Is there a difference between a "liberal" and a "conservative" brain?

Is there a difference between a "liberal" and a "conservative" brain?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/NRmdz1Op7wo
psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human-beast/201104/conservatives-big-fear-brain-study-finds
youtube.com/watch?v=HLlTW2Ie-_Y
nypost.com/2016/06/09/science-says-liberal-beliefs-are-linked-to-pyschotic-traits/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_political_orientation
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

...

Liberals have brains.

Generally those on the left are more willing to tolerate chaos, those on the right have an affinity to order. Those on the left are generally more compassionate.

That does not always apply, for example the SJW, prefer a high degree of enforced order

The projection is strong with this shill.

I think so.

Read Jonathan Haidt's book The Righteous Mind

youtu.be/NRmdz1Op7wo

Liberals have higher IQs, which allows them to build complex societies and large cities.

Conservatives can only build rural and suburban shitholes.

psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human-beast/201104/conservatives-big-fear-brain-study-finds

A bunch actually.

>And vote for Trump

>Left is more compassionate
Yes, goy! Now you're getting it!

>conservative
The peak conservative understands the world in its truest form & then choose to become religious cause they understand the need for order but the peak of liberalism is nihilism, hedonism , and depression

R/K selection theory.

conservative on the left having all those thoughts. liberal on the right housing knowledge in his brain

Yes.

The liberals whined and whined about being equal so God gave them an extra chromosome.

>need for religion to maintain order
Such a fragile order built on fallacies. Most religion is just a rip off of the golden rule anyway. You can have order using simple philosophical moral standards.

>The peak conservative understands the world in its truest form
>Doesn't understand this basic reality

lol and people still trust (((science))) as a system. the scientific method is WORTHLESS when even an OUNCE of ideology or corruption touches it.

>BUH MUH SCIENCE MANS ARE PERFECT EMOTIONLESS UBERMENSCH

keep thinking it r/atheists

Libturd murrican too low IQ to understand anything, probably due to his mongrelized bloodline

u need that community to succeeded

JEWS

Liberals place greater weight on cucky moral values like fairness and safety.
Lolbertarians place greater weight on dildo values like personal freedom and material prosperity.
Authoritarians place greater weight on statist values like order, purity and the ingroup.
Conservatives weight all of them roughly equally.

liberal brain - thinks that resources are abundant
conservative brain - thinks that resources are scarce

yes, liberals tend to use the more emotional parts while conservatives use cognitive/logical parts

whatever part is responsible for the self absorbed narcissistic virtue signalling "helper" attitude libs have will be enlarged.

nice meme

I understand you're emotional right now. It is understandable you would react that way, given your conservative brain structure.

"No."
This is akin to a leftist telling you to read a book. It doesn't matter how educated you are because your moral (and hence, emotional) leanings will influence your perception of that knowledge.

Liberals have smaller amygdalas.

youtube.com/watch?v=HLlTW2Ie-_Y

this, it's important to note how this extends to politics. Emotion leads to an individualist drive, whereas logic leads to a more collectivist drive.
For example what is good for the human soul (open borders, we want to help all other humans!) vs. what is good for the collective (we want to help as many people as we can but in their own countries to retain our own social cohesion).

>Stefan Molymeme
Not an argument.

These so called (((scientists))) are the same ones who support the liberal narrative of (((climate change))). It used to be global warming, but when they saw we have a cooling trend they changed it so it doesn't matter what happens and they can continue to preach their psudo-science. Maybe the larger amygdala in these self proclaimed conservative subjects actually helps them be less likely than to snap and resort to violence at the sight of a fucking hat. These (((psychologists))) are also the ones who say conversion therapy for homosexuals doesn't work, but at the same time says homosexuality is fluid and can change during a lifetime. So what the fuck is it? The article gives the reader absolutely nothing but a rash generalization, and provides absolutely nothing except a spun over generalization. Only 93% of the (((scientific))) community accepts climate change, and I'm pretty confident the scientists are wrong all the time.

think its a learnt behavior i remember a few years ago i would of said blowjobs were degrading to women to virtue signal for pussy now ill do anything

well, actually there is
nypost.com/2016/06/09/science-says-liberal-beliefs-are-linked-to-pyschotic-traits/

...

The right deals in facts, the left deals in feelings.

r-selection and k-selection.

Liberals favor mass egalitarianism and appeal to the lowest common denominator.

Conservatives favor a structured, meritocratic hierarchy where those with better skills, etc. have more power.

Leftist r-selection will inevitably backfire because leftists currently live within a de facto bubble of Western white ethnocentrism. The majority of the Earth is retarded niggers, so continuing to have open borders and no population control will eventually lead to a collapse.

I wouldn't mind if conservatives actually did have smaller brains than liberals. When they try to shame you for it, you can claim that they're body shaming your brains.

No. There are differences between demographics, and different political ideologies appeal to different demographics at different times based on a variety of factors, but there isn't something about a person's brain that makes them "liberal" or "conservative", which are overly simplistic labels to begin with. Communists used to have an extremely large working class following, now communism is mostly a boutique ideology that appeals more or less exclusively to well-off college students. 5-10 years ago, nerdy white guys were more or less universally left-wing, even on politically incorrect websites like Sup Forums. Now many are rapidly becoming Sup Forums-style racists due to the anti-white backlash in all Western countries. You can looking at the demographics that are currently supporting this or that ideology and draw broad conclusions, but these will inevitably be dependent on the time and place and culture in which you live and would be different in a different time, place, and culture.

tl;dr, no "conservatives" aren't inherently dumber, and no "liberals" aren't inherently pussies.

Liberals seek out novelty in hopes of improving, conservatives repel novelty in hopes of preserving

There are so few actual "conservatives" or "liberals" anymore: just one gang of idiots who read left-leaning websites and another gang of idiots who read-right-leaning website. Thinking? Processing power? Nah.

yes

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_political_orientation

>tfw to smart to trust globalists

There's a liberal mentality.

Liberals, with few exceptions:

1. Have all the loyalty of a snake
2. Think they're above any human law
3. Don't understand why being a slut or a faggot is bad for society.

They're big on "fairness" and "empathy." Don't count on them to actually care about you or stick up for you, of course, much less help you out with their own time or money.

Everything's about making themselves feel good---and nobody else has a right to complain, no matter how much easily-foreseen damage they do.

Don't you dare point that out when they come to you and beg you to clean up their mess, though.

Yeah, IQ

Oh, the irony in this. It should be the other way around faggot.

Hmm.. That's pretty accurate. Explains their hypocritical nature.

Did this guy overdose on the bogpill?

That's a meme. r/K selection is just a heuristic used to simplify reproductive strategies. It has basically nothing to do with politics.