Why is a global government bad?

why is a global government bad?

a one world government. why is it bad?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=tyhNgDNYuZY
youtube.com/watch?v=-leWJ84EUns
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

we'll need warp drive to make it work

Dat picture.
Does Cenk actually end up punching Alex?

Globalism is terrible. Won't have any part of it.

Because the good option lost. What we're getting now is the jew scheme.

We'd need to have singularity first

We need WW3, an anarcho-capitalist to invent the warp drive using the shell of an undetonated ICBM and Vulcans nearby to share replicator technology.

it's only acceptable if the capitol is in north america

When you look at how small the USA's government is, and then look at the known high levels of corruption that infest all levels of government... and then you look at Mexico, who are in serious trouble due to the cartels, and then you look at South Korea, who's president had to step down in the last few months because a cult spent 40 years grooming her for the job... and you think one government ruling all of us unchallenged is a GOOD idea? Tell me more about what you learned at the synagogue.

just look at what its doing.
Its earsing peoples and cultures.
re-writing history
eliminated jobs.
leveling nations.
spying on everyone, creating psychological profiles for every individual on the planet.
Abusing mind control, lowering the IQ of the world and aesthetics of the world, with the ultimate goal of creating mindless, godless and worthless consumers for boner pills and other cosmetics

Lol no. He tried to intimidate Alex but Alex never flinched. Based Texan

Lack of taylored policy. The federal government in the u.s. is too big to meet the needs of individual states. The EU is too big to meet the needs of europes individual Nations. Smaller government allows us to look out for our own interests will larger government allows us to defend ourselves; Global government means there's no need to fight but nobody gets what they want anymore

Dammit. Fifteen minutes later and this OP hasn't responded to anyone, I feel ashamed for falling for such dumb bait.

Who has power? How do they maintain it? How do they enforce their will? What redress is there if you disagree? There's nowhere to run to.

The EU is hardly a great example of what it would look like.

For the same reason you don't want to put all your money in one stock.

youtube.com/watch?v=tyhNgDNYuZY

Extremely diverse countries like the United States already struggle to have one government rule over their land effectively. The massive amount of different needs, different philosophies, and different living conditions in our country alone is absurdly difficult to manage, and we're only 350 million people living in

It's not.
A one world State would have saved hundreds of millions of lives just in the last few decades

It isn't able to properly represent all of its constituents

it's actually really important that different people get different things from their respective governments and trying to mash everybody together is kind of how we got the modern middle east

it's unlikely that this will ever change, or at least not for a very long time

...

>implying we aren't already living in a world government

Check it out:

Government should be close to those they rule. Conceivably, if the local government screws me over, I could burn down the mayors house while he sleeps. Same with state/national government, it's just a longer drive.

With global government, it becomes much more difficult to keep politicians accountable to their citizens.

Frankly, any government shouldn't be further than walking distance for the express reason that you can burn down the mayors house if you need to.

could be london, yeah?

I agree

sorry. i had to go do stuff. i'm anti globalism, but i just wanted some more sound arguments than what i have. i'm not gonna pretend to be super-smart. i just was hoping some fellow Sup Forumsocks could kind of help articulate my thoughts..

It's going to be even more pro-multiculturalism and anti-white than the current government. The pathologies inherent to large bureaucratic organizations will also be there in even more severe forms than with the current government.

well put burgerbro

>Also how does the political candidate get voted in?

>How long in power is leader?

>How do we set up a voting system across the planet that can't be rigged?

it used to be workable, as in people don't mind and are willing to give it a go
until some people got uppity and promoted """equal representation""" regardless of productivity
and so it became a reproduction contest, which only encourages shitholes and rewards being the biggest shitholes

globalism =/= one world government (per se)

Globalism only works once the human race becomes intergalactic. Until then the more camps the better.

Taiwan will be free of chinas influence just wait and see.

Aliens want a one world government to stop the progression of our species and keep us out of outer space. No competition on earth and no space race or competition out in space. It will be our doom. No faster than light travel and we are all fucked. End of humanity.

ebb and flow, local to national to local and on and on...
our one chance at a true worldwide state was with Alexander the Great. But he died at 32.
It is too late now. The only play is a Universal Carbon Tax and UN control of oil at the wellhead. That's what is at the heart of the Global Warming meme. But the ClimateGate emails scuttled the offensive.

what is globalism, then?

globalism is the free flow of capital and labor across borders. a state is a sovereign government with a monopoly on the use of force inside said nation.

Because fags

The establishment of shared treaties that tie individual government's hands even more than if there were a global government pulling the strings.

Hurr, Durr, you want a job, little one, well sorry my man, we signed this TREATY saying a chink's labor dying in a toxic waste dump of a factory is equal to yours!!

Meanwhile the oligarchy profits from the existence of the treaty and are the ones that pushed it though.

Fuck, read about what got snuck into the TPP, that is what (((they))) want.

I am saying globalism, the way the PTB were implementing it, is far worse than any sort of global governance (which would suck itself).

Globalism the way it was going was the abolishment of individual governance behind an opaque unresponsive bureaucratic nightmare.

Free trade /= global trade /= globalism.

>a one world government. why is it bad?

Because rulers far removed from the consequences of their actions tend to inflict the most harm and suffering onto the people they rule.

Fuck 'global government', it gets sold to the stupid goyim as some kind of super efficent system that simplified the current cluster fuck of government that we already have but in reality it's just another layer of bureaucracy ontop of the existing bullshit that never has to deal with the consequences of their actions.

Have fun paying welfare for the entire continent of Africa, cuck.

thank you.

Take a...
>(((guess)))

global governance is horrible because of the flaws that the EU has exposed. A cloistered elite get it in their little minds that doing things a certain way is 'best'. They destroy the lively hood of millions and trash an entire continent of countries future just to hold on to their flawed vision.

Governments should fear their people. They should be responsive to their people.

You will never get that at the global level.

Note that a global institution like the UN is not intrinsically horrible as long as it does not try to govern. As a meeting place of individual governments, ok, maybe. But psychopaths are drawn to power, and the UN will be corrupted into trying to impose some global order imho. It is the order of all things human.

A global government is bad because corporations currently run the world. Until we get rid of corruption and the rich running the world, it'll never work.

The only way it could work is if they homogenize the world. That's why they're constantly pushing race-mixing propaganda, not to mention demonizing any culture that isn't pop-culture

They want you to be rootless, they want you to be bloodless. Your culture is whatever they put on the teevee. Your heritage and genetic lineage is mystery meat.

I mean, what kind of sociopathic, monstrous fucking asshole goes to a rainforest, sees all kinds of different beautiful birds and says "THEY ALL NEED TO LOOK EXACTLY THE SAME NOW, IT'S MY VISION I'M GONNA DESTROY THIS PLACE TO MAKE IT WORK IF I HAVE TO"

These are the people we're dealing with. I'm an atheist, but now I see why these people are called demonic by tradcons

one thing most people don't understand is that you can't decouple monetary and fiscal policy, and that's exactly what supranational unions (EU) do.
Look at Greece. They desperately needed to devalue their currency to ease their debt. But since Frankfurt issues the bonds they were out of luck.

>what could possibly go wrong with a governing elite that would functionally be completely isolated and unaccountable and nobody has anywhere to escape to?

Whites are less than 10% of the world population, but we are the only ones who have managed to create somewhat decent governments. What do you think the government would look like if we gave the other 90% of the world political power over us? Islamic Theocracy like in Middle East? Constant civil war like in Africa? Corrupt socialist shithole like Latin America? Unless non-whites are banned from having a say in government it would suck.

Were already overpopulating. More need to die.

Centralised planning is incompetent and corrupt whether it is law, any other kind of public service, or product and distribution of any kind of good or service. Checks and balances can only exist where there is decentralisation. Globalism would initially just cripple the world economy with incesant bureaucracy and ultimately lead the world into a totalitarian nightmare where the 99% are a literal slave class and the 1% literally slave masters.

Your post reminded me:

I swear I read something about H.W. Bush (the Senior - ex CIA dude). advocating for a browning of America. That's apparently not quite the terminology - googlefoo fails.

Kind of along the same thing you are writing about.

From another view, maybe it is big business that most wants a homogeneous customer base. If you can standardize grades of steel and ball bearings across the globe to increase efficiency and profit, why not extend the thought to specific consumer classes.

it's certainly a thing many different groups want for their own selfish reasons. If the population is all abunch of dumb muts, then it's easier to sell them shit, which means its easier to stay in power and be profitable.

Either way, it's bad for the people being downgraded.

I thought he spit on him or something

>implying humanity will ever advance to space without globalization

Too susceptible to corruption and tyranny given human nature

A colossus style AI would probably be for the best - though it would be an inevitable nuclear holocaust due to both human nature and the possibility of loss of power being interpreted as an attack on its capability / throw a dead man switch

SpaceX is demonstrating that space access is well within the economic ability of a large not-even-multinational company.

Shit, Bezos is basically demonstrating it is possible with the assets of an individual.

Look at the EU.

Now imagine it bigger, more bloated, and with a lot more Greeces.

It's definitely possible for humanity to maintain a world government, but not until we start colonizing space and have a permanent presence beyond Earth. But even then, there is no guarantee that it'll work. You'd need to raise the shithole third world nations and their people out of the dirt, and I know that a lot of Sup Forums doesn't think that's possible because lel dumb niggers, which may or may not be the truth. And then when that happens you'd need to create a governmental system that allows for equal accountability to all people of the Earth, not just particular nation groups like the Americas or the EU, as well as a set up to avoid corruption and abuse of power which we find almost impossible on a local government level.

>implying you want corporate space

We don't know the best way to run a country objectively and part of the issue is that it depends on the people and their culture within a country. Until the entire human species is reduced to one race and one culture, world government would be horribly repressive or completely ineffective.

That's some top tier satire in the image.

Because humanity is too diverse in race, creed, and religion to be effectively governed by a central authority.

If the world had one race, one religion, and one political philosophy, one upon which all agreed as a matter of fact, then it might work. I say might because there is always the human propensity to bash each other's skulls in for their women and their stuff.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
If it did form today its main ingredients would be these 2 entities. If you want that you are not human but an insect.

The first efforts to the new world were mostly corporate, right?

I want humanity to get there, and not via a $1T propaganda NASA joyride for 10 people that come back home after a year or two.

I see no other way than corporate. After that, some religous kooks will want to go, to find their god or some nonsense. Then you have a frontier, with everything that entails.

Once you get people wherever 'there' is, get enough of them and they will demand rights, and setup some sort of government and laws. God help us all, that's just how things seem to work out.

It's not inherently bad. To me, at the moment, it is preferable to a number of different governments who can't stop the human race from fucking up the planet and killing itself off.

No one can rationally make the claim that it's inherently bad, but I'm a known hardcore globalist and one world government advocate who understands he is taking an extreme position.

because this is the ideology of the people who will be running it

youtube.com/watch?v=-leWJ84EUns

Read Brave New World if you really want to know.

Only those who would honestly give their life to prevent the rise of Globalism are worthy of living. There is no excuse for ignorance with a wealth of information at your fingertips.

>not becoming a global government to assure in the imperium of man

I don't think it's possible to effectively represent the interests of all the world's peoples in a monolithic world government.

Democracy runs antithetical to numerous societies, especially those in the third world. How would their representatives be chosen? Democratic representation is obviously out, would a world government that includes non-democraticaly chosen representatives really reflect the will of the people? Would the inclusion of some non elected people set a precedent where none need to be elected? Since the concept of a nation state is rendered meaningless, by which metric would representatives be chosen? Race seems the most obvious metric by which people choose but I doubt that concept would prove terribly popular in a mythical world government.

No sovereignty. If the leaders of the global government are corrupt, mad or sadistic theres nowhere else to go and everyones fucked!

you're an American, right? You have the highest standard of living in the world. Globalism will average you with somalia. Go for it.

Hey! That reminds me of EU.

We already have a one world government. The governments of the world are just a facade to keep the masses thinking they have a say. Never forget this.