Why have all predictions of global warming catastrophe proven to be wrong?

Why have all predictions of global warming catastrophe proven to be wrong?

Other urls found in this thread:

frontpagemag.com/point/263889/al-gores-environmental-scam-funded-george-soros-daniel-greenfield
skepticalscience.com/climate-models.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=ANMTPF1blpQ
sciencenews.org/article/changing-climate-10-years-after-inconvenient-truth
youtube.com/watch?v=rE3j_RHkqJc
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Dude the melting of the Arctic will be the best thing ever; just think of the new waterways and trade/prospecting opportunities

carbon credits
they would become a new financial instrument worth trillions
imagine if you invented the concept of a stock

because predicting complex natural phenomena with a multitude of variances accurately is almost impossible.

Related topic: The Economy.

And Manhattan was supposed to be underwater five years ago. Which is why it is now "climate change" instead of "global warming." The truth is, we have a long way to go before we match average temperatures prior to the Younger Dryas ice age cooling starting 14,000 years ago. In fact, we're at least 2 degrees celcius below the Medieval Warm Period when Northern England was warm enough to grow grapes for wine.

As an engineer i am very excited for the new opportunities global warming will bring. we will start building water pipelines from alaska and canada to california, increase offshore drilling, start building more lithium mines, and make faster trade routes. a report came out a few years ago that actually said climate change is a net positive for canada.

A FUCKING LEAF

Or all that fresh clay in Antarctica. Come home white man!

Climate Change is a real and present threat. It's not climate scientists' fault that the public takes their predictions literally. If you adjust the science consensus' models and claims to 'not true, but what that isn't evidence for anymore is still happening' then all the contradictions melt away

>or the new
it's funny because overall western/european countries will generally benefit from it, while shitskin countries will become even shittier sandboxes kek

Because it's a Jewish hoax

Next

Simply put (for OP's sake), science is not determined by emotion.

just as an FYI, Al Gore took exactly one science class in college and he got a fucking D in it, so nobody should ever take anything he says about global warming or climate change seriously. he's a fucking moron.

Super Cereal!

> its totally real
> it's science
> not to be taken literally

are you retarded?

if it is not to be taken literally, then it is NOT science

real scientists dont publish research based on metaphor, simile or aphorism, they publish papers base on observable phenomena and repeatable experimentation.

They can't even call it global warming anymore becuase they got BTFO so hard with independent scientists that arent (((funded through their Non profits)))

It's now climate change. Which is funny becuase I believe the earth wentry through a couple ice ages without human assistance.

Boils down to jews trying to convince dollars out of hard workers.

Because they were lies, lies, vicious lies!

It's always been climate change to anyone but total autists you moron. I swear pol is the most brain dead board.

Real scientists don't but the fuck heads on both sides misinterpret the actual science and romaticize it into either "dur we can't effect the climate it's dem greedy scientists. DRILL BABY DRILL" or its your al gore tier "in 10 months the whole world will flood" so read the fucking science you brain dead fucks instead of being "skeptical" because it hurts your fucking world view. Climate change is real and we already have proof and yes it's human facilitated

because global warming is bullshit for retards

now trump will crush this fake science

It's funny. Part of me knows they are wrong as hell but the other part of me, deep down, hopes they're right because a new ice age would be fucking beautiful. Nonwhites die by the millions. Imagine letting mother nature do the dotr for you. Not only that, but imagine fighting the battles of the third world war for the white race in fields of white snow and shimmering ice.

>Falling for the global warming hoax
WE GONNA INCREASE YOUR TAXES TO FIX THIS PROBLEM WE MADE UP

> in fields of white snow and shimmering ice.

BF2142 when?

>I swear pol is the most brain dead board

You fit right in.

Because it is another top-down control method.

Nah, It was "Global Warming" up until about 2010 when we went a decade without any rise in global temperature and all the doomsday predictions made by Gore in An Inconvenient Truth failed to show up on time. For a lot of people, it feels a lot like when some fundie says the Rapture is on for this weekend, and when the Second Coming fails to materialize, he has some reason for why Doomsday didn't happen on schedule, "but it's gonna happen this weekend, I swear you guys." You can only cry wolf so often, and the climate alarmists shot their wad seven years ago when the ice caps failed to disappear and the polar bears not only didn't go extinct, but doubled in number. Gore and the other Global warming alarmists could have dialed down a notch and retained some credibility when Doomsday failed to materialize, but it was always about scaring everybody into radical and effectively irreversible action more than anything else. And that failed spectacularly.

This

Because it's a hoax that politicians still don't quite know how to pitch right. Is the climate getting warmer? Sure. Is it because of humans? Absolutely not.

> eu was black

I used to be pretty fuckin mad at this, but my friend kept trying to explain it's because EU and USA are together so that's where the nigger's from

>buys beachfront property he predicted would be underwater couple of years later.

the fact that they seamlessly changed the term from "global warming" to "climate change" should be indicative enough of it being a fraud

The same reason some chucklefucks thinkGore is scientifically literate

Because your efforts have been helping! But we're still a long way from fixing it entirely! WE NEED MORE OF YOUR DOLLARS OR ELSE WE WILL ALL DIE!!!!

if the poles melt wouldnt the world get colder for a little whikle? like, colder on average?

CANT WAIT

Because Al Gore isn't a scientist, and the North Pole is predicted to melt at 2050

frontpagemag.com/point/263889/al-gores-environmental-scam-funded-george-soros-daniel-greenfield

It is still global warming, which is a type of climate change.

>The truth is, we have a long way to go before we match average temperatures prior to the Younger Dryas ice age cooling starting 14,000 years ago. In fact, we're at least 2 degrees celcius below the Medieval Warm Period when Northern England was warm enough to grow grapes for wine.
pic related

I don't blame humans for climate change, this cycle of warming and cooling has been demonstrated to occur regularly in the Earth's history.

But we, as humans, still need to consider what sorts of adjustments we need to make while things are still pretty calm.

Water levels ARE going to rise, so if you live in a coastal region, your city / community needs to start factoring into their budget what steps they'd like to take to adapt to the rising water.

No retard. It's because Al Gore isn't a scientist, so his predictions are politically motivated. But the predictions made by actual scientists are very accurate
skepticalscience.com/climate-models.htm

>causing refugee crisis
>will destroy the Gulf Stream, which will throw Europe into an ice age, while making the Americas overheat
>will flood Europe
>will increase natural catastrophe amount
>already destroyed 50% of plankton in the ocean, who are the bottom of the food chain
>will eventually collapse the food chain
>etc.

It's still called global warming, retard.
You live in some sort of echo chamber where you believe you are making "progress" against le ebil illumanti, whereas the truth is that more and more people are accepting it, to the point that the Paris agreement happened, China is the biggest investor in clean energy and the entire world is working together to stop it.
The US is the only first world country that has a significant climate change denier population.

youtube.com/watch?v=ANMTPF1blpQ

>It's still called global warming, retard.
and thats why you lose, retard

how many would not get grants/salary if it was realized that global warming was not a thing. They even had to change it to climate change as damage control. See this documentary it should interest you. They are working with a misunderstood model this is why their predictions are wrong, the model in that video predicted the cooling trends that are now being experienced.

t. climate science circlejerk

And that prediction was made over 15 years ago btw. What do you want to believe, what you can observe to be true/happening or the bogus stuff they claim to be true but never did happen?

>opinion trash
>flag comfy af

It still is global warming, retard
Nobody cancelled it, because we still emit more CO2 than ever.

And the predictions made in Al Gore's movies are actually coming true
sciencenews.org/article/changing-climate-10-years-after-inconvenient-truth

>politicians
Global warming was found in the scientific community
And majority of scientists agree that it is man made

>About 40% of human CO2 emissions are being absorbed, mostly by vegetation and the oceans. The rest remains in the atmosphere. As a consequence, atmospheric CO2 is at its highest level in 15 to 20 million years (Tripati 2009). A natural change of 100ppm normally takes 5,000 to 20.000 years. The recent increase of 100ppm has taken just 120 years.

>Manhattan will be underwater in your lifetime
Stop, I can't love global warming more than I already do

>retard alert

co2 is not the driver assclown.. this is why their model is wrong and their predictions are/were wrong. See this. youtube.com/watch?v=ANMTPF1blpQ which correctly predicted what we are experiencing currently and the why might surprise you!

Because science died with Tesla. Anybody calling themselves a scientist these days has no credibility. They took peer review and turned it into "let's agree with the findings that make us the most money, regardless of the amount of p-value hacking involved in obtaining our skewed results".

Modern science is nothing more than a substitute religion for atheists.

co2 is not the driver co2 emission is RESULT.. the sun and the other planetary spheres and galactic cosmic rays, but especially the sun and its cycles in relation to movement through spiral arms effecting cloud cover is what drives the climate.

Sounds good until you realise they'll probably all migrate to where you live.

...

It's actually quite fantastic how intricately it works so i'll link the video one last time IIT.

youtube.com/watch?v=ANMTPF1blpQ

Manbearpig!

don't asky questions, goy! get back to work!

Wow that hurt my brain

Bullshit. That is absolute blind faith bullshit. You are a fucking retard if you honestly believe that statement. Science is ABSOLUTELY emotional.

>What causes cancer?
We have no idea, but we know that faggots and trannies are totally born that way.

>Where did the moon come from?
We have no idea, but we can definitely state that anyone who believes in God is stupid and backwards.

>Why do we have hiccups?
We have no idea, but we can tell you that babies have orgasms so a toddler and a grown man in a relationship is totally natural.

You're a public-educated moron.

Because it's a science that makes predictions not based in math.

Science has only been concerned with so-called "first qualities" (extension, movement, etc.) for the past one or two centuries with few exceptions. The democratizing impulse in politics exists also in science. By and large the concern is "what can it do for us" rather than "what is it in itself." Thus we make ourselves absolutely dependent on machines and technology, to the point that if we were forced to return to life without machines, an enormous number of people would starve, die of exposure, die of thirst, etc.

There are no more Isaac Newtons or Nikola Teslas. Instead we have effete Jews and Indians with flabby bodies and whiny voices, who treat investigation into the nature of existence as a "job," while basking in the adoration of people who enjoy The Big Bang Theory.

And if you dare to question their dogmas, they'll ridicule you and ruin your career. How's that "freedom" working out for you, western man?

It's global warming, and it's still happening.

The person who would disprove global warming would be getting thousands of awards.
They never changed it to "climate change". Global warming is climate change. They call it both climate change and global warming, but climate change is used to refer to a more general phenomenon.

>They are working with a misunderstood model this is why their predictions are wrong, the model in that video predicted the cooling trends that are now being experienced.
>They
This word alone shows me your worldview. You see it as "us vs them".

>t. armchair scientist who is smarter than millions of people who actually work in the field, do studies and create theories that accurately predict the phenomena.

The prediction made by Al Gore means nothing, because Al Gore isn't a scientist. The prediction made by thousands of scientists who all do independent research and come up with the same findings actually does mean something.

>Climate change is real and we already have proof and yes it's human facilitated

This is what blind faith looks like. This is what we mean when we say that modern science is a substitute religion for atheists.

>The person who would disprove global warming would be getting thousands of awards.

That's where you're wrong, they refused to publish the study in the first place for many years.. not because there was anything wrong with it but it didn't fit the narrative of global warming that they were invested in.

These people don't care about the truth, with "climate change" science has become politically biased.

Retard alert!
CO2 does drive global warming.

Earth is a system that has a certain amount of heat in it. It receives heat from outside and releases heat back outside. For the temperature to stay stable, the amount of heat it releases and receives needs to stay approximately the same.

Earth receives heat from the sun through electromagnetic waves, but releases heat back into space only through infrared waves. CO2 blocks infrared waves, meaning heat becomes trapped in Earth, while the sun is still able to put more heat into Earth. That leads to global warming.

so why do (((experts))) get so pissy when anyone questions them?

This has never been shown, and any person who tried to claim so has been BTFOd by real science

>[The person who tried to claim that warming causes CO2] is claiming that his model shows that the long-term upward trend in CO2 is explained by temperature, when his methods actually removed the long-term trend.

The North Pole was predicted to have already melted by 1987. You're falling for the same truck that Jehovah's witnesses fell for when the apocalypse didn't happen in 1914. Every Jehovah's witness alive today is a fucking idiot for continuing to operate based on a method of interpretation that was fabricated specifically to bolster a doomsday claim failed. Every one of you retards who still buy into "man-made climate change" as an actual thing are literally as stupid as a Jehovah's witness.

Environmentalists are frauds. It's based on pseudoscience just like evolution and eugenics. Relies so heavily on feels that real evidence, proofs, and mathematics must be ignored.

>was warm enough to grow grapes for wine.
can confirm:
In Roman times Belgium used to export wine. This died off after the cooling of the earth, but it is slowly coming back.

>the climate community hated the idea that something other than co2 caused climate change
oy vey youtube.com/watch?v=ANMTPF1blpQ

Can someone explain to me where everyone is getting this " 90% of scientists believe global warming is real and man-made"
" you would discredit the majority of the scientific body in favor of Uncle conspiracy down the street?"
This has been thrown around a lot with no citation and I've just been wondering where this came from and isn't even true who are the scientists?

just go watch the video jackass you might learn something. I linked it 3 times for the intellectually biased and obtuse such as you.

Yeah, lets just cut down more rain forests.

fear mongering.

>they would become a new financial instrument worth trillions
>imagine if you invented the concept of a stock

interesting thought

If you try to publish a retarded pseudo-scientific paper without rigorous scientific method, people won't want to publish your paper

not only is climate science is a massive circlejerk, but those numbers are actually fabricate and include scientists that don't even believe it

This

youtube.com/watch?v=rE3j_RHkqJc

*fabricated*

I'm not gonna spend 50 minutes watching some Earth-is-flat tier video
TL;DR the video

This is a great example of feels over science.

It's not pseudo science at all and it has been published. The video is actually more of a scientific documentary covering the findings of it. And the irrational resistance from certain aspects of the scientific community that for many years refused to even examine the evidence, and it quickly became hush hush.. moving along and not mentioned much.

One of them literally told henrik that it would "be irresponsible to suggest that man was not responsible for global warming". Well if it's true and the evidence points towards it then it's very responsible to suggest!

Here you go, different studies that all ended up getting similar results. See pic

It's not earth is flat tier, these are real scientists dumbass not pseudo scientists.

Maybe you should learn some science then.

>China is the biggest investor in clean energy

Because of the pollution in their big cities, not because of global warming.

Zealot religious environmental religion retard alert

prove that man made CO2 is enough to affect the atmosphere
Prove that natural sources of CO2 don't far out weight the amount of CO2 man puts into the atmosphere
Prove the sun transfers a consistent amount of energy to the earth every year and has for recorded history
Why is it bad for the earth to warm?
What is the perfect temperature for the earth?
Is 50 years of semi accurate temperature recording a 12 billion year old planet a large enough sample to indicate yet alone predict temperature and weather patterns?

You are not a scientific skeptic you are a religious zealot that would put a scientologist to shame

TL;DR it retard

Exactly. Gore and D'capprio might as well invoke the Flying Spaghetti Logic Monster as their source.

That poll was literally conducted with a sample pool of "scientists" who were walking out of a private screening of "An Inconvenient Truth" before its release in theatres.

"98.5% of scientists agree with what's in this movie" is ACTUALLY "98.5% of scientists are incapable of critical thought, because the test-based public education system that indoctrinated them taught them that simply being able to recite facts is the same as being able to understand and apply facts."

Anyone who believes the findings of modern science has never done any research beyond reading the link titles on r/atheism.

And because of global warming, otherwise they wouldn't have agreed to the Paris agreement

I did and still am. Maybe you should.

The same reason Scientologist get pissy

This.

The polar ice caps aren't fucking gone. It's still cold out and I swear to God winter was never that cold where I am to begin with.

There's one (((UN))) report where people reach an consensus about the 'science ' in direct violation of the scientific method. It uses deliberately skewed computer models where the graph is normal and then the predicted trend rises ALL OF A SUDDEN when the model kicks in. We've only been tracking climate data for under 100 years. We don't even really know what's under the group below us or in the depths of the oceans, but somehow a few ice cores showing climate fluctuations means we will go beyond anything ever observed based on agreement by some liberal meme scientists. As a person and an engineer this upsets me to no end.

This is why you don't understand why the predictions don't come true, you simply refuse to listen, this same thing was what puzzled henrik svensmark, they simply refuse to even look at it or hear it!

this
chinese air is almost unbreathable

You've done a piss poor job of it.

Worst post ever