Philosopher Slavoj Žižek settles the “Is it OK to punch a Nazi?” question once and for all

>Philosopher Slavoj Žižek settles the “Is it OK to punch a Nazi?” question once and for all

So what do you think Sup Forums? is it okay to punch a nazi?

qz.com/896463/is-it-ok-to-punch-a-nazi-philosopher-slavoj-zizek-talks-richard-spencer-nazis-and-donald-trump/

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=AwTJXHNP0bg
youtube.com/watch?v=5dNbWGaaxWM
m.youtube.com/watch?v=3NOVLlC4tXo
youtube.com/watch?v=s5PigZzSAJo&t=2s
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>I once made a statement, maybe you know it, which cost me dearly. I said the problem with Hitler was that he wasn’t violent enough. Then I said, in the same statement, that Gandhi was more violent than Hitler. All Hitler’s violence was reactive violence. He killed millions, but the ultimate goal was basically to keep the system the way it was—German capitalism and so on—while Gandhi really wanted to bring down the British state. But his violence was symbolic: peaceful demonstrations, general strikes and so on.
kek, them redpills

>Today it’s these new alt-right people who are acting physically violent.

>I found a good pirate copy of La La Land

>clean shot at guy who isn't particularly big, from the side
>donkey punch him with a ton of momentum behind you, literally run and jump at him with all the time in the world to set it up
>don't even knock him out or knock him off his feet

i know the guy that did it is like 100 years old, but what the fuck? if your thing is bashing fascists don't give them a playground cuff a nine year old could deliver

Zizek is a meme but I like him a lot

>you know what it is for me?
>here we have a paradox!
>start reading Hegel
>and so on

lmao Zizek is a walking talking meme but he's so fucking based and, lets be honest with ourselves: he is right

would do coke with ./ 10

Sure, as long as you understand, you will get your shit kicked in. Sucker punches are only any good if the target is not expecting them.

disjointed mess, a guru for edgy libshit sociology majors

but he often BTFO libs too

feel free to start arguing at any time

Philosopher? He's a retard. A real "philosopher" would at least speak about who classifies someone as a Nazi etc. This guy is so stupid he just blindly brings up someone else that said it and says that he agrees.

I guess since he has a gay ass mustache people listen to him.

Goes right over the head of most Sup Forumstards.

I retract that to lefty sociology majors, although I'm sure most libshits would fap to him if he wasnt such a spastic moron

fuck this nigger, applying all those philisophical newspeech to REKT the fascists, he is a cunt

he always cracks me up

Slavoj Žižek: my country's best export, right after Melania

Why don't Molymeme and Zizek team up to become the ultimate autism philosopher tag team?

but who gives a fuck? this doens't matter in the real world this is some abstract metric for edgy humanities bachelors to fap to, because they are so smart to see it, no one IRL cares about that

why are Sup Forumstards so basic? not an argument to be found...

I highly doubt it, just because you're a idiot doesn't mean we all are.

Pretty sure most of pol already knows hitler dindu nuffin and ghandi's violence still reverberates in the waves of incest and poo spreading trough the indian ocean.

team up with the bogs

>concepts scare me

go on...

It isn't that deep

I aint swallowing that bait, /leftycuck/ but feel free to bait others

Sure, if you have a time machine. Go for it.

Slavoj is just as much of a liberal faggot as the faggots he claims to criticize
He is the intellectual equivalent of a Che Guevara shirt

...

looking forward to your argument

impotent rage isn't a good look for Poland

>I said the problem with Hitler was that he wasn’t violent enough.

If he is smart, he will say
No, b cause it only validates them and is only going to drive them
To the extreme

Then again for being a slobbering wheezing weirdo he has a soft spot for violence

>(Editor’s note: the following transcript has been edited for clarity.)

So there's no schniffs?

Fucking Žižek and his toilet analogies...

youtube.com/watch?v=AwTJXHNP0bg

((edited))

Sup Forums should coopt Ziżek as a figure of the altright for his constant shitting on libshits and little statements like this on hitler, imagine the fucking asspain of the /leftyweirdos/

Yes sure, but never hit a national socialist

t. thin-skinned narcissists insecure about their intellect. Likely trumptards too

He's actually based as fuck

I mean he says a lot of dumb shit all the time, but every once in a while he'll hit the nail on the head. I think Zizek is hilarious desu

Is Zizek the new TayTay?

What a load of old bollocks. I hate this man's sophistry.

Sure, it's okay to punch anyone.
Just expect to be punched back. (Unless you're punching a friendless weakling)

i don't know what the fuck it means but probably nothing of value. maybe you should start reading actual philosophers

Will some wiz user PLEASE photoshop that trashcan into a cannon muzzle?

He's not a Nazi, LitErAlLyyy, and calling him a Nazi still does not justify your petulant outburst of violence.

No way

>Zizek reacted to all of the cringy Che Guevara t-shirt wearing leftists crying over Castros death and praising Castro as some sort of hero
>He calls them idiots and blows them the fuck out

>punching nazis is a time honored tradition
Fist fighting nazis is, not wearing a hood, suckerpunching them, then running

>if I call somebody a nazi I can physically assault them because nazis are evil ree
>if I call somebody a nazi I can physically assault his friends and familybecause nazis are evil ree
>if I call somebody a nazi I can bomb their home because nazis are evil ree
>if I call somebody a nazi I can kill them because nazis are evil ree

really makes you think

youtube.com/watch?v=5dNbWGaaxWM

>I think that progressives should become the voice of common decency, politeness, good manners and so on.
lol good luck with *sniff that and so on

*sniff*
m.youtube.com/watch?v=3NOVLlC4tXo
>Can't find the orginal video anywhere.

He's a dumb fucking commie, what else is new

>literally who failed theater actor with mommy issues
>actual respected academic, philosopher and psychoanalyst
>teaming up

why post if you didn't even bother to read the link

maybe if he *sniffs* says this enough to the leftists *tugs shirt* they'll start acting like decent human beings and so on

it's morally ok if you hate Nazis. attacking someone who isn't a physical threat should remain illegal though. simple as that.

leave Sup Forums, almost everyone here is a beta in need of a strong leader. Which is why they're so hot for Trump.

>implying that disagreeing whilst agreeing isn't a powerful tool
>implying that defending your frame instead of getting the frame that's handed to you and rearranging it to better suit your version isn't better than simply going full spaztic and crying 'wrong wrong wrong'
you are a retard. you are peasant.

I'm actually an omega who never got loved from my peers so I'd preferred they get butthurt from our orange president.

He gives good advice, fortunately his words will be ignored by the left.

However I wonder what makes him say things like that? It seems to me that today alt-right is utilizing thsi passive violence that he speaks of

>Today it’s these new alt-right people who are acting physically violent.

Is he a left libertarian?

>You know what my fear is? Not that Trump will fail and there will be chaos, but for some real period of time, what if he succeeds?

Fucking dogmatic shits for fucks sake

came to make sure this was posted

...

>olange readel
>best readel

>But the “when they go low, we go high” strategy didn’t actually work for Democrats against Donald Trump in 2016.

probably because they didn't actually fucking do that! they went low as shit and everyone saw how hypocritical they were!

I honestly don't think you can put him under a single label. Zizek calls himself a communist, but it's just to get attention/reaction, or he's being facetious. Based on his statements and how often he contradicts his self-proclaimed beliefs, he's either the biggest troll in modern philosophy, or his brain is scrambled. maybe it's both, idk, but I find it really entertaining.

His only real indentifiable goal is to make leftists behave differently, and/or challenge how the left approaches issues.

Why do these cunts struggle to understand that, by their own logic, if it's acceptable for THEM to attack people THEY dislike, then other people will attack folks THEY dislike.

i.e you think it's okay to punch "Nazi's" because you're a leftist, and Nazi's are terrible people. Well, many Nazi's think leftist's are terrible people. Imagine if they started sucker punching any leftist they saw talking to a camera.

Do you want to live in a world where we all attack our political opponents?

Stupid CUNTS.

that's one for the archives right there

Exactly this.

it's not ok to sucker punch anybody, it's literally nigger tier and can easily have someone smash their heads on the pavement

>we lost, I mean no we lost on purpose, we accelerationist now guys, amirite guys? heh?
them mental gymnastics

this is embrassingly bad, I mean really, this is cuckservatism mixed with leftypol drivel

Žižek likes to think of himself as an edgy no-compromise guy, but he's too scared to talk honestly on racial issues.
He just repeats the bullshit leftist memes like "all races are the same, if you don't want to racemix you're a nazi".

>>Do you want to live in a world where we all attack our political opponents?
That's exactly the point meme sniffer man was making!

>I’m not saying we should greet everyone, embrace them. Be brutal at a different level. When you encounter a guy like the one who was punched, act in such a way that even hitting him, even slapping him is too much of a recognition. You should treat him or her or whoever as a nonperson, literally.

This is quite idealist. But he is an hegelian, so it's not a surprise.

When did he ever speak about race or racemixing?

>implying his pseudo-intellectual neo-marxist/hegelian opinion matters
Atleast he is a meme, and so on.

Almost never, that's the point. He doesn't acknowledge people having racial preferences, like Spencer.
He just plays along with the Spencer=Nazi meme.

He is completely correct, leftist knowledge of history only begins when Fascist violence starts but there is no such thing as Fascist revolution, only fascist counter revolution.

It's no coincidence that Fascist dictatorships came to power after a long period of leftist violence or oppression.

Fascist violence is always reactionary, thats why I want the leftists to continue because they will eventually get whats coming to them.

Trump sniffing has nothing to do with the time of year. He is skyping with Žižek and friendly banter soon turns to jokes, then Mr. President has to terminate the call. But they stay friends despite having differences.

He never called spencer a Nazi, he didn't use the word Nazi at all actually he referred to him as a "jerk".
Zizek is subtle, but he never acknowledged the interviewers use of the word Nazi

He didn't say it explicitly, but he played along, answering the question (which means you pretty much agree with the definition).

>barbed wire tattoo
>melanoma starter kit
>dyed black hair so nobody can tell she doesn't take care of it

Ewww.

Dont pretend that you would not spunk in her gay boy.

...

You know what my fear is? Not that Trump will fail and there will be chaos, but for some real period of time, what if he succeeds? You know what happened in Poland? The Law and Justice party, they did such a tremendous social transfer to the poor that no elected European government would dare to do it. They lowered retirement age, they made better conditions for health care, more help for mothers with children and so on. No wonder that people like them. My God! They did something that no left government dares to do. And for me this is the sad truth of Europe: it’s a paradox.

Richard Spencer is exactly like that obnoxious smug antagonist in movie that gets belted near the end and provides cathartic moment while we cheer on the protagonist gaining some self respect

It makes sense, it's just dumb. Philosophy that cannot be applied to the real world is pretty useless.

Yes punch someone who doesn't agree with you.

This is the commie rationale.

Gee it's almost as if the right are actually the way to go and the left is inherently pathological and destructive

Zizek is a smart man but its funny how he misses that something can be "right wing" and still an acceptable (and even moral) way for people to be governed.

I'm married. I'll take tight twat over that disaster zone any day.

That's because it wasn't a strategy, it was a slogan designed to put a respectable veneer or some of the dirtiest tricks in recent politics.

Really boggles the mind.
Maybe he's just acting to be left to keep the people's attention.
Don't really have a clue desu

Prior to the late 1800s there was no left/right dichotomy. There was order and there was chaos. What has happened with the likes of Marx is the chaotic tendencies have been intellectualised. Just look at all the left has achieved in the past century, particularly in western Europe. It weakens a country. It imposes a sort of national identity crises. Europeans are disoriented, confused, calling their own identity into question, and once you start doing that, you leave the door open to domination from other stronger groups who have a sense of themselves.

That is precisely what they want because in that environment, they can win by numbers. Political violence is just another Avenue for tyranny of the majority.

He built his whole persona on being a marxist/leftist, so he can't just let it go. But he's clearly socially conservative on some issues and likes order a bit too much for a leftie.

The only thing he doesn't dare approach with an intellectual honesty is the issue of race. He'll defend a pedo before he'll defend a "racist".

interresting read. zizek is at the fall of his life.
he lacks the spirit and ambition to become really relevant.

he was talking about greece there.


check this one out

youtube.com/watch?v=s5PigZzSAJo&t=2s

he even calls out da jew at around min 13, or so

>You know what my fear is? Not that Trump will fail and there will be chaos, but for some real period of time, what if he succeeds? You know what happened in Poland? The Law and Justice party, they did such a tremendous social transfer to the poor that no elected European government would dare to do it. They lowered retirement age, they made better conditions for health care, more help for mothers with children and so on. No wonder that people like them. My God! They did something that no left government dares to do. And for me this is the sad truth of Europe: it’s a paradox.

This is the crux of it, lads. For all their bluster, their true fear is not a descent into chaos which would allow them to take the reigns after saying "see i told you so" with complete validation and confirmation they were the good/smart ones and we were the bad/evil ones.

Their true fear is that our ideas actually make sense, and if they are effectively executed we can win.

In today's climate he seems to be doing the best he could to stay relevant.

she's good for a sportfuck, don't be a faggot
i'd kick down her back door and paint the walls white SAbro