I think I'm becoming a fascist. Tell me why I should or shouldn't be one Sup Forums

...

You should become a fascist because SJW pig creatures are going to call anyone to the right of MLK a fascist anyway.

Also, Nationalist is the better term.

Pic related, OP. It's a great idea, and the more you learn, the more you want to see it rise again.

That said, the only real reason why you *shouldn't* is because we will never see it rise again with anything short of a socio-political cataclysm.

Authoritarian leadership is only good when they are on your side.

All fascists are nationalists, but not all nationalists are fascists.

You should be a Theocrat of Taoism, human beings need a higher abstract concept to be better than innate animal desire

Pic related, famalam.

Becose Sup Forums is roleplaying faggots ,this isnt for real,being facist in 21st century is retarded ,you will not get any suport,you have to make new stuff not trying to revive defeated idiology,National socialism sucks,capitalism is better,also jews arent bad people.

Where do you get those flags?

Sup Forums was always natsoc before 2016, get the fuck out of this board you whiny newfag

op is also a newfag

Proxies, so if you want to show your support you could always--

/leftypol/ & /r/thedonald REEEEEEEE

This desu

>Speaking like a comunist
Fuck off kike,while democracy isnt best ,facism is worse.Did you know:Germans who made jokes about Adolf Hitler where sent to consentration camps and threated as jews.
THE MORE YOU KNOW tun dunn tsss

Should become a national socialist instead, its more deeply rooted, race based and anti semitic by definition.

Also its not as easy to wipe out as fascism

Kek, no they were not.

Concentration camps were seen as less dishonouring as a real prison and conditions were better.

It was more like bootcamp for people who obstruct society or petty criminals.

>falling for the division Jew

...

What do you guys think of Carl Schmitt's writings on authoritarianism?

Accept the fact that it's a stage like the stuff you believed before.

A democracy does not mean we all have access to nuclear codes. Also there is nothing a country can do once a treacherous person takes the throne. Would you like it if Obama had a licence to kill/imprison all white nationalists?

As you say gerbro

So you disregard my knowledge which is based on family experience for your convenience

sorry op i'm not feeling like writing about fascim today
but i definitely vouch for it

What specifically?

>Calling me retarded and thinking he made a good point
You americans didnt eaven fight for nazzis in ww2 but claim ti know more then people from countries that actualy did fight for them.

Never the less,free speach wasnt as open as now.

I suppose his arguments that authoritarianism can provide a more efficient form of governing (as compared to a congressional/parliamentary system), especially in times of emergency.

Why would you appropriate a foreign religion you don't understand rather than convert to Christianity?

Catholicism is the religion of Europe, for 2000 years and it hasn't stormed most of the good traditions that came prior to that. Everything you think you can get from le yellow fever religion can be found in the Church, with the added bonus of it being the faith of your own people

Like what writings?

I cant deny the Holocaust right now.

The prohibited subjects just changed.

Even in the US you would get legal problems if you spread enemy propaganda or listened to enemy radio despite their 1st amendment.

Pulling together makes sense in the face of hostile collectives.

Individualism makes you more than an ant in an ant colony.

Fascism jumps the shark when they into leader worship, and are more fascist than necessary.

>calling me retarded and thinking he made a good point
You misunderstand the satire from the original Sup Forums and spew disinformation about the National Socialists in the goofiest, most cartoony way possible. It's kind of hard to take that seriously.

>you Americans didn't even fight for the Nazis in WWII but claim to know more than people from countries that did

1. Freedomland wanted nothing to do with the World War, and if FDR wasn't such a massive cuck, not a drop of burger-blood would've been shed for either side.
2. Unless you're a pre-Boomer which is incredibly unlikely, you didn't fight for the Nazis either. Your elders may have, but you didn't. My worldview and understanding of NatSoc comes from years of personal research and trying to separate truth from disinformation. I find it incredibly hilarious that the guy advocating against Fascism/NatSoc (and Communism) is a collectivist, though.

all fascist governments have failed, but not my type of fascism

monarchy is the only viable form of government

>I cant deny the Holocaust right now.
Yeah becose you lost,its not illegal here though,although we fought along side with you guys.Eaven children in Latvia are thought in schools about Latvian ss and its greatness,and patriotism.(Pic related)
>Even in the US you would get legal problems if you spread enemy propaganda or listened to enemy radio despite their 1st amendment.
Like what?someone spreading ISIS propoganda?I mean its preaty justified.

Im not a colectivist, i am a capitalist.

You should!
It's alpha.

because you won't be able to get a job or you can be super secret undercover fascist which mean's you don't actually change anything, that's ok to live in an imaginary world but it's better to be in reailty.

If you aren't a collectivist, then:
*Why do you base your credibility on the experiences of your ancestors?
*Why do you dismiss opposition based on their nationality?
*Why do you attribute the lack of your opposition's credibility to the nationality of their ancestors?

That's pretty hardcore collectivism tbhfam

>its justified

you see? That is why everything is relative.

You can choose between a democratic dictatorship that kills your people or a dictatorship that secures your people. I would pick the latter.

T H I S
H
I
S

This. Some nationalists are (((civic nationalists))).

Well, OP, I'm primarily against Fascism because it has historically been associated with nationalization of industries, and just generally centrist, almost left-leaning economics. I think a lot of people are turned on to Fascism because they see it as this hard-right ideology, but it's really not, economically speaking. A lot of Fascists were economically similar to the Democratic party in the United States. I think that if you buy into the idea that Fascism is a hard-right ideology, you're really just drinking the leftist koolaid and accepting their skewed historical narrative. Also, if you're a fan of Trump, I don't see why you would be turned onto Fascism; he's been focusing on rapidly decreasing the size of government, which is pretty antithetical to Fascism. He just appointed a SCOTUS justice with a very strict, literal interpretation of the constitution. Trump is a Civic Nationalist, at best.

In short; Nationalism is good, but I think a lot of the right gets a false impression of Fascism, due to leftist indoctrination. Hope I gave you a well-reasoned argument on why some people on the right are still not crazy about the ideology in question.

>inb4 i get called a kike

>I think I'm becoming a fascist. Tell me why I should or shouldn't be one Sup Forums
that's not how it works

National socialism may have been defeated but social nationalism hasn't ;)

Precisely!

Identifying with any part of the ephemeral will drag you down back to samsara.

jesus christ burger
>Why do you base your credibility on the experiences of your ancestors?
>Why do you attribute the lack of your opposition's credibility to the nationality of their ancestors?
If x ancestors have experianced something that y ancestors havent, then y & x knowlage of subject is equil?
Also you are implaying that colectivism on any level is socialism,if i trust people with information about past its eqil to beleaving that ECONOMIC SYSTEM nac/soc is the same?

Congrats you won already.

Make up your own mind faggot.
The fact that you could be pushed towards fascism with all the anti Nazi propaganda should tell you something.

Not how it works tho,if everyone in germany would whant to legalise it ,you could yust voted for party that would legalise denying holocoust,however dictator would do as he pleases.If dictator is for the people then i agree he is better then democracy but problem is many dictators in History where not for the people.

Your logic is inherently flawed. Our ancestors, yours and mine, were kept in the dark and given a very narrow view of world events. The human mind is subject to misrememberance all the time, and it happens in court a great deal.

That said, if you look at your calendar: It's 2017 (>inb4 muh current year) and a wealth of information from around the globe is available at our finger tips, we need only seize it. The potentially flawed memories of one's ancestors don't equal the evidence and various perspectives compiled into the ocean of information online. No one passes down information anymore, we all collaborate it. Just because my ancestors didn't do shit doesn't mean I'm ignorant, and it's absolutely retarded to think otherwise.

My implication on collectivism is that socialism as a system is inherently collectivist and it's ironic for someone that is adamantly against socialism to display traits more collectivist than the people arguing *for* socialism.

Support Italian/British Fascism, BEFORE Mussolini aligned himself with Hitler.

Fascism =/= NatSoc

You should not become a fascist, you should become a traditionalist.

>he thinks our votes matter
hahah

and how is this going to happen if people are forced to pay 8 billions a year for our state run propaganda TV?

The boards of these channels are stacked with politicians.

Merkel is friends with the two biggest media tycoons in Germany that are not state run

>Faith of your own people
I doubt he's Jewish.

evola was opposed to nationalism

>2nd amendment

jesus fucking shrist burger
>Your logic is inherently flawed. Our ancestors, yours and mine, were kept in the dark and given a very narrow view of world events. The human mind is subject to misrememberance all the time, and it happens in court a great deal.
Internet has a lot of Fake information i am not sure how you can say witch is true and wotch is not,how do you tell ALL of the information a part?Becose you claim to know a lot of things ,now tell me would my grandfather lie to me?To he,s family member about what he seen?
My implication on collectivism is that socialism as a system is inherently collectivist and it's ironic for someone that is adamantly against socialism to display traits more collectivist than the people arguing *for* socialism.
>Trusting someone with information=Colectivism
>National socialism=Colectivism
Trusting someone with information /=/ National socialism

You shouldn't become a fascist because it's become an ideology without credibility. We live in a political climate where every civilised nation that might benefit from absolute rule is shackled in PC culture.

By identifying as a fascist you're only making yourself a target for mockery, rejection, and scorn.

Still better then risking to get a tyrant
Best example of a good democratic elected leaders=Trump
also
>Implaing nazzis didnt have propoganda of there own