other way around. Only countries which do well economically vowed to accept refugees.

> 2030

Look at the Sweden education tanking in international PISA evaluation

This, funny thing is that the leftards are using this to disprove whatever people (specially alt right rhetoric) say about Sweden or Germany. They don't understand that it's literally an non-argument and it could be actually argued that a big surplus is bad and actually a deficit could be considered positive.

No, behave Frog. Of course countries should try to even out their surplus, but with Germany's current problems one can only imagine that a lot of that surplus was spent on dealing (unsuccessfully) on said problems. There's a massive migrant wave set to happen soon, so if Germany has used up half their surplus in one year and are still in a shit place then you can imagine that the next half of their surplus will be gone pretty quick when dealing with a new migrant wave.

Every country even the most retarded ones invest a certain part of their income in hard savings. You aren't saying anything, Germany reserve take is already discounted for in these statistics. Actually taking your surplus and putting most of all of it in a reserve is also not a good idea.

This

>jews in charge of global finance
>good goy countries do better financially

If your argument is that they're doing well BECAUSE of the refugees, then you're ass backwards retarded as the Ubermensch in Germany and Sweden are thriving DESPITE the low iq, inbred, third world hoards taking all their welfare and paying no taxes

Well, good thing that every Euro of our surplus is reserved by law to help the refugees.
>Germany to use bigger-than-expected budget surplus on refugees

Still, how on the planet can having a big surplus be considered bad? You have more money available than you need. Of course investing it earlier could have given additional profit/growth, yet of you come out on top with lots of surplus in what kind dimension could it be considered a bad thing?

>Well, good thing that every Euro of our surplus is reserved by law to help the refugees.
Are you being serious? Surely not, r-right?

The US spends over $50 billion on foreign aid.
Mostly to Africa and the middle east.

We've helped to make some dictators very rich on that alone.

Just google "germany surplus refugees".

It isn't necessarily a bad but it can be a sign of either heavy taxation or poor government spending (which can mean immobility). Germany seems to be doing decently so far economically compared to most countries so I wouldn't worry about the surplus but for other countries in can be the symptoms of a sicknesses in short terms. In general talking only about surplus doesn't tell much though.

So basically, Germany's surplus dropped to one-third of the year prior when they started taking in refugees en masse?

This sounds like the refugees are about a twelve-billion loss to the economy.

What it was in previous years?
And what is debt?

I'd expect such post from leaf, frenchie.

The first post is the best post.

Fucking economic illiterates.

>pic related

>>>>>>>>>>>>>refugees

Why is it that multicultural countries like Germany, US, Sweden, even Canada are doing so well economically yet mostly white countries like Poland, Hungary, rest of eastern Europe aren't doing as good?

Really makes you think, hm.

Because (((they))) control our money.

Foreign aid

because the sandniggers dont go to poor countries?
why would economic migrants from africa want to go to poland lmfao

Imagine what it could have been if we didn't have all of the parasitic sand niggers...

Also, Sweden have marginal taxes of 60%...

Fucking phone posting.

*A bad thing
*Sickness

Not true at all. Your budget could plan to borrow money and you didn't spend it all. You now have a budget surplus and debt that you owe. If you don't earn more than the interest doing so will cost you money.

Multiculturalism in Germany wasn't born during the Syrian war, you know. Germany has been faithful to it's moral obligations and it was rewarded accordingly, with prosperity.

My province here in Canada used to be a conservative shithole that bowed down to corporate interests and traditional catholic values in 50's. Then we adopted a multicultural style plus a liberal economic policy and now we're doing great. But the best example is the US, a country founded on equality and multiculturalism received the most prosperity. Meanwhile conservative countries like in eastern Europe are still shitholes.

Not really. The surplus last year was 12.6 billion and now it's 6.2 billion.
But the main cause of the surplus is the taxation of citizens and businesses. It doesn't really depend on the number of refugees.

Haushalt doesn't only mean the amount of money you have but the balance of earnings and spending.

>raise taxes into oblivion
>look at how great our economy is lets let in MORE refugees!

Surplus does not mean a strong economy. Those countries have very high tax rates and are obviously not spending money for the good of the people.

Combine that with hundreds of thousands of migrants who take out of the system but don't put anything in and you are looking at an economic disaster in the future.

Ahem..

>German surplus 2015 is around 13 Billion
>year later it's six million
>See! You stupid Nazis they still have lots of money!

Give it a year.

>early America
>multicultural

Leaf, this shitpost has crossed a line.

It is the attitude towards life, rules and work.

AND refugees are drawn to strong economies.

>have negative birth rates
>lets tax people more while importing more burden
Are you really this fucking stupid?

Rapefugees don't get jobs, Mohammed. Even though every employer would love to signal that they have a pet nonwhite with them.

Every refugee costs the taxpayer about 12k€/months until he is out of the "processing phase"
>Germany still has a backlog of about 2 years worth of refugee processing just from 2015
Behind it is a entire industry making money off it and creating a short term job surge that will give your economy a boost until it crashes down
Think about all the:
>shelters that will be rented or build for some time
>actual housing build to move them out of the shelters
>new prison spots as almost 70% of them will end up there sooner or later and training of the needed prison wardens
>bureaucrats to crunch all the paperwork
>translators, teacher, lawyers and medical staff that speaks sand monkey or what ever other shit they speak
>security for the shelters
>large canteenes/caterer get contracts to provide the needed food so they have to hire additional kitchen staff
>Germany can actually deploy the Bunderwehr for something beside playing soldier in their quarters
>surge in demand of police forces due to the lost security across the country
>therapists and counselors for all the citizens that got culturally enriched

So now you throw out a shitload of money but it's a socialist country so for every € you throw at that shit you will get over 70cents back of it in form of taxes
To cover the missing 30 cents you defund desperate needed infrastructure upgrades like:
>schools
>salaries of public workers
>pensions
>roads
>elderly care
>affordable housing
>public transport

getting paid off to take them, just a guess

You are confusing cause and effect. Liberalism is a rich man's disease.

>The US spends over $50 billion on foreign aid.
>Mostly to Africa and the middle east.
youtube.com/watch?v=9Deg7VrpHbM

Yes goyim, more refugees is GOOD for you. it will make you richer and more diverse.
You need to take a million more refugees. trust me, nothing can go wrong.

>MONEY IS EVERYTHING GOYIM
>SAFETY? SOCIAL COHESION? CLEANLINESS?
GENERAL WELLBEING?.. FOR THE DOGS GOYIM!!!

countries that are good need destruction the most

Those livers aren't cheap

>The German government expects to spend 93.6 billion euros (105 billion dollars) on refugees by 2020,

french surrendering cuck
lmao faggot

good job shekleberg goldstein

They receive "refugees" because they are doing well
They probably also had bigger surplus in the previous years