Left-wing Economics Are Better But Right Wing Social Policies Are Better

If you disagree with this fact you are not redpilled. Fiscal Leftism with Social Conservatism. How is this not the best ideology out there?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=6P40_kd-mS8
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

you voted trudeau didnt you

It's retarded, just like you

It's the other way around, dumbass

Hows North Korea doing?

delete this shit

im reporting it as well

pinochet is right wing you stupid fucking leaf

you have dishonored him and Chile

sage

Trudeau believes in Far-Right economics and Far-Left Social policy, THE OPPOSITE of my post

You're retarded if you disagree

No moron. The other way around is for degenerate Ayn Rand lovers.

Pretty good if you ignore the garbage

You know telling a post is being reported is a bannable offense right?

>Left-wing Economics Are Better
Of course, because driving up workers wages whilst taxing the shit out of the rich to pay for the welfare of the workers who are now priced out of the market and thus move their operation overseas and hire 3rd worlders instead and then borrowing money to pay for the now bloated welfare state is a wonderful idea you FUCKING LEAF!

Yeah sure, allowing big corporations to do whatever the fuck they want thus driving them overseas plus importing a bunch of third-world low skilled workers to replace our jobs is TOTALLY better for the working class.

>If you disagree with this fact you are not redpilled.

Stop eating food.

>allowing big corporations to do whatever the fuck they want thus driving them overseas
What are you talking about? Over regulation drives companies overseas, why would letting them do whatever they want make them move their operations to Thailand and China?
They only do that because paying to ship all their crap back to 1st world countries is cheaper than operating in 1st world countries.

Funny since right-wing economics have ALWAYS led to starving people

No moron. If we allow corporations to do fuck all they will go overseas. If we pass a bazillion laws detailing what they can and can not do they won't even be allowed to move overseas.

Because I have a job.

youtube.com/watch?v=6P40_kd-mS8

protip: it's always gonna be more expensive in the first world

capitalism leads to some people starving

communism leads to everyone starving

Would you prefer some people starving or everybody starving leaf
Centralised government(required for left wing) is only viable in a small community such as a town

>If we pass a bazillion laws
Up to and including stopping these people from liquidating their assets and starting from scratch somewhere else?
Because that's the logical conclusion you totalitarian.

>He thinks this is "everyone" starving

>everybody starving
KEK

It's the other way around you stupid!

It's pretty obvious that you're never going to provide an actual example of what you're arguing for. Likely because no positive example exists.
Well played though leaf, had me going.

You tell them it's illegal for them to let their wealth leave the country. They won't start a new life penniless in India because they have to pay some freaking tax.

Both Franco and Pinochet exerted strict control over their economies at the outset of their regimes, with disastrous results. When on the advice of Chicago School economists they began to relax state control over markets, those economies became fairly healthy.

The only problem with American capitalism is it is infested with Jews.

If you disagree with my post it's you who is stupid

>no positive examples exist
Ok you're trolling but wutever here

Then the rich as a class will pool their resources to fund whatever politician comes along to unfuck the nightmare you've just created.

>leaf

When the United States had a State run economy quality of life was top notch. When America started to become Free Market the wealth inequality skyrocketed.

That's why you make it illegal to be rich

>Left-wing Economics Are Better
OP dosn't even know the meaning of the word "economics"
Leafs... every time!

You don't know the meaning of the word "leaf"

Kys fucking leaf, you have it backwards retard.

no one is this stupid

>you have it backwards
You're a mentally ill retard. If you disagree then you should have cancer.

You're a troll, no one is as stupid as you are pretending to be. I already pegged you as a troll.

Exactly opposite. Fiscal conservatism and fuck the government if they try to tell me what I can and cannot do.

>fiscal conservatism
No fuck that bullshit. That just leads to the rich controlling EVERYTHING

>fuck the government if they try to tell me what i can and canno't do
t. degenerate.

>leaf on leaf action
what.

Fuck off Cuckdeau

Absolute egalitarianism is actually counter-productive, though; because the government becomes focused on appeased the lowest-tier of niggers.

The meritocratic forge of capitalism is good in a way, because it helps people who have better skills, intelligence, and/or determination acquire more wealth, and thus influence society from a position of objective wisdom. Albeit, there are negatives to this too, when the children of rich elites don't strive to be as good as their parents, and just waste the wealth, or use it to support treason against the nation. These aren't as common, or as big of a danger as letting the country be government by total plebs though - as Marxism entails.

Hitler understood this, that's why National Socialism was a mix of government welfare programs, and also a degree of free market capitalism. The lynchpin was that both labor and management had to adhere to the tenants of German nationalism, though; and traitors were punished regardless of their social status.

I'm not a total capitalist, I just think that capitalism is a more valid model than plebeian socialism.

Fuck off you Trudeau-Obama loving prick

>muh lolbertarianism

Centrist economics and social conservatism is the best.

Functionally, at the extremes the rich and powerful control everything. Left or right. Or do you believe magical communism can be achieved?

>The meritocratic forge of capitalism is good in a way, because it helps people who have better skills, intelligence, and/or determination acquire more wealth, and thus influence society from a position of objective wisdom
The Jews are influencing society from a position of objective wisdom?

Except you need to have a left-wing state run economy so you can have a meritocracy. And a meritocracy is what drives growth and industry.

>Hitler understood this, that's why National Socialism was a mix of government welfare programs, and also a degree of free market capitalism. The lynchpin was that both labor and management had to adhere to the tenants of German nationalism, though; and traitors were punished regardless of their social status.
Fascism was left-wing economically. It valued meritocracy rather than letting a bunch of dumb rich drunks run everything

How is Centrist economics the best?

Exactly. The extreme right wants the public to be serfs to the rich and the extreme left wants everyone to depend on the wisdom and largess of the government. Sucks either way.

Actually I do as it was achieved in the 1950s when America had social conservatism with a left-wing state run economic system.

Jews get where they are allowed to be openly nepotistic and ethnocentric, unlike whites. Also, lots of them went into the baker field beginning in the Renaissance Era of Europe.

If you actually read my post, you'd see the part about nationalism being the standard that all facets of the society should adhere too. In my ideal government, the Jews would get arrested and have their wealth seized for being degenerate traitors.

Not the welfare state, no. Economic policy that promotes the strength of the nation and the workers.

Hitler was left-wing economically BTW

>He doesn't know about Krupp Steel Corporation

I know all about it STUPID

If Hitler saw the results of the welfare state he wouldn't support it. The welfare state has created a rotten underclass.

Welfare state is stupid