Cultural Marxism

Earlier today, an user posted this video among others regarding the Frankfurt School and Critical Theory/Cultural Marxism.

youtube.com/watch?v=G8pPbrbJJQs

What else can Sup Forums tell me about this subject?
Where does it lead to?
Where do we see modern day examples?
What other videos/articles can I indulge myself in to further redpill?

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=4fo5jLdJlgI
youtube.com/watch?v=QY82qNWMaaE&feature=youtu.be
kevinmacdonald.net/chap5.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_industry
youtube.com/watch?v=vLqHv0xgOlc
youtube.com/watch?v=5gnpCqsXE8g
youtube.com/watch?v=J92f2S3E0S8
marcuse.org/herbert/pubs/60spubs/65repressivetolerance.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

start here:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=4fo5jLdJlgI

Theres an interview floating around of Andrew Breitbart discussing a chapter of RIGHTour indigNATION if you can find that. Real good explanation if Whittle doesn'tcover all yku need to know.

The Frankfurt School was just another Jewish think thank to subvert Western culture, and create a Marxist revolution.

youtube.com/watch?v=QY82qNWMaaE&feature=youtu.be

Rather than being concerned about the economic aspects of Marxism to bring down capitalism and get control of the state, it's only concerned about culture and tradional values like family, nation, Christianity, etc. and tries to undermine them.

You can read an extensive analysis of the evolution of the school since it was started in Germany here, and the sizable Jewish involvement:

kevinmacdonald.net/chap5.pdf

Basically, you can thank the Frankfurt School for modern progressivism (or "SJWs" now), political correctness (Critical theory) and most social science departments in Western schools having been taken over by them.

...

Adorno and the Frankfurt School were busy with one question: Why did the communist revolution not succeed in the West and how can we bring down the structure of society to make it happen?

So it tries to break down every fundamental social institution in Western culture to make that happen, while useful idiots (the New Left that started in the 60s and were heavily influenced by the Frankfurt School) help them along, thinking they're being "progressive" and "moving forward toward a society free of hate" (which will never happen).

Cultural Marxism started with Gramsci, not the Frankfurt School

>Rather than being concerned about the economic aspects of Marxism to bring down capitalism and get control of the state, it's only concerned about culture and tradional values like family, nation, Christianity, etc. and tries to undermine them.
They still wanted to get rid of capitalism, but saw the ruling class as maintaining their power through culture and the media, and cultural subversion as a means to socialist revolution.

The way they talked about the ruling class imposing values through culture/media actually isn't altogether different from how pol talks about it now, just with different aims.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_industry
>popular culture is akin to a factory producing standardized cultural goods—films, radio programmes, magazines, etc.—that are used to manipulate mass society into passivity

Essentially, the USSR (which was also dominated by Jews like Trotsky and Lenin in the first few decades, and started with the Jewish Bolshevik Revolution) lost the Cold War with economic Marxism, but it won by mainstreaming cultural marxism as the dominant culture in Western society.

Even after the USSR has fallen, it still dominates Western ethos because it was normalized through the media and cultural institutions, and it was implemented in schools. This was primarily driven by the Frankfurt School.

This is why college campuses are now breeding grounds for "trigger warnings", "safe spaces" and all sorts of radical leftist ideologies.

youtube.com/watch?v=vLqHv0xgOlc
>Yuri Bezmenov: Deception Was My Job

youtube.com/watch?v=5gnpCqsXE8g
>Yuri Bezmenov,, ex-KGB agent on Psychological Warfare Subversion & Control of Western Society

...

OP this is the most important video your can watch on that topic.

youtube.com/watch?v=J92f2S3E0S8

Jonathan Bowden was a genius and nobody on this board seems to have properly educated themselves

Damn, thank you based leaf

>>popular culture is akin to a factory producing standardized cultural goods—films, radio programmes, magazines, etc.—that are used to manipulate mass society into passivity

Of course they would talk about that. They had been using the media to manipulate the population for decades even before that. They just wanted even more control and to standardize it.

Not so much different from how Marxists would criticize the flaws of the ruling class in capitalism before the Bolshevik Revolution, but once they got in power with the USSR they did the exact same thing as the bourgeoisie they detested so much, and even worse.

...

This is actually described perfectly in this passage of MK:

>Soon the Jew became the leader of the battle against himself. I am speaking figuratively when I say “against himself” because the “great master of lies” always succeeds in making himself seem innocent and throwing the blame on others. Since he had the audacity to lead the masses himself, it never occurred to the people that this could be the most legendary fraud of all time...

>Without being aware of it, the laborer is put to work for the very power that he believes he is fighting against. He is led to believe he is acting against capitalism, and therefore he is easily made to fight for capitalism. The cry is heard against international capital, but the real target is the national economy. The current economy must be destroyed so that the international stock exchange can replace it on the corpse-strewn battlefield, with Jewish financial world interests.

>To achieve his goal, the Jew proceeds as follows: he creeps up on the workers in order to win their confidence, pretending to have compassion for their poverty and circumstances or even anger at their miserable lot in life. He is careful to study all the real or even their imagined problems. Then he arouses the desire for change. With infinite shrewdness, he stirs up the urge for (((social justice))), an innate desire that is sleeping within every Aryan. Once the fire is burning, the Jew turns it into hatred toward those more fortunate and puts the stamp of a very special World-Concept on the battle; he builds a philosophy designed to correct social injustice. He founds the Marxist doctrine.

Have you guys ever read a book by any members of the frankfurt school?

I read A Critique of Pure Tolerance, part of which was written by Marcuse and The Authoritarian Personality by Adorno.

The rest I'm basing on analysis and criticism by other people, and the fruits of the Frankfurt School (Anti-positivism, Critical Theory, etc.) and how similar to other Jewish subversive intellectual movements their whole game was.

What were the problems with that chapter written by marcuse and what adorno said in that book?

Ah, the alt right: Where the height of intellectual discussion can be found on youtube videos

>go to a job interview to cook a new superfertilizer made of duck feces.
>put on my scorpion jacket and racing gloves.
>enter store.
>ignore the "Employee Only" sign.
>walk straight into the interview room.
>manager says "umm, are you appyling for the open position?"
>stare out the window.
...
...
...
>"i cook"
>manager tells me they are only hiring for driving positions
>i stare at him silently for 2 minutes
>walk out the store
>a real human bean

Which discuss books....

what did you expect from a very crowded image board, high attention spans and lots of reading material?

at least there is SOME discussion here, much better than circlejerking about how that other board is so bad and you're all so smart

Marcuse's chapter was typical communist nonsense about how leftists should have the right to be violent, and to censor any opposition to communist ideology, because they think liberal democracies will always favor the majority (that is White, Christian people), and without censorship or revolution, the minority of Communists (who in their mind is correct about everything) will never get anywhere. This is why the Jews from the Frankfurt School pushed for mass immigration, because they knew a White Christian majority would prevent them from getting the power they wanted, so they had to change the demographics and undermine Christianity (which is what is happening right now, whites are about to become a minority in the US, and Christianity gets weakened more and more by the year). Ironically a lot of people who now call themselves "liberal" in the West think that way, even though this essay was a criticism of liberal tolerance.

Basically he was advocating for another Bolshevik Revolution to overthrow the current establishment and get power, as they did in the USSR, and was trying to justify it morally.

It's not that long, everyone can read it here:

marcuse.org/herbert/pubs/60spubs/65repressivetolerance.htm

pretty sure the intellectual discussion was held without you