I just found one of the most illuminating articles I've ever read. It's long as fuck...

I just found one of the most illuminating articles I've ever read. It's long as fuck, but if you want to understand the radical/violent paranoia of the left, then you really owe it to yourself to read this.

status451.com/2017/01/20/days-of-rage/

Here's my favorite part:

>Weatherman bombed the Pentagon in ’72, but by 1974, they’re fighting among themselves, arguing about feminism (hence their name change to Weather Underground). And this is where Weather Underground becomes incredibly relevant to 2016 again: because they decided to re-enter mainstream politics. To do this, they decided, they would take over the radical left, and use that as wedge/entry point to change society.

>...

>Everything goes smoothly in Weather’s plan until the PFOC conference happens, which looks stunningly like what we’re seeing emerge in today’s Democratic party politics. The white leftist elites (Weather) are stunned to discover that the diverse radicals (black, American Indian, Puerto Rican) they’ve imagined leading actually have opinions of their own, and perfectly rational desires for their own power, and no desire to be ruled by Weather’s upper-crust radicals.

>One of Burrough’s Weather interviewees notes that she was very upset and rattled to continually be called racist. This was before white leftists started to unpack their invisible knapsacks and bewail their whiteness as original sin. She couldn’t grasp it.

>In the end, Weather was ignominously expelled from their own conference by a Communist who had been one of their former members. (Said Commie later got arrested himself by the Feds when he tried to start a bombing campaign of his own).

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=CpSXLqikT9I
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haymarket_affair
gallup.com/poll/160373/democrats-racially-diverse-republicans-mostly-white.aspx
youtube.com/watch?v=DnX0RCl5MaY
keywiki.org/Main_Page
keywiki.org/Weather_Underground_Organization
nbcnews.com/news/world/iran-hosts-u-s-activists-conference-police-brutality-n452171
vimeo.com/33006390
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Please bump if you find it interesting so others can see it.

Also for what it's worth, I have no affiliation with the writers or this blog. I found the post in a plebbit thread.

That extract doesn't really say anything, it just says the atmosphere of society has changed. Which we know since the radical left has taken over.

It might be a good read though. I think I will read it.

Here's my second favorite part:

>In fall of 1968, there were 41 bombings and arson cases on college campuses. We’re not talking letters under doors or vandalism, here. We’re talking about Molotov cocktails setting shit on fire. Here’s how radical SDS was: Burrough notes that Weatherman’s opponents for leadership in SDS elections were “Progressive Labor,” who were literal Maoists. To distinguish themselves, Weatherman called for white radicals to live like John Brown: ie, to kill the enemies of black liberty.

>The election was nuts; Weatherman literally expelled their opponents from the party before the vote, so SDS split. But Weatherman occupied the national office, which meant they could evaluate SDS members as potential recruits.

>The FBI was up SDS’s ass, and Weatherman’s. They harassed the core cadre. Beat them. Threatened them. This does not dissuade revolutionaries. Weatherman started doing crazy stuff with SDS: street brawls, public nudity, sexual orgies, ordering established couples to break up. If you think it sounds like a cult, you’re right. This is literally cult indoctrination stuff. They were remaking people, seeking the hardest of hardcore.

>The Black Panthers, erstwhile allies, thought Weatherman was nuts. But Weatherman, despite pro-black rhetoric, didn’t care. (Weatherman’s pro-black rhetoric was mainly Phariseeism, done to win acclaim from other whites. Basically, they’re Tim Wise.)

Thank you for the article. Here's a bump for you.

These people became professors.

Well, I wouldn't say that the radical left has taken over. They're closer than they've ever been (which is why Trump led to such massive temper tantrums). And obviously they've taken over academia, but not really the state.

I think the article is really interesting though. To me, it shows that leftists haven't really changed. All the way back to Lenin or the radicals of the 60's and 70's, they take over benign institutions (then political movements, now cultural ones like comics and gaming) and start their "one true faith" nonsense.

The main thing that this article convinces me of is that things haven't really been that violent, even with the more radical fringe of the modern left like BLM. It also makes me believe that Trump is going to really radicalize them. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see bombing campaigns start again.

>I think the article is really interesting though
I think so too. So thanks for raising awareness for this. Hopefully more anons will pay attention to it. So have another bump.

Yeah, it's really amazing how little repercussion these people ever faced.

My favorite example of this came up in a debate between Bill Ayers (of SDS/Weatherman/Weather Underground) vs Dinesh D'Souza:

youtube.com/watch?v=CpSXLqikT9I

Jump to 1:37 if you don't need the background info.

The greatest tragedy of the modern era, was the failure of vietnam vets to form their own version of the 1918 freikorp.

The article makes a similar observation:

>Institutions are one of two major assets that the Left has and the Right lacks. The other is Shock Troops.

>Institutions are organizations the Left controls that operate for the benefit of the Left’s people. The Right doesn’t really have these. As an example, there are occasional hard right lawyers, but so far as I know there is no such thing as the Reactionary Lawyers’ Guild.

>The other thing that the Left has that the Right doesn’t are Shock Troops: unshameable actors.

>Institutions and Shock Troops are important resources for the Left. They work together. The Left’s Institutions accept, cater to, train, and/or employ its people, including Shock Troops. And, in the cases of several Weathermen (and Davis), give them cushy jobs in their Shock-Troop retirement.

bump for Sup Forums

Thanks bro.

You'd think Sup Forums would be more interested. It even gets close to the phenomenon of white leftists and cuckoldry:

>And white radicals — many the kind who’d be really into privilege confession today — started getting into the idea of black leadership. I mean: really into the idea of black leadership. To the point of fetishizing it. Fetishizing black convicts, especially.

>In 1972, a group called Venceremos, from the Bay Area, literally broke out a black convict named Ronald Beaty during a prison transport so he could train them in guerrilla tactics and lead a revolution.

>That was their actual plan. That was their entire actual plan.

>Exactly that one bit from South Park, but a bunch of ’70s white Bay Area radicals going, “Token, you’re black; you know guerrilla tactics.” (Spoiler: when Beaty got arrested again, he promptly rolled over on the white radicals.)

Weathermen and other left wing terrorists were trained and supplied by Cuban intelligence service

They also trained people to become agitators/provocateurs who turn peaceful protests into violent clashes with police

Who is supporting them this time?

Yeah, I never really understood the thought process behind going thousands of miles to vietnam to kill commies, while letting the ones back home do whatever they wanted.

bump

>Who is supporting them this time?
The universities and guys like Soros are big ones. There's probably a lot of weird shit going on today like in the 70's, to again quote the article:

>July and November of 1970, a gang occupies the South Bronx’s Lincoln Hospital and presents demands to administrators. The demand: Lincoln Hospital facilities are shitty. The gang demands a drug treatment center, and they demand to operate it.

>They got nearly a million bucks from the government to do it. That’s what the 1970s were like. This was Lincoln Detox. It was run by militant leftists. (They gave the BLA medical supplies, to give you an idea.) Methadone came coupled with Marxist education, paid for by the city. Political education as a cure for heroin addiction.

>I’m not kidding! This really happened! New York City was paying for it all!

I've been really worried about one particular group. By Any Means. They could become THE radical group that might begin attacking people and institutions.

I would hate to predict these sorts of things but there could be bombings in the next few years in the US.

What's mind-boggling to me is how Democrats could know about this kind of crazy shit and still support it anyway. I don't just mean the hard line crazies. For example, I don't believe Hillary Clinton buys into hard leftist bullshit. But during the campaign she was spewing all kinds of nonsense about how awful whites are and how men need to sit down and shut up.

This "social justice" shit isn't new. Lenin used that exact phrase in the early 20th century when describing his worker's paradise. Recall that Lenin was also the guy responsible for horrors that rival the fucking holocaust.

>I would hate to predict these sorts of things but there could be bombings in the next few years in the US.
It definitely feels that way. I hope not, but leftists never seem to learn, or develop a moral center for that matter...

The upper brass is pretty cynical and will say whatever for power, and I'm guessing their advisors give them those lines. With that said, about half of the democratic party is nonwhite, and it's going to further drift in that direction, so I assume there is a audience that demands it.

If you look into the principle actors behind the bolsheivks, they're basically a coalition of ethnic minorities, with a jewish core. Certain people are trying to recreate that here with racial minorities and whites as the kulaks/capitalists. They can't act yet because they'd be slaughtered, so they're biding their time.

>I don't believe Hillary Clinton buys into hard leftist bullshit
She doesn't... It was that commie kike and his faggot-ass followers that forced her further to the left

I hope they do. It will be great entertainment to watch these losers proceed to either get v& or somehow blow themselves up. Lets not forget, lefties regularly set themselves on fire by accident during flag burning demonstrations.

Sanders isn't even that bad as far as radical leftists go. He's barely on the radical spectrum. For example, he doesn't (seem to) hate white people and he actually cares about workers (whether or not his policies would help them is another story). When asked about opening the border, Sanders was the only Democrat in the room to say that it would be terrible for US workers. If I recall correctly, he was booed for saying as much.

>about half of the democratic party is nonwhite
Not disagreeing, but do you have a source? Would be handy to have.

>Certain people are trying to recreate that here with racial minorities and whites as the kulaks/capitalists. They can't act yet because they'd be slaughtered, so they're biding their time.
I've had very similar thoughts. When I finally started reading about communist revolutionaries it was like "my god, it's the exact same shit today. They literally want to kill us all."

Sure puts the left's hard anti-gun stance into perspective, no?

>>They got nearly a million bucks from the government to do it. That’s what the 1970s were like. This was Lincoln Detox. It was run by militant leftists. (They gave the BLA medical supplies, to give you an idea.) Methadone came coupled with Marxist education, paid for by the city. Political education as a cure for heroin addiction.
What the hell happened after that?

>t definitely feels that way. I hope not, but leftists never seem to learn, or develop a moral center for that matter...
Things seem to always have to repeat for people to learn. Interestingly communists/socialists have been using bombings as a means of dissent for as long as I know. Since the Chicago bombing over a hundred and 20 years ago and still act as though they are above criticism.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haymarket_affair

I swear that one faggot in DC who "set himself on fire" was actually trying to bomb Trump's hotel. He just fucked up and his backpack caught fire.

>What the hell happened after that?
It's in the article, maybe 1/4 the way down. The story gets even weirder.

>Interestingly communists/socialists have been using bombings as a means of dissent for as long as I know. Since the Chicago bombing over a hundred and 20 years ago and still act as though they are above criticism.
I can't find it, but I read recently that something like 95% of all terrorism today is committed either by islamists or by communists.

I'd never thought about that before. That's an interesting and plausible explanation to be honest.

>There’s a famous case where a shadowy group was after a high-value, high-status target who used his considerable resources to retreat. The group couldn’t get to him. So they targeted everybody associated with him: Friends. Family. Staff. Lawyers. Sympathetic journalists. Eventually, that utter devastation of infrastructure led to the death of the high-value, high-status target, whose name was Pablo Escobar.

>The shadowy group that unleashed carnage on Pablo Escobar’s Institutions had a name.

They were known as Los Pepes.

Here we go boys!

>Not disagreeing, but do you have a source? Would be handy to have.
gallup.com/poll/160373/democrats-racially-diverse-republicans-mostly-white.aspx

This from party self-identification a few years ago, and I assume it has since further tilted to 50/50.

>I've had very similar thoughts. When I finally started reading about communist revolutionaries it was like "my god, it's the exact same shit today. They literally want to kill us all."

>Sure puts the left's hard anti-gun stance into perspective, no?

Fortunately, these people don't benefit from tsarist conscription, so I really don't expect someone like gersh kuntzman to become a comissar, because they're all so soft.

Short answer: The Russians

Again I would not want to see it. But imagine for a minute a group led by an influential man decided to attack the core of the USA. Spreading fear across the USA. Besides 9/11 and the Boston bombings there hasn't been a wave of terrorism by Americans. Never. It only takes a few people with so access to weapons to do something.

youtube.com/watch?v=DnX0RCl5MaY

I feel that it's not just about the USA at this point. What do you expected they will do? They don't have anything left, every day, a war draws closer not only in USA but in Europe also. I truly believe that this is not planned by anyone. It's an unforeseen reaction, to an experiment of enslavement through guilt and war thought shaming and out breeding. A disgusting display of "taking advantage" of the helping and caring nature of us.

What the faggots forgot to take into account is that even with this placebo society in which we are daily in a permanent state of "comfy", there is a lust for conflict. War will come and it will be the most disgusting and horrific conflict history will witness. It can't be stopped, their little "NWO" failed miserably.

The good will always win in the end, this expression is more than a mere fairy tale. The only question is who will emerge victorious? Is this the final conflict? Is just another one? If they win, now they will have all the knowledge of where they failed, and the next trick will be even closer to perfection for them. If we win, we save the world.

Bump

Yeah
Compared to the Left, the Right has no real organization. It's a damn shame too

I wonder if it would be possible to get one of the youtube personalities to talk about this article (or even better, the book that the article describes). This seems like the kind of thing Sargon might be into, but I have no idea how to reach him other than shitposting on twitter.

why would they do that? this SJW trending isn't only in America btw

also the global media is in favor of this progressive stuff, and they bashed Putin when he was against it.

It's ideological subversion. Same reason they were "caught" "hacking" the election. They wanted to be caught so people would consider our president illegitimate.

The question we have to ask ourselves now is how many people were recruited during these protests? Lots of naive idealists are easy targets to be seduced into radical left terrorist groups.

>why would they do that?
The Chinese and Russians want to end US hegemony
They don't have the military ability to do it without destroying themselves, so they likely do encourage domestic unrest

It's a matter that doing so simply benefits them. The US is a dying empire, the sooner it falls for them the better.
For example, RT gives very favorable coverage to nigger riots and pushes the oppression meme

This guy gets it.

Not sure if the Chinese are involved though. I haven't really read into Chinese stay behind operations, active measures, or ideological subversion, so if you have any reading materials on this, I'd appreciate it.

I don't have any materials on it, just an educated guess
The question of "who benefits"
Similar to how the US funds NGOs and "pro-democracy" movements in Russia and China

It's all about the Great Game

they are obviously being recruited but it isn't Russia, there's no reason to believe that.
RT is far from being relevant, it simply doesn't have the audience
Also why would China fuck themselves by altering the status quo? It's too soon for that anyways.
Trump didn't win because of the SJW hate or the mails, he won because of the jobs the chinks are stealing from you. A trade war wouldn't benefit China at all.

Good read OP

bump reading now

yep. Many people don't know how much of this stuff was going on in the 70s. It was widespread terrorism done by communists. If you want to look deeper into individuals and groups mentioned, check out this site:

keywiki.org/Main_Page

All those new left guys are the predecessors of modern organizations getting people to riot in the streets today. And not just ideological predecessors, but they are directly connected. Bob Creamer from the Veritas video? He and his organizations have links going back to these same new left groups. Keith Ellison who could be the chair of the DNC as well.

P Accurate

The Black Panthers, erstwhile allies, thought Weatherman was nuts. But Weatherman, despite pro-black rhetoric, didn’t care. (Weatherman’s pro-black rhetoric was mainly Phariseeism, done to win acclaim from other whites. Basically, they’re Tim Wise.)

Love thes kind of threads here regarding geopolitics.

Great post compared to the usual garbage here

"And, of course, Barack Obama, twice President of the United States, started his political career in Bill Ayers’s living room."
Explain plz Sup Forums!

keywiki.org/Weather_Underground_Organization

>Among the attendees of the “War Council in Flint" identified by the Flint police department and/or its informant were: Michael Avey, Karen Ashley, Bill Ayers, Edward Benedict, Margaret Bennett, Douglas Bernhardt, Jeff Blum, Harvey Blume, David Chase, Peter Clapp, Judy Clark, Bernardine Dohrn, Diane Donghi, Linda Evans, Brian Flannigan, David Flatley, John Fuerst, Lynn Ray Garvin, Bert Garskof, Michele Garskoff, Mark Glasser, Theodore Gold, Lenny Handlesman, Ann Hathaway, Karen Hardiman, Daniel Hardy, Tom Hayden, Phoebe Hirsch, Arthur Hochberg, Anne Hodges, John J. J. Jacobs, Jeff Jones, Sam Karp, David Klafter, Dianne Kohn, Peter Kuttner, Bradford Lang, Stephen Lang, Karen Latimer, Jonathan Lerner, Naomi Lev, Bradford Long, Alan Maki, Eric Mann, Howard Machtinger, Carol McDermott, L.R. Meadows, Lisa Meisel, Jeff Melish, James Mellen, David Millstone, Russell Neufeld, Diana Oughton, John Pilkington, Edward Purtz, Jonah Raskin, Natalie Rosenstein, Dennis Roskamp, Mark Rudd, Karen Selin, Mark Shapiro, Janet Snider, Mike Spiegel, Jane Spiegelman, Marsha Steinberg, David Sole, Susan Stern, Clayton Van Lydegraf, Cathy Wilkerson and Mary Wozniak[2].

whew... those names..

Worried alt right fags? ;)))

Nice thread btw.

Not directly Russia, I'm talking about far left extremist groups which are recruiting young minds. These far left extremist groups are ran by Russian GRU agents and their networks.

You guys really underestimate Chinas influence.

Also, remember, Iran hosted a conference on police brutality in the US, and flew prominent BLM leaders to Tehran.

The left is being played like a fiddle by foreign actors.

Forgot link

nbcnews.com/news/world/iran-hosts-u-s-activists-conference-police-brutality-n452171

Bump

"If you think a bunch of coked-up black radicals and feminist commies can’t come up with a plan to spring a handless Puerto Rican bomber all I can say is, you don’t know the Seventies, brother. Check this shit." kek

They blew all their budget on Richard Spencer and the "alt right."

decent 2002 doc about the weather underground here:
vimeo.com/33006390

>Example #2: Some white leftists (like SLA) worship black revolutionaries, crave their leadership.
Literally cucks