White Privilege Debunked

Hi Sup Forums, on thursday, a fellow redpilled Sup Forumsack friend and I will be attending a discussion at our college about white privilege. We intend to go and debate these people and debunk the myth of white privilege. Please dump everything you've got towards our argument.

Other urls found in this thread:

atlanticcenturion.wordpress.com/2016/09/27/skinning-the-invisible-knapsack-part-1-of-5/
youtu.be/rrxZRuL65wQ
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Bump

bump nigger good luck based burger

thank you based leaf

Use their own liberal reasoning, eg: White privilege is a eurocentric ideology and shows their western privilege

...

Here's one: atlanticcenturion.wordpress.com/2016/09/27/skinning-the-invisible-knapsack-part-1-of-5/

when they start off about how minorities are opressed, ask them how. When they inevitably say something along the lines of "black people need help to stay even with whitey" tell them that it sounds alot like they are saying white people are just better than everyone else.

good stuff thank you guys

Just debate how "white privilege" is intrinsically contradictory if you follow their own logic.
If a white believes in white privilege, he isn't a reliable source because he's white.
If a non white believes in white privilege, he also isn't a reliable source because he doesn't know what being white is actually like (in the same way that a white can't possibly know what being a non white is like in the "white privilege" narrative).

Pic related can be used to argue that whites are not privileged, just less violent and more cooperative.

Address that they're confusing privilege with achievement. Also mention certain black privileges. Such as the ability to be racist and get away with it and the infantilization of the entire black community in America. An infantilization that sees non-blacks constantly pandering to their every whine.

I'm willing to bet they'll be judging you for being there alone, use that against them. "Tolerant Left"
Godspeed burger, may Kek be with you...

Would you give up being white and live as a black man because of "black privilege"? Yeah, i didn't think so.

no but only because niggers suck

>implying white privilege is just a myth

>If a non white believes in white privilege, he also isn't a reliable source because he doesn't know what being white is actually like (in the same way that a white can't possibly know what being a non white is like in the "white privilege" narrative).

This logic can also be used to dismantle tranny retardation.

it's a good thing Obama didn't have to beat any rich white men to become president

The fact that there's plenty of white people with power who hold that view regarding black people is the basis of white privilege

Wrong, Obama just had be black.

Also, if they say that America is shit ask them to name a better country. 9/10 times it would be more white one.

First off may Kek be with you on your task.
But my indirect comment on white privilege is, how do they know whether some one has a nonvisibly apparent illness, has grown up in poverty, been physically or emotionally abused throughout thier childhood? Or any other hardship?
To make assumptions about someone based on appearance is to pre judge them, the very definition of prejudice.
If they really want equality you need to make no presumptions

Ask them if they believe in race, then ask them if they believe in white privilege.

Which is circular reasoning.

...

...

It's an argument impossible to make if you are white

...

...

youtu.be/rrxZRuL65wQ literally all you need

Also can use the argument of asian privelege. Every last thing they claim whites are better at because of racism asians have even more. They are per capita more educated, more wealthy, less criminalized ect. So where are asian forefathers who created this system of asian priveledge?

fucking this, that was his entire platform. Nobody gave a fuck about his past, they just saw electing him as the ultimate virtue signal

That's disgusting and proof colleges do t give a fuck about education anymore.

White privilege has a little truth to it, but as with most of these kinds of debates it is an incomplete truth.

The problem with the concept of white privilege is that instead of focusing on treating everyone fairly and equally and uplifting people of all races and enabling them to all see success, it seems to be entirely bent on disparaging the white race and constantly talking about "fucking white males" being oppressive just for existing. And people are wondering why white people voted overwhelmingly for Trump, it is really because modern liberal ideology makes them feel very unwelcome.

...

...

Whites: Propanly won't pump and dump you
Niggers: Definitely will pump and dump you

>bourgeoisie
Fuck off commie.

...

...

Sources for any of that?

>smell like cocoa butter

I have not once, *ever*, met a nigger who didn't smell like either week old sweat or raw sewage.

People have been fooled that the US has always been a multicultural country, news flash it was entirely European until the 1960s. I'll admit this was a hard red pill to swallow at first. Americans are totally brainwashed with the Melting pot bullshit since pre-school.

...

Holy shit I have not seen this before

...

Just kill them instead. They have litterally no intention of arguing nor do they know how to fomulate a logical position. No mattrr what you say or do they will never accept your axioms or conclusions so they will never change their minds.

Point 5 is not very clear in that chart.

Jude!

negative, it seems like they have all the citations under the graphs. Poor quality tho, sorry

and also: what about new races and race creation in general?

yea the quality of the picture isn't optimal sadly, i wish i could find a high definition version

...

That comes from the fact that whites hated each other, anglos against germans, irish and so forth, Shit even today in a world that is more whites against asians, against blacks, whites still argue about who is white enough.

because indeed, this graph just don't get the most import point about racialism, and NatSoc approach of races:

THe most important point is to eliminate the inferior individuals in each race, so you increase the level of Humanity in general. Of course, this is a job for master race.

>> So, don't forget: Racism is effective only when you start thinking about racial engineering.

...

>yea the quality of the picture isn't optimal sadly, i wish i could find a high definition version
No I mean the argument is very poor: whereas this point is the main point.

>Please dump everything you've got towards our argument.

All white privilege is that a white person gets the benefit of the doubt more often than not.

Anything else said there is bullshit that is not white privilege exactly but more of privilege attained from work of ones self or ones parents who just so happen to be white.
Also why is the majority of Sup Forums a bunch of retards who quite literally must ask others to think for them so they don't sound stupid due to how fucking stupid they are that they must ask other to make their arguments for them instead of you know thinking for themselves.

sounds like liberals tbqhfamalanadingdong

wasnt that the qualification for his nobel peace prize

...

>wasnt that the qualification for his nobel peace prize
Having black people being able to do science is one of the greatest success of racial engineering of the last centuries. Don't joke with that, it's serious.

statistics to be relevant must use a lot of math shit and verification.
That's why your point 5 on the graph is so weak.

Those people are traitors trying to divide and conquer.

Shadilay, OP.

A.) You're moving the goalposts
B.) Maybe because white people are less likely to commit violen crime. Of course so are asians, but that doesn't fit your bullshit Marxist agenda.

You should make sure you define privilege

And white privilege must stem from being WHITE

I dont think anyone here doubts a certain amount of privilege comes from being wealthy, or that people born without legs have it harder.

Id say that privilege is something that makes it significantly easier for you to succeed in life
White privilege would then be describing a situation where being white makes your life easier.

I dont know how your debates going to work but at this point Id ask your opponent/the audience exactly how they think being white makes life easier
>more money
No, there are poor white people and rich black people. Money privilege is not white privilege.
>systemic racism
Systemic racism means the "system", being society/government, favors one race over the other. In this case they say its whites, granting them white privilege.

But it's the system that has quotas for minorities
And it's the system that adds artificial points for a black person's college entry
So if a black person and white person are raised in the same economic background then the black person actually has an advantage in getting a job and getting a good one through college - an advantage given to blacks by the system against whites. So there is systemic racism, but it's racist against whites.

>muh cops

Studies/statistics show they shoot blacks and whites equally, and that shootings are roughly equal with the amount of violent crime. Basically very few police are ever shooting someone outside of justification.

>muh recent hood nigger that got shot but was a good boy
No he wasn't a good boy

Though I highly doubt any of your argument will mean anything OP. I doubt you'll be able to even make an argument.
You're going to be playing chess with a pigeon.

Go full fascist, just tell them "reality/Nature has a racial bias" and watch their heads explode. Any system based on merit will produce unequal outcomes. If they say that isn't fair, tell them we should focus on eugenics. At the end, make sure to say "Hail Trump" and raise a glass of water.

Racialism is a science.
Soon bro, we'll have hundreds of new races on this planet, each one superior to the oldest ones. That was the plan of the Fuhrer: to build a superior race of superior human being.

The first step is to eliminate the inferior individuals of the white race, all the half jew people pretending being white.

Blacks dont want to be us for privilege, they want to be us because we're better than them.

And if someone wants to be white how does that prove their reasons for that are correct?

as much as i wanna say/do this shit, i also dont wanna get kicked outta school lol

Genetic: it's a racial science.
CRISPR: It's the perfect tool to create new superior races.

White privilege does exist but it's the privilege of having good genes. Genes are the "head start" whites have over blacks.

All actions taken to uplift blacks at the expense of whites or Asians like affirmative action are an attempt to adjust for the effects of genetics. So what the libtards say about their programs are accurate--just not in the way they probably mean it.

Agreed on this. It's important to separate race from racial associations like wealth when debating the topic. An SJW will quickly tangle the two together in such a way that's it's never clear whether they are really talking about race or family stability or fiscal responsibility or social experience based on race/wealth/location/dress.

White Privelige is real, but a Privelige is something that was earned(by parents, grandparents).

Whereas a right is something given to you, like aboriginals getting automatic gibsmes

>CRISPR: It's the perfect tool to create new superior races.
More like a good way to give yourself incurable cancer.

What? More like a way to erase cancer all together from your body.

Editing DNA will cause cancer. You don't know what downstream effects changing some genes will have in the context of the other genes someone might have. There's no way of knowing it will work out as planned. Most likely it would depend on another gene to regulate it in some complicated way, and without knowing which that is you would get cancer.

>Please dump everything

Here it is....irrefutable evidence that white privilege is a myth....wait for it....wait....

...and I got nothing...sorry.

just go whip yourself for being white you cuck

I wonder how mad Lefties get about this picture

Who is Mitt Romney?

what is sarcasm?

Nah, that dude is 100% serious.

>france