>So let me get this straight, in the communist classless society, there are still POWER classes that exist due to dynamics of relations but not economic classes?
first of all, you must understand socialism and communism are 2 separate things.
there are no power classes no, since leaders are just there to represent the opinions of smaller councils and not their own opinions
>You'd have to basically create a perfect hivemind. Everyone moving at the same time same direction-- no free will to fuck it up.
no not really, power structures will just be organized from the bottom up, from smaller councils to higher councils with rotatory representatives and not career politicians. again, we are talking about COMMUNISM and not socialism
>Due to natural differences some persons will have greater aptitudes such as intelligence leading to a greater ability to create for society. This in turn would confer to him more worth and persuasive power given that his death would come at the cost of multiple others
not everyone has to become a scientist mate, and someone being more intelligent will not mean they will somehow automatically try to exploit people around them. remember that for communism to be achieved, we must first reach post-scarcity under socialism. in a post-scarcity society and without capitalistic exploitation culture, people won't feel the need to exploit others
>
You also cannot have a smart population. If the population is smart, they will associate with eachother and due to their improved productivity, come to occupy more important and complex roles in society. This would make schooling something which divides people by a "cognitive class"
and like i said, not everyone will be a scientist. but in its core, those productive people do what they do 99% of the times out of passion for their work and not for it's economical benefits (which they won't need anyway since like a said this is a post-scarcity world). and by class, marx means economic class