Why is this allowed?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=exnaY0l4XsM
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Buffett
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Because we allow it to.

because they worked to get in that position, unlike the plebs who want a stress-free, clock in and clock out job that doesn't deserve the same level of pay

>I can't have what I earned
Hang yourself, commie

most of the super rich didnt work to get there, their fathers and grandfathers did
but its fair game unless they are jews of course

What about old wealth?

Most of that half are niggers and pooinloos, so dont worry about it.

>It is obscene for so much wealth to be held in the hands of so Jew.

What did they mean by this?

They jewish themselves and reach that heaven.

Exactly. All it takes to stop something like this is a similarly small number of men willing to risk their lives and freedom. A truck bomb is a hell of a force multiplier.

At the beginning of the 20th century it was 4, so that's an improvement.

im not one of the 8 so this is unfair.

(((8 men)))

Rothshild, Rockefeller and who else?

"It is obscene for so much wealth to be held in the hands of so jew*"

What about it?

>people who don't understand how economy works throw a tantrum over nothing

They were born into it, not that they worked for it.

Which half of the world though? Did they take the most degenerate, drug-addicted, nigger nations into account? Because those people can really skew the numbers.

because under socialism the wealth inequality would be even worse

Your missing the point. It doesnt matter if it was their parents or grandparents money.

Lets put it this way, If I work and earn alot of money throughout my life, its my money and I can do with it what I want, right?

If I want to leave my kids and grandkids an ungodly amount of money I earned, thats my right.

>calling out Bill Gates
>the man gives most of his money to charity

fucking ungrateful cunts

Sometimes I realize its better for those 8 men to be rich.

I've seen how badly poorfags spend money, its better for the environment if they stay poor at the moment.

...

So? Don't you want a better life for your kids? Oh right, you're a liberal, you don't believe in having kids.

>If I work and earn alot of money throughout my life, its my money and I can do with it what I want, right?
Anything is yours as long as you can defend it.

Inheritance, m8.

>article fails to mention all 8 are jews
rly makes you think

Because we don't need 7 billion+ people on the planet?

youtube.com/watch?v=exnaY0l4XsM

You wouldn't take the st- I mean earned wealth of God's chosen away from them, would you now, you anti semite?!

yeah thats why north korea exist
but thats also why the majority of the world understands socialism is pure slavery

>Lets put it this way, If I work and earn alot of money throughout my life, its my money and I can do with it what I want, right?

Not really, you can't take it with you.

you can give it to your kids which is more satisfying then even owning it yourself

The only thing this shows is how little money there is to go around. If alk their money was spread around the world most would hardly sense it.

Because money doesn't mean shit.

get a job

because poor people are poor because they're stupid.

distribute the world wealth equally between everyone and i can pretty much guarantee that the people who were rich will end up being rich, and the people who were poor will end up being poor. (except the rich brats who never worked hard to get the money)

Some people are meant to be leaders, and most people are meant to be followers.

nature is not equal, if it was then all animals would be apex predators.

Why is it not allowed?

Nah, it's that just gross majority of people would be worse off than they're now.
>grandpa managed state farms
>ignored every single order from the administration because they didn't know shit about farming
>was swapped between different farms because somehow once he came to one that was managed in strict adherence to planners from Warsaw, the farm started generating profits instead of losing money
>every time inspection came he went drinking with the guys that were supposed to control him, told them to sign all the papers when drunk and sent them their way
>lost his job after raising the issue of the planners in agriculture ministry being dogshit on party convention

At least communism has fallen like 10 years later.

Seriously central planning - not even once.

You could spread it only among white people instead

>most of the super rich didnt work to get there, their fathers and grandfathers did
Really? Lets fact check this

The Wealthiest 10 people in the world are, in order:
>1. Bill Gates
>His father was a prominent lawyer, and his mother served on the board of directors for First Interstate BancSystem and the United Way.
Wealthy parents, but Gates current wealth was self made with Microsoft and outstrips his parents by an order of magnitude. Privileged, sure, but he wasn't handed his wealth by his parents.

>2. Amancio Ortega
>He left school and moved to La Coruña at the age of 14, due to the job of his father, a railway worker. Shortly after, he found a job as a shop hand for a local shirtmaker called Gala, which still sits on the same corner in downtown A Coruña, and learned to make clothes by hand
Nope

>3. Warren Buffet
>He left school and moved to La Coruña at the age of 14, due to the job of his father, a railway worker. Shortly after, he found a job as a shop hand for a local shirtmaker called Gala, which still sits on the same corner in downtown A Coruña, and learned to make clothes by hand
Nope

>4. Carlos Slim
Yes

>5. Jeff Bezos
No

>6. Mark Zuckerberg
No

>7. Larry Ellison
No

>8. Michael Bloomberg
>Bloomberg's father, William Henry Bloomberg (1906–1963), was a bookkeeper for a dairy company and the son of Alexander "Elick" Bloomberg, an immigrant from Russia.
No

>9 & 10 Koch Brothers
Yes

Because obviously if they have it they know how to use it.

The dead have no rights

>distribute the world wealth equally between everyone and i can pretty much guarantee that the people who were rich will end up being rich, and the people who were poor will end up being poor. (except the rich brats who never worked hard to get the money)

Well, then there is no problem redistributing it periodically isn't it?

yeah thats why there estate is manages when there alive

>Some people are meant to be leaders, and most people are meant to be followers.
and some Indians are meant to poo in loo, and most Indians are meant to be street shitters.

You see /pol, this is the real problem. All the rest is meaningless distraction.
If we're able to fix this, and I'm not implying complete redistribution of wealth, it can improve everyone's life and generations to come.
I know it's a bitter pill to swallow /pol (realizing that this kind of inequality is our biggest problem), but I'm certain of it's a red one.

Morgans, Lehmans, Kuhn Loebs, Warburgs, Lazards and Sieffs.

>redistributing it
thats a fancy way to say steal it

>ok so let's stop or slow down globalism
>"WAIT NO..."

welfare basically

What are you gonna do about it? They can just employ a small mercenary army of 25% the world population and kill you

>because they worked to get in that position,

stealing isn't really working

Yes, goyim, the disparity between the wealthy and the poor isn't a problem at all! Keep blaming all the problems on race and women!

Ah, but taxation is theft.

Problem the profit motive is socially inept.

People with money only know how to make more of it, not do something as prestige as absolve social justice. No, just increasing the value of a variable and expecting people to become said variable.

Not very viable if you ask me.

Oops, didn't copy and paste Buffets proerly, should read

>He was the second of three children and the only son of Leila (née Stahl) and Congressman Howard Buffett,

Son of a public servant. Wasn't handed his wealth.

The point is the majority of wealthy people are self made. Actually very few people inherit billions of dollars. It's just another left wing talking point from people who don't really understand the world. College students think "He's rich, I'm not, he must have got it off his parents!". There are some dynasties of course, like the Saudis, but they're comparatively rare compared to people who earned their wealth on their own merit

im glad you agree
better dead than red

Fake news

>Well, then there is no problem redistributing it periodically isn't it?

the only moral way to do this is through the taxation of land based on it's value, with more useful land being taxed more, the land that has the largest amounts of value exchange occurring are obviously the ones to get taxed the most.

taxation with no representation (sound familiar ?)
is theft

Join socialism now, and get a free casus belli on George Soros and others like him.

And that gives you a claim over that money?

then wouldnt they be worth the same since a large part of their value is taken by the larger tax
so you dont even appreciate the larger value?

Kek, how did you figure out which site it was from?

it is not allowed it is the law of nature.
The gulf between rich and poor has always been part of the human condition, but Pareto resolved to measure it. He gathered reams of data on wealth and income through different centuries, through different countries: the tax records of Basel, Switzerland, from 1454 and from Augsburg, Germany, in 1471, 1498 and 1512; contemporary rental income from Paris; personal income from Britain, Prussia, Saxony, Ireland, Italy, Peru. What he found – or thought he found – was striking. When he plotted the data on graph paper, with income on one axis, and number of people with that income on the other, he saw the same picture nearly everywhere in every era. Society was not a "social pyramid" with the proportion of rich to poor sloping gently from one class to the next. Instead it was more of a "social arrow" – very fat on the bottom where the mass of men live, and very thin at the top where sit the wealthy elite. Nor was this effect by chance; the data did not remotely fit a bell curve, as one would expect if wealth were distributed randomly. "It is a social law", he wrote: something "in the nature of man".

all those people have money but no power though

Bloomberg and Koch bros have a little

I'm not saying I don't agree with you but understand that historical context changes and new problems arise, therefore we need to come up with new solutions because it's obvious the old ones aren't working.

You don't have any representation today.

People who work have a better claim to money than people who don't, yes.

>I'm not implying complete redistribution of wealth

Exactly, I'm sick of this stupid kneejerk reaction. A kind of 'cap' on wealth does NOT automatically equal a Soviet planned economy. The mechanisms need to be in place to ensure that things spread around and 'trickle down' as they used to put it before they got ashamed of lying. The simple fact is that having people so wealthy on the planet is an immense SECURITY risk to independent states. The US obviously allows it because it's a de facto oligarchy owned and run by people like this (and there are people hiding from this list who really ought to be in it), but other countries should do what they can to resist, until such time as the politics in the US itself changes.

>Well, then there is no problem redistributing it periodically isn't it?

After some time you should understand that most people do not learn how to handle money and will waste it. Where will all that money go? To the people who work hard to do something innovative.

If there is no incentive for doing something do you think these people will ever work?

Also what and >and some Indians are meant to poo in loo, and most Indians are meant to be street shitters.

Absolutely, just like some Swedish are going to fight, but most will prepare the bull.

>Why is this allowed?

lol why don't we talk about how this affects women and minorities?

I doubt real holders of power in the world are in this list. In fact, these people with lots of green paper most likely nobody compared to them.

lol, "worked"

You'r'e free to come for my money. But know that I will rape your eye-socket before we're through

well you would fit your tax brackets however it made the most sense to your situation but the Chinese have been wiping the floor with us using this Georgist economics model , we need to dump the Keynes bullshit

>why is this allowed
I honestly don't know why we allow people to complain about the success of others.

Boy, I wonder how the inheritance got there.

fed income tax is definelty a scam
but i dont have the resources to do anything about
but the answer is definitely not socialism or basic income

Profiting off the misery of the less fortunate.

Prove it, faggot.

Because those 8 men are more valuable than half the world's population. Hell, you yourself are probably more valuable than half the world's population.

An enormous portion of the human population has absolutely no purpose whatsoever other than just staying alive and producing more useless people. You could get rid of 99% of the African, South Asian, and South American population without impacting global productivity and civilization in any measurable way. These people are worth less than nothing. They are net loss in terms of resources.

And they fucking deserve every penny. They are the successful ones smart enough to make products that every one uses.

didnt read dont have to
better dead than red

Prove it, parasite.

His father was doing pretty well for the time.

After failing to secure a job in the family grocery business, he started a small stock brokerage."

'Unshakably ethical, Howard refused offers of junkets and even turned down a part of his pay. During his first term, when congressional salary was raised from $10,000 to $12,500, Howard left the extra money in the Capitol disbursement office, insisting that he had been elected at the lower salary.' His wife said he considered only one issue when deciding whether or not to vote for a bill: 'Will this add to, or subtract from, human liberty?'[5]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Buffett

But yes he was not very wealthy, but then again very few people were very wealthy in the 1940s and 1950s. Most of the old money WASPS had lost their fortunes in the Great Depression, WWII, and afterwarfds were hit by severe taxes.

W E W C O M R A D E

You mountain jews could do nothing but cry if some other country decided to get your jewgold. Fortunately, you are international jew deposit so other countries wouldn't be very glad about it

That's why you write a testament, retard

are you aware of a concept called "private property", leftypol?
Btw people who work do have a claim to the money they are owed for their work, not to money inherited by others

>After some time you should understand that most people do not learn how to handle money and will waste it. Where will all that money go? To the people who work hard to do something innovative.

Right, and if they didn't have that money to waste, the people who work hard to do something innovative would be unemployed.

>If there is no incentive for doing something do you think these people will ever work?
>

Why do you care if they don't work? As long as they don't breed.

Capitalism

>money but no power
As if that were even POSSIBLE. If you have it, you try to keep it or increase it. Otherwise you will very rapidly NOT have it. To do this, you exercise political influence, and lean on all the right people. If these individual had any kind of ethical position against this, they simply wouldn't be in the position they are.

>Snow Niggers know nothing of history, makes shit post.
Russian colonies need to keep their mouths shut and heads down.

>man who gives most of his money to bioweapons development in Africa

ftfy

Thats not the point, the point is the left continually asset wealthy people didn't earn their wealth but inherited it or some bullshit when the facts say that's not true and people are both entering and falling out of the 1% every single year. The richest 1% of people is not a monolith, people make it there all the time, people lose their fortune and drop out of it all the time. It is not unattainable if you are smart and skilled and put in the work, the left desperately want to make it appear unattainable because it's the only way people will support their beloved socialism

Why not?
Most absolutely poor people live in horrible countries anyway.

Also these 8 men are also the world's biggest philanthropists.

Because if it were the other way around, the state authorities (read: dictatorships) that vehemently promise the masses that they'll redistribute the wealth usually let the power go to their heads and the end result is millions dead.