Moderate

>rights have the red pill
>lefts have the blue pill
>middle has nothing?

I'm a moderate, what can I do to enlighten myself?
I need a better reason for my place on the political spectrum other than "don't really care", but I'm coming up short.

Other urls found in this thread:

westcoastrxers.com/2016/12/08/the-moderate-mantra-of-the-status-quo/
rense.com/general86/talmd.htm
celebstoner.com/blogs/doug-mcvay/2016/03/24/richard-nixon-on-the-drug-war,-blacks,-gays,-hippies-and-jews/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Come to the anarcho capitalist side

you don't need a pill because you're fucking sane.

moderates/centrists usually concern themselves with other things than politics
like gardening
or jogging

You can take the best from both ideologies and create a better understanding of the world through you.

Seriously anybody who unironically wants a race war with blacks and Hispanics have been brainwashed by the Jew. Not even Hitler wanted this.

Anybody who wants open borders and think trannies are sane have been brainwashed by the Jew.

Purple pill. You're like the half ape hominid in the evolution diagram.

Moderate is a relative term which means you hold views which don't differ too much from where the Overton window is.

westcoastrxers.com/2016/12/08/the-moderate-mantra-of-the-status-quo/

bogpill

There really is nothing except the red pill, everything else is a lie

Radical Moderates like us don't need no blue pill for our ED or red pill for our cholesterol! ABSOLUTE MODERATION sustains us!

Moderate in moderation.

Read books, get in arguments and realize which of your beliefs are wrong

You're still blue pilled but you know the red pill exists. You can see through the lies but you cannot embrace the truth. Not until you take the red pill.

We don't need a pill. We have a brain.

the fact that you're not an idiot ideologue and are actually being pragmatic means you're already plenty enlightened

Redpill isn't about left or right, its about the truth you idiot

The red pill has been exported to china for mass manufacture by the jews. Why do you think Sup Forums is such shit?

>I need a better reason for my place on the political spectrum other than "don't really care", but I'm coming up short.
There's a reason why the center never holds when shit hits the fan.

>middle has nothing?

Middle has AIDS.

Because they're gay.

I think you mean GRIDS.
That's it's REAL name, before they PC'd it up.

>109137977
>Wondering why a group of people with no values or beliefs doesn't have a personification of something that doesn't exist

i want a genderwar
males and females vs. the rest

Being a moderate is suicide because you will eventually go where the radicals go with enough time. Being a moderate is surrounding to whichever radical side wins.

For example a radical leftist in the 60s, or even in the 90s, would be considered a moderate centrist now. A moderate centrist from the 60s would be called a Nazi now.

...

>For example a radical leftist in the 60s, or even in the 90s, would be considered a moderate centrist now
This is not true at all. There were some batshit crazy people in the 60s who have been completely forgotten and people find it hard to imagine someone even holding their beliefs.

Richard Nixon would have run for prez as a democrat in this election and won easily

Embrace taoism.

>not being a radical centrist

...

In the 90s, Bill Clinton had a confederate flag as part of his campaign, and proposed to build a wall and deport illegal aliens.

Now the confederate flag is considered taboo and on the verge of being banned, and Trump is called literally Hitler for wanting to secure the border, deporting people who broke the law to come to the country illegally, and having temporary restrictions on immigration from certain countries. Trump was running around with a LGBT flag before the election, while 20 years ago that wouldn't have been something considered by Democrats, let alone anyone else.

In the 60s, most people in the US were against interracial marriage/relationships, thought segregation was a good means of separating the races to prevent themselves and their neighborhood from being harmed by blacks and brought down to their level, thought the idea of affirmative action was ridiculous, gay marriage wasn't even on the map as something to be considered, and only immigration from European countries was allowed. Being a tranny was considered a mental disorder.

Now arguing for/against any of those things makes you branded a radical by the pop narrative. 95% of people who lived in the US in the 60s never wanted whites to become a minority in their own country, they were fine with being a 90% white country and for racial differences to be acknowledged and codified into law. Now basic acknowledgement of racial reality, or arguing against whites being disenfranchised, marginalized, and removed from their own country is considered Nazi extremism. Literally arguing in favor of white genocide is the status quo. In the 60s these kinds of immigration plans were signed into law by Jews and their useful idiots without a popular vote, and they had to lie to the population about it to even get them to accept it. Now people just accept the result of these policies that were implemented as the status quo, something normal.

>bogpill
Indeed

This fucking meme has to stop you pillers need to be thrown into the fucking ovens

You're not getting it. The redpill is the implication of reaching a sense of awareness in the world; bluepilled is the refusal to accept anything beyond what you see in your immediate vicinity.

Being 'redpilled' is not some football style 'team game sport,' where you pick and choose what you do and don't like; it's just raw observation of the world around us.
For example, the jews. Try and criticize them in countries where free speech is not allowed - europe, for example - and you will be jailed, for 'anti-semitism,' or 'hatespeech.' Then there's how they practically rule us by being the vast majority holders of virtually all regulated and established fields of media, as well as politics.

On top of this, they manage to accomplish this all while being only 3% of the american population.

If you want sheer rock solid proof of the jews being malviolent monsters, then read the Talmud; it's filled with quotes about 'goyim,' how every jew will have 2800 slaves when 'whomever' arrives, in what might as well be 'the second coming,' etc; how they expect that we would attempt to kill them all should we all find out about the talmud, etc.

rense.com/general86/talmd.htm

If you refuse to at least consider what we propose here, then you are undeniably bluepilled. Cucked, ruined, wasteful, hopeless, brainwashed, etc.

The keyword here is "Consider." Nobody knows the truth; the 'redpill' is merely the key to striving for it

>my white supremacy mantra
Like I said dude, there were some batshit crazy people who have been completely forgotten. There were domestic terror groups who pretended to be some kind of vanguard for the marxist-faggotist revolution. They killed people.

Richard Nixon was vilified for being a warmonger by the left in the 60s and 70s, people literally rioted in the streets and the national guard killed people over it but if you read any of his or Kissinger's notes, or listen to his WH audiotapes, you'll see more in common with "moderate centrists" now. He would have demolished Hillary in a primary and then demolished whoever the Republicans put up against him.

Jane Fonda went to Hanoi during the height of the Vietnam war and talked about the US was intentionally bombing civilian infrastructure there and it was a war crime or whatever. How much did you see of that in Iraq? How much do you see of that now? It's basically unimaginable to think of someone of her celebrity and stature do something even remotely like what she did and get the kind of reception she did. Sean Penn is a laughingstock just for chumming it up with Hugo Chavez, which is just a failed Latin American state, not a country we had been at war with for a decade with 55,000+ dead.

You're cherry-picking little things and exaggerating the meaning of them. The radicals and reactionaries of the 60s would have no clue what's going on in today's world and it's not because their ideas were adopted by the mainstream.

what did anything about what he had to say have anything to do with
> "Muh wite supremussee"?

The middle has the bogpill

I'm also a moderate. You don't need to do anything in terms of "enlightening" yourself.

Basically, you are in a perfectly fine position mentally, but you will have to align with one side or another until society gets to a place you want. It's the hardest position to maintain because it requires balance, and most forces go left or right due to radicals making change.

In our current state, I'd say we are more left than when I'd like the world to be like, so I choose to align with the right and "tug" from their side until we get to a less insane state.

This issue ofc is that the right will probably tug a bit more than I wanted, make some concentration camps, and I'll have to join the other side eventually.

Welcome to hell.

Anyone able to give a quick rundown for OP?

>That feelio when national-conservative
D-do you hate us Sup Forums?

He's using knowledge of the future to create a narrative of the past. He's writing historical fiction and ignoring the vast majority of events that happened then.

I was just trying to point out the difference between historical events he cares about and historical events he doesn't: he cares about the immigration act because of how he feels about its results, but he doesn't care about radical terrorists in the 1960s because nobody cares about radical terrorists from the 1960s anymore.

But nobody caring about radical terrorists from the 1960s anymore just proves the point that what he said was bullshit. Weather underground is an actual weather service now, not leftist terrorists who murder people. Their beliefs haven't been adopted by the mainstream, they've been forgotten.

You're moderate. You're actually the most redpilled.

Be careful nige.

...

I dunno m8 I just want to reverse the white genocide; preserve america for what it had been for centuries until 1965; a nation of and for whites, and the select few others who were willing to work alongside us.

>you're better if you're right in the middle fallacy
Nice one! Upvoted, liked, and favorited!!!
Do you even know the fucking context for 'the red pill?'

sorry but you are cucked. kys

>centrist
underagepill

Being a Moderate is objectively the best

being a moderate is objectively in the middle. There is no 'best' when it comes to a spectrum of what is effectively a collection of subjective ideals, you cuck

your objectively subjective opinion on politics makes you objectively no better than anyone else, just because you got a hard-on for being a dumb fool who finds no interest in politics, as every other centrist typically stands to date.

Children aren't allowed on Sup Forums for the same reason they're not allowed to vote; you can't expect them to formulate an objective opinion on the world around them without it being skewed.

How about you wait until you're 18 before coming back here

>there were some batshit crazy people who have been completely forgotten

And they were fringe. The Black Panthers were a fringe group. There were more militia groups but that's about it.

There were probably more actual communists/Marxist-Leninists with radically left-wing views on economics, but in terms of social views, the mainstream narrative has shifted so far to the Left that it's not even funny. Even people like MLK or Malcom X would be disgusted by how degenerate Western society has become. MLK thought homosexuality was a "problem with a solution".

> if you read any of his or Kissinger's notes, or listen to his WH audiotapes, you'll see more in common with "moderate centrists" now
Nixon constantly named the Jew in his tapes, and spoke out against feminism, niggers, and homosexuality. You would never see that now.

celebstoner.com/blogs/doug-mcvay/2016/03/24/richard-nixon-on-the-drug-war,-blacks,-gays,-hippies-and-jews/

>How much did you see of that in Iraq?
Same reason why you didn't see a lot of protests against American involvement in WW2. Because both of them were promoted by Jews. who controlled the media, Hollywood, and other institutions and would punish anyone spreaking out against them. In fact this persists to this day (unlike Iraq, where people are allowed to acknowledge that it was a mistake), and saying Americans should've never gotten involved in WW2 is enough to get you character assassinated even to this day.

Also another thing that changed is views on marriage and the family. Back then having children out of wedlock, being a manchild or a slut, and single mothers were heavily stigmatized, and no-force divorce wasn't a thing. Now it's all considered common.

It's not cherrypicking, you'd have to be an idiot not to see how much the cultural narrative has shifted to the Left over the last decades, and the "far-right" or "alt-right" of today was the moderate center or moderate Left a few decades ago.

...

...

>no-force

no-fault divorce*

dude free helicopter rides lmao

>Nixon constantly named the Jew in his tapes, and spoke out against feminism, niggers, and homosexuality. You would never see that now.
That's exactly my point idiot. He would have DEMOLISHED Hillary and DEMOLISHED Trump or whoever ran against him as a Republican in this election. Do you think Nixon is far-left???? Do you think the Democratic party that would have elected him has "adopted far-left" ideas?

>And they were fringe
No shit. They were far left.

>Even people like MLK or Malcom X
MLK Jr was a socialist who was murdered because they thought he'd be able to turn his civil rights marches into anti-capitalist marches.

>and saying Americans should've never gotten involved in WW2 is enough to get you character assassinated even to this day.
Character assassinated?? The opposing candidate to FDR in 1940 was an isolationist. Isolationism is still partly celebrated. Not getting involved in other people's shit is a founding principle of the country which is celebrated. You won't ever get character assassinated for that.

What you're getting character assassinated for is being a moron. You're going out and saying shit like "the nazis should have beaten us", or whatever. Nazi Germany declared war on America, not the other way around. The US didn't have much of a choice to get involved.

>It's not cherrypicking, you'd have to be an idiot not to see how much the cultural narrative has shifted to the Left over the last decades, and the "far-right" or "alt-right" of today was the moderate center or moderate Left a few decades ago.
Never heard of Reagan?

How do you think Christian Conservativism became a thing? How do you think gun laws have shifted so much away from what the left wants? How do you think taxes work?

>Pat Buchanan
Exactly. Do you think Pat Buchanan is a nut or normal? The guy is a friggin MSM analyst.

>Same reason why you didn't see a lot of protests against American involvement in WW2
>when you fight back against people who attack you, they win
There weren't lots of protests against American involvement in WW2 because Japan attacked us for not selling them oil. There weren't a lot of protests against American involvement in WW2 in Europe because Germany unilaterally declared war on us 3 days later.

maximum stupidity

whats that