Drumpf BTFO

...

Other urls found in this thread:

edition.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

quit being a poofter and show what it looked like when it mattered

What, exactly the same? You can even see in the background how empty it is, despite the low angle.

On the left was 10:30. Right was 8:20

if you weren't an idiot, and marooned on a wind swept rock, you'd know that travelling deep into enemy territory to attend Trump's inauguration is quite different than King Nigger providing free bus rides and lunch to every Obama son on the East Coast so they could attend.

Are these threads equivalent to those threads where retards drooled over every mm movement of blue and red lines of worthless polls?

Also:
What does that picture change?

Shills

Wow thanks for posting this, I was worried that I would go 10 minutes without seeing this posted again.

>What does that picture change?
Well, it was big of enough deal to be the topic of the first press conference in the white house.

>This was the largest audience to witness an inauguration. Period!

...

that was hilarious, the white house having a rant about the crowd numbers. what tiny cocks they must have to behave so weakly

Embarrassing really. It's pic related all over again.

But, Trump is still the president. In addition, the inauguration was broadcast all around the world on many channels live, plus on the internet.
Still not a big newsworthy thing the number of people there, especially considering how the press gets more useless tabloid news day by day.

>Still not a big newsworthy thing the number of people there, especially considering how the press gets more useless tabloid news day by day.
Then why does Trump send his press secretary to cry about? Jesus Christ. This wasn't even a big thing in the media.

He could have talked about Trump signing an executive order to roll back Obamacare or something like that. Instead the topic was a rant about crowd sizes. And he took no questions. Impressive.

Maybe Trump will fire him.

Why is the media and lefty niggers on here deliberately lying about the crowd then?

THERE WERE 6 GORILLION AT THE CROWD HOW DARE YOU SUGGEST OTHERWISE

I dont doubt that obama drew a bigger crowd. he was the first ape president after all.

edition.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/

Trump's crowd was slightly smaller than Bill Clinton's inauguration if the latest rough estimates turn out to be right. Shit's sad when you take population growth into account, but you have a point that republicans are a small minority in the northeast and D.C.

Also, people who show the gigapixel hoping to prove the aerial photo wrong are shooting themselves in the foot. Shit is veritably the crowd size during Trump's speech. You can clearly zoom and match up all the white spots and sparse crowds in the aerial photo with the low-angle they got by comparing each squared off barricaded area in both photos. It also gives you an idea of how the illusion of 'more people/less empty space' is created by depth perception on a 2D picture becomes more 'squashed' and harder to parse as the distance increases-- Just look at the last towers in the back row near the monument and compare it with the aerial picture. Shit looks like it's only a couple feet from the white building in front of the monument (a building that wasn't there in 2009 and was instead a jam-packed crowd of jigaboos according to aerial pictures).

did it rain back then too?

USA BTFO

Occupy Democrats is popcorn for nig-nogs, cunts, and sheckle grabbers