How do you respond?

How do you respond?

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/d_seaman/status/822453148983947264
theamericanmirror.com/video-passengers-cheer-woman-berating-trump-supporter-kicked-off-plane/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Do you want to see us /stop/ being civilized?

>1773
>let's go all the way back to stone age then

wasn't a protest, it was a rebellion

you're not protesting unfair taxation
you're protesting police brutality and mass incarceration

give back your welfare check then nigger

Didn't know I've lived for over 200 years

It's like they forget about the fucking war that followed.

same shit, different cucks in power
"white people" in 1773 example are George III and his clique having not enough resources to effectively enforce their claim that protests are indeed illegitimate.

The Boston Tea Party was targeted destruction of property directly related to what the colonists perceived as unjust taxes on tea. They didn't go around burning down their own homes and businesses and they didn't even torch the ships. The object of destruction was very specific and symbolic.

Leave it to men to actually make a statement and follow up while woman and their cuckholds burn trashcans and smash the windows of local businesses.

>Implying whites will give up modernity and revolt against the gobernmnt

This, if you're making the 2016 argument you don't understand what's going on. Power is the currency of history and that's it. We need power and nothing else matters.

dissent is only legal if it prevails.

History is written by the same guys.

cause libtards chimping out in an autistic rage over the outcome of a democratic election, destroying property, both public and private owned is the same as a nation protesting unfair taxation.
grow up

>hey didn't go around burning down their own homes and businesses and they didn't even torch the ships

They were low-test af lmao

Fine. Give the ghettos their independence. Wall them off. Let them be free of American oppression forever.

so when are the mods going to stop deleting our threads?

This

destruction of property isnt warranted for every personal problem
1773 was a unique situation with a just cause, determined by an entire side of people instead of one faction in the midst of that side

if all citizens united itd be one thing
but the left has no entitlement to break windows to vent their anger against a democratic election

thank you

That's British property...

If white people in the 1773 were morally in the right, those niggers should start picking cotton.

>white people protest
>create the strong country in the world

>black people protest
>destroy their own cities and opportunities for social mobility

It was Indians retard

in fact, they are protesting for unfair taxation, so they can fuck off.

You're right. We totally should all go back to acting like it's 1773.

How many black people do you plan to enslave? I'm thinking I'd like at least a dozen.

They swept the deck of the ship clean after so as not to leave a mess.

Anyway this was'nt even a legitimate protest for freedom especially if you consider the fact that this "protest" happened mostly for economic reasons

But at least it had more sense and justification than the crying liberals in the whole world

If those niggers looting stores wanted to be looked upon favorably by history, they too should found their own country. In Africa. We would build monuments in their name here for their revolutionary efforts.

the american revolution was nothing but a bunch of whiny radicalized libtards who just wanted to loot, pillage and rape. They were filthy degenerates and the founding fathers couldn't get past the first sentence of the constitution before inserting their marxist agenda.

the sons of liberty didnt destroy the tea nor was it a protest as such.
it was stolen from british merchants and resold untaxed by the kingdom. not thrown into the harbor as the myth goes..

The didn't loot, anybody who was caught grabbing tea was publicly punished and humiliated.

I mean, like 20% of us at most can trace our ancestry back to the Anglo-Americans living in New England in the 1770s. I'm not sure what the point is. It's the equivalent of me blaming "black people" for the atrocities committed by Mansa Musa's kingdom of Mali.

>inb4 butthurt British-descended Americans respond about their ancestry

Yes, but I'm talking specifically about English-descended people from New England. If your name is English but you're from the South then you had nothing to do with this.

this is a troubling redpill

it very uncomfortable to realize just how deep the problems we face are

furthermore! what pisses me off is to watch a generation that is supposed to be more educated then the previous one struggle to grasp the consept of fascism and starts labeling anything and anyone as fascists who's ideology or political view's do not align to there own.
a generation saturated with degenerates, yearning for a meaning or a purpose in life so they start a war over a cause that is not even there. I am ashamed by my piers....

They dumped tea because it
>belonged to the East India Company, one of the Crown's closest collaborators
>was one of the things taxed by the Tea Act

If the "protesters" burned Trumps buildings, or government buildings I'd kinda get it. But trashing random businesses does not equal protest.

thank you

it's context sensitive. destroying the tea was a way of saying "we're going to provide for ourselves". destroying a car says "we don't respect what other people earned for themselves".

dont worry, trumps gonna put that marxist trash through the shredder and crown himself king.

>outcome of a democratic election
>democratic election
>democratic

>candidate with 5,000,000 more votes lost
>democratic

This is why people laugh at redtards

There are so many things wrong I don't know how to start.

>british boat (not american, therefore no correlation). The damage """protestors"""" are committing is on other americans
>"""protesting""" against """facism""", """"""racism""""" and """"""""""misogyny""""""""" is not the same as fighting for representation in parliament
>the tea party wasn't a funded psyop

they also had slavery, and women weren't allowed to vote back then, should we bring that back too?

This was on the verge of armed rebellion, eventually leading to 1776 as we all know and love.

If the leftists would like to do this and present this argument, then we should learn from history and quash it.

The thing it that they didn't destroy their own products but Britain's.

Some of the men who threw the tea off that boat probably kept slaves. Your founding fathers most certainly kept slaves. Does that mean we should still have slaves?

it's not my fault you have a faulty system that could be changed but you are not man enough to change it.
be civilized or see yourself out please

By that logic, why don't we still have slaves

>This was on the verge of armed rebellion, eventually leading to 1776 as we all know and love.

1775, actually. I know 1776 is the official start date, but random New England farmers with hunting rifles were fucking up Brit soldiers at Concord and Lexington.

"The shot heard 'round the world" and all that

>LITERALLY ITS 2017

>How do you respond?

You forgot they also dressed up like "wild Indians" to hide their identities and blame it on "wild Indians"

>I failed highschool civics

I don't even burgerland and I know why you are wrong. You should be embarassed, I hope you don't make that argument in public.

>am leaf
Sorry aboot that, don't know my American history very well

>tea owned by the East India Company
>one of the largest multinational companies in the world at that time with full private armies
>heavily backed by the British Empire
>British Empire forcing the colonists to buy East India Company's tea, regardless of whether they want to or not.

eyyyyy

1) All destroyed property belonged to the government, which they, the people, had no real representation in. (not a one)
2) The destroyed property was taxed items to protest the Stamp Tax Act on tea from the government funded and sanctioned monopoly that was the East India Trading Company.

The only way this could be comparable would be if Trump used his executive action to establish the Trump Organization as the only legal source of steaks, then put a 15% tax on steaks, and the rioters only damaged a shipment of Trump Steaks in protest. What actually happened was that the rioters destroyed the property of some of Hillary's biggest corporate donors in order to protest Trump being freely elected.

Cuz tea was for niggers anyway

That's a distortion of the truth. Nobody would have ever honestly believed that wild indians snuck into Boston (the 4th-largest city in the whole British Empire), went down to the harbor, and started dumping tea into the water.

It was kind of a tongue-in-cheek cover story, a sort of lame disguise intended purely to disguise the identity of the Americans involved and nothing more.

Don't worry about it, I'm just a very drunk history student who is also a hypersensitive patriot (my family fled for their lives from a commie dictatorship to come here so I treat our history almost like it's a religious text), so I'm getting kind of "nitpicky". Your general point is completely right either way.

Perfect breakdown. 10/10 A+ did pay attention in civics course

can I get one of those slaves?

EXACTLY. Top-tier analysis and analogy.

this

This was the property of bongs tho....

>"white people"

>dressed like native Americans

Yeah sure, "white people"

white people destroy property for a logical reason and do so in an organized way.

They paid for the tea, they just didn't pay for the import tax on the tea.
The tea wouldn't be there if they didn't already buy it, they just didn't wanna pay Britain twice so they decided to unload it in the harbor for free rather than unload it on land for a tax.

> Hmm how should i protest governmental taxation on goods?
> BY ZOUNDS LET US DISRUPT THE GOVERNMENT DELIVERY OF GOODS!

> Hmm how should i protest police brutality.
> MUHFUGGA WE GON BLOCK THE ROADS, BURN THE STREETS, FUCK WHITE PEOPLE!

Really activates the jogging of my almonds.

Go fucking picket a Governor or Mayor or Sheriff or whoever the fuck has the power to change what you want changed.

>Protesting the social, political and economical oppression of an empire by destroying the very item that enabled them to become so powerful the same as mob behavior destroying innocent people's property
Hmmmm, really makes you think...

you haven't been watching the news have you?

Is your point that white people evolve, and learn from the past? While you stay living in it?

He considers antifa and nu male feminists to be non-whites. Anyone who denounces white culture loses their white card.

You don't understand. The sheriff is black. 3 of the 5 cops who shot that "innocent black boy who dindu nuffin*" The City Council is black. The mayor is nearly always black (if we're talking about Baltimore). The Attorney General was black. The President was black.

Picketing those men would have been an admission that the problem had nothing to do with race. And our Jewish masters can't have us realizing that, can they? So they paid our reverends to lie to us, tell us it's all the white man's fault.

*he robbed a store and attacked innocent people, but let's ignore that because he looked like my cousin, which makes him a good buy who wuz just getting his life on track bruh

>protesting is the same as revolution.
If you want to revolt declare it already so we can kill you on sight. Destruction of property isn't a peaceful protest, something SOMEONE YOU MIGHT KNOW(cough cough, Martin Luther King) wouldn't want.

Marxism didn't even exist at the time, you fucking moron. You're talking out of your ass. No wonder liberals run circles around your gunt you fat fucking failure.

*3 of the 5 cops are black

Sorry. I'm a half-black dude from Maryland who has gotten super-depressed about this whole thing and has drunk himself into a retarded stupor (3 bottles of Shock Top beer and 500 ml of Bacardi Rum so far, it's a fucking miracle I can still type at all). So my typing might be a little off.

>White People 1773: Let's destroy the property of the oppressors in revolution! This will ruin them!

>Black People 2016: LET'S DESTROY FUCKING EVERYTHING, EVEN OUR OWN NEIGHBORHOODS

dumping their own tea into the bay rather than pay tax on it

Also, the federal judge for this area (Judge Green, a really smart and friendly man, I did an internship in his courthouse) is also black. As are many of his prosecutors.

Black people cannot protest against the local government, because the local government in so many cases is either black or sympathetic to blacks. So our anger gets redirected by the ((media)) towards other things. Hilariously, this usually means burning black, latino, and asian-owned businesses.

Then stupid upper-class half-black "woke" college girls (who only date white men, by the way) write about how it's all the fault of white privilege, only furthering fueling the flames. The white liberals are setting us against one another, then telling us it's all whitey's fault. It's brilliant. People pretend that slavery ended, but we have been the slaves of the Democratic Party from the day this country was founded and that hasn't changed. They have just figured out a way to get us to be their slaves voluntarily.

spoiled brats the lot of them but still white.
funny how the tolerant left is quick to resort to vandalism and other pleb like behavior where as the "gun totting rednecks" where showing composure and clearing blockades so people might enjoy the ceremony.

>twitter.com/d_seaman/status/822453148983947264

its not faulty, its working perfectly as intended

it kept a bonafide criminal out of the big house

This event ended with large crowds of revolutionaries being shot, and would have ended with a failed revolution if not for the fact the Colonists believed in the right to bear arms.

Which today's socialist "revolutionaries" do not.

Guess they want war

50 states
votes in Cali don't count in Idaho.
being this dumb

>first it's 2 000 000 votes, then 3mln now 5mln
10 years from now Trump will ''lose'' by 30 mln votes, somehow.
Also, you know the drill, illegals, dead people, machines flipping votes, democrat staff flipping votes, etc etc.

>this

The difference is that the people were willing to accept the consequences of their actions.

They did something illegal and knew it, and knew they could be killed for it.

It is the same with Martin Luther King Jr. He disobeyed laws and accepted the consequences. He was arrested and went to jail.

Liberals now want to protest and riot, but the instant police start responding they all cry and whine and screech. They don't accept consequences. If one of them was shot and killed after attacking someone, they'd come up with a new hashtag and try to lynch the guy defending himself.

>"THE POLICE FIRED RUBBER BULLETS AT US AND TEAR GAS, ALL WE WERE DOING WAS QUIETLY PROTESTING BY BLOCKING MULTIPLE INTERSECTIONS, HARASSING PEOPLE, BREAKING WINDOWS, AND LIGHTING CARS ON FIRE WTF POLICE BRUTALITY"

I'm a paternal libertarian, I've been trying to compromise with fascists ideology far longer than they've been this popular.

It's weird having to defend the people I've been arguing against for years. Everyone is like sharing shit on FB like "yeah! Punching Nazis works!"

No it doesn't. All it's done is give him a lot more publicity, and has emboldened the more proactive Nazis (the ones the left really doesn't want to mobilize). You have to respect the NAP and reach a middle ground with Nazis. At the end of the day, they just want this to be a great country

So you think that we should stay with the conventional wisdom of 1773. Fine. Where are my Slaves.

Because it was targeted and they had no representation and no way of being represented. They also brought with them the principles of Magna Carta and ideas of democracy.

They weren't anarchists and communists setting fire to trash cans and limos in an attempt to financially damage the society enough that they can take control using violence and tear down the countries entire political history.

throwing the tea being imported by your oppressors because they taxed said tea and sugar and everything else and didn't use the tax to help you or your people.
Is not the same as going around smashing other peoples shit especially if they probably voted Hillary to since you're in a fucking city

theamericanmirror.com/video-passengers-cheer-woman-berating-trump-supporter-kicked-off-plane/

these (((people))) are savages and should be treated as such

Underrated and the most accurate

>protest is the same thing as a rebellion

Good, then you don't mind if the military opens fire on them.

That was a revolution. Separatism. War. If that's what leftists want, then they should get to it.

>implying thats what he meant
>implying he didnt mean that the day of rope is upon us, burger and leaf alike

im black btw

>directly targeting the commodity in question

vs

>smash starbuck's windows because FUCK DRUMPF!

There were founders that disagreed with the Boston Tea Party because East India had nothing to do with the Stamp Act, and it was destruction of private property (though East India was effectively a state org). I know Benjamin Franklin was at least.

>LOL SOMETHING PEOPLE DID 240 YEARS AGO IS EQVANLANT TO SOMETHING I DO NOW

Difference is whites are people

nazi germany also destroyed property

Dont forget that the only thing damaged besides the tea was a single padlock, which they provided a replacement for the next day.

Meanwhile leftists protests burn down entire city blocks