How come african nations never had big wars amongst them even they are so violent?

how come african nations never had big wars amongst them even they are so violent?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Congo_War
bbc.com/news/world-africa-38669347
youtube.com/watch?v=UyydJOemUQ4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Rwanda? Angola? Today in Gambia?

...

they do. Their just isn't the same level of media over there, and not as many people interested in documenting it. Usually, it's foreigners who document African wars.

Before they were colonised they were mostly tribes and it's a bit hard to have big wars when all you have is sticks.

And they foguht all the time as soon as we gave them guns.

When colonised they were under our thumbs. Most of them are scared of someone bigger crushing them if they start stuff again.

takes a level of organization that they're not capable of.

>how come african nations never had big wars amongst them

A large-scale war requires coordinated planning, assault, counter-assault, and exit strategies.

Do you really think sub-humans can think that far ahead?

Africans generally don't organise along national lines. They're a tribal culture first and foremost.

They've had plenty, it's just nobody cares about them.

They fight all the time, they are just too poor to make it really big like us whites.

1998 - 2003
Second Congo War
2.7–5.4 million excess deaths

Noone cares

The countries don't have the infrastructure for modern mechanized combat. Also the wars tend to be along tribal lines, instead of supra national.

But even then, something like 5 million people died about 10 years ago in the second congo war.

And people barely noticed.

>ywn be a modern nigger condottiere running around pillaging and raping everything in your way as you take advantage of changing coalitions between the major forces in your shithole

Africans have never build a thing in their life they thought of themselves. Ever.
Then it is no surprise that they are not capable of doing mass warfare either.

there was a screencap over at /k/ detailing some really cool paratrooper exploits in African regional conflicts.

>A large-scale war requires coordinated planning, assault, counter-assault, and exit strategies.
>Do you really think sub-humans can think that far ahead?

"Since the dawn of history the GOOGLE has owned the continent of Africa – rich beyond the dream of poet’s fancy, crunching acres of diamonds beneath his bare GOOGLE feet and yet he never picked one up from the dust until a White man showed to him its glittering light.

The GOOGLES land swarmed with powerful and docile animals, yet he never dreamed a harness, cart, or sled.

Hunters by necessity, GOOGLES never made an axe, spear, or arrowhead worth preserving beyond the moment of its use.

The GOOGLES lived as an ox, content to graze for an hour.

In a land of stone and timber GOOGLES never sawed a foot of lumber, carved a block, or built a house save of broken sticks and mud.

With league on league of ocean strand and miles of inland seas, for 4000 years GOOGLES watched their surface ripple under the wind, heard the thunder of the surf on his beach, the howl of the storm over his head, gazed on the dim blue horizon calling him to worlds that lie beyond, and yet GOOGLES never dreamed a sail.”

these
op is a faggot

becouse "big war" requires, organization, discipline, tactics, and all of those things are not present in any nigger country.

a 10.000 european army could easily conquer entire Africa without ANY casulties

Lack of ambition

they can't afford it

>big wars
requires a *disciplined* army, not just a bunch of thugs in fatigues

The Second Congo War involved most of the continent and killed over 5 million. If you add in the First Congo War, and the Rwandan civil war/genocide the overall conflict lasted about a quarter century and killed 8 figures worth of people. Nobody knows it happened because lolafrica.

Yeah like Afghanistan or Viet-Nam

What's worse, roach: One big war or one small, constant war?

African war deaths are around 50 000 000 in the last 100 years. The continent is so backward reporting deaths are near impossible.

These wars were done on a much smaller scale than the world wars and the proxy deaths are probably a hundred million more.

The dark continent if left alone would probably see a population shrinkage of 99% in 100 years.

rules of engagement are a bitch.

ameriniggers are not europeans, also, doctrine of american war is not european doctrine

no rules of engagement or laws and literally just carpet bombing everything of value i.e food, water and fuel would stave a population in months.

You can use modern weapons to decapitate a nation without entering her borders. Today you can cheaply and effectively target the civilian population with several strains of flu to cause mass deaths in a city under siege.

Modern weapons are devastating on civilian populations. Without the civilian populations resistance evaporates.

They do constantly. The congolese civil war is the world's longest running conflict and has involved nearly every neighboring country iirc. Black africans are violent AF, but also dumb AF, so instead of brief, high-tech wars, you get endless low-tech tribal nigging.

do you remember any keywords? i want to read it from archive

You are kidding right? All that starvation they show us while begging for cash is a result of the constant wars there.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Congo_War

>all these people who don't know anything about niggers

fucking shame, learn your nigger history you dumb fucking cumskin little shits

It is truly hard to fight a war against yourself and your neighbor at the same time.

>Today in Gambia?

- American education

fpbp

Yeah, wtf are you talking about, OP? The center is in a constant state of war.

Somalia has been in a constant state of war since the 1980's.

There's no good side to take, and no resources, so we don't do very much about it.

bbc.com/news/world-africa-38669347

you need logistics for "big wars", which Africa does not have.
They just have constant violence like Detroit or Chicago, but on a Continental level

Wars there are always a "ruler vs population" scenario lol.

So how big do you think Gambia is?
Just curious.

Because no ammo

youtube.com/watch?v=UyydJOemUQ4

Be careful with your reasonable posting, leaf. The others will drive you out or make you retarded with their maple syrup machine.

because they're too unorganized
its why they have had a ton of smaller wars/conflicts

lol
Whats the European doctrine? Cavalierly charging tanks? Getting raped from two fronts at once while your allies do nothing but watch? Surrendering after two months?

Why this nigger is talking to a White Man about White history?

Problem with the Congo is nobody feels "Congolese".
It is just a collection of small tribes that don't give a shit when the neighboring tribe gets invaded.

they could never the complexities of logistics tro organize anything "big"

haha good one turkey, they have tribal wars because they are so far down on the iq ladder that all they can achieve is a group of 50-100 oogas fighting another group of oogas with blunt objects, usually guns that have run out of ammo because they cant aim or know the meaning of restraint

>pollacks
>human

Don't worry, Germany will solve the Polish Problem once and for all soon enough

What exactly are you asking here?

They did. You didn't hear about them because it was in Africa and so it didn't matter. Ethiopia and Somalia had a bigger tank battle than Kursk.

You have to stop being in constant civil war mode to have a war with another nation

lack of any real infrastructure or organization to fight a large scale war with.

on top of that there fucking nothing to fight over
>come one everybody let's die going from our patch of barely inhabitable disease infested jungle to another path of barely inhabitable disease infested jungle

Curious too

Which matters why? The Balkans is basically the same situation but with white (other than alboniggers) people instead of black africans. And yet the congo and virtually every other African state are 6 gorillion times more unstable and violent.

And they were chimping just as hard during the pre-colonial era. Look up the Zulu Mfecane. It's basically the holocaust, only real and done by niggers with spears and for no discernable reason.

>big war
takes organization&ressources
do i have to say more?

Multiculturalism at work!

>how come african nations never had big wars among them

Africa has zero technology and equipment.
there great wars are fought with spears and machetes. they last for whole minutes.

no news would bother reporting on it because the reporters always end up laughing on camera.

Kek, how fucking funny is it that there is this world we live in, mostly civilized and advanced, then there's this huge ultra-violent caveman nigger continent in the middle

No, since they are so uncivilized they fuck too much and will always have a decent population

>poland

There's war 24/7 but they don't have the means to make it look like a real modern time conflict.

When it comes to war we only look up when we hear words like bombing, air strike, invasion etc.

Those apes simply can't afford or even coordinate such things. All they can do is raid village after village with cheap and used AKs.

2 posts by this id

I have a new crayon called polish purple. It's green!

Bone dry, bone dry

tribal warfare. they can't organize enough to form a full fledged military

I spoke catelessly, it wasn't "bigger than Kursk" in terms of the actual numbers of main battle tanks, but it is significant and overlooked. And like Kursk it was primarily tank against tank.

fucking lel

No technology.

Even there'd been peace over that period 2 million would have starved to death anyway. Look up the break down of that war, only maybe 100k actually die from fighting

Which were literally colonies 100 years ago