Why is forced breeding/murder/eating of animals legal but consentual bestiality is not?

Why is forced breeding/murder/eating of animals legal but consentual bestiality is not?

What

>consentual bestiality
animals cannot consent.

Because the family and procreation is the basis of civilization and bestiality/homosexuality/pedophillia is an attack on that.

Because animals cannot consent you fucking proxy using leaf

Obviously you've never been around animals in heat

This.
not just as a sarcastic quip, but this is actually the legal reason.

no, animals cannot legally give consent.
Just as minors and inebriated people cannot legally consent.

consent you retard.

consent is a social construct.

It will be. You just have to give liberalism and stupiidty time. Hopefully Jesus will have come back before everyone starts fucking VR goats.

But I'm pretty sure... Almost 100% positive a 12 year old can give consent.

Minors can give consent its just that the law says its not real consent until you pass a certain age. Pedophilia is obviously sick.

Then your entire point is circular. This is the very legal matter being questioned by OP in the first place. Quit yer question begging.

Communication between animals and humans is inherently ambiguous. To you, an animal in heat might signify "the animal wants to fuck", but to the animal, it's simply a chemical reaction forced unto it by nature. It's not equivalent to consent, at least by the judgment of any rational, non-goatfucking person.

and?

I'm not sure if this is a troll, bc cheney is a pedo or something.
"legally give consent"
In the same way I cannot legally give you the keys to someone else's car. I mean I can give you the key's but that doesnt make it "right", binding or legally valid.

not begging any question. animals anrt people. They cant give consent, I mean thats the beginning middle and end.

legally give consent is such a bullshit term and to say it doesnt make it "right" are you new here?

Because the bible says it's okay to eat animals but not to fuck them.

Like it or not, that's the answer to your question, and any other answer is bullshit.

>actually the legal reason.
Dude, that's complete nonsense.

>consentual bestiality is not?

it is though

I mean, its not bullshit.
Its the legal framework we live under.
You can disagree, and I'm cool with that.
I dont even really give a shit if OP is a sheepfucker. Go fuck some sheep OP!
But OP asked why, and that is the simple answer wrapped up in a bow.

In contract law there are many caveats like this, I may enter into a contract, and have "agreed" to it. But that doesn't mean the contract cant be voided at a later date if you didn't disclose necessary information or allow me time for due diligence.

seems to make sense to everyone who isnt a sheepfucker.

>it's not okay to rape a sheep
>but it's fine to force it to breed (rape by animal), murder it and mutilate it's corpse

no one has ever cared what their property thinks or consents to. animals dont "consent" to being eaten either but it doesnt matter, because theyre animals

I don't think we have any laws that can possibly indight or prosecute an animal for rape.

Its also not murder.
Murder is always a form of unjustifiable homicide.

They don't consent for being force fed, slaughtered or eaten either, as OP put it. Your justification revolving about consent does not stand.

Is that the guy from YMS?

An animal being killed for food is slaughtered as quickly as possible. As long as undue harm isnt done to the animal it is legal. Since the sheepfucker might be at fucking a sheep for minutes, hours or years, the same standard definitely does not apply, it is considdered abuse in the same way a person kicking their sheep is abuse.

ITT: no one answers the question.

If an animal can't consent to being raped, it can't consent to being killed either. You can't defend the legality of one but not the other.

>it's an "the rlm/yms/stuckmann/youtuber fanatic got banned from Sup Forums and is now looking to Sup Forums for attention" episode

No animal was ever hurt in loving sex. Yet we cram animals inside tiny cages, cut their beaks off and castrate them

its gross

its gay

its degenerate

the animal doesn't feel pleasure

Because most laws are based on feels instead of reason.

THIS

>It's another why isn't this part of degeneracy legal thread

>muh feels

>muh feels

>muh feels

>objectively false

Checkmate, athiests

Hmmm. Really makes me think whist I fuck my cat.

Legality of this sort is based on physical outcomes and not ethical concerns.

Being able to kill a pig enables the citizens whom the law concerns to raise pigs and eat them. Being able to eat pork is a net positive because it provides a greater variety of potential food to the people of the country. While it might carry some sort of ethical connotation to some people that killing pigs is bad, the net gain of feeding the people of the country outweighs it.

Fucking animals, on the other hand, provides no tangible benefit, and it is gross and embarrassing to even consider that people in the country could be fucking animals. Since it has no tangible benefit associated with it at all, it doesn't require much ethical (or visceral) basis to have it banned.

Yes pretty much sums it up, its ok to murder them but not to fuck them, believing the reverse makes you a faggot degenerate.

Degenerate

One incites disgust and enragement in the populace and the other does not.

It does so because it is maladaptive and parasitic and pathogen spreading.

A dog fucking a woman is not being subject to abuse. Why are fags against that?

Dogs don't feel pleasure

Putting your penis into anything other than a female of your own species is fucking degenerate and you should be hung from the neck until dead if you fuck animals.

they dont have to consent to being killed. They just have to be killed humanely.

However, there is no legal way to be a humane sheep fucker because they cannot consent.

You cant say the question hasnt been asnwered its been answered by numerous people numerous times. The legal answer is they cannot legally consent.

If you are asking about morality, or ethics of being a sheepfucker ask a question about morality.
But your question was about legality. "consent" is the fucking answer.

animals feel pleasure during sex. proof: we're animals and we feel pleasure

this

try it and see if your argument holds up in court.

Zoophilia is consider pretty fucking degenerate, It's defended by liberals and it's something a fucking caveman would do.

If you want Animal fucking to be legal then you're pretty much the definition of a grade a degenerate.

It's time to stop fucking animals.

would hold up in at least 20 states

wrong

You really believe being sexually assaulted or raped and getting to live another day is worse than being killed?

>provides nothing tangible
It provides pleasure

I'm glad Ohio recently banned the practice of it. At least this country has some sanity left.

prove it

>canadian states

So if a woman is on the floor on all 4s and a dog comes up and starts pounding away, how is that abusing the animal? I want *your* opinion, not what you think a court would say.

Canada doesn't have states, retard

a dog stops fucking once it knots (10 seconds)

that can't happen unless she has dog pheromones

you can consent while drunk though

I'm not making a moral or ethical argument, you are conflating morality with legality.

You asked a legal question, I gave the legal answer.

>pretending like it's not hot when a girl is getting knotted by a dog

I have to ask, Why are you retards defending degeneracy again? This board is Anti-Degenerate leave if you like to fuck animals so much.


>MUH ANIMALS LOVE ME

Fuck off with that crap.

you've never seen how non-neutered dogs behave sometimes, have you?

my opinion, is the dog is your property, what you do in your house with your property is your business.

Things are not banned/allowed because they have or don't have tangible benefits associated with them. Playing video games, apart from the particularities of each activity, is as pointless as having sex with a cow.

Where did the pig sign its consent to be slaughtered?

Time to go back to beastforum faggot.

dogfucker

its actually pretty gross.

>consentual bestiality is not
But at is! Or at least it seems that way when I co on to a website called pornsocket. Judge for yourself.

Nice dodge.. How about you address the situation I gave in my post?

>a dog stops fucking once it knots (10 seconds)
depends on the dog and who cares, thats about how long I last

Animals rape other animals all the time. In fact, since animals can't consent to sex, any time an animal is having sex, it is either committing rape or being raped. Interestingly humans are the only species on the planet that is capable of not engaging in rape.

not in the US pablo

send me a link, and can I log in with your account?

average dogfucker

WRONG

Consensual beastiality is not illegal. It is not possible

>Implying I have an account on the world's biggest degenerate forum

I can't wait till someone raids that place.

A willing dog and a willing woman sounds like consent enough to me.

>tfw too smart to fuck animals

>'''''consentual bestiality'''''

The breeding & murder of animals is deeply embedded in human culture, and for its downsides, gives animals a chance to live.

Bestiality causes animals to suffer. "Consensual Bestiality" is always coerced as no animal with an actual sex life with their own species would want to fuck something of another species. It's also just an easy place to draw a line legally.

I'm serious. If a couple gets a little bit tipsy and decides to fuck it's ridiculous to believe they are both being raped by each other.

>that can't happen unless she has dog pheromones
You haven't seen many Art of Zoo videos, have you user? Try watching a bunch of the ones with Cannibal Cupcake and Mr Biggs. They really have something going on. Anyone else agree?

>no animal with an actual sex life with their own species would want to fuck something of another species

that's where you're wrong, kiddo

Even using the example of a dog fucking a woman, where the dog obviously initiates to some extent, the issue is that you're fucking a dependant.

We don't allow female schoolteachers to fuck their students, or mothers to fuck their children. People can use the exact same justification, "well he initiated it, so he obviously wanted it". Pet and Owner is the same relationship, and unlike children, pets never become mature enough to consent to sex with their owner.

confirmed

>as no animal with an actual sex life with their own species would want to fuck something of another species.
That's evidently false. Just look at OP.

Why are degenerates on Sup Forums again?

[WRONG.jpg]

This is a false equivalency of the highest order.

>OP
>Having a sex life

WE Sup Forums NOW

Any male who doesn't think it's fucking hot when a girl is getting pounded by a dog and taking a knot is probably at least 50% gay.

So a child fucking her dad's dog is ok then?

It's called devil's advocate, user.

Definitely a false analogy. In many cases, the dog will not belong to the women. She'll just be a whore from Portugal or Thailand who wants some extra dough, so she gets naked in a room with a dog and wiggles her ass around until the dog chooses of its own will to mount this stranger and fuck her. There's no relationship of dependence here. It's a choice made by a horny dog that wants to hump. It's like any male creature wanting to get off, given a good opportunity.

Because you shouldn't play with your food boy

>We Sup Forums now
>devil's advocate

You're the definition of a newfag. Sup Forums is for Stormfronters and lolbertarians not dog fucking newfags from leddit.

It's the ultimate cuck

beastiality is wrong because it's fucked up, not because of some nonsensical process of reasoning to reach conclusions

it's nonsense to complain about consent, it's a fucking animal
animal breeders don't care about consent

this

Enjoy your Art of Zoo videos user. Cupcake and Knotty are the best.