WTF I hate capitalism now!
WTF I hate capitalism now!
Isaiah Torres
Ryder Thomas
>Rothschild not named
I wonder why.
Isaac Campbell
crazy how numbers do that
Robert Stewart
pol will defend this
Ryan Kelly
>8 jews*
Nicholas Rivera
You have no source
Who do you think creates business?
rich people
What do you do when you tax the shit out of them and their corporations?
they stop making jobs
Gavin Mitchell
>using dollar amount and not percentage of income
>using increments of 200,000
fucking leafs I swear
Evan Sullivan
They're all white males too. Almond status: activated.
Jose Perez
really makes me think
Brody Hughes
>Low income levels barely pay any taxes to begin with
>Low income levels still paying less than before
Lucas Perry
Wow crazy how the whole world has the same cost of living too
Austin Brown
>africa
Most browsing the internet are probably the top 30-20%. Some people have fucking nothing.
Also, simply getting the money and giving it away woudn't do jackshit. Most of their money is just a fucking number on a computer and most of it is has no relation to reality because (((fiat money))) is a fucking scam.
Asher Gutierrez
Everyone just report the leftypol fags who keep spamming this pls.
Brayden Lopez
Everybody in the world is becoming richer so it does not matter how wealth is divided.
Brody Williams
Didn't realise the gooks had 4 chan
Anthony Ramirez
>not trusting these 8 guys to use their money to create plenty jobs and make everyone happy
commies are retarded
Gabriel Lewis
>im poor because rich peoplr have money
>they they were poor i would be the rich one
Chase Sanders
because their inbred family are now full of retards that are either faggots, racemixers, or autists.
They have legacy cash and that's about it. There might be one or two still involved in the bank of England and the World Bank, but they're running out of family members with the brains to run anything.
Logan Lopez
Well I don't.
Caleb Murphy
I would actually about $7000 per year and I'm middle class. I make just a bit more than enough to pay taxes
Angel Reyes
Socialists like to argue that under capitalism the rich get richer and the poor get poorer; these days, it's usually a matter of presenting statistics on "income distribution" to show that the top earners' "share of national income" has gone up, while the bottom 10 or 20 percent of income earners have seen their share stay the same or go down. To get to this conclusion you have to assume that the same people are somehow stuck in an economic rut at the bottom of the income scale. Economists Michael Cox and Richard Alm exposed this by citing a University of Michigan study that tracked more than 50,000 Americans for three decades to discern the extent of economic mobility in America. they found that very few people are "stuck" at the bottom of the economic ladder; most rise quickly. Among their findings:
-More than three-fourths of families in the bottom fifth of income distribution in 1975 had made their way up to the two highest income quintiles in 1991.
-The poorest families made the largest gains. Those who started in the bottom 20 percent in 1975 had an inflation-adjusted gain in annual income of 27,745 by 1991; those who started in the top 20 percent in 1975 also improved, but only by 4,354
-Less than 1 percent of the sample population remained in the bottom 20 percent during the 1975-1991 period
-More than half of the families who were in the bottom 20 percent in 1975 made it to a higher bracket within four years
The greatest engine for economic mobility, progress, and opportunity is capitalism; and there is no was that socialists can get around their own history of economic stagnation and failure.
Camden Morris
I would honestly love for somebody to explain why a wealth disparity between two people is a bad thing that must be remedied. I ask every leftist I see complaining about income inequality but they never answer.