Has there ever been a successful multi-racial society?

Has there ever been a successful multi-racial society?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_of_the_Latins
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sack_of_Constantinople_(1204)
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

The Silk Road

Rome

>amerifatfuckfaggotretard education

One if a bunch of drug trading degenerates. The other describes a supply chain for opium and luxuries. The Silk Road is not a society.

Rome subjugated other societies and forced them to pay tribute. That is not 'multi-racial'.

how'd that go?

Ancient Egypt?

Palestine

Until Zionists terrorized it with the help of the Brits.

fyi they sure as shit weren't multiracial when they started out

The United States of America.

Ottomans
Russia
Poland-Lithuana
Austria-Hungary
U N I T E D S T A T E S
Mughals

One could argue Russia, for a relative value of success.
One should also note it was only successful due to the vast geographic seperation of its peoples.

Egypt
rome
silk road
kys
you are proven wrong

Ancient Rome

individuals from said subjugated societies ended up becoming emperors though. sounds like great assimilation to me.

Do you faggots really believe Rome was a success as a multi-culti empire?

>protip
It wasn't. Losing its Roman roots and blood is the reason it fell. The empire began to take on millions of refugees
>wow sound familiar?
Then it fell.

>silk Road
lol bait

>Egypt
Not even close to being multicultural.

>he thinks Ancient Egyptians were all (keyword: all) blacks

There is no such thing as race, so "multi-racial" is not a real concept.

That's a nigger myth. Egypt was white, like Carthage.

Is your French brain assuming a white country is automatically multicultural?

They had slaves back then, and were deeply xenophobic. But not to the Greeks of course, they loved the Greeks.

Russia. Nobody even thought of it as a big deal until you fuckers allowed kikes to start all this pc multi-kulti shit.

FUCKING JEW SHILL GET OFF MY BOARD REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

No.

t. the "Rainbow Nation"

Brazil :^)

Of course! Austria-Hungary was the greatest country ever. Just look at their history between 1848-1850. Empowering minorities made it the strongest nation on the planet.

Vienna is arguably the pinnacle of Western civilization u pleb

Of course they don't work. Unless everyone is roughly equal, with shared values and goals you don't even have a real society.

Any example that does work will always have some catch that actually stops people mixing, or the person saying it is in complete fucking denial.

It's like schools. While you persist to mix up poor people, dipshits, and good kids you are always going to have bullying. There is no solution to human nature.

Russia

I hear a country called "America" tried it, and now every country on Earth comes to American websites to shitpost.

define 'successful'

If you are asking if there has ever been a multi-racial society without constant fighting and friction, no.

However, financially the USA is doing pretty good for now.

>fell by being overrun by germanics, huns and slavs
Yeah that foederati idea wasn't such a great idea was it?

Well the English and the Welsh seem to get along okay.

>Mewling about multiculture

The OP asked about multi racial.

No, fuck you

Middle East since Persian Empire until Ottoman Empire got sliced apart.

Sup Forums

Persia and pretty much almost all Caliphate were multi-racial.

The Umayyad were very successful.

The question is: Can Whites be multi-racial and succeful?

Let me go trough every possible answer
>Rome
They fell because they took too many refugees. Sounds familiar.
>Russia
Everyone has their own containment province
>Austria-Hungary
They would implode like Yugoslavia, WWI just made its dismantling sooner
>USA
That's just delusional.

Yes as long as there is clearly one race,culture in power and mixing is curtailed to very few instances,without outside interference it would work

So you're only considering European options but OP didn't ask for European successful multi-racial society.

Better question, has there ever been a successful society with whites as the minorities?

>Canada
Same as USA
>Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela
Shithole. Why? Racemixing. Most crimes are committed by mestizos.
>Umayyad
Lots of conflicts with the Christians
>Ottoman Empire
Everyone in the Balkans wanted to be free, had rebellions, etc., the middle east was stable but they're somewhat culturally close
>Egypt
White, dindu myth
>Carthage
White, dindu myth

Christianity.

500+ years of best empire

Japan.

The US

Sup Forums

My country

Multiracial - yes, many such cases. Every successful Empire was multiracial.

Multicultural - now even if it isn't shit, it only breeds problems.

The Byzantine empire was Greek and Latin, it respected both cultures and languages for centuries before one became dominant

Deny this you FAGGOTS Italians are not Greeks and Greeks are not Italians, two cultures living together and reigning from 300 BC to 1453 AD explain this Sup Forums

Wrooong.

>Umayyad
>Lots of conflicts with the Christians
1: Lies - The Umayyad have conflicts with SOME Christians but during many years Christians were allow to their religion in peace in Spain.
2: Having conflicts with foreigner doesn't mean you are not successful.
3: The Umayyad Empire was largest than any other in that period and it last 100 years, that looks pretty successful


>Egypt
>White, dindu myth
Egypts weren't white. lol They weren't black either, is not A or B.


>Ottoman Empire
>Everyone in the Balkans wanted to be free, had rebellions, etc., the middle east was stable but they're somewhat culturally close
What? Middle-East is one of the less culturally close part in the world. You're probably saying "They are all arabs and all looks the same" but we are seeing things in a real historic point-of-view and
1: Middle-East is a region habitated by many ethnic and race
2: Being Arabs is the same as saying you're Latin, doesn't mean having an X culture or race
3: Back in time they were even many Greeks living there and many others
4: Turks have nothing similar to Arabs or any other Middle-Eastern groups

This is the right answer.

Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth

>Egypts weren't white. lol They weren't black either, is not A or B.

Sorry man, but we WUZ KANGZ.

>4: Turks have nothing similar to Arabs or any other Middle-Eastern groups

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_of_the_Latins
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sack_of_Constantinople_(1204)

>ctrl+f
>no Singapore

It is only successful because there's an invisible gun to everyone's heads.

That and it's a tiny state, Singapore is about the size of my city.

Of course if you have a state that small and can threaten everybody, you can be forceful in your social engineering.

Try Singapore style shit in the USA and society would implode.

Seleucid empire

Oh look there's a roach to cherry pick one thing that happened once over 1,700 years and another that happened because of religion (orthodox vs Catholicism NOT CULTURE) and Jewish money grubbing

Have you ever cooked anything without leaves in it? Your melting pot sucks

Turks don't came from the same culture or ethnic group as most of Middle-Easterns, Singapore.

Under absolute authoritarianism?

No, niggers would be genocided and only the niggers and spics who behaved are indefinitely paroled.

The only problem is incompetence and corruption. Remove these two and viola.

usa

switzerland

>white, like Carthage
I'll give you caucasian but come on man no it wasn't snow white like your nordic buttbuddies

Has there ever been a successful society?

Yes, most large European countries.
>inb4 Muslims
Im talking out pre third world immigration. "German "french "spainard" "Italian" "British" "Russian" aren't races. They are made up of different groups.
The key is they become culturally unified in important areas (morals and social etiquette)

>Amerinugget education

In the sense that Latin speakers in the west and Greek speakers in the east were on par.

>every answer people give in this thread is an empire

/thread

Yes, but only if there is a hierarchy of races that is for the most part immoveable.

European colonial empires, Assyria, Mongolia, Rome and the Caliphates are just a few examples of multiracial societies that succeeded quite well for some time.

Never worked ,eaven if you take humanist ideas ,fucking russian rebeals spawn on all the time!

He's right you know.

Panama is :D

The American South was stable with both slavery and Jim Crow. It took outside forces to shut down those social systems.

Ottomans were constantly suppressing rebellions.

You're right about most crimes being commited by negros and mestizos but it's lefties policies that made those countries shitholes. I dont Know about Brazil but Venezuela in the 50's was safe as fuck and was multicultural

>ctrl+f
>thankfully sing

A white founded colony stolen by brits from malaysians, and given to the chinese.

I don't think there is another case of non-whites revering their country's white father like Sing.

>all education is mandatory to be in english

Sing is pretty based tbhqhimo

Yea Canada.

And i thought singapoere was based becose they have illegal gay marieage.

Has there ever been a successful society?

It lost to fucking Italy. It fared worse than Abyssinia on the war front.

...

REMINDER THAT RETARDS ON Sup Forums ARE SAYING ROME DOESN'T COUNT BECAUSE THEY CAN'T DISTINGUISH BETWEEN MULTI-RACIAL AND MULTI-CULTURAL

UNDERAGE FGTS NEED TO BE B&

Egypt is a shit country though. I need a good country, Ahmed.

Austria hungary and the Ottoman empire worked pretty well

Leaf, what Canada has is a multitude of ethnocentric countries several provinces.

>Quebec is an ethnocentric identity
>Markham North is China town
>Vancouver is also China town
>Prairies, Whites
>Atlantic, Whites
>Toronto/GTA Dindus, Whites, China, Hispanic, all the other colours of the rainbow
>Yukon, Nunavut Natives, Whites
>Anywhere not an urban center is likely White

Alberta could be a country, Ontario, Quebec, Atlantic Canada, Prairies, Vancouver, our country doesn't even have a centralized ethnocentric identity, even when it was White because the geography and population sparse us to much.

So can you actually point to a successful multi-racial society then?

US up until the 60's was pretty successful
UK up until WWII was pretty successful

ROME YOU FUCKING IDIOT

H-how about me senpai?

Has there ever been a successful society?

>post yfw you realize US is actually doing great, and it has never been better for most of the poeple there
>also Sweden
>butthurt Sup Forums memes aside