Why is the NATO insisting on attacking Russia? The NATO could crush Russia ezpz

Why is the NATO insisting on attacking Russia? The NATO could crush Russia ezpz.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Grenada
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grand_Chessboard
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Great_Game
takeoverworld.info/Grand_Chessboard.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Hand_(nuclear_war)
youtu.be/fI2zV22VTCw
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kursk_submarine_disaster
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

(((NATO))) hates anything that isn't socialist.

Not if we don't commit our troops. NATO may as well just be America.

nuclear war.

NATO and Russia should attack UK. Look at numbers. They would beg for mercy less than a week.

Germans back in 1941 were sure they could crush Russia in 6 months. And Germans were real men with strong leadership.

Do you americucks really think that with your army of niggers and faggots you could win a war against Russia?

>Germans back in 1941 were sure they could crush Russia in 6 months
didn't they?

No?

Since I'm not speaking German right now- no, they don't

>No?
I'm sure you've seen how many Russians were murdered by the Germans. The USA was the spiritus movens of victory over Germany

Western banker kikes and liberal degenerates are mad that they can't corrupt/control Russia.

There's also a few patriotards that want to attack Russia just because it used to be our enemy.

Yep but also Russians back then were real man with real leadership,what makes you think that your country could achive the level of mobilization as it happened back then?

No one is going to invade Russia again, we will just destroy your army on the fronts and blockade you ports, why waste precious lives when we can just starve you? a war of attrition is easily won.

You didnt include the cold factor.
Who cares about how many guns you have. Daily remainder: a bunch of Viet peasants defeated the mighty burgers

>over 9000 tanks and sixtyllion gorillion troops.

But how will you be able to control them, when Jew York and Londonistan will be nuked? Pic related.

Russia export million of tons of cereals.

commander kot and his sub.jpg

You're right, it would only take us 1 month

>starve you
>Implying Russia can't be a self-sustaining country
>Implying most of the population wouldn't eat dirt rather then surrendering to the westerners
AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH
Good fucking luck with that)

NATO doesn't want to attack Russia because that would mean doom for everyone. They are just using them as the scary boogeyman to the east.

Ha-ha, you keep thinking that Achmed. And do not discover the fact that Russia is unrivaled in quantity and quality of nuclear submarines. And ofcourse after sanctions had been lifted we are self-sufficient in terms of food supply.

I don't get why people keep playing up the NATO vs Russia thing. Rus would get stomped. The only interesting opposition to NATO would be a fully militarized China but even then they'd probably lose.

the reason for u.s. and uk success was that the major forces of the germans were on the eastern front.. and they were sucking russian cock

> NATO insisting on attacking Russia

No it's not turn off the RT. Get off Sup Forums for a half hour and get on /k/ and lurk more. A brigade combat team isn't a attacking force, it's hardly even a defensive one.

How fucking retarded are you people. You keep posting this shit. You see a few tanks on a rotational exorcise and you go full retard.

This guy kind of gets it.

^Retards

> Russia is unrivaled in quantity and quality of nuclear submarines

Is this a joke?

>1 month
>Says americuck whose country never won a war

Awww, what's wrong sweetie, did I pull a nerve hun?

>Russia only has 800,000 troops

They have 40 million reserve, basically.

Biased graphs don't show Russias true nuclear capability

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Grenada

Result

US victory

Grenadian government deposed
Cuban military presence defeated
Restoration of former government

So you don't have anything else to say, faggot?

>this is our most recent victory

Kill me.

>Is this a joke?

Hope you faggot will taste our jokes one day. You are always welcome to discover it in Syria and Ukraine.

>Russia is unrivaled in quantity and quality of nuclear submarines

kekd

like Kursk? top quality lad

Holy shit, that's some glorious victory. No

>Russia, around 8k nukes
>NATO, around 7.8k nukes for the US and 700 more with France and the UK.

Who would win?
No one

They seized about 6 million rounds of ammunition.

I meant that US armed the Soviets and that stopped the advancement of Germany, look how devastating that war was for SU

Depends what the win condition is

Invade and occupy?
Fuck no, especially not with a massive draft.

Completely dismantle your ability to make war? 2 months tops.

Why are you using something from 83 as justification in an argument we can win a modern day war?

Any war we have results in China, Europe, Russia and America being radioactive wastelands.

Without*

Plus I don't see patriotic white Americans going to die or kill Russians

Not even 1 submarine is needed to defeat your pathetic kind. You are doing well by yourselves.

yea.. so devastating that right after it usa and great Brittan were afraid of the soviets and consider their might as a real threat to the world.

Because.. China

>Thinking Russia can win a war of attrition against NATO

A ground incursion into Russia would be a foolish idea as it will take a lot of casualties with no real gain. But we can easily incapacitate Russia to wage war outside of it's borders, after that it's jsut waiting game as we will lose nothing while your people have to smuggle in spare parts and medicines.

On top of that NATO will likely support insurgent groups around the Caucasus to tear up Russia internally.

This is isn't 1941

>0,0001% of the population is representative of the entire country

I have plenty of pictures of Russian faggots

Russia has a massive fucking reserve though.

>A ground incursion into Russia would be a foolish idea as it will take a lot of casualties with no real gain. But we can easily incapacitate Russia to wage war outside of it's borders, after that it's jsut waiting game as we will lose nothing while your people have to smuggle in spare parts and medicines.

Like you fuckers are not trying to do it right now in Suria and Ukraine. Assad must go? He-he.

>On top of that NATO will likely support insurgent groups around the Caucasus to tear up Russia internally.

Like your Saudi pets are not doing it right now.

i love this meme

>Regarding the landmass of Eurasia as the center of global power, Brzezinski sets out to formulate a Eurasian geostrategy for the United States. In particular, he writes, it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger should emerge capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also of challenging America's global pre-eminence.


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grand_Chessboard

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Great_Game

>The Grand Chessboard in .pdf form
takeoverworld.info/Grand_Chessboard.pdf

>smaller GDP then Australia
>war with the west
nice meme putincucks

If we wanted to destroy Russia, we would obviously have done it in the 1990s.

le 'NATO is going to attack Russia' meme is only believed by Russians who watch the state-run media, Russiaboos, and conspiracyfags.

It's all about nukes and their delivery methods now.

Soviets had like 27 million casualties m8, if you don't see it as devastating, then I don't know what you expect

It's meme-tier, I prefer Mackinder.

>27 million casualties
>17 million civilians

)))

>war with the west

That is not the Russia deploying military bases at Western borders

We stopped them at Moscow long before any meaningful support from allies arrived.

Most of them being defenseless civilians that nazis slaughtered on occupied lands. What are you doing in Poland fritz?

Fucking Patton was ready to take Moscow. We all know how that ended. The SU had lost 20+ million. US lost like 300k.

We should have let Patton take Moscow

Ignoring nukes, there's more to war than pure numbers.

Force projection for one. Invading Russia wouldnt be an easy undertaking. Just the logistics alone. Russia would be on defense.

All them NATO troops. Brave french and leaf soldiers...

Also, boats vs russian steppe. Have fun blockading all of asia.

And The USA still has ISIS, Kim, China etc to worry about.

We would be fucked six ways from Sunday.

>muh GDP
>muh tanks and airplanes

KEK
E
K

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Hand_(nuclear_war)

Yeah, no.

Our industrial might was LITERALLY unrivaled plus we had the bomb and they didn't.

agree.. for russikis that was a blow. but dont forget that they had many many more soldiers and the took berlin and at the end of the war had a massive veteran army.

>27 million
Soviet Union took 8 million military casualities.

Kursk was blown up accidentally by an American submarine. Everyone knows this. Putin covered it up because he didn't want to start a nuclear war. This is also well-known.

Dutchland: fertility is lower then 2 after 2010. EVEN WITH MUDSLIMES, clown. Source: google.

Consider also that your local mudslime shit would 1st attack your own country (Their own country - Netherlands) first, If any major conflict will outbreak.

Your pathetic claims to block Russia are a joke and you know it. We don't even need to somehow obstruct western europe countries as our potential enemies. The demographics and Islam will do everything on their own. And also we have enough military power so that US and China won't openly attack us. Moreover because of economical issues ther are more reasons that the conflict will outbreak between US and China. Russia is a worst country in the world to wage war with now. Simply fact.

>Do you americucks really think that with your army of niggers and faggots you could win a war against Russia?
Yes. This isn't even a question.

We could annihilate your entire nation without even resorting to NBC WMDs.

Your equipment is shit, your soldiers are shit, your doctrine and tactics are shit.

They're not you triple faggot. Defending yourself isn't an attack.

+15

>accidentally

>We should have let Patton take Moscow
>1945
>french most popular party
>PCF
>italian most popular party
>Partito Comunista Italiano
>Oppenheimer and co are pro-communists
>soviet army absolutely experienced warriors and accustomed to hardship
>burger army)))


I don`t even mentioning about send arms to niggers and socialists to shoot some millions of porky whites )))

If Murrica decided to attack SU in 1945 it could be big war, but Soviet Victory seems legit

Fuck man I always get chills down my spine when I watch / listen to this

youtu.be/fI2zV22VTCw

Russia har ready to kill all of humanity if they have to desu senpai

Lets just bully the Chinese and Kim instead

War means money, opportunity to create huge shifts in social norms, scientific progress. And finally, it allows the flawed economy if imaginary money to pretty much reset itself with all the debts, non-existing backing etc.

They probably strongly believe that when the russia is nearly down, they won't have the balls to push the red button.

Oh c`mon Holland people are ultimate cucks, their airplanes are just training targets for Ukrainian air defense

Conspiracy theory with retarded explanation.

Russia have like 13k active tanks and 47 more on conservation tho

>you americucks really think that with your army of niggers and faggots you could win a war against Russia?
Yes, and Russia knows this too

you mean for Russian air defense?

>They probably strongly believe that when the russia is nearly down, they won't have the balls to push the red button.

Nah, I think they want to rope russia into an anti-chinese/anti-iranian kind of friendship.
At least those were the main points of trump foreign policy program.

+2 hrivny porash

Those aren't all MBT

nah, i mean Ukrainian air defence, how could our AA shoot down aircraft, when it was in Ukraine`s flight zone

only on paper

Because Russia has nuclear deterrence, retard.

with all the respect i have for Patton, dont forget that what you had tech advantage ruskis had in numbers, father winter and unlike todays cucked west ruskis ppl don't take invaders very well especially after the nazis that promised them freedom from communism and then stab them in the back.

Who-would-win.jpeg
Also
This-triggers-american.jpeg

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kursk_submarine_disaster

> On 29 or 30 August 2000, an official government commission tasked with investigating the disaster announced that the likely cause of the sinking was a "strong 'dynamic external impact' corresponding with the 'first event'", probably a collision with a foreign submarine or a large surface ship, or striking a World War II mine. They cited that the exercise had been monitored by two American Los Angeles-class submarines—USS Memphis and Toledo—and the Royal Navy Swiftsure class submarine HMS Splendid. When the exercise was cancelled due to the accident, they put in at European ports.

No I don't.

But then war should be also beneficial to Russia, because their inner politics is bad and unsatisfying for Russians

>russia into an anti-chinese/anti-iranian kind of friendship.

That must be some 7D thinking, turning them against each other by giving them a common enemy of United States and the NATO.

Oh what are they?

нy нe pвиcь ты тaк cлaдeнький

DPR barely has people who are able to operate sophisticated anti air systems so all their crews are Russians

When the U.S pulls out of NATO, they won't be able to fund such a huge army anymore so it's not a problem at the moment.

>What is BCY

>BCY
what
google says that's a bow producing company

Nukes. Both sides would lose.

Did you want me to lie? I'm just being honest.

Your nation is utterly incapable of putting up a prolonged fight against the United States alone, much less NATO combined. For instance, we can invade you - you can't even manage to do that to us.

dont know about you goys, but this infographic only taught me that russia could blitzkrieg the fuck out of the UK anytime it feels like it

Igor here Is right, and allso why anyone think that they can conquer russia if nobody threw out history couldnt do that.

Besides Is russians priviledge to conquers russia as history been shown

I don't want to fight with you again, and beat you again Ivan. The collapse of the Soviet Union was hard enough on you guys and your econ....econ.... lol I can't say it

It's a shame that nuclear weapons exist.

And that USA is the only country to have the balls to ever drop one on another nation. Russia won't be able to. Thankfully, Trump will get us out of NATO, so that Eurocucks like you, especially you Baltics, are left to fend for yourselves.