What's the difference between a neo-liberal and a classical liberal?

What's the difference between a neo-liberal and a classical liberal?

classical liberals are similar to modern libertarians. Think the founding fathers and most US presidents in the 1800's.

neo-liberals are just straight up fucking commies...

A classical liberal is what's created the United states of america

A neo liberal is what's destroying the United states of america

Classical liberals wore powdered wigs and made profound intellectual observations which reshaped the relationship between the government and the governed.

Neo-liberals wear giant cocks and vaginas for a hat, mistaking profoundly asinine behavior and vulgarity for making a point.

>neo-liberals are just straight up fucking commies...

Surely they're the opposite? Pro-free trade/economic deregulation and globalization?

A neo-liberal is a moderate that hates Bush but agree with his policies
A classical liberal is a leftist that jacks off to John Locke and Rousseau and apposes to pc shit

Classical liberals are faggots who don't want to admit that their ideology has changed and want to pretend that they're not right wing because they don't believe in God or whatever it is about them that they think is incompatible with conservatism. They're reddit tier up their own ass moderates who want to feel superior to both sides of the political spectrum.

Just to add clarification to the OP, I'm looking more towards the economics side of it.

Economically, aren't Classical Liberals and Neo-Liberals practically the same?

what the fuck are you smoking? neo-liberals are democrats and SJWs

unless I'm mistaking what you're calling neo-liberal for what liberals are today?