Someone explain this to me

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/tTmbSur4fcs?t=1873
youtube.com/watch?v=qzMQza8xZCc
youtube.com/watch?v=CFrP6QfbC2g
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_turn
youtube.com/watch?v=ObJL6aA2czo
ustream.tv/channel/live-iss-stream
youtu.be/SF7FUU7CThs
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Wow almost like different cameras spanning different decades in diffetent situations render different color schemes.

Are you really this ignorant about photography?

>he thinks cameras are taking these "pictures"

stay woke fa.m

Yes so explain

Really canoodled my noodle

You people legitimately deserve to be gassed.

You will never be anything buy a drain on humanity.

youtu.be/tTmbSur4fcs?t=1873

doesn't look flat to me

Just about every photo from space is retouched in some way.
It's easier to justify spending dickloads of money on something thought of as "cool" and "exciting" than "boring" and "mundane".

youtube.com/watch?v=qzMQza8xZCc

you're playing stupid, right?

threads like this makes me think pol is filled with morons.

That's the intent, same reason you see threads about hollow earth and Antarctica.
It's a tactic used to discredit organizations as a whole since the CIA became a thing. They are responsible for seeding a large amount of fake conspiracy theories.

Here are a few more for your pleasure xD

posts like yours make me think Sup Forums has turned in a cesspool of shills.

It's a conspiracy. There are 8 earths. OP was sent here to ensure this one had the most faggots.

>Republicans will still argue Obama is a bad president

...

they're artists impressions and photo compositions, they don't send a camera 10 thousand miles into space and take a photo of earth

>He thinks rockets should go in 90 degree angle
>he uses the internet that uses satellites in space sent by these rockets

isn't this due to the curvature of the earth?

xD

They want the rockets to reach the orbit and stay orbiting, not to sling those into deep space for one way trip.

ˢᵘᵇᵗᶫᵉ ᶰᶦᶜᵉ

That's called a gravity turn, it's the most efficient method to go into orbit.

I would assume it's something around the fact the earth spins.

Somewhat related to the coriolis effect.

I'm led to believe snipers have to factor in the spin of the planet to shots that are made on significant distances of a mile or more or something like that.

the earth is hollow

How much KSP have you played?

Well, we have cameras in space, sometravelling great distances into the solar system. Why are we not using them to photograph earth?

Someone pls explain this

youtube.com/watch?v=CFrP6QfbC2g

no it's a procedurally generated mmorpg

1247 hours since 0.25 came out.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_turn

This picture always confuses me in terms of who think it shows the Earth to be different?

Every picture has the Earth being round, covered in water, having an atmosphere, and having land.

What's the issue?

Has anyone noticed the evidence of a 'Symmes hole' in the first picture?

>introducing the concept of openings to the inner world at the poles.

Supposedly there's one in Antarctica as well.

>taking photos of a globe in different angles
>omg the distortion must be manmade

>earth
>globe
Pick one

depening on what you believe, yes

...

Nice. I've learned a ton about orbital mechanics from playing that game. Something about your post made me suspect you've put more than a few Kerbals into orbit.

This is a mi6 porn star thread nice try

and

also

>internet
>satelites
bruh

...

Reminder, the earth is flat but not in the way we've expected it to be. It's kinda like an elongated donut/ring/sphere shape with one hole at the north pole, and another hole at the south end.

The bottom 5 are CGI depictions of earth from various documentaries from History channel, National Geographic, and Science channel. The earth looks different depending on what angle the sun is and what angle above the horizon it was taken at. In addition to this, the images you presented are from a wide range of cameras, some analog, others digital, all with either different types of film, and at different resolutions.

NASA admits that these are CGI created. Show me one real photo of the Earth

we can't say, because we haven't seen it. However, most evidence points at the earth being hollow

Jews are the chosen people because they have privileged contact with species from beyond the Antarctic Wall. That's why they have created (((NASA))) and the like to keep us from truly knowing how our world is. We must be the cream of the goyim and solve the Jewish problem.

>people thinking there are forests on earth in 2017
Why don't you take the greenpill?
youtube.com/watch?v=ObJL6aA2czo

I like to think the biggest secrets being kept hidden are the ones we should be trying to investigate- rather the most we can do is to FIND THE TRUTH and then SHARE THE TRUTH WITH AS MANY PEOPLE AS YOU CAN.

YOU CANT REPRESENT A 3D IMAGE ON A 2D PLANE. THERE ARE DIFFERENT MAP MAKING MODELS WHICH ARE USED WHICH DISTORT CERTAIN PARTS OF THE MAP IN ORDER TO MAKE A MAP THE EYE CAN RELATE TO

I believe so as well. Every theory should be investigated with an open mind

>NASA admits that these are CGI created
How about you watch the fucking video, it's not even 3 minutes long captain ADHD

ustream.tv/channel/live-iss-stream

very nice

Because the Earth spins, the satellite that takes these pictures flies around the Earth and the Earth flies around the sun which leads to different weather patterns.

Now stop being a dumb fuck.

There are NO REAL Photos of Earth.

...

learn 2 photography

for those who don't know how to copy paste.
youtu.be/SF7FUU7CThs

Why are rendezvous so sexy?

you are not relevant

>angle
>camera
>distance

Earth got a practically fixed inclination. During the year that makes it show one hemisphere more than the other to the sun. This is why we have seasons.

On the left the one it is the south hemisphere that's receiving more light. On the right one, the north hemisphere. Notice that the poles never get exposure, that's why they're icy.

North america didn't get bigger or smaller. It's all a matter of perspective.

The camera that's taken this shot is presumably in line with the sun in order for the photo-voltaic cells to work and power the station/satellite to which this camera is mounted.

I presume you knew most of these but I didn't want to give you half of a response.

>you are

puts more emphasis on how unimportant you are

Are you seriously that dense? Do you think computers grow in fields? You truly are spoiled by this society, such that you take for granted what the space race has given us (computers and the internet). I mean without the space race and NASA you would be ideologically isolated to whatever region you live in while the powers that be would have total control over your life. Hillary would be president.

Put simply we need to not back on space exploration but increase it. The entire universe is out there and the US can lead the world towards the future or further devolve into a giant Appalachian sister fucking, bible thumping, retard fest. The US didn't import Nazi scientists so we could stand back and watch the chinks, slavs, and poos master space. So if you want you grand children sitting in some fucking log cabin in Boise, while every other nation is enjoying perfect health and the inifite universe then keep posting like an ignorant fuck who wants to see the USA fall further. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.

No it just makes you even bigger loser.

nice englando leaf try harder next time

2012 image is definitely fucky.

go back to basic. try reading newton's philosophy of nature.

The earth is breddy old. He's getting a bald spot.

>science is hard

Sigh.

>Anons can't into physical geography
Google Earth images are corrected for earths curvature so low info surfers don't OMG ITS SO BIG.

Google Earth doesn't need to correct anything since it renders the Earth as a sphere. Maps only need to correct things because you can't perfectly map the surface of a sphere to a flat 2D plane.

1) That makes no sense. How does the curvature of the earth affect whether or not Alaska and Greenland are visible from a given point in space? Either there's a line of sight or there isn't.

2) Why does the 2007 image match perfectly then?

Are these retards freaking serious?

Then why do they show the Mercator projection? It's not geographically accurate.

Unfortunately, yes. We have these threads everyday.

The two first are real shots. The next 3 seem to be CGI. The 2013 might be a composite, I'm not sure. The next one is a low altitude wide angle shot, which is why Mexico is so big, and the last one is CGI.

Imagine being this stupid.

You know, the earth rotates with ~1700 km/h=473 m/s=1060 miles/h

>leaf

>107138707
you deserve cancer

SUUURE

These people just elected Donald Trump.

What do you think?

What's up?

You are cancer.

The 2007 one is from a distance, probably like a geostationary satellite, although the colours look fucky, probably enhanced or even pure CGI. 2012 is a real shot but very wide angle at low altitude, like sticking your nose close to a fisheye lens.

Why don't you go launch a weather balloon and see for yourself if the earth is round?

Don't do this unless you want your dog shot by FAA agents.

Orbiting satellites don't orbit because they are weightless in null-gravity like a lot of leymen believe.

Satellites feel nearly the same amount of gravity that we do on the surface, but they are moving so fast that they move forward as they fall, letting them rotate and orbit the earth. This is what you are seeing.

You're my hero

This and the distance from the subject.