This thread is for Discussion of Libertarianism, Capitalism, AnarchoCapitalism, and the physical removal of communist fags from our board of peace.
Thread Theme:
youtube.com
>Post sneks
>Bump for Life, Liberty, and Private Death Squads.
I can't beleve this thing is still for sale.
ebay.com
Hey Sup Forums why can't Nat-Soc into economics?
Other urls found in this thread:
pdfs.semanticscholar.org
liberalstudies.ca
il-rs.org.br
socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca
iea.org.uk
mises.org
mises.org
riosmauricio.com
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
twitter.com
GENERAL READING LIST (feel free to make suggestions to expand this list)
>Basic Economics - Thomas Sowell
pdfs.semanticscholar.org
>The Law - Frédéric Bastiat
liberalstudies.ca
>Free To Choose - Milton and Rose Friedman
il-rs.org.br
>Nicomachean Ethics - Aristotle
socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca
>Hayek’s The Constitution of Liberty - Eugene F. Miller
iea.org.uk
HOPPE READING LIST
>The Economics and Ethics of Private Property (1993; 2006 2nd edition)
mises.org
>A Short History of Man: Progress and Decline (2015)
mises.org
>Democracy—The God That Failed (2001)
riosmauricio.com
>A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism (1988; 2010 edition)
mises.org
>From Aristocracy, to Monarchy, to Democracy (2014)
mises.org
>The Myth of National Defense: Essays on the Theory and History of Security Production (2003)
mises.org
>The Private Production of Defense (1998; 2006 edition)
mises.org
>Economic Science and the Austrian Method (1995)
mises.org
>What Must Be Done (2009)
mises.org
...
Do snakes get along well with frogs nowdays? Or how does it work?
yeah we do get along. but we also like thos bants
...
...
shit how did i get a thumbnail. anyone gotta full size?
...
>conservatism
>antiegalitarian
...
Care to explain?
...
...
I made it bud
...
based
Thanks for your contribution senpai
...
...
>88
HEIL HOPPE
...
just baked this
...
So let me ask you guys something. I am a Libertarian at the very core but I know this approach isn't practical since neither Democrats nor Republicans like Libertarian values...but the reality is that libertarians have more in common with Republicans than Democrats, so is it acceptable to vote republican even if you disagree with a lot of their stance on things?
This is kind of my theory on the current political mess. I really believe most "red pilled" people are libertarians at heart but the democrats are so fucking stupid that the only reasonable approach for us is to vote republican
...
You should vote for people who will reduce government, that's it.
I agree with that man. shit many libertarians run as republicans because libertarian party is so cringe and fringe.
extended version
Daily reminder that if you aren't a Hoppean, you are a cuck.
Can we please just agree open borders are retarded.
A free society won't stay free very long when full of authoritarian Muslims and welfare loving beaners.
If not then I'm officially Paleocon.
Agreed. Link to the test please?
of course we can have borders. When we physically remove commies we have to put them somewhere. why not outside my walls
ooh now thats a keeper.
only autistic ancaps are gonna complain about that, truth is, we're slaves and voting is like playing SAW's games to save yourself, there's no room for muh perfect principles when you're a victim, not everyone can afford the cost
when I have more gold I'll vote commies, to troll on my surroundings and tell them about my plan to profit from their destruction of civilization
>being a cuckservative
You people make me sick. You'd happily see whites reduced to a minority in every country if it meant you get to hang on to a few more sheckles each year.
...
If you believe the white race is truly superior then they will come out on top.
And yet white people were most prosperous when we had private property rights which included the right to disassociate from minorities and other cultures. Not to mention that multiculturalism as we know it (cultural enrichment) only came about after governments increased their powers and deteriorated the traditional natural hierarchies of kinship and association.
Great post not-so-greatest ally, really gets the noggin' joggin'.
>only 30 Qs
>only Y/N/M
Try to be truthful.
A more nuanced test needs to be made.
I didn't understand your comment. Please link me to the test senpai.
Socialist her; been here since /new. I have missed you libertarians so so much. These kiddo fascists are retarded.
ANCAPS BTFO
you have to go back. fascists are cooler than you.
I am one though
you call that aesthetic? you can't just put a purple vhs filter on already existing art and think you're cool.
The red and white are inverted on that flag tho
You think making baddly drawn snake memes and drinken jewish semen is cool? Dont make me laugh
Libertarianism doesn't work when it has to fight against the authoritarian left.
This is bullshit. I fucked for $10 in Cuba. Anal included. Some white bitches want $100
Yeah how the fuck that retard Gary Johnson got nomination? I mean cmon he probably has brain damage or something. This could have been historical chance for libertarians during this giant douche and turd sandwich election...
Because of this.
I recommend Liberalism for the reading list. It is a great read and full of good quotes.
How did that Fascism work out for Itlay?
Hoppe is the best example of the massive self reductio ad absurdum that the right libertarian movement has now become.
Is the radical centre welcome here?
It went well
>Hoppe is the best example of the massive self reductio ad absurdum that the right libertarian movement has now become.
What do you mean by this?
>radical centre
wut?
explain yourself "radical centrist"
implying the libertarian party isn't a plot of intelligence services to keep the bigger risk of the state in check
ancap is gay tho user.
REEEEEEEEEEEE
daily reminder that future society is libertarian, without subhumans who are unable to survive on their own
>tfw when when no true Libertarian party in UK politics
There are no political parties in the UK which represent my Libertarian views, lads. Maybe I should start one...
The natural progression of the Hoppean treatment of land is no different from statism. All land will eventually be someone's property, you get born there, and then you have to live under their rules, taxation or whatever unless you want to face their arbitrary punishment
I am a right libertarian in every regard minus the fact that I think land acqusition has to obey the Lockean proviso, i.e. you can't acquire so much land that it makes it impossible for others to acquire land. I fail to see how the world right Libertarians end up with is any different from regular statism otherwise
why would you do that
why
did you want super herpesgonosyhpilaids with a side of crabs?
it would be extremely difficult to get democratically elected into any position of power
tech and people's behaviour will bring about the real change with the growth of digital economy skirting both the established state wealth redistribution schemes and kike banking systems; this will annihalate state budgets and leave no choice other than accept people's will
Hello, Mr. Tucker.
>Mr. Tucker
pls elaborate
>you can't acquire so much land that it makes it impossible for others to acquire land
there is absolutely no way to enforce this, as seen time and time again, for example with tax collection i.e. those with means and sufficient mental capacity ALWAYS find a way of getting out of various taxes (shell companies, offshoring, transfer of ownership, creative accounting...)
having some arbitrary limit for land ownership would play out in exact same way, therefore any such legislation would be flawed and unenforcable in the real world even with the official records being in order
>be CURRENTYEAR
>still thinking unrestrained social liberalism and free movement of people doesn't ultimately destroy liberty for hist nation
Libertarianism is unrealistic. Take the paleocon pill boys
>USA for democracy
>"Tyranny of the majority!"
what are you a retard or something? Do you not realize America is NOT a direct democracy? And that our entire system is this carefully crafted government to ensure no one holds too much power?
Why do you think democrats were bitching about "b-but hillary won the popular vote!" all this time?
I might as well by the same token argue that it's impossible to enforce a prohibition on violence, so we should just abandon the libertarian project entirely and resort to nihilistic survival of the fittest anarchism because "people are too smart"
Chill dude, it's just a plant.
...
I'm being realistic: when people are faced with two choices, one being to enjoy 100% of the fruits of their labour and other to enjoy 50% of the same but with unsustainable and unrealistic promises of some "rights" like healthcare and pensions, only rational choice is the former
violence is easily self-regulated by having everyone armed
I wouldn't have anarchy as such but leave all branches of power in the hands of the local community; this way we'd have many competing communities that are organized in harmony with their members
I'm sure that in case of security threats from outsiders, communities would unite in matters of defense, on top of citizen militia
Go for it. But I think the main problem is europeans tend to be more group thinking as opposed to the individualistic americans.
I admit Im talking out of my ass here, but it seems every european is either some for of "suffer for the will of the party!" communist/socialist or just a mirror version of that in the form of neo-fascist.
I wouldn't say that, commonly found special snowflakes are highly individualistic and social media whoring suggests that this is the new normal
Why do people like Bill Maher claim to be Lobertarian when he is a socialist who wants gun regulations.
Taxation is theft.
I like you lads even though I obviously don't hsare most of your beliefs.
Liberals have an identity crisis between being libertarians or socialists. They just don't know who they are.
you're cool with me as long as you remove commies and let me inject weed.
Jeffrey Tucker, the bow-tie wearing guy from Mises. He's the Internet tech specialist of the place.
"Libertarian" was a cool buzzword around '08. And in defense of Maher, he is at least somewhat more "libertarian" than other democrats. Hes totally against PC culture, calls out islam all the time, and even calls out gun grabbers and proudly says he owns a gun.
Yeah it's funny how the blue and purple squares are the only ones who mutually get along.
Maher stills plays with Identity politics so he is responsible for the lefts behavior.
Anyone can criticize Islam but you won't see Maher criticize Israel / Zionism.
Liberals are mentally ill.
thanks for the links OP.
What do you guys think of Enoch Powell? He had a sort of "libertarian/nationalist" type of view, if such a thing exist.
>Lolbertarians thinking their system is sustainable.
Good people create good times.
Good times create weak people
Weak people create hard times
Hard times create weak people.
Libertarians allow this cycle to continue which causes political instability.
Only NatSoc/Fascism has actually tried to combat this and create a strong people that can maintain a strong world. All problems with the world lie within weak people not inherently in systems themselves.
Perhaps one day being Libertarian will be probable however that can only come after we properly combat the degradation of society through NatSoc.
*Hard times create good people
cringed
>when I have more gold I'll vote commies, to troll on my surroundings and tell them about my plan to profit from their destruction of civilization
same reason im pro catalonia's independence
were you bullied in your adolescence and feel the urge to command and control everyone's life because your pussy self couldn't/wouldn't enjoy your freedoms so noone should?
> All land will eventually be someone's property
> r > g
t. Piketty
>the freedom to do harm is good
what harm? what am I missing here?
personal freedom comes with personal responsibility; if your choices bring you harm I might feel sorry for you, perhaps even help but I don't want to be responsible for the cleanup/footing the bill
And if your choises bring me harm?
>inb4 nap
then you defend yourself dingus.
you mean my choice to take care of my business and noone else's unless we mutually and voluntarily agree to do x? how would that bring you harm?
dump sneks