I used to not care about what the gays did, until I read this:
>although gays make up only 3% of the population, they account for 1/3 of all child sex crimes
also, 100% of gays are marxists that try to brainwash others.
Should they be allowed to have kids?
Other urls found in this thread:
wnd.com
dailystormer.com
shortlittlerebel.wordpress.com
wvdhhr.org
ngopulse.org
twitter.com
You should actually work out the math of "what percent of gays are child molesters" then come back.
someone else do it
>also, 100% of gays are marxists
Didn't know Milo was a Commie
They're perfectly normal people, user
wow, sounds like True love
wtf i hate gay people now
I'd say yes, but every time I remember those news about gay couple adopting male children to rape them ... it's disgusting. So just in case, I maybe they shouldn't.
Should deviants be allowed to produce more deviants? Let me think about that for a moment.
Fuck off Putin and pissbed go piss with lolita hookers on some beds at Epstein's near mar a lago. With ivanka. 95% of pedos are straight. Heterosexuality gave man all his sin and brought death and the fall. Congratulations
>frog board
>fixing this with Christ
You're all feminist zionists
Better 2 men than one mom. IMO.
What about lesbians adopting boys?
Surrogacy. Thanks. Go wallow. There's also the XQ28 gene, Charlie Sheen. Muh zika and super gonorrhea. How many kids have you put in cages today? Heteros are terrible examples. I prefer David and Jonathan
They shouldn't be allowed to breathe
>head inside fish cave
>breathing
no, they shouldn't be allowed to exist
Only if they're related to the kid and the alternative would be a foster home really. There's no shortage of normal nuclear families that want to adopt.
t.fag
Well. YOU fucken put em here!
If it means more children can have homes, then yes.
Personally, I think two men and a mom sound better. Not to say it turns me on, but out of the choices given, I'd prefer it.
Yes.
...
...
I used to think that gays should be able to adopt. The best argument against it I've heard is that we have loads of evidence showing that children do best with a mother and a father.
adoption agencies have a duty to get kids into the best possible family situations. So they have a good reason to prefer hetero couples.
I don't think they should be barred from having kids, though. Let them do surrogacy or something. or put them as low priority. at least then the adoption agencies can do what's best for the kids they receive.
still on the fence.
Pretty high.
I know both 'bro' gays, they are the ones who are not pedos and were 'born with it' (more or less) I believe.
Then there are the ones who were molested, who I know as well, and they are horrible pervs.
I would say 1/4-1/3 are the pervy ones. Pretty bad rate if true
holy shit that image
What a compelling study.
no. homos need to be electrocuted.
The rarest thing in the world is a "bro" lesbian though, especially in this cucked shithole. One of my coworkers (low paying blue collar job) is that though. Tall introverted country gal type.
If they aren't predators who are going to rape the shit out of the kid, then sure.
I don't see how you'd prevent that though considering the foster care system is rife with abuse.
If you can then yeah why not fuck it. Like I said it'd be better than the shitty foster homes in this country.
Give them this chance. It has never been tried before. If it is confirmed we will know and this right might be taken.
There is a good chance most of them won't do this.
A constant critic to gays is that they don't reproduce. It would be incherent to not let them adopt.
The only annoying thing will be them saying they are the best parents ever.
> Should gays be allowed to adopt kids?
Nope. A kid needs a family, and a couple of space-docking poopdickers do not qualify nor a couple of crotch-pugilist dikes.
>although gays make up only 3% of the population, they account for 1/3 of all child sex crimes
Show me the study, I bet it's from a page like "family research council" lmao.
And yes they should under the condition that they have to go through the same process as straight parents have to.
maybe if the lot of them weren't pedophiles
Douglas Murray is gay and so are you
convinced yet?
No, but male and female(male) couples should be allowed to.
Alright, I'll actually make a serious reply to this. Yes, gays should be able to adopt.
Your figures come from the Family Research Council, a Christian conservative think tank run by Dr. Timothy Dailey, a guy with a Ph.D. in religion. Unsurprisingly, they're incredibly biased, uncertain, and misleading. But for now, let's take the "3% of the population is gay" and "1/3 of child sex crimes are male on male" as fact.
The overwhelming majority of men who molest boys claim not to be gay. They exclusively pursue relationships with women and never adult men. Furthermore, when you hook their dicks up to a measuring device, they demonstrate more arousal to pictures of adult women than adult men. Only about 3% of men who molest boys will admit to being gay, a number corroborated by the phallometric responses.
Among men who have molested boys, those who claim to be straight are interested in different features than those who claim to be gay. The "straight" men who have molested boys show a much stronger arousal response to young, prepubescent boys with feminine features (sound familiar?). The self-admitted "gay" men who have molested boys show a much stronger arousal response to boys who have already gone through puberty (age 15+) and demonstrate masculine features.
If you've been on Sup Forums for more than a week, the "traps aren't gay" meme actually explains this entire situation in full. Either way, the behavior of men who engage in relationships with other adult men is clearly distinct from the behavior of most male-on-male child molesters.
tl;dr: if a man pursues relationships with other adult men, he is actually less likely to be a child molester than a straight man.
>that one canadian poster who always spews pure, unintelligible nonsense in gay threads
>i'll just fucking make up a number
you are such full of shit, come out of the closet u fagget
>tfw you run out of space for citations
Jenny, Carole; Roesler, Thomas A.; Poyer, Kimberly L. “Are children at risk for sexual abuse by homosexuals?” Pediatrics 94, no. 1 (1994)
Freund, Kurt; Watson, Robin J.; Rienzo, Douglas. “Heterosexuality, homosexuality, and the erotic age preference.” Journal of Sex Research 26, no. 1 (1989)
Marshal, W.L.; Barbaree, H.E.; Butt, Jennifer. “Sexual offenders against male children: Sexual preferences.” Behaviour Research and Therapy 26, no. 5 (1988)
>implying traps arent gay
>implying those who molest boys arent gay
are you fucking serious? just because they claim to not be gay doesnt mean they arent
>allow paedophiles (AKA homosexuals) to adopt children
What could go wrong?
I think you need to reread my post, buddy.
It's not that they simply claim not to be gay. It's that their dicks get hard when they see naked women and not naked men. It's that they don't pursue relationships with men and exclusively date women (in fact, one study found that in 74% of cases, the victim was a relative of the woman the man was currently dating).
If you want to say they're technically gay because they had a sexual experience with a young boy, that's fine by me. But it's retarded to apply the statistics observed within this group to gay couples who want to adopt. It has been demonstrated that gay men who engage in sexual behavior with other adult males are not the ones doing the molesting. And these are the people the adoption question is about.
Friend, there is not a homosexual man alive who does not strongly desire to fuck young boys. It is the irresistible urge of the homosexual pervert. Some have the self control to refrain from it because they know it is against the law. Many do not.
The moment those laws are relaxed, it's open season on little Jimmy's butthole.
Day of the rope
I don't like children.
Hell no
>loads of evidence showing that children do best with a mother and a father
>"what is the greater good?"; offers factual premises building toward a logical conclusion
>"what's wrong with x ?"; offers various scenarios trying to rational the exception as the norm
no, the same stigma attached to single men adopting kids should be placed upon the homosexuals as well
>pic related
wtf?
Was that guy in pic always an orphan? Pretty sad desu.
Some more food for thought, from a source Sup Forums can trust:
dailystormer.com
If you're interested in barring groups from adopting on the basis of being more likely to be child molesters, you need to make sure blacks and Hispanics don't adopt either.
no, usually people are gay as a result of being molested, people who were molested are statistically more likely to molest a child
Milo plays the marxist game, a BBC loving jewish faggot. Now Apu, go shit on a sacred temple or else
Leaf talks loud
Leaf provides no proof
Shitposters like you will bring the Day of the Rake fucking soon
Lesbians need a helicopter ride soon too shortlittlerebel.wordpress.com
>people itt are actually saying yes
Absolutely not homosexuality is a disorder
If you're circumcised you should be gassed. Every circumcised male on earth should be killed.
i don't follow your meaning
gays should be castrated, fucking in the ass is a mental disease !
Why on this board is gay synonymous with anal sex? From what Ive heard most gays dont do it.
>It has been demonstrated that gay men who engage in sexual behavior with other adult males are not the ones doing the molesting.
Hard to believe. Gays have very little control over their sexual urges and most have a thing for twinks. If you add those together, it's hard to ignore why children adopted by a gay couple aren't at a significant higher risk of being molested.
What the fuck are you talking about, how are gay people going to have sex apart from anal? Slap their dicks together?
No.
Blowies, handies, rubbing dicks.
Fucking can't be done spontaneously
You must have a very unimaginative sex life
...
I don't have a sex life, but my point was anal is the main way gay people have sex, and i would assume the vast majority of them do it.
they smile for the picture, but what goes on behind closed doors?
bet they wanted the long dong of a black boy
that fucking horrified look on the cats face
Adoption from Africa should be banned. We don't need any more niggers in this country.
kek
>never seen the online orphan shopping centers
here's the one for West Virginia, a relatively white state.
>Browse West Virginia Children
wvdhhr.org
...
If anything the most common porn in gay sites is actually bears. And twinks aren't child's.
Yeh that's actually more common meeting someone random, anal has to be an agreement.
That image just made me sad if true
they should
also, allow singles to adopt/ have children through ivf or whatever
It's not in the best interests of the child tbqh but in the West offending a minority is seen as more regrettable than potentially messing up a child's life.
>And twinks aren't child's.
Still mostly underaged.
Once a faggot reaches 30, his value in the sex market drops to zero (Aka gay death). That's when they are most likely to be sexually starved.
Twinks are just effeminate skinny men, not underage boys.
You seem to know (assume) a lot of this for a non-gay man. Though you are mostly talking out of your ass.
That cat has seem some shit. The little baby knows something ain't right.
>le healthy gay relationship meme.
wow, are you the defender of the gays?
Yeah I'm a fag super hero.
I'm going to say yes. I meet, dated and slept with a tourist from Amstredam who has 3 mothers and a sprem donor who she barely knows. Parents got divorced and one remarried.
As an Australian she is by far the most reserved girl I've ever encountured. Rents her own apartment, has amibition in the film industry, works 2 pleb jobs to keep herself afloat while she follows her dream. That's better than like 90% of Aussie girls I know. Better than 100% of americo sluts, I fucked while they were here on exchange. She's one of like 3 girls who's insisted I use a condom. her 'last minute resistance' involved crying from the shame of sleeping with a guy she barely knew.
All in all, better than 95% of girls I've fucked only one to come from gay parents.
No
you have only shown you are just as degenerate as any faggot
try learning some modesty and decency you subhuman
>Muh sex only after marriage
>Not using your twenties to fuck as many women as you can
nope.
Most gays aren't child molesters, but most child molesters are gay.
>Not using your twenties to fuck as many women as you can
>Not using your teens to fuck as many faggots as you can.
yeah, Im not a teenager anymore. Your 20s should be used to focus on math, science, your career ect
women will only slow you down and give you mental problems
you answered your own question with all those statements mate. not sure why you need Sup Forums's opinion.
its called discussion, and changing the minds of others
dont nigger me
That's kinda gay Argentina.
do you have a link to the article?
Whats the age americans start college? I entered at 17… though i wasn't supposed to. A short career there is just 4 years (here it's six because we add an specialization). You have plenty of time.
Only if they adopt from their respective countries
>muh 3rd world asian baby
Fuck off we're full