HOW IS THIS EVEN ALLOWED?

and now repeat after me - I AM NO KEK

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/image/gvJf6heFVURbR1eUdOBOhQ/
threetypes.com/philosophy/the-3-types-of-income/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Thank the republican party for that. The funniest thing is the poor rednecks and hick white trash here in the US kept voting republican because the republicans told them the gays and blacks are gonna hurt their lives. When will white trash learn?

how can we save ourselves from taking big ultrarich jew dick?

I know right. This could all be solved if we kill 2 billion poor people. That would raise the global median income tremendously.

Or tax 8 men and redistribute wealth to white hard working middle class. Fuck them niggers, they produce nothing... Only middle class ACTUALLY produce shit.

It would desu

I vote for the Chinks and Poo's to be sacrificed.

>8 white men are richer than a bunch of Africans, poos, and chinks stuck in communism.

ftfy

They earned it. I don't see any problem here, socialist shill

How stupid you have to be to believe this I wonder....

>having inheritance
>being investment jewschemeer
earned it... nice try cuckold

red pilled trap sign me up I'm a degenerate why even try anymore

This fucking thread. Every single day... The reason it's allowed is that the people who think it shouldn't be allowed are always extremely incompetent, and so they always fail to explain rationally why it should be disallowed. Why is it hard for you to grasp?

>redistribute wealth
Kill yourself
And end jewery instead
Fractal reserve banking is highway robbery and this shit is the result

8 white men that have like 1.5 kids on average while Africans and chinks have 10 which means white people wont even exist in 50 years.

BECAUSE IF THE MADE EVERYBODY A MILLIONAIRE THEN IN LIKE 1 WEEK MAX FEW SMART PEOPLE WOULD HAVE HALF THE WORLD'S WEALTH AGAIN

You realize half of the people on that list are technocrats and not Jewish bankers, right? The bankers probably have much more than that but that's obviously not going to be published, goy.

>Fractal reserve banking is highway robbery
You mean fractional reserve. And yes, yes it is.

I vote whites

It would effectively tax the rich as well as get rid of beta cucks

It clearly shows that the system is rigged and the 1% of scumbags at the top are criminals. I probably would be ok with it if they used what they had to help develop the world and solve it's problems but what they do is only trying to hold on to status quo no matter the consequences to the planet and its inhabitants

It's quite easy to explain. We live in a society based on slavery. We always have. And we all agreed that slavery is wrong.

>8 men as rich as half of the population

The way this "study" measures wealth is completely fucking retarded. It essentially completely neglects material wealth and only counts money and debt.

According to this study, a poor kid in Bangladesh is richer than your average American because the poor kid doesn't have any debt. How fucking insightful.

>no KEK
>not collecting pepes

Faggot

>muh opinions about what it clearly shows
>muh opinions about what the rich should do with their money
That's not a rational argument for why the amount of wealth someone can accumulate should be limited.

>people having more money than i approve of is slavery
That's not a rational argument for why the amount of wealth someone can accumulate should be limited. See, this is what I mean when I say you're not competent enough to provide a rational argument.

I think you linked the wrong comment, bro.

Oh. You're right. I meant the one above you:

kek

Well, draw the fucking line somewhere and tell me it's not communism.

this conclusion is made by leftists.

Because in their calculation the average american citizen actually has a debt of $50k.

Which skews the numbers greatly.

They are asking for revolution.

3 billion times 0 is sill fucking zero. EOT.

Ask your grandparents about Commisar Schlomo.

WE NEEDA GIB MO MONEY FO DEM PROGRAMS MAN WHITEY HOLDIN OUT SHIEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Every society based on private property is slavery, because owning a property generates wealth without having to work. Getting money without working makes you a slave master. Very simple.

>owning a property generates wealth without having to work
Prove this claim.

>Getting money without working makes you a slave master.
No. Forcing people to work for you against their will is slavery. Your definition of "slavery" is completely made up.

>Getting money without working makes you a slave master.
I plant a tree. Tree yields fruits every year on its own. I sell the fruits. By your logic, I am a slave master.

had the exact same discussion with a liberal friend a few days ago. he totally avoided rational argumentation and kept on talking about how it is unfair and how we should provide equal opportunities for the poor Africans.

None of people who hold most power in the world are in this list, not even close. So in the end this is bullshit.
Problem is that societies which abolished private property are known to regularly produce much more cruel slavemasters.

Buy an apartment. Rent it. Now you have monthly payment without having to work. Very simple.

So you disregard the point about how was is it possible for them to accumulate the wealth as just an opinion? Have you ever read a book about anything related to money, economics and history? And btw I'm not saying amount of money one can have should be limited, I'm saying scumbags, killers and thieves should hang.

Fucking commie

While you're at it, why not send all the rich to gulags. And engineers too. And anyone else who's remotely productive.

>Now you have monthly payment without having to work
you had to work in order to get an apartment first.

>i like to suck my masters cock.

Inheriting money isn't really a hard thing to do. Once you have it you can even just pay someone else to maintain it.

>Happened under Obama's administration.

also this

Stop spamming the same shit over and over you fucking faggot.

archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/image/gvJf6heFVURbR1eUdOBOhQ/

>muh 1%
You realize that includes any house income above 300k/year ?

>Buy an apartment. Rent it. Now you have monthly payment without having to work.
Yes, and as I've already demonstrated, this is not slavery because:
1. Your definition of slavery is your own made up definition, not the actual definition
2. By your definition of slavery, if I plant a tree and sell fruits, I'm a slave-owner now
If you still don't understand why your argument is insanely idiotic, I don't think anyone can help you.

>be bank
>print money
>buy an apartment

See?You don't have to work. You also could have inherited it, won the lottery, stolen the money without getting prosecuted etc... and all of these scenarios happen way too often.

implying bankers are producive

>no mention of nobility and royalty

Really made me rothschild

>So you disregard the point about how was is it possible for them to accumulate the wealth
Yes, because it's completely irrelevant. I wasn't asking you to speculate about how they accumulate the wealth. I asked you for a rational justification of whatever arbitrary limit you want to put on the amount of wealth an individual can accumulate
You people are mind-blowingly incredibly dense...

Middle class and rich people all voted Trump.
Only poor retards voted for Clinton.

I use the 1% figuratively, looks better than 0.001% and I don't know exact percentage of those top cucks but you missed the point

>could
there we go

>and all of these scenarios happen way too often
you know what happens even more often? people work for it.

get yourself a job pls.

>Thank the republican party for that
ah yes. the republican big names like bill gates mark zuckerberg and jeff bezos

you're a fucking retard

>he makes up his own bizarre definition of slavery
>he refuses to acknowledge all the bizarre outcomes of his definition
>he thinks that giving some examples of things he doesn't like that fall under his bizarre definition of slavery proves something
I am baffled that you exist.

Lets redistribute it so everyone gets $118!

>hands of so jew
subtle

You know it was the opposite right ? Besides blacks of course

(((8 richest men)))

Red pill me on fractional reserve banking, Moshe.

It's not irrelevant you poor little cuck, all you are saying is " I know how capitalst system works and I'm gonna laugh at anyone who says there is anything wrong with it at all and it's gonna look like I'm smart while I just repeat bullshit I believed at face value without thinking about it" what you are saying is basically Russia should use all their nukes tomorrow and try to wipe out as many people as they can cause it's their nukes and everything else is irrelevant.

(((oxfam)))

You cannot plant a tree without owning the land first.
The definition of slavery has shifted from "working for free" to "being underpaid". If you own a company with 10 workers and you underpay them by 50%, it is is equal to having 5 slaves who work for free.

How many times is 1 larger than 0?

Half of the world population doesn't even understand the concept of money. They still barter with chickens.

Don't drag them into your commie propaganda!

Yes, and it always be. No matter how much you will try.
Every system got weaknesses that can be exploited.

Give me one reason I shouldn't pass my wealth on to whomever I want, Commissar Petroff.

The blame belongs on the poor people who feed these 8 people all their money.
STOP GIVING THEM ALL YOUR MONEY..
okay dokey.

Actually, it's the crime stats that told them blacks are going to hurt them

>asians are the most hardworking people
>The richest family in the world is a banking family that prints money


Your argument is void. Read a book or two.

hey, doc. ill give you a chicken if you pull out my rotten tooth.

You realize that poor people having 10 kids is part of the reason there are so many poor people, right? The West needs to stop subsidizing this.

>scumbags, killers, and thieves
Microsoft sucks, but really?

>It's not irrelevant
It is irrelevant, because I asked you a question and you repeatedly refuse to answer it, because that's a little harder than spewing mindless recycled Marxist rhetoric.

>You cannot plant a tree without owning the land first
So if I have a house and I plant a tree in my garden, I'm a slave owner. Are you sure you're not a full-blown schizophrenic?

>The definition of slavery has shifted from "working for free" to "being underpaid"
No. The definition of slavery is still "forcing someone to work against their will". You don't get to redefine what words mean and then pretend the new meaning is still bad because the old one was. Your idiocy is mindblowing.

>poor people having 10 kids is part of the reason there are so many poor people
what else to they have to do? if you didn't have nothing to do all day but sit around and socialize with your female neighbors you would end up with ten kids too.

>setting up a strawman

kek

*unsheathes sleeve*
*rubs hands behind you*
Nothing personal kid.

how is my argument void when the most common source of income is work?
you are an unemployed NEET in his twenties, lazy as fuck, blames capitalism and everyone except him for his laziness, and just states how mean and bad the world is while hoping that one day you might win the lottery or inherit some money.
>if you work you are a slave!1!1! Money is slavery!!1!
stop looking for excuses.
I have also have a question for you: How do rich people affect you and your daily life? How do banking families affect you and your daily life? Pro tip: They have little to no impact on you but you are looking for a scapegoat to defend your NEET-worldview.

IMAGINE A WORLD WITH NO AFRICA.

>Hands of so jew

Kek

Solution: Redistribute the means of production.

Ges chumbos?

You have to buy the house first in order to have a garden. You simply confirmed my argument and admitted you are wrong. Thank you.

No matter how you call it the principle is the same- you exploit others for their labor using private property. You could call it slavery or exploitation, but principle is the same.


>how is my argument void when the most common source of income is work?

it is not. Most common source of income is private property. 20 Rotschild family members are richer than entire UK. It is mathematicaly and logically impossible that 20 people can be more productive than 60 million people no matter how smart and hard working they are.

>You have to buy the house first in order to have a garden.
So just answer the fucking question, you imbecile: if I buy a house, I plant a tree in the garden and I sell some fruits, I'm a slaver owner according to your definition and you don't think it's absurd? So I'm not allowed to have a house or plant a tree? Just answer these questions, you mental cripple.

>Most common source of income is private property
that's wehre you're wrong kiddo.
threetypes.com/philosophy/the-3-types-of-income/
>While earned income is the most common mechanism for making money [...]

>Most common source of income is private property
also in oreder of getting private property one needs to work.

guess there is no way in turning him away from his communist utopia and NEET-worldview.

need to work now. bye. i hope i won't get enslaved today

sucking the jewish dick isnt enough burger?

most common =/= most efficient
You first argument was "most property owned is earned by working" which his simply not true: at least according to OPs image-since 1% owns more than half of worlds assets, and they are all property owners, not wage slaves.

It's a stupid question. Does owning a gun make you a killer? It does if you use your gun to kill people.

He's saying that private property is unfair because it has been unfairly distributed.

Inheritance is something that was earned to be passed down to later generations of a family. Fucking commie scum

Yes. Thank god we have people like Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian, otherwise our society would collapse.

You did not answer the questions, you absolute imbecile. You're claiming that getting money without working is slavery. Now I'm asking you a series of simple yes-no questions:

1. Is it okay for me to own a house?
2. Is it okay for me to plant a tree?
3. Is it slavery if I sell fruits from the tree I planted?

Just answer the questions, you mental cripple. How hard could it be?

>anectodal evidence
And Trump inherited loan of a million from his father and turned it into billions, what's your point?

Some may take advantage of the inheritance while others will do jackshit with it other than stroking their ego but what matter is that the previous generation rightfully earned it and wanted to leave it for their children.

These men made that money by usury and manipulation of the finance markets, the same thing Sup Forums hates about Jews. Why defend the ultrarich? Sure, they're smart enough to profit from the system we're in, but there's no reason for us peasants to defend or justify their existence. Might makes right, and when shit happens for real they will be the first to be killed by a mob