US has no legal right to force Mexico to pay for wall

I dont think anyone takes Trump seriously when he says he will make Mexico pay for the wall, its just one of many crazy things Trump has said on the campaign. But what if Trump uses economic coercion tactics, ie makes Mexico pay for stupid shit for no reason. Will the UN support Mexico against such tactics?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/UOOBlcOIcLs
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>UNh
>caring about third world countries

they only need countries SO POOR they can parade them around as pets to show how humanitarian they are.

Mexico has no legal right to allow mexican immigrants to enter our country illegally.

Legal smegal, paco is paying.

so the UN tells the US to stop
what will the US do?
stop?

yes, there is something called international law that protects against economic exploitation

Well they do according to the UN declaration of human rights
>Article 13.
>(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
>(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

It's not Mexico's responsibility to stop them from leaving Mexico. If you don't want them in your country, it is up to you to stop them from entering.

If Trump puts up a tax for Mexico, the great wall gets paid by Mexico that way after congress releases funds for the wall and the money will be recovered eventually.

he would likely have to kill Nafta along with dozens of other trade agreements to do this. I suspect some industry people might not be too pleased with that sort of meddling in their affairs.

That wall is going to cost 120 bucks to each murican, drumpff got his shit pushed in by a manlet in public, many such cases.

>(((international law)))

Pedro, please. There is no such thing in reality. The only law that matters is the law of the land, the law of the USA. Fuck the UN

Hitler back then did less than making another country pay for a wall in order to get pushed into a world war
im just saying

If the tax is on imports, it will just make imports from Mexico more expensive. Therefore it will be the American consumer who pays for the wall.

Jose, has that helped the peso recently? You know a peso is worth five cents right now? What's that international law done?
N O T H I N G
cool story, kid. It's just a story though.

Mexico refused to have a civil conversation to discuss the payment of the wall even though they owe us bigly.

We have every right to bar them until they give us what we demand,

mexico is letting people from all over latin america flood into the states. they have every right

I guess it's technically "civil" to politely ask someone to pay billions of dollars for something that does not benefit them, but you can't be shocked when the answer is no

It probably isnt crazy, if he wanted to he could easily make them pay for the wall and probably will. The best part about the statement, is its a non factor. Anyone who wants that wall does not give a fuck who pays for it. Libs on the other hand hate the wall, and think they found a loophole to fuck him over with. "See mexico didn't pay for it, trump is a liar". Meanwhile the wall is built and mexicans are being sent back in droves, and libs think they have a win under their belt and push it as such.

Then if he hasn't had mexico pay for it already, he probably will. Even if he doesn't, we still have a wall and less mexicans.

>they have every right
they have every right to build a wall

they have no right to force Mexico to pay for it

>wall will help stop the flow of drug cartels which behead people daily in mexico
>wall will discourage people from countries south of mexico to sneak in to try and get across the mexico-american border
>wall will inspire mexicans, showing them that anything is possible if you believe enough

What? That makes no sense, it's retarded.

Of course a wall benefits, Mexico.
You don't know much about this, do you?
Just wanna virtue-signal and come to your pet-Mexicans rescue.
youtu.be/UOOBlcOIcLs

That's not even correct. I can argue the total opposite using the points you used.

1st - The citizens of the country/state they live in have the right to live wherever they would like WITHIN the borders of their OWN country where they are a citizen.


2nd - That rule applies to moving through country for travel etc. It does not allow them to just move into another country and stay illegally.

If that's the case, would you be fine with everyone evacuating Germany and setting up shop in your country without going through any legal process?

Learn to understand legalese

MEXICO HAS NO LEGAL RIGHT TO SEND ITS NATIONALS TO THE LIVE ILLEGALLY LIVE IN THE US

>they have no right to force Mexico to pay for it

Wrong. There is no right prohibiting putting a tax on imports from a country, thus no law prohibiting from making Mexico pay for the wall.

The thing is, what the fuck are they gonna do to us if we choose not to listen to them. Once we leave the EU, international law means fuckall to us. In fact, it means fuckall to us currently. Who's gonna hold the US's feet to the fire? We'll swat any other country like flies

the video you just posted explains why you are wrong

>I dont think anyone takes Trump seriously when he says he will make Mexico pay for the wall

We all take him seriously. And Mexico better start taking it seriously too.

He is assuming Americans will just pay huge prices for mexican goods over the same costing american shit that has a 20% buffer that would all go to american workers.

Liberals are literally retarded when it comes to common sense measures like this. Yes, people who buy mexican goods will pay that tariff, but people who buy american will not. Ultimately this gives us more tax revenue, and fucks mexico over as far as what they sell here while creating a competitive environment for us companies.

And if mexico steps the fuck up and treats their workers fairly, and doesn't fuck them over paying them real wages, we could easily lift that tariff since the playing field would be equalized.

>implying we have no right to stop the cash flow from migrants into mexico, thus making them pay for whatever the fuck we want

Trump said he will no longer talk about that subject in public, you know he got fucked, right.

Mexico has no legal right to dump human trash in Murcia either.

The US helped Mexico build a wall on THEIR southern border to keep out the third world. What's the deal now?

That just means you niggers will be paying for it under the table. The "negative" press about you paying for the wall is only detrimental to you guys. Only one who would benefit from silence is the mexican president, which seems like a compromise on trumps part. So it sounds like a deal is in the works to me.

And you expect him to keep his big fucking mouth shut
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

You cant use that as an example because the wall is in sections and some of it is fence so it is obviously not a wall. Also the picture used by people was not the wall in question so its FALSE. Do you even snopes bro?

Might makes right.

I don't expect anything from him other than to build a wall and keep you niggers out. And so far he is doing it. If your president was stupid enough to trust trump to stay quiet that is on you idiots. Stay pleb mexico.

we should definitely tax the absolute hell out of cash transfers to Mexico, since that's the only reason illegals are here. it would negatively affect legal immigrants too, but they can buck up and bite the bullet.

When Mexican currency is worthless they will come begging to Trump for a deal

Money well spent.

>US has no legal right to force Mexico to pay for wall
Fuck you america does what it wants.

CHI

Are you retarded? Mexico has no right to keep their citizens from entering another country, they only have the right to stop others from entering their country (unless they are Mexican citizens) according to article 13. The US doesn't have the right to stop Americans from entering any other country legally or illegally, but it does have the right to stop others from entering the US (unless they are American citizens). Hence, the responsibility to stop illegal border crossings falls entirely on the host country.

>If that's the case, would you be fine with everyone evacuating Germany and setting up shop in your country without going through any legal process?
It would be up to the Swedish government to stop it, not the German government. Germany has no responsibility to prevent people from fleeing into Sweden, regardless of where they are coming from (If we ignore the EU free movement implications).