FAKE NEWS GUIDE

Here's a guide on how to know real versus fake news Sup Forums.

Get familiar with this and use it.

Huffington post needs to be in the vey bottom left and CNN needs to be where Huffington is now

Also BBC is only good for international news for British local news it's got a lefty bias

...

Nice try fake news. Please kindly fuck off.

You can tell this was made by a redditor

>muh news is neutral

We need to kill anyone left of Hitler.

r8

>minimal partisan bias
>new york times

>The Wall Street Journal
>The Guardian
>VOX
>everything else
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

>wikileaks
>reliable
That was 1 year ago.

>CNN dead center
Nope.jpg

Complete shit

>minimal partisan bias
>CNN
>NYT
>WAPO
>NPR

WTFAMIREADING

>great indepth spurces of news
>liberal but still reputable
>the atlantic

holyfuckingshitlol

This chart was made by a liberal

It as if this chart was made purely for bait.

>mainstream (minimal partisan bias)

...

CNN MINIMAL PARTISAN BIAS.

GET THIS SAGE OUTTA HERE

The BBC isn't minimal partisan, it's just a facade. It's their "official" front. They have to come across as non partisan because the public funds them. We're forced to pay for the BBC

So, if they come across as biased people will obviously complain and they will start losing their funding.

Their propaganda is much more subtle

Most of the higher ups aren't white and they're constantly pushing multiculturalism

>Brietbart
>Just No.
Read CNN, goyim. Far (((less bias))) paper.

Always right

Anything without a RSS feed isn't real news

>BLM MOTHER JONES CNN.
>HIGH QUALITY
you dont even look at your own graphs do you Mohammad?

Is politifact reputable?

literally everything in the center that isn't reuters and AP needs to be moved to the left, VOX and Slate need to be moved even more to the left

how the hell is natural news liberal when they're riding trump's dick 24/7?

> The guardian
> Good

Into the trash this goes.

Better than OP's

Where is Zero Hedge?

The guardian is biased as fuck, have you not seen the liberal shit-tards that write their shit agendas on it?

I stopped finding it reputable 15 years ago.

>economist
>skews conservative

I wondered that myself. They do have tons of doom porn but overall I'm a fan.

Buy gold bitches

>NPR, The Washington Post, The New York Times and CNN are not bias according to this chart that was made in Microsoft Paint

...okay

Also the fact that Vox and Slate aren't to the FAR left also makes me question this chart

>Slate
Lolnop

>Huff Post
>Analytical

wat

This makes a lot more sense if you tune out the metrics on the side and realize it's goatse.

...

This is sooo much better.

>great source of news
>New York Times
>WaPo

>The Guardian only 'skews' liberal

>The Economist is conservative

>BBC is neutral and 'meets high standards'

now THIS is center-left shilling

>the guardian, slate vox
>great in depth source of news
>CNN, WaPo, NYT, Big Black Cock
>minimal bias

My poli sci teacher unironically posted this in class.

report them

CNN only reported what was reported elsewhere they never stood behind it or once tried to legitimise it.

fixed that for you

It's shit

no

Pretty good apart from Al Jazeera
They used to be neutral, it's a mouthpiece for the UN now

>CNN
>minimal partisan bias

babbys first anarcho-capitalist tendencies

>Sup Forums
>high quality
MY SIDES

In what world does the economist not skew fiscally conservative?

There's an easier way to determine credibility, left or right:

Is it owned/edited/managed by Globalist Jews?

So fucking plebbit

>npr
>minimal partisan bias

r u avin a giggle m8?

>CNN
>BLM
>high quality

Wikileaks is agenda driven now. They're all about muh social justice. I say here still left of the line but I can understand why you'd put them in the center. Though it's outdated already. Also Reuters was caught in the DNC leaks colluding with Dem operatives, talking shit on Fiorina. They need to be moved slightly left of the line at the very least

Thanks bud.

Now I know every single one of those is fake news.

>cnn
>minimal party bias

I bet CNN made this.

>high quality
>mother jones
>BLM
>salon
I don't think so shlomo

Is anyone suscribed to foreign policy? Are they more left wing or right wing?

MSNBC unbiased? are you out of your fucking mind?

I'd say center-right.

Goes to show what a non-STEM college education is worth these days.

fiscal conservatism is not really essential to conservatism and most libertarians are socially liberal, as the Economist is.

I don't think skewing a little bit "fiscally" conservative makes them a conservative paper

Neoconservatives are fiscally conservative, they also support immigration and diversity for all.

something that annoys me with these pictures is the idea that the more politically biased/skewed a publication is, the less reputable it is

this is almost always framed as a deviation from centrism, which is particularly weird since centrist solutions/perspectives are as much a political bias as conservatism/liberalism are

what i think people mean by political bias is that a publication might leave out important details if they don't support their conclusions but the problem with that is:

1) it's not bias, it's just bad journalism
2) it's probably more rampant in "centrist", "moderate" publications

to illustrate my point just imagine how drastically op's image would change if you added in stuff like jacobin and the spectator

Something doesn't quite add up in that statement

Okay thanks

i wonder who is behind this post...

There's always bias doesn't mean the info is wrong necessarily but you should always consider the source.

Personally I get most of my news from NPR cause I can listen to it in the car and there's no autistic shouting. They do have a liberal bias though which is especially apparent on their programs like on point, but in general when they're just reporting news straight up they do a good job it's their shows with hosts/guests where their politics come more into play but to their credit they at least acknowledge the existence of the other side as opposed to some outlets that present things as "there's the left and there's wrong!" or vice versa.

RT is centrist, if anything.

Seriously. Whoever this ctr-ish shill faggot person/organization is posted something similar on plebbit this morning and then got it on the front page (presumably botting itself). Is this seriously the best the David Brockite nerd virgins can do?