Reminder that Winston Churchill wanted to attack the Soviet Union in 1945 and free eastern Europe from communism...

Reminder that Winston Churchill wanted to attack the Soviet Union in 1945 and free eastern Europe from communism, his goal for the operation was to ''impose upon Russia the will of the United States and the British Empire''. But the USA wouldn't go through with it, why did the USA allow communism to destroy eastern Europe when it could of been prevented?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Unthinkable
youtube.com/watch?v=wljpYZ8wejA
youtube.com/watch?v=fusRz0KUnSk
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Stop telling fibs on the internet Mohammad

Churchill slaughtered the wrong pig.

You eat poo poo!

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Unthinkable

Churchill was also the one who gave eastern europe away and played the USSR anthem on british national radio

fat cunt

You're also forgetting that WW2 decimated the UK, sure we won if you belive that, but at what cost? FDR made us give up the Empire, this was not lost on Churchill so how about you STFU cunt?

>mmm maybe hitler was right
>dammit communism is going to take over europe!

too little too late

>wiki

here come the jews lies.

So did Patton, America's last true cowboy.

Churchill was also the one insistent that most of lendlease go to the Soviets.

Eternal anglo gets the Americans to build the soviet military, then begs America to die against it.

Churchill was mad with power

ITT: Communists

Indeed

Western democratic socialism is far worse than russian communism

FDR was a commie retard.

>could of

So years later after fall of USSR V4 will be formed.
It will be full of hate and resentment towards anything slightly connected with Marxism. Absolutely resistant to its fake promises.
They will preserve sanity and self-protection instinct in decadent Europa polluted by left and cultural Marxism.

Really makes me think, dad.

>memes
>reality
pick one

>109045274

>communism to destroy eastern Europe

no you fucking anglokike, YOU destroyed Eastern Europe after communism fell.

Under communism we had a border, an army, education, culture, demographics and everything else that we've lost basically.

With all its flaws, and they were many and serious, now we know it was a million times better than western "democracy".

>jew lies

how does Britain and USA wanting to destroy communism fit in with the Jewish agenda exactly?

Yugoslavia wasn't part of the Soviet Union.

either your new here or you havent been paying attention.

Biggest reason was jewish communist infiltration of US govt.

Go see Moly's brief 300 hour video on the topic:
youtube.com/watch?v=wljpYZ8wejA

It was communist, and therefore under Soviet influence as the map rightfully indicates.

It was communist, but that doesn't make it "under Soviet influence".
The soviet union had no say as to what went on in Yugoslavia. In fact Tito and Stalin hated each other so much that Stalin organised several failed assassination attempts.

The juden were afraid of Hitler, he couldn't be bought and controlled. The soviets we're easy to buy out.

Yugoslavia did not accept the Marshall plan and deferred to Stalin. I don't disagree that there was a rift between Tito and Stalin later on, but in Western eyes, this action and the decision to remain communists makes it seem you prefer Soviet policy to Western policy.

>but in Western eyes, this action and the decision to remain communists makes it seem you prefer Soviet policy to Western policy.
Yet throughout it's existence you kept investing huge sums of money into Yugoslavia in hopes of winning it over to your side.
Really it was the only thing keeping our economy afloat.

Churchill did nothing of the sort.

>istria is italian

>wanting that communist hellhole in your country
they can have for all i care

>they can have for all i care
t. Nemanja

>attacking Red Army in 1945
Good plan.

No cajones, cabron

the cold war era was highly profitable for the US
so from their point of view they did everything right

That was impossible in 1945 because the Soviet Army was stonger in the Continent than the Anglo-American one.

However I read that Churchill wanted to liberate South-East and Central-Europe in 1943. (Adriatic D-day or something like that)

This

USA had so many commie spies and agents in the government during the World War 2 era.
The main points of the USA being in World War 2 was to defend the USSR from Germany and also to grow the US economy.
Google Harry Hopkins, who was in charge of Lend Lease to Russia. It has been said that he was actually the "assistant President" to FDR who was to sick to govern properly.
The USSR got all their aid from the USA for free whereas Britain had to pay for everything.
Google for "Major Jordan's Diaries" he was in the airforce in charge of flying planes and supplies from the USA through Canada and across Siberia to the USSR.
He realised the USA was sending them supplies that they didn't even have themselves.
Also he discovered the USA was sending them uranium to help them build an atom bomb.

Are you retarded? Patton wanted it as well

Also Harry Hopkins was probably a Soviet Agent.

Indeed, when the wall of yours fell and the Iron curtain with it, they basicly sold their shit to us easterners and so avoided a market crash.

LOL what it was you that invited them in the first place.

Why? Jeez i dont know because the Soviet Bear was full on war machine and we couldn't match their production for what they already had in place. It would of resulted us nuking them.

We wanted to preserve the fucking eastern countries. Again it was Churchill that gave them a shitload of promises and freedom to do w/e

Churchill was a cuck degenerate

>"any day now the Americans will come to our rescue!"

>could of

>churchill wanted america to spend millions MORE american lives solving Europe's problems

Yeah, I'll pass. The limies love ayran blood but they'll take burger blood when they run out of aryans.

brits and us thought ussr have atom bomb, so they were scary to attack ussr

(((Winston Churchill)))
yes goyim (((Winston))) totally wanted to destroy communism

>FDR made us give up the Empire

M E M E
E
M
E

The Second World War and its outcome had essentially nothing to do with the decline of British imperialism.

Go look up the economics of the British Empire in the twentieth century. There was no way whatsoever that the empire could have survived, it was simply not profitable. It was an empire built for global trade that stopped being profitable in an age where colonialism was too expensive and costly, borders and seas were too expensive to defend, and free global trade in an international market was too profitable. What else could have happened to it?

Stop falling for the fucking meme that anything but globalism and international capitalism was ultimately responsible for the decline of the British Empire.

this is a well known fact, britain and usa were the puppets of the same (((hand))) that drove hitler.
when hitler lost (((they))) rushed into europe to prevent ussr from taking it over.

nevertheless the main plan was and still is complete destruction of russia and overtake of it's resources.

unfortunately for (((them))) both communism and nazism failed in this task at the time.

Why did you need to destroy the Austria-Hungary, then? It was a perfect example of a stabilizer of the whole bloody region.

This, the rest of you newfags lurk more or get out

Many western companies made a lot of money in the industrialization of Soviet Union. They would never let a war between east and west happen.

youtube.com/watch?v=fusRz0KUnSk

and here i am from soviet ukraine
all eastern europe is fuking god damned fail state
there is and there was nothing to fight for

They destroyed themselves

>Ministers of Defense who haven't served in the military
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Entente backed the idea of the partitions. The people of Kingdom of Bohemia never wanted to separate, because they knew, that we would be fucked as a smaller state.

Churchill became Prime Minister in May 1940, 8 months after the UK declared war on Germany, and after the fall of both Poland and Denmark. Churchill had nothing to do with the USSR's (or Germany's) expansionism and aggression in Europe in the leadup to the war.

Churchill also absolutely despised communism and Bolshevism, arguably almost as much as his contempt for Hitler and National Socialism. He wanted the Allies to continue the war to free people of it because he (correctly) saw Bolshevism as a plague on Russia and Eastern Europe that enslaved millions.

Also, Churchill's efforts towards the end of the war and following it directly contributed to the USA accepting to be a major member of the United Nations and continuing to be interventionist in the world following the death of FDR instead of becoming isolationist again. Churchill desperately used his political capital to ensure that the USA would remain a force in the world almost entirely to challenge and fight against the influence of the USSR.

Trust me, you can fault Churchill for a lot of things, but his hatred of communism is one of the things you can't. Sheer practicality and lack of support from allies is one of the main reasons why Unthinkable never took off, why Stalin was allowed so much of Europe, and why the Cold War never got serious for a long time.

Austria-Hungary was an ancient and incompetent imperial power that had absolutely no hope.

>one of the only countries that can say that they lost heavily to the armed forces of imperial Russia in the twentieth century
>and let's not forget that it also suffered at the hands of Italians
>it was a central European power too close and allied with Germany to allow to continue to exist
>it was a multicultural mess destined to collapse anyway

Austria-Hungary wasn't a stabiliser whatsoever, are you fucking dense? It was as a result of its own direct actions that the First World War began. Did you forget that A-H invaded Serbia?

a lot of you seem to forget that the iron curtain shielded eastern europe from liberalism

>The people of Kingdom of Bohemia never wanted to separate, because they knew, that we would be fucked as a smaller state.

Once again, have you forgotten that it was Austria-Hungary's actions that began the First World War and are therefore largely responsible for not only one of the bloodiest wars of European history but also for its own demise?

I'd confidently say that any constituent nation of Austria-Hungary would be better off in an independent form than a constituent of that empire.

The USA was already full of LITERAL Bolshevik Jews.

I have LITERAL Bolshevik Jew ancestors, I found this disgusting peace of shit family crest from the Bernstine side of my family.

Makes me want to light my self on fire to purge the filth.

I'm a convert to Southern Baptist, but still feel responsible for the sins of the fathers.

You're wrong the V4 (V3) states and the Baltic States were stable countries in that time.

Ukraine always was a frontier state between Russia and Europe therefore it's a fail country.

Also, the last name Berns, Bernstine, Berning etc... is a Bolshevik Jew last name.

>Bernstine

Is that meant to be a defence for an empire of the most oppressive, totalitarian and murderous regime this planet has ever seen?

us just wants to keep anyone down. if you are weak you "need help" don't you? then they come to your country to make military bases and follow their interests. selfish warmongers yanks!

We planned "The United States of Greater Austria". But you had to have an alliance with the most autocratic nation ever, Russian empire. Germany was cool until you cut its wings and destroyed the legacy of Habsburgs.

That's not true. The imperialism was responsible for the WWI.

>you had to have an alliance with the most autocratic nation ever, Russian empire

Obviously. Why would one imperial European power NOT ally with another imperial European power?

Is your contention with the First World War really that the British Empire allied itself with a natural ally, the Russian Empire? That seems absurd.

Imperialism was fundamentally responsible, yes, but the war was declared because of the invasion of Serbia by Austria-Hungary.

History is repeating itself only Russia will actually be on our side against the mudslimes in Europe and chinks in Middle East/Africa.

>Churchill geting Tito off power
kek he could off tried

Because Stalin would have slapped your shit.

This

if it wasn't there eastern european countries would be sucking "refugee" cock and waving faggot flags right now, at least now we have part of white civilisation that is salvageable, so you can thank them for that
its not about "muh molsems", 10% of russia is muslim

russia doesn't give a shit about muslims in europe

>I'd confidently say that any constituent nation of Austria-Hungary would be better off in an independent form than a constituent of that empire.
That really turned out well

Damn it, Eternal Anglo, you must atleast grasp, that the Russians were always fucking primitive savages, nothing changes about them. Alliance with Russia was basicly your cockblock against potentially getting rid of Russia having an incredible amount of resources to troll you, when it gets to its mind (Soviet Union).

Different types of muslims.

>His goal was free eastern Europe from communism, his goal for the operation was to ''impose upon Russia the will of the United States and the British Empire''

>Free eastern europe Europe
>"Impose the will off the United state British Empire"
Hehe goyim looks like Dr. Disraeli about to prescribe you some (((freedom)))
Do Anglokikes even hear themselves?
I wish this cancer tried it instead of tripping on his empty bravado.
The eternal Russkies vs paki rape squads and drunk swine vomit artillery.

Churchshill was the eternal-ist of Anglos.

sure, but russia doesn't care about muslim immigration into europe, they only look out for their own interests

they'd support a muslim dick sucking faggot party in europe if it meant they were friendly towards russia

The west saving eastern Europe. Westerners risking their lives to save eastern Europe. If this isn't the biggest SF scenario of mankind, I don't know which one is.

>wanted to attack the Soviet Union in 1945

you mean he wanted burgers to attack the soviet union

Influence in Europe is in their interest. US, UK, Russia, and others are going to take on Germany after it becomes ISIS.

Ungrateful.

>Churchill
>let in TEN MILLION third world foreigners during the ten years he was PM
There wasn't even that much immigration into to UK in the entire 19th and 20th Centuries combined.

If Germany explodes, we want Bavaria.

Who do you think bankrolled the commies?

>if it wasn't there eastern european countries would be sucking "refugee" cock and waving faggot flags right now, at least now we have part of white civilisation that is salvageable, so you can thank them for that

>unironically defending the USSR because of the European social policies of the last few years

You shouldn't be allowed to vote, you are clearly an absolute fucking cretin.

I'd say so, since Austria-Hungary's "stabilising" impact on central Europe was the reason that the world was plunged into war in 1914.

>le upset at geopolitical events eternal anglo meme

Okay?

germany won't become ISIS, more like south africa

same with france

Yes, but it will be war and we'll be supporting the European side.

hold on I'm not defending the USSR, I'm just pointing out that it protected half of europe from decades of liberal brainwashing

if poland was under western influence after ww2 it would be the same as germany is today

ww2 historyfag here

The US were technically neutral at that point of the war and just like in ww1 they spent the first half of ww2 just making money selling supplies to everyone else like before.

Thing is selling supplies to only one side ends up inadvertently puts you on their side. Japan feared that the US was gunna attack them if they went for Indonesia's oil, so they thought a sneak attack on Pearl Harbour would be the right move to prevent a cheeky counter-attack but they were mistaken.

Funny thing is China, the UK, Singapore, Phillipines and all of S.E.Asia fell to the Japanese except Australia, they couldn't beat the Australians in jungle warfare, just like the Russians can't beat the Finnish in winter warfare.

People get behind factions in wars thinking it's all about political struggle and ideals. Really wars are just all different states of economic stages in a country's/the world's history.

After a 6 year long war with a pissant little country like Germany and considering that the Russians literally won ww2 by themselves without even really using proper equipment, training or any resources was terrifying. WW2 left most of the world drained.

mistake also I thought OP was talking about the war mid-way thru, didnt realise he was talking about "if it continued". My point still stands though.

Also 'straya day cunts!

Who financed a commie revolution in a first place? Who provided military support to bolsheviks?
Who gave the tech and the equipment for USSR industrialization?

you forget how weak western europeans are, they will roll over and die while arabs and niggers breed with their women

I cant see foreign intervention being likely as most muslims aren't radical in the same way ISIS is and therefore don't pose a threat to their neighbours

best thing you can hope for is for the slavs to invade and kick the brown people out after nuclear weapons become obsolete

>claims to be a historyfag

>the Russians literally won ww2 by themselves without even really using proper equipment, training or any resources was terrifying

Why have you deliberately chosen to ignore the fact that millions of tonnes of materiel, arms, vehicles, food, clothing, medicine and other essential supplies were shipped to the USSR by the USA and UK in order to ensure the Red Army survived, and that they needed Western food, clothing, and supplies in order to continue fighting for years?

Because the US was infiltrated with Jews and their fellow travelers. Patton wanted to do the same and was assassinated.

jews

top one is fake